The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

9 protocols using cd206 fitc

1

Tumor Macrophage Polarization by Flow

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The polarization of macrophages was detected by flow cytometry after the preparation of the single-cell suspension from tumors. F4/80-BV605 (BD Biosciences, CA, USA), CD45-PE-Cy7 (BD Biosciences, CA, USA), and CD11b-AF-700 (BD Biosciences, CA, USA) were used together to identify the mononuclear immune cells in the tumor, then the proportion of CD86-BV421- (BD Biosciences, CA, USA) positive cells was identified as M1, and CD206-FITC- (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, USA) positive cells were identified as M2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Evaluating M2 Macrophage Polarization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To determine the effects of different treatments on macrophage M2 polarization, samples were blocked with anti-Rh Fc receptor binding (Invitrogen, 2296579); stained with CD206 (CD206-FITC, Invitrogen 141704) and Edu (Edu-AF594, Invitrogen 2420611) (cell sample), CD206 and CD86 (CD86-PE/Cyanine7, Invitrogen, 105014) (heart sample), or CD206 and F4/80 (F4/80-PE, Invitrogen 157304) (heart sample); and evaluated using a flow cytometer (Cytometer, USA). Following staining for MertK (MertK-PE/Cyanine7, Invitrogen, 2555774), flow cytometry was performed to determine the effect of LNP-MertK on macrophages. Nystatin, a decreasing endocytic reagent, was used to reverse the above effects (MCE 1400-61-9). Data were analyzed using FlowJo 10.6.2 (BD Biosciences).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Polarized Macrophage Phenotyping by Flow Cytometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After induction of polarization for 2 days, cells were harvested and resuspended in FACS tubes (106 cells in 100 uL PBS). Simultaneously, culture supernatants were collected and tested for specific cytokines (IL-1β and IL-12 as M1 marker, and IL-10 as M2 marker) using ELISA kits (eBioscience, San Diego, USA). Subsequently, macrophages were labeled with 5 μL of specific primary antibodies against relative surface markers (CD68-PE as pan macrophage marker,14 (link) CD86-APC as an M1 marker,15 and CD206-FITC as an M2 marker,16 (link) all obtained from eBioscience) on ice for 30 minutes. The stained cells were washed twice with cold PBS, resuspended in 400 μL of PBS, and detected for surface markers using flow cytometry (BD LSRII system, BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, USA). THP-1 cells in M0 state were processed in the same manner as the control.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Evaluating Treg Polarization using cASC-EVs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To evaluate Treg polarization, PBMC-derived lymphocytes cocultured with cASC-EVs were harvested. Obtained cells (1 × 106) were suspended in 100μL DPBS and 1 μL of each primary antibody against the following proteins: FOXP3-PE (eBioscience, San Diego, CA, USA; 1:100), CD3-FITC (MCA1774F; Bio-Rad, San Diego, CA, USA; 1:100), CD206-FITC (eBioscience, San Diego, CA, USA; 1:100) and CD11c-PE (eBioscience, San Diego, CA, USA; 1:100). After incubation for 1 h at 23 ± 2°C, the cells were washed with DPBS. Unstained cells were used as controls for autofluorescence. Cell fluorescence was analyzed with a flow cytometer (FACS Aria Ⅱ; BD bioscience). The results were analyzed using FlowJo 7.6.5 software (Tree Star, Inc., Ashland, OR, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Immune Cell Phenotyping in Murine Tissues

