The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Rotina 420r centrifuge

Manufactured by Hettich
Sourced in Germany

The Rotina 420R is a high-performance centrifuge designed for laboratory applications. It features a brushless motor and an automatic rotor recognition system. The Rotina 420R can achieve a maximum speed of 15,000 rpm and a maximum relative centrifugal force of 21,382 x g. The centrifuge is equipped with a microprocessor-controlled operation and a user-friendly interface.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

9 protocols using rotina 420r centrifuge

1

Tissue Dissociation Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

feather disposable scalpel (Feather Safety Razor, Köln, Germany);

Petri dish, Nunclon Delta Surface (Thermo Fisher Scientific);

a 5 ml test tube with lid, Polystyrene Round-Bottom Tube (Falcon, Corning, Corning, NY);

PTFE Stirrer Bar, Micro, 5 × 2 mm (Cowie Technology Group, Ridgeway, United Kingdom);

water Bath/Magnetic Stirrer System RET Basic (IKA Labortechnik, Staufen, Germany);

a 40-μm cell strainer (Sarstedt, Nümbrecht, Germany);

Rotina 420R Centrifuge (Hettich Zentrifugen, Tuttlingen, Germany); and

Nunc 96-Well Polystyrene Conical Bottom MicroWell Plates (Thermo Fisher Scientific)

+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Measuring D-dimer Levels in Equine BALF

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
D-dimer concentrations in BALF supernatant were measured in samples from 58 horses by using an automatized analyzer (Sysmex CA-1500 system; Sysmex, Germany) and performing immune turbidimetry (INNOVANCE D-dimer test; Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics, Germany). The limit of D-dimer detection was 0.19 mg/L fibrinogen equivalent units. As most samples were below the limit of detection, 3 samples from control horses and 18 samples from RAO horses were concentrated by ultrafiltration at 2,000 × g for 60 min by using a Rotina 420R centrifuge (Andreas Hettich, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Arsenic Speciation Analysis in Powdered Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
About 200 mg of each powdered sample was accurately weighed into a 50 mL polypropylene tube (Greiner, Bio-one, Frickenhausen, Germany), and 10 mL of water was added. Samples were extracted by shaking at room temperature for 60 min in a GFL-1083 shaking water bath (Gesellschaft fur Labortechnik, Burkwedel, Germany). Extracted samples were centrifuged for 15 min at 4700 rcf (relative centrifugal force) in a Rotina 420R centrifuge (Andreas Hettich GmbH & Co.KG, Tuttlingen, Germany). Supernates were collected and filtered through a PTFE syringe filter (0.2 μm; Bruckner Analysentechnik, Linz, Austria). Filtrates were analyzed for arsenic species using HPLC-ICPMS.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Comprehensive Analytical Techniques for Biomaterial Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For sample analysis, flat bottom 96-well microtitration plates and Eppendorf tubes were purchased from Greiner (Greiner, Frickenhausen, Germany). Component weighing was performed on a laboratory scale (Ohaus, Parsippany, NJ, USA). Sample centrifugation was performed on a Rotina 420R centrifuge (Hettich, Tuttlingen, Germany). Dynamic cell seeding of scaffolds was performed in a Roto-Therm Plus agitator (Benchmark Scientific, Sayreville, NJ, USA). SDS-Page analyses were performed using a Mini Gel Tank and PowerEase 90W (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Gel imaging in white light or in chemiluminescence was performed on a Uvitec Mini HD9 gel imager (Cleaver Scientific, Rugby, UK). Colorimetric and luminescence measurements were performed on a Varioskan LUX multimode plate reader (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Immunohistochemistry and Live-Dead imaging were performed on an inverted IX81 fluorescence microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). Telomerase activity PCR analyses were run on a StepOne Real-time PCR Systems instrument (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Sample lyophilization was performed in a LyoBeta Mini freeze-dryer (Telstar, Terrassa, Spain). Sample terminal sterilization by γ-irradiation was performed by Ionisos, Dagneux, France.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Synthesis of SnO2 Nanoparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Feedstock solution was prepared by mixing 0.4 M aqueous tin chloride pentahydrate (SnCl4·5H2O; J. T. Baker, Mexico City, Mexico and urea (CH4N2O; Sigma Aldrich, Mexico City, Mexico in 1:2 ratio. Then the mixed solution was vigorously stirred and heated until the solution temperature reaches around 93 ± 5 °C. Unlike the former case (urea), for ammonia (NH4OH; Sigma Aldrich) as precipitation agent it was added dropwise to 0.4 M aqueous SnCl4·5H2O until the pH of the solution reached 12. The resultant precipitates in both cases were centrifuged at 400 rpm for 1 h using a ROTINA-420R centrifuge (Hettich, Toluca, Mexico) and the obtained pastes were dried at 100 °C for 24 h to eliminate any remaining solvent. Finally, the dried powders were calcined in a furnace at 800 °C for 2 h to obtain pure SnO2 powders. All the synthesis conditions were studied, optimized and reported in our previous works [33 ,34 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

