The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Fractionlynx system

Manufactured by Waters Corporation
Sourced in United States

The FractionLynx system is a laboratory instrument designed for automated fraction collection. It is capable of precisely collecting fractions from liquid chromatography or other separation techniques, ensuring efficient and reproducible sample handling.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

5 protocols using fractionlynx system

1

HPLC-ESI-UV/MS Analysis of Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HPLC-ESI-UV/MS analysis was performed using a FractionLynx system from Waters (Milford, MA, USA) working in analytical mode, equipped with an Acquity QDa mass spectrometer and a 2489 UV/visible detector. The chromatographic separation was carried out using a C18 reversed-phase column, Luna (250 × 4.6 mm, 5 μm, Phenomenex, Torrance, CA, USA), at a flow rate of 1 mL/min, injecting a volume of 20 µL. The run time was 70 min, and the gradient was built using 0.1% HCOOH in H2O (solvent A) and MeOH (solvent B) as mobile phases. The elution gradient comprised the following steps: isocratic elution, 95% A for 7 min—linear gradient from 95% A to 60% A in 33 min, linear gradient from 60% A to 40% A in 5 min, and linear gradient from 40% A to 10% A in 5 min; and isocratic elution, 10% A for 7 min—linear gradient from 10% A to 95% A in 5 min and equilibration of the column for 8 min. The UV detector was set at 280 nm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Analytical Characterization of Organic Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
1H-and 13C-NMR spectra were recorded at operating frequencies of 300 and 75 MHz, respectively, using tetramethylsilane (TMS) as the internal resonance shift standard. All chemical shifts (δ) are reported in parts per million (ppm) and coupling constants (J) in Hertz. The spectral data were analyzed using MNOVA software. Mass spectra were obtained using a mass spectrometer (Shimadzu LCMS-2020 UFLC/MS System, Shimadzu Corp., Kyoto, Japan). Flash chromatography was performed on a Purif™ System (Shoko Scientific Co. Ltd., Kanagawa, Japan) using silica gel (30–50 μm particle size). Preparative HPLC was performed (column: C30-UG 25 mmID*150 mmL, 5 pm; mobile phase: acetonitrile and water with 0. 10% v/v acetic acid; FractionLynx System, Waters Corp., Milford, MA, USA). HRMS spectra were recorded using electrospray ionization time-of-flight measurement (ESI-TOF; maXis 4G, Bruker Analytik GmbH, Rheinstetten, Germany).
Compounds 2 and 7 were commercially available, and compounds 1 (CAS: 94508-09-5), 5 (CAS: 2767029-73-0), and 12 (CAS: 2758680-15-6) were known. They were synthesized by methods reported in WO2022075486. Solvents and other commercially available reagents were used as received, without further purification or modification.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Purification and Characterization of Organic Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Reagents purchased were used as received, unless otherwise noted. Purification of intermediates and final compounds was performed using silica gel chromatography using the Biotage® IsoleraOne flash purification system. When required, preparative HPLC was conducted for final compounds on Waters FractionLynx system using acetonitrile/water and 0.1% formic acid gradient and collected based on UV monitoring at 254 nm. LCMS analysis was performed using a Waters Alliance reverse phase HPLC (columns Waters SunFire C18 4.6 × 50 mm, 3.5 μm, or Waters SunFire C8 4.6 × 50 mm, 3.5 μm), using a multi-wavelength photodiode array detector from 210 nm to 600 nm and Waters Micromass ZQ detector (electrospray ionization). All compounds tested had a purity of > 95% as measured by LCMS. 1H NMR spectra were obtained with Varian NMR systems, operating at either 400 or 500 MHz at room temperature, using solvents from Cambridge Isotope Laboratories. Chemical shifts (δ, ppm) are reported relative to the solvent peak (CDCl3: 7.26 [1H]; DMSO-d6: 2.50 [1H]; Acetone-d6: 2.05; or CD3OD: 3.31 [1H]). Data for 1H NMR spectra are reported as follows: chemical shift (ppm), multiplicity (s for singlet, d for doublet, t for triplet, dd for doublet of doublet, m for multiplet), coupling constant (Hz), and integration. Compounds obtained from GSK in-house library were not resynthesized unless otherwise noted.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

HPLC-UV Analysis of Dopamine Adsorption

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The HPLC-UV analyses were performed
by means of a FractionLynx system from Waters (Milford, MA) working
in analytical mode. The instrument is equipped with a 2535 quaternary
pump and a 2989 UV/visible detector. The analytical column used for
the chromatographic separation was a C18 reversed-phase column, named
Luna (250 × 4.6 mm, 5 μm, Phenomenex). The injection volume
was 20 μL of a suitably diluted sample coming from solution
in contact with MOF after 0, 1.5, 24, 48, and 120 h. The elution was
carried out with 0.1% formic acid in water (solvent A) and methanol
(solvent B) under gradient conditions. The gradient steps were the
following: from 100 to 92% A (0–8 min), from 92 to 20% A (8–18
min), 20% A in isocratic for 2 min, from 20 to 80% A (20–24
min). Finally an isocratic flow (8 min) to equilibrate the system
before starting the new analysis was used. The total run time was
32 min, while the flow rate was set at 1 mL/min and the UV detector
was set at 280 nm. The concentration of the solution of dopamine hydrochloride
in contact with MOF was evaluated using an external calibration curve
gained by standard solutions ranging from 50 to 300 μg/mL. The
experiment was performed in triplicate, and results are reported as
average values ±3 SD. Data are reported in Figures 6 and S10.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Macrolactone Synthesis and Purification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Macrocycles employed in the primary screen were synthesized according to the general procedure for macrolactone synthesis outlined below. Crude reaction mixtures were directly purified using mass-guided, preparative HPLC on a Waters FractionLynx system. Purified compounds meeting a >90% purity threshold (as determined by UPLC–MS-ELSD) were stored as 20 mM DMSO stocks at −30 °C prior to aliquotting for screening.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!