The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

75 protocols using durcupan resin

1

Electron Microscopy of Immunolabeled Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sections for the electron microscopic analysis were immune‐labeled as described above except that we omitted the use of Triton X‐100 during the staining protocol. After the immune‐staining sections were osmicated (1% OsO4 in PB for 30 min), dehydrated in graded ethanol (the 70% ethanol contained 1% uranyl acetate). After complete dehydration in ascending ethanol series, sections were immersed in propylene‐oxide, then into a mixture of propylene‐oxide and Durcupan resin then, were flat‐embedded in Durcupan resin (Fluka‐Sigma‐Aldrich, Hungary). After polymerization at 56°C for 48 hours, the sections were viewed under a light microscope, and areas of interest were chosen for re‐embedding and electron microscopic sectioning. To select the appropriate region of the CA1 area for the ultrathin sectioning, semithin (500nm) sections were stained with toluidine blue. Ultrathin (60nm) sections were cut with a Leica Ultracut UCT microtome and collected on Formvar‐coated single slot copper grids, stained with uranyl‐acetate and lead citrate and examined with a JEOL 1200 EX‐II electron microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Electron Microscopy Sample Preparation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were harvested and pelleted then fixed with PBS containing 2.5% glutaraldehyde overnight at 4°C. Following fixation, pellets were mixed in 3% porcine gelatin (Sigma-Aldrich). Hardened small blocks of approximately 1 mm3 were cut. Blocks were post-fixed in 1% osmium-tetroxide in PBS for 1 h at 4°C and dehydrated with increasing concentration of ethanol. Uranyl-acetate (1%) was added in 70% ethanol to increase contrast. After complete dehydration in ascending ethanol series, blocks were transferred to propylene-oxide twice for 4 min. Then blocks were immersed in the mixture of propylene-oxide and Durcupan resin (Sigma-Aldrich) for 30 min. Later blocks were placed into Durcupan-containing tin-foil boats overnight, and embedded into gelatin capsule filled with Durcupan resin (Sigma-Aldrich). Following polymerization and hardening of the resin at 56 °C for 72 h, semi thin sections were cut with Leica Ultracut ultramicrotom, mounted on glass slides, stained with toluidine-blue and examined with Olympus BX50 light microscope. Then serial ultra-thin sections were cut by ultramicrotom, and mounted on mesh grids. Ultra-thin sections were contrasted by uranyl-acetate and lead-citrate, and examined using JEOL 1200EX-II electron microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Ultrastructural Analysis of Cerebellar Lobule

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Coronal sections of cerebellum were cut at 70 μm thickness using a VT1000s vibratome, (Leica Instruments) into 6 serial sections and washed three times in 0.1 M phosphate buffer. Sections were incubated with 1% osmium tetroxide for 1 h before dehydrating in a series of washes from 50% to 100% ethanol. Sections were then incubated with a 1% uranyl acetate solution for 40 min before further dehydration in a series of washes from 50% to 100% ethanol. Sections were impregnated with Durcupan resin (Sigma–Aldrich) before baking overnight at 60 °C. For each condition, the cerebellar lobule VIII was dissected from the tissue and re-embedded in resin blocks. Ultrathin sections (70 nm) were cut using an Ultracut UCT ultramicrotome (Leica Instruments) and mounted onto grids. Prior to electron microscopy, grids were post-stained with lead citrate for 3 min at room temperature before air-drying. Imaging was done using a Tecnai 12 (FEI) transmission electron microscopy (TEM) microscope operated at 120 kV and equipped with a Oneview camera (Gatan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Ultrastructural Analysis of Kidney and Podocytes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For ultrastructural analysis using Transmission electron microscopy (TEM), kidneys and podocyte cell cultures were fixed in 4% PFA and 2% glutaraldehyde (#4157, Carl Roth, Karlsruhe, Germany) in a 0.1 M cacodylate buffer (#11650, Science Services, München, Germany). The samples were postfixed in 1% osmium tetroxide (Science Services, #E19150) in double-distilled water (ddH2O) and then washed six times in ddH2O. The tissue was stained en bloc in 1% uranyl acetate solution (Science Services, #E22400-1) and washed two times in ddH2O. Dehydration was performed via sequential incubation steps in 30%, 50%, 70%, 90%, and 2 × 100% ethanol (#32205, Fisher Scientific, Hampton, NH, USA) and then 2× 100% acetone (#179124, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). All incubation steps were microwave-assisted (BioWave Pro+, PELCO, Fresno, CA, USA). After embedding in Durcupan resin (Sigma-Aldrich, #44611 and #44612), ultrathin sections (55 nm) were performed using a UC7 ultramicrotome (Leica), collected on Formvar-coated (Science Services, #E15830-25) copper grids (#G2500C, Plano GmbH, Wetzler, Germany). Post-staining was conducted for 1 min with 3% lead citrate (#11300, Delta Microscopies, Mauressac, France), and imaging was performed using a Talos L120c TEM (ThermoFisher, Waltham, MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantifying Peroxisome-ER Contacts by EM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
EM was performed as previously described (Costello et al., 2017b (link)). In brief, monolayers of cells were fixed for a total of 1 h in 0.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.2 M Pipes (pH 7.2) and postfixed in 1% osmium tetroxide (reduced with 1.5% wt/vol potassium ferrocyanide) in cacodylate buffer for 1 h. After washing in deionized water, the cells were dehydrated in a graded ethanol series before embedding in Durcupan resin (Sigma-Aldrich). 60-nm ultrathin sections were collected on pioloform-coated 100-mesh copper EM grids (Agar Scientific) and contrasted with lead citrate before imaging with a JEOL JEM 1400 transmission electron microscope operated at 120 kV. Images were taken with a digital camera (ES 1000W CCD; Gatan). Quantification of peroxisome–ER contacts was performed as previously (Costello et al., 2017b (link)). In brief, peroxisomes were sampled (n = 36–55, mean = 44 ± 1 [Fig. 4] or n = 106–116, mean = 112 ± 1.46 [Fig. 7] peroxisomes per experimental grid) by scanning the EM grids systematic uniform random. To estimate the mean fraction of total peroxisome membrane surface in direct contact with the ER, a stereologic approach by line intersection counting was used. Intersections were classified as direct membrane contact (defined as “attachment”) if there was <15-nm distance between peroxisome and ER membranes.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Mesenchymal Stem Cell Ultrastructure Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MSCs, cultured on ACLAR® films (Ted Pella), were treated with 10 volume percent of 50 µg/ml MSNP or WSNT dispersions for 24 h. Media was then removed and cells were washed with PBS and fixed using 1 ml of 1% glutaraldehyde for 1 h after which 1% osmium tetroxide in 0.1 M PBS was added. After fixation, cells were dehydrated in graded ethanol washes and embedded in Durcupan™ resin (Sigma Life Science, MO, USA). The samples were cut into 80 nm sections using a Reichert–Jung UltracutE ultramicrotome (NY, USA) and were then placed on formvar coated slot copper grids. The sections were counterstained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate. We imaged the samples using a JOEL-JEM-1400 transmission electron microscope (MA, USA) with a Gatan CCD Digital Camera system (CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Immunolabeling of Rph3a in Rat Brain

