The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

16 protocols using vacuum pump v 700

1

Preparation of Viscum album Dry Extract

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
V. album hydroalcoholic extract was obtained by maceration at room temperature followed by a daily agitation for 21 days, according to the methodology used by Holandino et al. [22 (link)] and described in the French and Brazilian Homeopathic Pharmacopoeias [44 ,45 ]. The plant material was fragmented and submitted to the total volume of the solvent in an environment protected from direct action of light and heat. After the maceration period, the extract was filtered. At last, the solvent was concentrated in a rotary evaporator (Büchi, Vacuum Pump V-700) under vacuum (Büchi 461 Water Bath) at 40 °C. The extract was frozen and subsequently dried by lyophilization (Christ Beta 2-8 LD) to obtain the V. album dry extract (VADE).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Polyphenol Extraction from Medicinal Herbs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Two sequential reflux extraction processes were performed on 25 g of each herbal product. The first extraction used 1.5 L of solvent for 30 min and the second 750 mL of solvent for the same time. The two extract solutions were combined, concentrated in a rotary evaporator (Vacuum Pump V-700, Buchi Labortechnik, Flawil, Switzerland), and lyophilized (ALPHA 1–2 LDplus freeze dryer, Martin Christ Gefriertrocknungsanlagen GmbH, Osterode am Harz, Germany).
The dry extracts were kept in a glass vacuum desiccator to not capture moisture from the atmosphere. The samples were marked as follows: RE—rosemary extracts, TE—thyme extracts [42 (link)], REM—rosemary extract from the control crop, REF—rosemary extract from the common crop, TEM—thyme extract from the control crop, and TEF—thyme extract from the common crop. The solvent used for polyphenolic compound extraction was 50% ethanol for both medicinal plants, ensuring the most effective process [43 (link),69 (link)].
The raw materials’ quality was evaluated using established and typical spectrophotometric techniques. The identity of the analyzed chemicals in the plant raw materials was also validated using the UHPLC–MS and HR ESI–MS techniques.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Micellar Extraction of Grape Pomace

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The micellar extraction process was performed using a mechanical stirrer (CAT, R50D; M. Ziperer GmbH, Ballrechten-Dottingen, Germany). A 2% (w/w) aqueous solution of surfactant—decyl glucoside was used as the extraction medium. Grape pomace was frozen and grounded with dry ice in a laboratory knife mill (Cutter Mixer R5 Plus, Robot Coupe, Palinges, France). To prepare GPE_10pDG2p to 450 g of extraction medium, 50 g of grounded grape pomace was added and stirred vigorously at 380 rpm. To prepare GPE_20pDG2p, 100 g of grounded grape pomace was added to 400 g of extraction medium. The process was carried out for 3 h at room temperature. The formulation used to prepare the extracts is presented in Table 7.
The obtained extract was filtered under vacuum (Vacuum Pump V-700, Büchi, Flawil, Switzerland) using a non-woven polyester filter (ULESTER 32S (258/231 µm), Silk & Progress, Brněnec, Czech Republic). The filtrate was centrifuged at 7500 rpm for 5 min (Universal 320R centrifuge, Andreas Hettich GmBH &Co, Tuttlingen, Germany) and used directly in further studies.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Sediment Pollution Analysis in WWTP Effluent

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Only one sediment sample could be collected in the WWTP effluent channel (W.C., Figure 1), since the bottom at Cl2 (Figure 1) and Dp consisted of small pebbles. To evaluate the degree of pollution of this sediment sample we measured the concentrations of heavy metals (chromium, copper, nickel, lead, cadmium, zinc, cobalt, and mercury), arsenic, molybdenum, mineral-oil hydrocarbons, PAHs, and PCBs.
The methods used for determining heavy metal concentrations (Cr, Cu, Ni, Pb, Cd, Zn, Co, and Hg), arsenic, mineral oil hydrocarbons, and PAHs have been previously described in detail [20 (link)]. The concentration of Mo was determined in the same way as the heavy metals. For PCB detection, the oven-dried samples (5 g) were transferred to a Soxhlet apparatus and extracted with 100 mL of n-hexane. The extracts were evaporated on a rotary evaporator (Rotavapor R-210 with Heating Bath B-491, Vacuum Pump V-700, and Vacuum Controller V-850, Büchi) and concentrated in a stream of nitrogen gas. They were then transferred into a centrifuge tube and cleaned up with concentrated sulphuric acid (min. 96%). If the samples were highly contaminated repeated acid clean-up was employed. PCBs were quantified by a gas chromatography with a 63Ni Electron capture detector (GC-17A-ECD, Shimadzu) according to EPA 8082 [21 ] standard method.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Extraction of bioactive compounds from A. spinosa

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The fruit shells of A. spinosa were dried and then finely grounded to powder (IKA WERE, M20, Germany). A quantity (500 g) of the powdered shell was extracted for two weeks in the dark with 5000 ml of ethanol (70%) at room temperature (25 ± 2°C). The mixture was filtered and the extract was concentrated to dryness under vacuum using a rotary evaporator (BUCHI Switzerland, Rotavapor R-210, Vacuum Pump V-700) at 40°C. The residue (3.5% w/w) was stored at −20°C until use.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Isolation and Fractionation of Copaifera lucens Leaves

