The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

3 protocols using mouse anti mecp2

1

Quantifying MeCP2-positive Cells in Rat Brain

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Rats were deeply anesthetized with a ketamine/xylazine mixture (100/10 mg/kg) and intracardially perfused with 4% paraformaldehyde as previously described [42 (link)]. Brains were cryoprotected and cut into 40 µm coronal sections. To identify MeCP2-positive cells, a previously established protocol was used [43 (link)] with slight modifications. In short, sections were permeabilized with 0.03% PBST for 60 min at room temperature and then blocked for 60 min at room temperature with 16% normal goat serum and exposed overnight at 4°C to 1:1,000 mouse anti-MeCP2 (Abcam). Next day, the sections were washed in 1× PBS, and incubated for 60 min at room temperature with 1:1,500 anti-mouse Alexa 488-coupled IgG (Sigma-Aldrich). The sections were again washed in 1× PBS, incubated with 20 µg/mL 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI), washed, and mounted on slides. Images of each hemisphere for each region of interest (mPFC: bregma + 2.7 and BLA: bregma + 2.04) were generated with a fluorescence microscope (Axio Imager M1) and the software Zen (Zeiss) under consistent exposure time. MeCP2- and DAPI-positive cells were counted separately for each hemisphere by an investigator blinded in terms of experimental conditions via ImageJ [44 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Immunostaining of MeCP2 and β-Endorphin in Brain

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunostaining for MeCP2 and β-endorphin were performed as described previously [17] (link). Brain sections (20 µm thickness) were cut on a cryostat (Leica) and collected on pre-chilled glass slides. These sections were double stained for MeCP2 (1∶500) and β-endorphin (1∶200) antibodies. The primary antibodies used were mouse anti MeCP2 (Abcam, Cambridge, MA) and rabbit anti β-endorphin (Bachem, Sam Carlos, CA). Secondary antibodies used in this study were Alexa-Flour 488 donkey anti-mouse (2 mg/ml; Invitrogen, Grand Island, NY) and Alexa Flour 594 donkey anti-rabbit IgG (2 mg/ml; Invitrogen, Grand Island, NY). After staining, pictures were taken using a confocal microscope with a 20× objective (Nikon EZ-C1 3.60 build 770, Gold version; Melville, NY). Total number of β-endorphin cells as well as total number of β-endorphin cells, located on the right and left side of the third ventricle, that were positive for MeCP2 were counted. The experimenters were blind to the experimental treatment group of the section during counting.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Immunohistochemical analysis of MeCP2 in adult male brains

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Adult male brains were dissected and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (Electron Microscopy Sciences) for 40 minutes and labeled as described previously (Certel et al., 2010 ). The following primary antibodies were used: rabbit anti-MeCP2 (1:30, Cell Signaling Technologies), mouse anti-MeCP2 (1:500, Abcam), rat anti-CD8 (1:100, Molecular Probes), monoclonal rabbit anti-GFP (1:200, Molecular Probes), mouse nc82 (1:100) and anti-MBD-R2 (1:200) (Prestel et al., 2010 (link)). Secondary antibodies include Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated donkey anti-mouse, Alexa Fluor 594-conjugated goat anti-rabbit, Alexa Fluor 647-conjugated donkey anti-mouse, Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated goat anti-rat cross-adsorbed antibodies (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, West Grove, PA). Brain samples were mounted in a drop of Vectashield (Vector Laboratories Inc, Burlingame, CA) and Images were collected on an Olympus Fluoview FV1000 laser scanning confocal mounted on an inverted IX81 microscope and processed with Image-J 1.33 (NIH) and Adobe Photoshop (Adobe, CA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!