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Three Sprague–Dawley male rats (∼6-week-old) of ∼150 g were used. After terminal anaesthesia was induced by brief inhalation of isoflurane (0.05% in air), followed by an intramuscular injection of ketamine (100 mg kg−1) and xylazine (10 mg kg−1), rats were intracardially perfused with 4% PFA and 0.1% glutaraldehyde in PBS (0.1 M, pH 7.2), and brain sections (100 μm) were cut on a Leica VT1000S vibratome (Leica Microsystems)19 (link)60 (link). The sections were immunolabelled with rabbit anti-Rph3a polyclonal antibody (1:100; ab68857, Abcam), followed by a biotinylated secondary antibody, ABC Elite Kit (Vector Laboratories), and the peroxidase reaction was revealed by ImmPACT VIP substrate Kit (Vector Laboratories). Then the sections were osmicated, dehydrated and flat embedded in Durcupan resin (Sigma-Aldrich). Ultrathin sections (70–90 nm) were countercoloured with uranyl acetate and lead citrate. Control experiments, in which the primary antibody was omitted, resulted in no immunoreactivity. The sections were visualized with a Philips CM100 transmission electron microscope (FEI) at 100 kV. The images were captured with an AMT XR40 4 megapixel side mounted CCD camera at a magnification between × 7,900 and × 92,000.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Retinal tissue preparation for electron microscopy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Adult heads were decapitated, halved, fixed for 30 min in 2.5% glutaraldehyde + 1% OSO4 in 0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer pH 7.2 for 30 min on ice, and incubated in 2% OSO4 in 0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer pH 7.2 for 2h on ice. Retinas were then dehydrated with successive 10 min incubations on ice in 30%, 50%, 70%, 90%, and twice 100% EtOH. The tissue was incubated 3x 10 min on ice in propylene oxide, placed in 50% propylene oxide/50% soft Durcupan resin (Sigma) for 12h at room temperature, and then in 100% resin for 4h at room temperature. Retinas were then transferred to BEEM flat embedding molds (Ted Pella) and baked at 70°C for 12h, cut into 2 μm sections with a microtome, and mounted in DPX (Sigma). Samples were imaged at 100x under phase contrast.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Cellular Ultrastructural Analysis of O-GNR-PEG-DSPE Exposure

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Six well plates with surfaces covered with ACLAR® film (Electron Microscopy Sciences, PA, USA) were plated with cells at a density of 6 × 105 cells per plate, and exposed to 40 µg/ml O-GNR-PEG-DSPE for 5 min or 12 h. At the end of two time points, cells were fixed with 2.5% electron microscopy grade glutaraldehyde (Electron Microscopy Sciences) in 0.1 M PBS. After fixation, the films containing fixed cells were placed in 2% osmium tetroxide in 0.1 M PBS, dehydrated through graded ethanol washes and embedded in durcupan resin (Sigma-aldrich). Areas with high cell densities were blocked, cut into 80 nm ultrathin sections using an Ultracut E microtome (Reichert-Jung, Cambridge, UK), and placed on formvar-coated copper grids. The sections were then viewed with a Tecnai Bio Twin G transmission electron microscope (FEI), at 80 kV. Digital images were acquired using an XR-60 CCD digital camera system (AMT)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Ultrastructural Brain Analysis via Perfusion and Embedding

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Animals were intracardially perfused with 2.5% (vol/vol) glutaraldehyde and 2% (vol/vol) paraformaldehyde in phosphate-buffered saline, and then the brains were postfixed overnight in the same fixative. The brains were rinsed and dehydrated through a graded series of ethanol solutions (50 to 100% ethanol) and embedded in Durcupan resin (Sigma). Ultrathin sections (70 nm) were collected on pioloform-coated EM copper grids (Agar Scientific) and stained with lead citrate. The sections were examined using a transmission electron microscope (TEM, H-600IV; HITACHI, Tokyo, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!