The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

9 protocols using leica em uc7 microtome

1

Electron Microscopy of Extracellular Vesicles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were treated with LEVs or SEVs and incubated for 48 h. Treated cells were fixed by incubating with 200 mM cacodylate buffer containing 8% glutaraldehyde and 20% paraformaldehyde (Wako). After dehydration with ethanol, ultrathin sections were prepared using a Leica EM UC7 microtome (Leica) and collected on 200 mesh copper grids. The sections were stained with 1% uranyl acetate and lead citrate, and images were obtained with a JEOL JEM 1010 transmission electron microscope (JEOL) at 80 kV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Ultrastructural Analysis of Rat Cortical Neurons

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To obtain sections for electron microscopy, rat cortical neurons were grown in vitro on Thermanox coverslips (Thermo Fisher Scientific). On DIV10, the cells were fixed with 2.5% glutaraldehyde in PBS for 120 min and washed twice with PBS. Afterward, the cells were incubated with 1% osmium tetraoxide for 1 h, washed three times with deionized water and then in increasing concentrations of ethanol, and then incubated with 1% uranyl acetate for 40 min. The samples were then dehydrated in ethanol, followed by pure propylene oxide. The samples were then embedded in EPON resin (Sigma-Aldrich), cut into ultrathin sections (60 nm) using a Leica EM UC7 microtome, and mounted on copper grids (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany). Photomicrographs were taken using a Tecnai T12 BioTwin electron microscope (FEI, Hillsboro, OR, USA) at ×18,500 magnification.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Ultrastructural Analysis of Leaf Tissues

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Leaves were cut into small pieces (approximately 1 mm2 and avoiding the main vein) and fixed in 3% glutaraldehyde for 4 h at room temperature. After washing in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.1), the leaf samples were post-fixed in 1% osmium tetroxide for 3 h and then dehydrated in cold ethanol. The samples were embedded in Epon-618 polymerization resin for 12 h at 37°C, which was hardened by 24 h at 45°C, followed by 48 h at 60°C. The embedding block was trimmed and 70 nm thick sections were cut using a Leica EM UC7 microtome (Leica, Germany). The sections were stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate, and analyzed using a Hitachi-7500 transmission electron microscope (Hitachi, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Ultrastructural Analysis of Mouse Cerebellum

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For transmission electron microscopy, whole mice were anesthetized with isoflurane using a VetEquip Vaporizer until a toe pinch yielded no response, and transcardially perfused via the left ventricle with 50 ml of phosphate-buffer saline (PBS) pH 7.5, followed by 30 ml of 2% glutaraldehyde (GA), 2% formaldehyde (FA), 2 mM calcium chloride in PBS. Cerebellum samples of 1 mm3 were dissected, washed three times in 0.1M cacodylate pH 7.4 and further fixed in 2% GA, 2% FA, 2 mM calcium chloride, 0.1M cacodylate pH 7.4 for 2 h at 4°C, washed four times for 10 min in the buffer and postfixed in 2% osmium tetroxide in the same buffer for 2 h on ice. The samples were washed twice in the buffer, five times in water, stained en bloc overnight in 2% aqueous uranyl acetate and washed three times in water, dehydrated in a series of ethanol concentrations and penetrated with EMbed 812 (EMS, Hatfield, PA), which was polymerized for 60 h at 65°C in flat molds. Thin (80 nm) sections of the samples were cut on a Leica EM UC7 microtome (Leica, Deerfield, IL) and stained with uranyl acetate/lead citrate. The samples were examined on a FEI Tecnai 20 electron microscope operated at 120 kV, and images were recorded on an AMT XR81 CCD camera.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Sperm Ultrastructural Analysis Techniques

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Spermatozoa from AY078 and fertile controls were washed three times with 1× phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) at 2500 rpm at 25°C and then fixed with 2.5% glutaraldehyde (pH 6.9) for more than 2 h at 4°C.
For SEM, fixed samples were dehydrated using an ethanol gradient (30, 50, 70, 80, 90, and 100%; ×2), dried with a Quorum K850 Critical Point Dryer (Quorum Technology, Lewes, UK) after the ethanol had been replaced with hexamethyldisilamane, coated with a Cressington 108 Auto Sputter Carbon Coater (Cressington Scientific Instruments, Watford, UK), and observed using a ZEISS GeminiSEM 300 instrument (ZEISS, Oberkochen, Germany).
For TEM, fixed spermatozoa were post-fixed for 2 h at 4°C using 1% osmium tetroxide, dyed with 2% uranium acetate, dehydrated using a gradient, embedded in EPON 812 epoxy resin, cut into 100-nm sections using a Leica EM UC7 microtome (Leica, Wetzlar, Germany), stained with lead citrate, and examined using a Talos L120C G2 TEM (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