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The leaves of Copaifera lucens Dwyer were collected from the field of the botanical garden of Rio de Janeiro, Arboreto, Canteiro, Brazil, identified by the botanist Haroldo Cavalcante de Lima, where a voucher sample was kept (RB 474303). The leaves were dried in a dark, dry and well-ventilated area. The leaves were air dried and ground using a knife mill, and 0.5 Kg of the powder was macerated three times each three days using 4 L of a hydroalcoholic solution (ethanol: water; 7:3), filtered and concentrated under vacuum (Rotavap: Model R210 Buchi ™ with Vacuum Pump V-700, Vacuum Controller V-855 and Recirculating Chiller F-105). The crude extract (88.58 g) was lyophilized. Fifty grams of the extract were dissolved in 600 mL of methanol: water (6:4), and partitioned with ethyl acetate (3 X 300 mL), followed by partition with n-butanol (4 X 200 mL), in sequence. The fractions were concentrated under vacuum and lyophilized. The yields were 14.4, 14.9 and 17.6 g for n-butanolic, ethyl acetate and water fractions, respectively. The n-butanolic fraction (BF) was analyzed by HPLC-UV and used in the biotransformation experiment. Gallic acid, as a reference substrate, was purchased commercially (Sigma-Aldrich).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Extraction and Characterization of Medicinal Plant Extracts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Dry leaves from M–ML common and control crops were used for obtaining dry extracts. Based on our previous study [22 (link)], the solvent used for the extraction was 50% ethanol for all plants. Exactly 25 g of plant material were used from every crop and were subjected to two consecutive reflux extraction processes: the first extraction used 1.5 L solvent for 30 min, while the second used 750 mL solvent for 30 min. The two extract solutions were mixed and concentrated in a rotary evaporator (Buchi, Vacuum Pump V-700) and then subjected to a lyophilization process (Christ Alpha 1–2/B Braun, BiotechInt, New Delhi, India). The dry extracts were conserved in a glass vacuum desiccator [50 (link)]. The samples were marked as follows: MM E (Mentha extract from control crop), MF E (Mentha extract from common crop), MLM E (Melissa extract from control crop) and MLF E (Melissa extract from common crop). Each stage of the research includes a presentation of additional tools and experimental setups used in this investigation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Preparation of Abietis Dry Extract

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The ethanolic extract was transferred to a balloon and the solvent was evaporated at 40 °C (Water Bath, Büchi, Flawil, Switzerland) under vacuum (Vacuum Pump V-700, Büchi, Flawil, Switzerland). Lastly, the residue was frozen at −80 °C and subsequently lyophilized (Christ Beta 2-8 LD) for a period of 24 h (−43 °C/0.09 mbar), obtaining the ethanolic dry extract of VA ssp. abietis (VA_DE).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantitative Phenolic and Carotenoid Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Extract condensation was performed under vacuum and heat-assisted evaporation, in temperatures below 35 °C, using a Büchi Rotavapor R-210 apparatus, equipped with a Büchi vacuum pump V-700, Vacuum controller V-850 (all obtained from Büchi, Flawil, St Gallen, Switzerland), and Julabo F12 (Seelbach, Germany) cooling unit.
The estimation of Total Phenolic Content (TPC) and Total Tannin Content (TTC) was implemented using an Infinite® 200 PRO microplate reader (Tecan Group Ltd., San Jose, CA, USA) and the estimation of Total Carotenoid Content (TCC) was performed using an x-ma 100 spectrophotometer (Human Corporation, Seoul, Republic of Korea).
An Accela Ultra High-Performance Liquid Chromatography system equipped with an autosampler and coupled with a TSQ Quantum Access triple-quadrupole mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) was used for the determination of the phenolic and carotenoid compounds qualitative and quantitative content.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Preparation of Drug-Loaded Liposomes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
LUV dispersions were prepared following a method previously described. 30 A buffer solution (10 mL, PBS300 or PBS65) was gently added on top of an organic phase containing methanol (0.2 mL) and SPC/chloroform solution (200 mg/mL, 1 mL) in a 50 mL round bottom flask. LUV formulations containing caffeine, ibuprofen, ketoprofen or theophylline were prepared by dissolving the drug (2 mM concentration) in the aqueous phase (PBS300 or PBS65, respectively), whereas LUVs with hydrocortisone or methylprednisolone were prepared by dissolving the drug in the SPC/chloroform solution (drug-lipid ratio approx. 0.035 w/w). Unilamellar vesicles (containing 20 mg/ml lipid and 2 mM drug) were spontaneously formed after the removal of the organic phase by rotary evaporation (40 °C, 40 rpm, 0.1 bar, 90 min, Büchi R-124 rotavapor equipped with Büchi vacuum pump V-700 and Büchi B-480 water bath, Büchi Labortechnik AG, Flawil, Switzerland). Liposomal dispersions were subsequently extruded through polycarbonate membrane filters (5x800 nm and 10x400 nm, Nuclepore Track-Etched Membranes, Whatman International Ltd., Maidstone, Kent, UK) at room temperature (23-25 °C) to obtain vesicles of homogeneous sizes.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!