The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

9 protocols using anti ki67

1

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Xenograft Tumors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tumor samples from xenografted mice were collected and fixed according to routine procedures. Histological staining was then performed on the tissue sections of the paraffin-embedded tumors using the streptavidin-biotin-peroxidase method. Primary antibodies were as follows: anti-FOXA1 (1:200; Abcam), anti-AR (1:50, Abcam), anti-Notch1 (1:100; Epitomics,), anti-Hes1 (1:250; Epitomics), anti-Ki67 (1:100; Boster, Wuhan, China), and anti-PCNA (1:100; Boster). The sections were then counterstained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Ki67

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The excised tumor tissues were fixed using 4% polyoxymethylene, paraffin-embedded and then were sectioned. And then, the sections were incubated with the primary antibodies: anti-Ki67 (1: 67, BOSTER) at 4 ˚C overnight. Later, the sections were added with the corresponding secondary antibodies labeled with horseradish peroxidase (HRP). Finally, after treated with DAB to visualize the Ki67 signal, the sections were observed using microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Protein Extraction and Western Blot Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total protein was prepared from UCB tissues and cells using RIPA buffer, and protein quantification was conducted by a spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Protein extracts were subjected to 14% sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), followed by transfer to polyvinylidene fluoride membranes (Millipore, Bradford, MA, USA). After blocking with 5% nonfat milk, membranes were probed with primary antibodies at 4°C overnight, followed by incubation with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody (Boster, Wuhan, China) for 1 h at room temperature. Primary antibodies were as follows: anti-Nrf2 (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA), anti-Ki-67 (Boster), anti-matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-2 (R&D Systems), anti-MMP-9 (R&D Systems), anti-cleaved caspase 3 (R&D Systems), anti-p-glycoprotein (p-gp; Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA) and anti-β-actin (Boster). Immunoblots were developed by ECL reagents (Pierce, Rockford, IL, USA) and quantified by the Image J software (National Institutes of Health, NY, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Immunohistochemical Profiling of Tumor Tissues

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunohistochemistry was used to detect protein expression in tumor tissues sections. The antibodies used were anti-β-catenin (1:50; Cell Signaling Technology), CD31 (1:50; Bioworld Technology), anti-E-cadherin, anti-N-cadherin (1:50; Santa Cruz Biotechnology), and anti-Ki67 (1:100; Boster, China). Ki67 staining is usually evaluated by counting positive cells of the total cell count (nucleus is stained by Ki67 antibody). Both cytosol and nucleus of the cells were positively stained for β-catenin protein.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Cell Lysate Analysis and Immunoblotting Techniques

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell or tissue lysates and immunoblot analysis were performed as described previously [11 (link), 12 (link)]. Densitometric analysis was conducted using ImageJ software. The primary antibodies used include: anti-STIP1 (1:200, Boster Biotechnology, Wuhan, China), anti-ALK2 (1:400, Boster Biotechnology, Wuhan, China), anti-SMAD1/5 (1:200, Boster Biotechnology, Wuhan, China), anti-CTSK (1:500, Boster Biotechnology, Wuhan, China), anti-ERK1/2 (1:500, Boster Biotechnology, Wuhan, China), anti-Hsp90 (1:500, Boster Biotechnology, Wuhan, China), anti-Ki67 (1:500, Boster Biotechnology, Wuhan, China) and anti-GAPDH (1:500, Boster Biotechnology, Wuhan, China).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantifying Ki67 Expression in Tumor Tissues

