The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Evo scanning electron microscope

Manufactured by Zeiss
Sourced in Germany, United States

The EVO Scanning Electron Microscope is a high-performance imaging tool designed for a wide range of applications. It utilizes an electron beam to scan the surface of a sample, providing detailed information about its topography, composition, and other characteristics at the nanoscale level. The EVO SEM offers high-resolution imaging capabilities, versatile sample handling, and advanced analytical features to support a variety of research and industrial needs.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

15 protocols using evo scanning electron microscope

1

Scanning Electron Microscopy of Bacterial Strain S3

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The general morphology of bacterial strain S3 was observed by routinely cultivating on DF-ACC agar medium at 28 °C for 24 h and furthermore, investigated by ZEISS EVO scanning electron microscope at Amity Institute of Renewable and Alternative Energy, Instrumentation facility, Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India. The bacterial strain was inoculated in LB broth medium for overnight incubation and then harvested by centrifugation at 2000 g for 5 min. The resultant cell pellet was washed twice with 0.05 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.3) and fixed with 1.5% glutaraldehyde at 4 °C for 24 h and subsequently, washed thrice with phosphate buffer solution. The cells were then dehydrated with graded series of ethanol (30–100%) at 15 min interval. Followed by drying to remove excess liquid, the dehydrated cells were mounted on a SEM stubs, coated with a layer of gold: palladium (60:40) and imaged using ZEISS EVO SEM and SEM micrographs were recorded.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Scanning Electron Microscopy of Material Grains

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The samples were loaded into a Zeiss EVO Scanning Electron Microscope (Carl Zeiss Microscopy, Munchen, Germany) at the Electron Microbeam Unit of Stellenbosch University’s Central Analytical Facility (CAF). Zeiss InLens SE (Secondary Electron) and SE2 detectors, as well as Backscatter Electron (BSE) Detector and Zeiss Smart SEM software were used to generate images. For Secondary Electron detection, operating conditions of 3 kV accelerating voltage and 100 pA beam current with a working distance of 3.8–4 mm were used to generate images. For Backscatter Electron detection (BSE), operating conditions of 20 kV accelerating voltage and 11 nA beam current with a working distance of 9.5 mm, were applied. Images were captured in random areas and at a range of magnifications, to characterize grain morphology.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Surface Morphology Analysis of Alkaline-Pretreated Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The surface morphology of the untreated and ultrasound-assisted alkaline pretreated samples and also the conventionally treated samples was determined using SEM equipment, ZEISS EVO scanning electron microscope (Carl Zeiss Microscopy Ltd, US), operating at 3 kV rating.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Scanning Electron Microscopy Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The samples were
analyzed using a Zeiss EVO scanning electron microscope. Prior to
imaging, the samples were mounted on aluminum stubs with double-sided
carbon tape. The samples were coated with a thin (∼10 nm thick)
layer of gold using an Edwards S150A gold sputter coater. A Zeiss
five-diode backscattered electron (BSE) detector (Zeiss NTS BSD) and
Zeiss Smart SEM software were used to generate BSE images. The samples
were chemically quantified by semiquantitative energy-dispersive X-ray
spectrometry (EDS) using an Oxford Instruments X-Max 20 mm2 detector and Oxford Aztec software. Beam conditions during the quantitative
analysis and backscattered electron image analysis on the Zeiss EVO
were 20 kV accelerating voltage, 8 nA probe current, with a working
distance of 8.5 mm, and a beam current of 5 nA. The counting time
was 10 s live-time.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Characterizing CuxNi1-x Alloy Catalyst

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The CuxNi1−x composition as a function of position on the substrate was determined via energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS). EDS was measured using an X-ray detector mounted on a Carl Zeiss EVO scanning electron microscope (SEM) (Oberkochen, Germany) and spectra were obtained at 10 keV and a magnification of 10 kx. A Zeiss Auriga SEM was used to capture high magnification images of the CuxNi1−x alloy catalyst before and after graphene growth.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Muscle Ultrastructure Visualization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Muscle sections from mice and rats were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 30 min at RT and dehydrated in ethanol solutions of increasing concentration (30%- 100%), for 15 min per concentration. Muscle sections were dried at RT, mounted on aluminium stubs and sputter coated with platinum (5 nm) using a 208HR sputter coater (Cressington, Redding, CA). Data were collected using an EVO Scanning Electron Microscope (Carl Zeiss).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Comprehensive Characterization of SPEx-MIONPs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The characterization of SPEx-MIONPs involved a comprehensive approach utilizing various techniques [43 (link),44 (link),45 (link)]. Utilizing a Zeiss EVO scanning electron microscope (Pleasanton, CA, USA), scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was performed to examine the morphology and size of the nanoparticles. For a more detailed analysis of morphology and size, transmission electron microscopy (TEM) was conducted using a Talos S200 microscope (FEI, Hillsboro, OR, USA). Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR, Nicolet iS50 FITR Spectrometer, ThermoFisher Scientific, Madison, WI, USA) played a crucial role in obtaining information about the structure of SPEx-MIONPs, enabling the identification of different bioactive functional groups and Fe-O bonds. X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns, measured on a Bruker D8 Advance A25 diffractometer with a Cu anode (Bruker, sourced from Madrid, Spain), were utilized to confirm the oxide phase and crystallographic structure in the range of 2θ = [15–70°].
This advanced characterization aimed to validate and provide profound insights into the structural and morphological features of SPEx-MIONPs. The combination of SEM, TEM, FTIR, and XRD techniques ensured a comprehensive understanding of the nanoparticles’ properties, contributing to a thorough assessment of their structural integrity and potential applications.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Electron Microscopy of Nanostructures

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Prior to microscopy examination, samples (2–3 mm) were cut and treated with osmium vapor (1%) for 8 h to fix the samples and facilitate their observation under the microscope. Then, the fixed samples were covered by a thin film of Au to improve the quality of the micrograph (improving sample conductivity). The microscopy examination was performed using a Zeiss EVO scanning electron microscope (Stuttgart, Germany) with a secondary electron detector at an acceleration voltage of 10 kV. A digital processing free software, FIJI Image-J (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA), was used to determine the pore size distribution and the mean pore size of the nanostructures.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

SEM Imaging of Precipitated Crystals

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SEM imaging was performed using a Zeiss Evo scanning electron microscope equipped with a Gemini column and a field emission gun, operating at 3 kV. In order to investigate the dimensions and morphological details of the precipitated crystals, samples deposited on glass slides were fixed on aluminum stubs using double sided copper tape, coated with a thin layer (ca. 5 nm) of gold, and imaged using the secondary electron detector.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Biosynthesis and Characterization of AgNCs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
UV–Vis spectra were recorded to check the reduction of silver nitrate with A. precatorius ethyl acetate extract using a Systronics UV–Vis Spectrophotometer in the range of 300–700 nm. A Zetasizer nano ZS (Malvern Instruments, Malvern) was used to determine the nanoconjugates' average hydrodynamic particle size distribution and zeta-potential. In order to prepare a well-dispersed suspension, the sample was first diluted with MilliQ water followed by 10 min of ultrasonication. FT-IR spectrophotometer (PerkinElmer, Frontier ATR/IR) was used to compare the IR spectra of both A. precatorius seed extracts and AgNCs in the λ range of 4000–500 cm−1. The structural morphology and elemental analysis of the AgNCs was studied using ZEISS EVO Scanning Electron Microscope and Energy Dispersive X-Ray Spectroscopy (EDX)65 (link),66 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!