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells from the spleen or tumor from mice were stained with antibodies (eBioscience) Gr-1-APC eFluor 780, CD11b-eFluor 450, Ly6b-FITC and F4/80-PE Cy7 to detect neutrophils (Gr-1+, CD11b+, Ly6b+), macrophages (Gr-1, CD11b+, F4/80+) and IMPs (Gr-1+, CD11b+, Ly6b). For M1 and M2 macrophages, MHC II-PE and CD206-FITC antibodies (eBioscience), respectively, were used.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Multiparametric Flow Cytometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The following directly conjugated anti-human monoclonal antibodies were used: CD4-FITC, CD4-APC, CD8-PE, CD163-PE, CD206-FITC, CD86-PE-Cy5, CD64-APC, CD273-PE, TLR-4-PE-Cy7, CD40-FITC, HLA-DR-PECy5 and CD274-APC (eBioscience, San Diego). Saturating amounts of antibody were used to stain approximately 3 x 105 cells in staining buffer (1 x PBS, 2% FBS) at a final volume of 20 μl for 30 min at 4°C protected from the light. All samples were washed with staining buffer and resuspended in 200 μl of FACS Buffer. Samples were examined in a FACSCalibur (BD Biosciences) and analysis was performed using FlowJo software (Tree Star, Inc., OR).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Flow Cytometric Analysis of Liver Leukocytes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Liver leukocytes of infected mice were prepared by Ficoll-Hypaque (Hao Yang Biological Manufacture, Tianjin, China) gradient centrifugation after being dispersed through a 70 µm nylon strainer. For flow cytometry analysis, peritoneal macrophages and liver leukocytes were washed twice and suspended in PBS containing 0.1% BSA and 0.05% sodium azide. A total of 1 × 106 cells per 100 µl were incubated with F4/80-PE-Cyanine 5 (eBioscience, CA, USA), CD206-FITC (eBioscience, CA, USA) and CD16/32-PE (eBioscience) for 30 min at 4 °C in the dark. After washing twice, the cells were pelleted and resuspended. Data were acquired on a FACScan flow cytometer (Beckman Coulter) and analysed using FlowJo software (Treestar, San Carlos, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Delineate Innate Lymphoid and Macrophage Subsets

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Stained cells underwent analysis utilizing FACS Canto II, and the resultant data were processed utilizing FlowJo version 10 software (Ashland, OR, USA). The following antibodies procured from eBioscience (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) were employed for the delineation of innate lymphoid cells: Biotin-CD3e (100304; clone: 145-2C11; 1/200), Biotin-CD45R/B220 (103204; clone: RA3–6B2; 1/200), Biotin-Gr-1 (108404; clone: RB6-8C5; 1/200), Biotin-CD11c (117304; clone: N418; 1/200), Biotin-CD11b (101204; clone: M1/70; 1/200), Biotin-Ter119 (116204; clone: TER-119; 1/200), Biotin-FceRIa (134304; clone: MAR-1; 1/200), FITC-Streptavidin (405202; 1/500), PE-Cy7-CD127 (135014; clone: A7R34; 1/100), Pacific Blue-CD45 (103116; clone: 30-F11; 1/100), PE-GATA-3 (clone: TWAJ; 1/50), APC-RORγ (clone: AFKJS-9; 1/50), and Fixable Viability Dye eFluor 780 (1/400) [20 (link),21 (link)]. Additionally, the following antibodies (eBioscience, San Diego, CA, USA) were utilized for the discrimination of M1 and M2 macrophages: APC-CD45.2 (17045482; clone: 104; 1/50), PE-F4/80 (12480182; clone: BM8; 1/50), APC-Cy7-CD11b (47011282; clone: M1/70; 1/50), FITC-CD206 (MA516870; clone: MR5D3; 1/50), and PE-Cy7-CD11c (25011482; clone: N418; 1/50) [22 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Characterization of Lung Macrophage Subsets

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A single cell suspension of left lung MNCs at a density of 2 × 10 6 cells/mL was prepared. The MNCs were first labeled with APC-Cy7-F4/80 (Biolegend Inc, San Diego, Calif) and PE-CD11c (eBioscience, San Diego, Calif) at 4°C for 40 to 60 min in the 100 μL staining buffer. The F4/80 and CD11c double positive MNCs were marked as AMs. After washing once with PBS for 7 min, we analyzed the co-expression of iNOS + , CD206 + , IL-10 + , IL-6 + , and IL-12p40 + with F4/80 + CD11c + MNCs stained using FITC-CD206, APC-iNOS, FITC-IL-10, FITC-IL-6, and APC-IL-12p40 (eBioscience, San Diego, Calif). Meanwhile, iNOS + F4/80 + CD11c + MNCs were marked as M1 AMs. CD206 + F4/80 + CD11c + MNCs were marked as M2 AMs. Data were analyzed using FlowJo software (FlowJo LLC, Ashland, Ore).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!