RNA-FISH Localization of Transcripts in Rice Leaves

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples from rice leaves were placed in 50% FAA fixative solution (Sigma-Aldrich) for at least 24 h at 4°C. Fixed samples were re-hydrated by twice going through an ethanol series of 100%, 85%, and 75% (v/v) for 5 min each and DEPC-treated water for 1 min at room temperature. Samples were then embedded in LR White embedding medium and polymerized at 62°C for 2 h before being sectioned with the Leica EM UC7 microtome. After a protease (Sigma-Aldrich) digestion for 20 min at 37°C, the samples were treated with 0.2% glycine (Sigma-Aldrich) for 2 min, followed by TEA (Sigma-Aldrich), HCl, and acetic anhydride (Sigma-Aldrich) treatments. After two washes in PBS buffer, the samples were de-hydrated and hybridized with probes overnight at 53.3°C. For the symbiont Xosr001 transcript and OsJMT1 detection, RNA-FISH probes (Supplemental Table 2) were designed and provided by Molecular Instruments (Sangon Biotech). Images were adjusted to optimize the visual resolution using Leica Application Suite X (v. 3.4.2.18368).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Preparation of Immature Spikelets for Microscopy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immature spikelets (stage 6; 1000 ~ 1200 μm) were collected from wild‐type and mutant plants and then fixed in a solution (2.5% glutaraldehyde (v/v), 1% paraformaldehyde (w/v), 0.1 M phosphate buffer pH 7.2) for 4 h at room temperature. After washing 15 min each for two times in the phosphate buffer (0.1 M, pH 7.2), the samples were dehydrated with a graded ethanol series (30%, 50%, 75%, 80%, 90%, 95% and 100% (v/v)) for 30 min at each step and infiltrated in LR White resin (Sigma‐Aldrich, USA) according to the following schedule: absolute ethanol: LR White (1:1, v/v) and 100% LR white (2 h at each step) and left overnight after another change of 100% LR white. Once infiltrated, polymerization was done at 60°C for 14 h. 1–1.5 μM semi‐thin sections were prepared using a Leica EM UC7 microtome (Leica, Germany) equipped with a DiATOME diamond knife, stained with 1% crystal violet and observed under a CX23 microscope (Olympus, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Ultrastructural Analysis of Lead-Treated Plant Tissues

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
This part references Małgorzata’s method [69 (link)] with some changes. One- to two-millimetre sections of the control and 10,000 mg/kg Pb (NO3)2-treated leaves, stems, and roots were fixed in 4% glutaraldehyde (v/v) in 0.2 mol/L sodium phosphate buffer (49 mL 0.2 mol/L Na2HPO4•12H2O with 51 mL NaH2PO4•2H2O in a total of 100 mL) at pH 6.8 at 4 °C for 12 h. The tissues were rinsed with 0.1 mol/L phosphate buffer (pH 6.8) six times (10 min each time) at room temperature, postfixed in 1% (v/w) OsO4 at 4 °C for 2 h and then rinsed six times (10 min each time) in 0.1 mol/L phosphate buffer solution (pH 6.8). The samples were dehydrated using graded acetone and ethanol series (30, 50, 70, 80 and 90%) at room temperature, infiltrated, embedded in LR white resin and cut into ultrathin sections (~ 90 nm) using a Leica EM UC7 microtome (Leica, Nussloch, Germany). The sections were collected on copper grids, dusted with coal, and finally observed using a JEOL JEM-1230 transmission electron microscope (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) at an accelerating voltage of 80 keV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

TEM Analysis of Cannabis Seed Ultrastructure

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) was performed according to a previously described protocol (Luo, Xu et al. 2013 ) with some modi cations. Brie y, C. sativa seed sections (1-3 mm) of 45-DAP were xed in 2.5% (v/v) glutaraldehyde and stored at 4°C overnight. The samples were washed three times with phosphate buffer solution for 10-15 min and xed in 1% osmic acid for 14-18 h, and then the samples were washed three times with phosphate buffer solution for 10-15 min. After dehydration through an ethanol series, samples were embedded in Epon812 (SPI Supplies Division of Structure Probe, West Chester, USA) and polymerization was conducted at room temperature for 24 h and then at 60°C for 24 h. Specimens were sectioned to a thickness of 1-2 mm with glass knives on a Leica EM UC7 microtome. Ultrathin sections (70-90 nm) were prepared using a diamond knife on a Leica EM UC7 ultramicrotome and pieces taken with 100-mesh copper mesh, and stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate. Sections were examined and photographed using a JEOL TEM1200EX transmission electron microscope under 80 kV acceleration voltage.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!