The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

117 protocols using ofloxacin

1

Antibiotic Susceptibility Screening

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Ofloxacin, kanamycin, rifampin, tetracycline, and gentamicin were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich Chemical Co., and were used at 5, 30, 100, 50, 20 μg/ml, respectively. The Escherichia coli single gene deletion mutant library Keio collection and the parent strain BW25113 were used for the screen (see below). All experiments were conducted at 37°C in Luria-Bertani (LB) medium.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Evaluation of Antibacterial Agents Against Bacterial Strains

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Bacterial strains were cultured in 1:20 diluted trypticase soy broth (1:20 TSB) at 37°C, shaking at 200 rpm. For solid medium, TSB was supplemented with 1.5% agar. The following antibacterials were used: ofloxacin, ciprofloxacin, erythromycin, polymyxin B, rifampicin (Sigma – Aldrich), fosfomycin, meropenem (TCI Europe), triclosan (Merck Chemicals), melittin (Bachem), and SPI009 (Figure 1). Concentrations are indicated throughout the text. Bacterial strains used in this study are listed in Table 1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Antibiotic Stock Solutions and Media Preparation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Stock solutions were prepared for ofloxacin (Sigma–Aldrich), levofloxacin (Sigma–Aldrich), moxifloxacin (Bayer or Molekula) and gatifloxacin (Lupin, India or Sigma–Aldrich) at 10 000 mg/L in 0.1 N sterile NaOH and stored in aliquots at below −18°C for 1 year maximum. Leftover thawed aliquots were not refrozen.
Middlebrook 7H9 broth medium was prepared by adding distilled water, 10% Middlebrook OADC [Becton Dickinson (BD)], 0.5% glycerol (Sigma–Aldrich) and 0.1% casitone (BD) to Middlebrook 7H9 powder (BD) and stored at 2–8°C for 3 months maximum.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

MIC Determination of Antitubercular Drugs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Rifampicin (RMP), isoniazid (INH), ethambutol (EMB), streptomycin (SM), ofloxacin (OFX) and kanamycin (KAN) were purchased from Sigma. Racemic R,S-1′-acetoxychavicol acetate (rac-ACA) was purchased from LKT laboratories (St. Paul, MN, USA; Product Number A0817). The MICs were determined as described previously [16 (link)]. Briefly, all mycobacterial strains were prepared from scoops of solid culture and suspended in PBS plus Tween-80, to reach a concentration equivalent to McFarland Standard No. 1 (approximately 3 × 107 Colony Forming Units (CFU)/mL) and then diluted by Middlebrook 7H9 medium supplemented with 10% OADC to about 105 CFU/mL. One hundred microliters of the bacterial suspensions were added to microtiter plates containing, in each well, two-fold diluted drugs in 100 µL of Middlebrook 7H9 medium with 10% OADC. The volume of drug-free and bacteria-free wells was adjusted to 200 µL and used as the control. The plates were incubated at 37 °C for 5 days. Twenty microliters of Alamar Blue dye (Accumed International, Westlake, OH, USA) and 12.5 µL of 20% sterilized Tween 80 reagent were added. The plates were re-incubated at 37 °C for 24 h, and the colors of all wells were recorded. The MIC was defined as the lowest drug concentration that prevented a color change from blue to pink.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Development of Fluoroquinolone Immunoassays