FRAP Assay for Antioxidant Capacity

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The antioxidant capacity was evaluated with the FRAP method using the protocol developed by Benzie and Strein [23] (link). A FRAP working solution was prepared before the assay. Two hundred and fifty milliliters of acetate buffer with a pH of 3.6, 25 mL of the TPTZ solution (2,4,6-Tri(2-pyridyl)-s-triazine (10 mM in 40 mM HCl) and 25 mL of iron (III) chloride hexahydrate solution (20 mM) were mixed. The solution was incubated at 37 • C and assays were then performed. Six milliliters of the FRAP solution were added to 200 µL of the sample and 600 µL of H 2 O. Four minutes after the addition of the sample, absorbance was measured at 593 nm. Based on the conducted measurements, a dependence curve of the absorbance value on the material concentration was plotted. Based on the curve, the absorbance value was determined at a concentration equal to the mean of the dilutions used, and the antioxidant capacity was calculated at the same absorbance value based on the standard curve determined for Fe 2 ions. To remove solid parts, the samples before the assays were centrifuged for five minutes with a Rotina 420R centrifuge (Hettich, Germany) at 3000 revs. min -1 . All assays were performed in three replications.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Multimodal Analytical Techniques for Biological Assays

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Component weighing was performed using a laboratory scale (Ohaus, Parsippany, NJ, USA). Sample centrifugation was performed using a Rotina 420R centrifuge (Hettich, Tuttlingen, Germany) or on a Sorvall Legend Micro 21R microcentrifuge (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Colorimetric and luminescence measurements were taken using a Varioskan LUX multimode plate reader (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Telomerase activity and chondrogenic gene expression quantification assays were run on a StepOne Real-time PCR System instrument (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Spectrophotometric analyses were performed using a NanoDrop instrument (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Immunohistochemistry imaging was performed using an inverted IX81 fluorescence microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Immunofluorescence and Flow Cytometry Staining

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were stained with antibodies for 20 minutes on ice and expression markers were analyzed with a BD LSR II flow cytometer (BD Biosciences). For immunofluorescence staining, 1 × 105 cells in 200 μL/chamber were used, and for flow cytometry, 1 × 105 in 50 μL antibody were used. For intracellular staining, cells were fixed and permeabilized with IntraPrep (Beckman Coulter, Krefeld, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. For immunofluorescence staining, cells were centrifuged for 5 min at 200× g (4 °C) on culture slides using a Rotina 420R centrifuge (Hettich, Tuttlingen, Germany) and dried overnight. Cytospins were fixed with acetone:methanol (1:1) (AppliChem), blocked with 5% BSA (Sigma-Aldrich, Schnelldorf, Germany) in PBS and stained with primary and secondary antibodies (Table 1) diluted in 0.1% BSA in PBS. Cells were then fixed with 4% PFA (Microcos, Germany) and mounted with ProLong® Gold antifade reagent with DAPI (Invitrogen). The antibodies used in this study are listed in Table 1. For analysis of dead cells, Propidium iodide (Sigma-Aldrich) was added for 10 min at 4 °C prior to the analysis by flow cytometry.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

ATP Degradation Product Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Frozen samples were shredded using a kitchen grater, and approximately 1.0 g (exact weight listed) was homogenized with 7,5 ml of trichloroacetic acid (TCA, 7% w/v) for 1 min with an Ultra Turrax T25 Basic (Janke & Kunkel IKA®‐Labortechnik, Staufen, Germany). Potassium hydroxide was then added to the sample solution (KOH, 1 M, 3.25 mL) to achieve a pH of 6.25. The mixing tubes were kept on ice during preparation thereafter centrifuged (18000 rpm, 4°C, 15 min) in a Rotina 420R centrifuge (Hettich Zentrifugen, Germany) before the supernatant was filtered through a nylon filter (0.45 mm) and transferred to HPLC vials (Agilent, 862‐09‐16, 2 ml) for analysis.
The samples were analyzed on a Poroshell 120 porous column (ECC18 3.0 × 100 mm, porous size 2.7 mm, with a Poroshell 120 Fast Guard (3.0 × 5 mm, Sub‐2 mm), Agilent InfinityLab) after a modified method by Sellevold et al. (1986 (link)), as described by Lerfall et al. (2018a (link)). The K value and H value were calculated based on the concentrations of ATP degradations products (Hong et al., 2017 (link); Howgate, 2006 (link)):
K=Ino+HxATP+ADP+AMP+IMP+Ino+Hx×100%
H=HxIMP+Ino+Hx×100% where Ino is inosine, Hx is hypoxanthine, ATP is adenosine triphosphate, ADP is adenosine diphosphate, AMP is adenosine monophosphate, and IMP is inosine monophosphate.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!