The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

5 protocols using isovolt titan x ray generator

1

Clonogenic Assay for Radiation Therapy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were seeded in 60 mm Petri dishes (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Roskilde, Denmark) at a density of 720 to 7200 cells per dish and incubated for 24 h at 37 °C before the addition of the KIs CC115 (1 μmol/L), AZD7648 (5 μmol/L), or Sapanisertib (0.5 μmol/L). We delivered 2 Gy IR 3 h later by an ISOVOLT Titan X-ray generator (GE, Ahrensburg, Germany). After 24 h of incubation, the medium containing the drug was replaced with fresh medium. Cultures were incubated for 1–3 weeks until colonies were formed. Colonies were stained with methylene blue (#66725, Sigma Aldrich, Munich, Germany) for 30 min at room temperature. Clusters containing 50 or more cells were considered to be a colony. Image analysis software (Biogas Kobi 1.2) was used to count the colonies (Biomas, Erlangen, Germany). The determination of plating efficiency (PE) involved calculating the ratio of the colonies formed to the initially seeded cells. The survival fraction (SF) was then computed by dividing the number of colonies formed by the PE and multiplying the result by the number of cells initially seeded [59 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Cytotoxicity Assessment of Melphalan Analogs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The acute monocytic leukemia cell line THP1 (ATCC® TIB–202™), promyelocytic leukemia cell line HL60 (ATCC® CCL–240™), and the multiple myeloma cell line RPMI8226 (ATCC® CCL–155™) were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Rockville, MD, USA). All the investigated cells were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, penicillin (10 U/mL), and streptomycin (50 μg/mL) in standard conditions: 37 °C, 100% humidity, and an atmosphere of 5% CO2 and 95% air. Cell viability was systematically controlled using 0.4% trypan blue. In all experiments, cells in a logarithmic growth phase were used when their viability was above 95%.
One concentration of the drugs for each cell line was chosen for the study: THP1: 0.3 µM; HL60: 0.7 µM; RPMI8226: 3 µM. These were the same as in previous studies evaluating the biological properties of melphalan analogs [14 (link),15 (link)]. In all experiments, cells were treated for 4 h, 24 h, and 48 h. Simultaneously, control cultures were incubated similarly without further treatment. For the immunostaining assay, a positive control from irradiated cells was prepared. The cells were irradiated with 1 Gy of ionizing radiation by an ISOVOLT Titan X-ray generator (GE, Ahrensburg, Germany) [51 (link),52 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Apoptosis and Necrosis Assessment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Adequate count of cells was seeded into T25-flasks to reach a confluence of around 50 % and settled down over night. On the next day medium was exchanged with cell culture medium containing a reduced amount of 2 % FBS to avoid bias in outcome because of cells triggered strongly for proliferation. Additionally, kinase inhibitor was added in a certain concentration and after 3 h of incubation cells were irradiated with a dose of 2 Gy by an ISOVOLT Titan X-ray generator (GE, Ahrensburg, Germany). After 48 h of incubation cells and supernatant were collected and stained using Annexin-V-APC and 7-AAD (both: BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) for 30 min on ice. Cells were analyzed using a Beckman coulter cytometer (Cytoflex, Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA). Cells neither positive for Annexin-V nor 7-AAD were defined as “alive”, Annexin-V-positive and 7-AAD-negativ cells as “apoptotic” and double-positive cells as “necrotic. For data evaluation, the Kaluza analysis software (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA) was used.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantifying DNA Damage and Repair after Radiation Exposure

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were seeded on cover slides and cultured to 90% confluence maximum. Culture medium was exchanged, and half of the samples were treated with 5 µmol/L of CC-115 DNA-PK and mTor inhibitor. After 24 h of incubation at 37 °C, cells were irradiated with 10 Gy by an ISOVOLT Titan X-ray generator (GE, Ahrensburg, Germany). After another 4 h, slides were fixed and permeabilized with 4% formaldehyde and 0.1% Triton X-100/PBS for 15 min. Slides were then blocked with 1% BSA overnight. Staining with primary antibodies mouse anti-γH2AX (1:1500, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) and rabbit anti-Rad51 (1:250, abcam, Cambridge, UK) was carried out overnight at 8 °C [11 (link)]. Slides were further stained with secondary antibodies AlexaFluor488 goat anti-mouse and AlexaFluor594 chicken anti-rabbit (Invitrogen, Eugene, OR, USA). DAPI was applied for DNA staining (10236276001, Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). Cover slides were mounted onto glass slides using Vectashield (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, US) and images were acquired by a Zeiss Imager Z2 fluorescence microscope (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany). Foci were quantified using Biomas Software (Version V3.07/2012, MSAB, Erlangen, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Ionizing Radiation Exposure Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The cells were irradiated from 1 up to 8 Gy with ionizing radiation (IR) by an ISOVOLT Titan X-ray generator (GE, Ahrensburg, Germany). Unirradiated and irradiated samples were processed along each other. CC-115 (C16H16N8O, MW 336.35 g/mol) was obtained from Selleck Chemicals (Houston, TX, USA), diluted in dimethyl sulfoxide (Roth, Karlsruhe, Germany) and stored at −80 °C. Prior to each experiment the required amount of CC-115 was freshly thawed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!