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All of the chemicals used in this investigation were of analytical grade. Danofloxacin (DAN), ofloxacin (OFL), levofloxacin (LEV), garenoxacin (GAR), pefloxacin (PEF), gatifloxacin (GAT), clinafloxacin (CLI), sarafloxacin (SAR), lomefloxacin (LOM), tosufloxacin (TOZ), sparfloxacin (SPA), difloxacin (DIF), pazufloxacin (PAZ), marbofloxacin (MAR), moxifloxacin (MOX), rufloxacin (RUF), norfloxacin (NOR), ciprofloxacin (CIP), enrofloxacin (ENR), pipemidic acid (PIP), nalidixic acid (NAL), oxolinic acid (OXO), orbifloxacin (ORB), enoxacin (ENO), nadifloxacin (NAD), flumequine (FLU), bovine serum albumin (BSA), ovalbumine (OVA), casein, 1-ethyl-3-(dimethylaminopropyl) carbodiimide hydrochloride (EDC), N-hydroxysuccinimide (NHS), N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF), ethylenediamine hydrochloride, triethylamine, sodium borohydride, glutardialdehyde, 4-aminomethylfluorescein (4-AMF), 3,3′,5,5′-tetramethylbenzidine (TMB), and Tween-20 were Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA) products. Complete and incomplete Freund’s adjuvants were produced by Becton Dickinson (Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). Peroxidase-labeled anti-rabbit immunoglobulins were from the Gamaleya Institute of Microbiology and Epidemiology (Moscow, Russia). All other chemicals (salts and solvents of analytical grade) were from Khimmed (Moscow, Russia).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Antibiotic Resistance Profiling of Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A total of 56 P. aeruginosa strains were selected from the Pseudomonas collection of the Molecular Microbiology Area (Centre for Biomedical Research in La Rioja, CIBIR, Logroño, Spain) (Table S1). These strains were obtained from clinical (n = 28) and non-clinical (n = 28) samples from Spain. P. aeruginosa PAO1, PA7 and PA14 reference strains were also included in the study.
Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) of ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, norfloxacin and ofloxacin (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) were determined by agar dilution method using P. aeruginosa ATCC27853 strain as control strain and interpreted according to CLSI (2020) [13 ]. Furthermore, to assess the role of efflux pumps, MIC of ciprofloxacin was determined in presence and absence of the inhibitor Phe-Arg-β-naphthylamide (PAβN, 40 mg/L, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). Isolates were defined as efflux pump overproducers when MICwithout PAβN/MICPAβN was > 2, as previously described [18 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Calix[4]arene Host-Guest Chemistry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All chemicals and solvents were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Milan, Italy) and used without purification. The hosts tetra-dodecoxy-p-tetra-(N,N-dimethyl-N-hydroxyethylammonium)-methylene-calix[4]arene (CholineC4dod) (Rodik et al., 2015 (link), Granata et al., 2017 (link)) and tetra-propoxy-p-tetra-(N,N-dihydroxyethyl-N-methylammonium)-methylene-calix[4]arene (MedeaC4prop) (Consoli et al., 2018b (link)) were synthesized as previously reported. The guests (chloramphenicol, ofloxacin, and tetracycline hydrochloride) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich and used as received. MOPS salt was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich and was of the highest purity commercially available. High-purity water (Millipore, Milli-Q Element A 10 ultrapure water) and A grade glassware were employed throughout.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Analytical-grade Chemicals for Research

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All chemicals used were of analytical-reagent grade. Melamine, cyanuric acid, ofloxacin, and ampicillin were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Darmstadt, Germany). Deionized water with the conductivity of 0.1 μS cm−1 was used for the preparation of all solutions and experiments.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Prophylactic and Therapeutic Lactoferrin for Tuberculosis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CHO-expressed recombinant human lactoferrin (rHLF; >98% purity; <10% iron saturated; <0.5 EU·mg−1; Cat# LFH-101) was kindly provided as lyophilized powder by PharmaReview Corporation (Houston, TX) (Choi et al. 2008 (link); Kruzel et al. 2021 (link)). The rHLF was reconstituted in dH2O to a concentration of 10 mg·mL−1. From day 14 to day 28 after Mtb infection, mice were given 1 mg·(100 μL)−1·mouse−1 of rHLF by oral gavage every other day as prophylatic treatment, similar to reported use in models of mycobacterial granulomatous responses (Hwang et al. 2017 (link); Welsh et al. 2010 (link), 2011 (link)). One mg/ml was found to be more productive than a 100 μg/ml dose (Fig. S.1). From day 21 to day 28 after Mtb infection, another group of mice were given 1 mg·(100 μL)−1·mouse−1 of recombinant human lactoferrin by oral gavage every other day as therapeutic treatment. Ofloxacin (Sigma Life Science; O8757-1G) was given at 100 μL of 30 mg·mL·1·mouse−1, solubilized in DMSO and diluted 1:10 with phosphate buffered saline (PBS), was intraperitoneal administered 30 min prior to sacrifice (Batard et al. 2011 ; Hwang et al. 2008 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Analytical Standards Preparation for LC-MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Stock solutions of the target compounds (Atenolol CAS 29122-68-7, Azithromycin CAS 83905-01-5, Caffeine CAS 58-05-2, Erythromycin CAS 114-07-8, Diclofenac sodium salt CAS 15307-79-6, Cyclophosphamide CAS 50-18-0, CiprOfloxacin CAS 85721-33-1, Sulfamethoxazole CAS 723-46-6, Carbamazepine CAS 298-46-4, Ketoprofen CAS 22071-15-4, Trimethoprim CAS 738-70-5, Clarithromycin CAS 81103-11-9, Ofloxacin CAS 82419-36-1, Estrone CAS 53-16-7, 17-beta Estradiol CAS 50-28-2, Ibuprofen CAS 15687-27-1; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) were prepared in UHPLC-grade MeOH, purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, Co. (St. Louis, MO, USA). MilliQ water was obtained from MilliPore (MA, USA), LiChropur Formic Acid 98–100% and LiChropur Ammonia solution 25% for LC-MS were purchased from Merck KGaA (Darmstadt, Germany), Hydrochloric Acid (HCl), and Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid trisodium salt dihydrate (Na4EDTA) were obtained from Fluka Analytical (Sigma-Aldrich, MO, USA), while Ammonium acetate for LC-MS was purchased from Fisher Chemical Scientific (Geel, Belgium).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!