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The collected tumor tissues were fixed with 4% polyoxymethylene and made into paraffin-embedded sections, which were then cultured with the primary antibody anti-Ki67 (dilution ratio of 1 : 1500, BOSTER, Biological Technology Co., Ltd, Wuhan, Hubei, China) at 4°C overnight. The following day, the sections were cultivated with the corresponding secondary antibody labeled with horseradish peroxidase. The sections were subsequently assessed under a microscope after the visualization of Ki67 signal with the aid of 2,4-diaminobutyric acid. The sections were examined by two independent pathologists who were blinded to the experiment protocols. Ki67 staining was scored as the result of staining intensity multiplied percentage, with staining intensity graded four levels (no staining, 0; weak staining, 1; moderate staining, 2; and strong staining, 3), and the percentage of positive cells was classified into the following four grades: 0 (0%), 1 (1–25%), 2 (26–50%), 3 (51–75%), and 4 (76–100%).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Comprehensive in situ Hybridization and Immunohistochemistry Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
ISH and IHC were performed as previously described. In brief, the double (5′–3′) digoxigenin (DIG)-labeled miR-744 probe and U6 probe were purchased from Boster (Wuhan, China) and ISH was conducted according to the manufacturer's instructions of the microRNA ISH Optimization Kit (Boster, Wuhan, China). IHC was carried out with appropriate primary antibodies according to their manufacturer's instructions. These antibodies included anti-NKD1 (1:100, Abcam, USA), anti-ki67, anti-caspase-3, anti-CD31, and anti-CD34 (All 1:100, Boster, China). ISH and IHC scores were performed using a semiquantitative grading system as our previous study [43 (link)]. Sections with no labeling or with fewer than 5% labeled cells were scored as 0. Sections with 5%–30% of cells labeled were scored as 1, with 31%–70% of cells labeled as 2, and with labeling of ≥ 71% as 3. The staining intensity was scored similarly, with 0 used for negative staining, 1 for weakly positive, 2 for moderately positive, and 3 for strongly positive. Each sample was examined separately and scored by two pathologists. Cases with discrepancies in the scores were discussed to reach a consensus.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

MicroRNA Expression and Apoptosis Analysis in Tumor Xenografts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MicroRNA in situ hybridization (ISH) Buffer and Controls kit (Exiqon, Vedbaek, Denmark) were used for ISH. The double (5′–3′) digoxigenin (DIG)‐labeled miR‐200a probe and U6 probe were purchased from Boster (Wuhan, China) and ISH was conducted according to the manufacturer's protocol of the microRNA ISH Optimization Kit (Boster, Wuhan, China). The expression of BRD4, Ki‐67, and caspase‐3 were detected by immunohistochemistry in the specimens which were fxed in 10% neutral‐buffered formalin and subsequently embedded in paraffn. After a brief proteolytic digestion and peroxidase blocking of the tissue slides which were cut to a thickness of 4 µm previously, the slides were incubated overnight at 4°C with the anti‐BRD4 (1:1000, Abcam, USA), anti‐ki67, and anti‐caspase‐3 (All 1:100, Boster, China). In situ hybridization and IHC were scored in a semiquantitative manner. The scoring system was conducted as follows: 0 (<5%), 1 (5%‐30%), 2 (31%‐70%), and 3 (≥71%). Additionally, the staining intensity was stratified as follows: 0 (negative), 1 (weak), 2 (moderate), and 3 (strong). Based on the intensity score, the percentage of positive cells were multiplied to obtain the final immunoreactivity scores (IRS) for Ki‐67. Apoptosis ability in the tumor xenografts was also determined from the number of Caspase‐3‐positive cells.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Western Blot Analysis of Gastric Cancer

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
GC-MSCs and gastric cancer cells were homogenized and lysed in RIPA buffer supplemented with proteinase inhibitors. Equal amounts of proteins were separated on a 12% SDS-PAGE gel. Following electrophoresis, the proteins were transferred to the PVDF membrane, blocked in 5% (w/v) non-fat milk and incubated with the primary antibodies at 4°C overnight. The sources of antibodies were as follows: anti-GAPDH (Kangcheng, China); anti-YAP, anti-vimentin, anti-Bcl2, and anti-Bax (Bioworld Technology, Louis Park, MN, USA); anti-β-catenin (Cell Signaling Technology, Beverly, MA, USA); anti-E-cadherin, and anti-N-cadherin (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Santa Cruz, CA, USA); anti-Ki67 (BOSTER, China). The membrane was washed with Tris-buffered saline/Tween 3 times and incubated with the secondary antibodies (Bioworld Technology) at 37°C for 1 h. The signals were visualized by using a Lumina crescendo western horseradish peroxidase substrate (Millipore). The dilution factor for the primary and secondary antibodies was 1:1,000, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!