The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Puregene blood core kit b

Manufactured by Qiagen
Sourced in United States, Germany

The Puregene Blood Core Kit B is a laboratory equipment product designed for the purification of genomic DNA from whole blood samples. It provides a simple and efficient method for extracting high-quality DNA that can be used for various downstream applications, such as PCR, sequencing, and genetic analysis.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

25 protocols using puregene blood core kit b

1

Genetic Analysis of Werner Syndrome

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Blood sample was collected from the patient and his mother, after taking informed consent. Genomic DNA isolation from peripheral blood samples was done using the Puregene BloodCore Kit B (QIAGEN Sciences, MD, USA), and lymphoblastoid cell lines (LCLs) were established with Epstein-Barr virus [5 (link)]. Sanger sequencing, polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) were performed at the International Registry of Werner Syndrome, Seattle, WA, USA, as described before [2 (link), 3 (link)]. Western blotting analysis was done as previously described [5 (link)], using the mouse monoclonal antibody against aa 1074–1432 of human WRN protein (W0393, clone 195C, 1:2000 dilution; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) and a biotinylated anti-mouse antibody (BA9200, 1:500 dilution; Vector laboratories, Burlingame, CA) [2 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Genomic DNA Extraction from Whole Blood

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA was extracted from whole blood via the Puregene® Blood Core kit B (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Obtaining Biological Samples for Family 374

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Consent was provided for receiving and using biological sample for family 374 under an approved Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery institute IRB protocol. Whole blood was drawn from both parents, the affected female and genomic DNA purified using a Qiagen Puregene blood core kit B (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA). Fibroblast cultures were established from a skin biopsy using a standard protocol.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

NOBOX Gene Polymorphisms Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA was extracted from whole blood samples using Puregene Blood Core Kit B (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer's instructions.
Seven SNPs have been studied in NOBOX gene covered by three different pairs of primers. All primers were designed through SnapGene software using the NOBOX gene sequence obtained from the Ensembl genome browser according to the transcript ID number (ENST00000467773.1). The primers were synthesized at Princess Haya Biotechnology Centre, Irbid, Jordan. Primers sequences, products size, included polymorphisms, and their cycling conditions are listed in Table 3.
The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) products were loaded in 2% agarose gel in 1X TBE buffer at 120V for 45 min to determine the product size. 50 bp DNA ladder was used to determine the band sizes, and the gel was stained with ethidium bromide then displayed by GelDoc-It 310 imaging system (UVP, USA). PCR products were purified using ExoSAP-IT PCR Product Cleanup kit (Affymetrix) and then loaded in the ABI 310 Genetic Analyzer (ABI Prism310, Applied Biosystems) at Princess Haya Biotechnology Centre. ChromasPro software (Technelysium Pty Ltd) was used to analyze the sequencing data.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Malaria Diagnosis via Microscopy and PCR

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Malaria infections were diagnosed by microscopy of Giemsa-stained thick blood smears, and by Real-Time PCR amplification of a species-specific segment of the multicopy 18SSU rRNA gene of human malaria parasites. The Giemsa-stained smears were evaluated by experienced microscopists, according to the malaria diagnosis guidelines of the Brazilian Ministry of Health. For Real-Time PCR, genomic DNA was extracted from either whole blood samples collected in EDTA, or from dried blood spots on filter paper using the Puregene blood core kit B (Qiagen, Minneapolis, MN, USA) or the QIAmp DNA mini kit (Qiagen), respectively, according to manufacturers’ instructions. Real-Time PCR was performed as previously described [25 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

DNA Extraction and NGS Sequencing for RASopathies

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA was extracted from peripheral blood samples using PureGene Blood Core Kit B (Qiagen). For the derivation cohort, 28 DNA samples were tested using next generation sequencing (NGS) of the NF1 (NM_000267.3) and SPRED1 (NM_152594.3) genes. For the validation cohort, all 505 samples were tested using next generation sequencing (NGS) of 14 RASopathy‐associated genes (Table S1) as previously described (Pugh et al., 2014). Briefly, NGS was performed by oligonucleotide hybridization‐based DNA capture (SureSelect; Agilent) followed by sequencing using the MiSeq‐M01450 instrument (150‐base paired end mode; Illumina). Sequence reads were aligned to the reference sequence (GRCh37) using bwa‐mem v0.7.10, followed by variant calling using GATK, version 1.0.4705 (McKenna et al., 2010). For the validation cohort, Sanger sequencing was used to confirm all clinically significant variants and fill in regions with insufficient coverage. Methods used for polymerase chain reaction and Sanger sequencing have been previously described (Zimmerman et al., 2010). Copy number variants (CNVs) were identified via an NGS‐based detection tool (VisCap) (Pugh et al., 2016), but were only available for 23 patients in the derivation cohort and 281 patients in the validation cohort due to NGS data quality. Confirmation of CNVs was done using ddPCR as previously described (Ceyhan‐Birsoy et al., 2015).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Malaria Diagnosis by Microscopy and PCR

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
At the time of blood collection, all individuals were submitted to a finger-prick for malaria diagnosis by light microscopy. The Giemsa-stained thick blood smears were prepared and examined by experienced local microscopists, according to the malaria diagnosis guidelines of the Brazilian Ministry of Health (2009) [41 ]. Species-specific PCR assays targeting different plasmodial targets (18S rRNA gene and non-ribosomal Pvr47/Pfr364 sequences) were carried-out essentially as previously described [42 (link)]. For this, genomic DNA was extracted from either whole blood samples collected in EDTA, or from dried blood spots on filter paper using the Puregene blood core kit B (Qiagen, Minneapolis, MN, USA) or the QIAmp DNA mini kit (Qiagen), respectively, according to manufacturers’ instructions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Methylation Analysis of SLIT2 Promoter

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The isolation and modification of genomic DNA was performed using Puregene Blood Core Kit B and EpiTect Bisulfite Kit (QIAGEN, Duesseldorf, Germany) as described previously [15 (link), 16 (link)]. Real-time quantitative methylation-specific PCR (RT-qMSP) was first used to evaluate SLIT2 promoter methylation with AceQ qPCR SYBR Green Master Mix (Vazyme Biotech Co., Piscataway, NJ). The primers for SLIT2 promoter methylation detection were as reported [12 (link)]. Relative SLIT2 promoter methylation was counted using the 2− ∆∆CT formula as referred to ALU methylation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Genetic Analysis of FBN1 Mutations

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genetic analysis was performed at the Department of Molecular Genetics of the Istituto Auxologico Italiano (Milan, Italy). Mutation screening, with the consent of the patient or a guardian, was performed on genomic DNA extracted from peripheral blood cells using a commercial kit (Puregene Blood Core Kit B; Qiagen, Minneapolis, MN), following manufacturer instructions. The entire coding region of the FBN1 gene was screened by direct sequencing. Polymerase chain reaction fragments were sequenced using the BigDyeTeminator Kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) and analyzed on the ABI Prism 3500 automated sequencer (Applied Biosystems). According to the international database UMD‐FBN129 and Alamut software (Interactive Biosoftware, Rouen, France), mutations were classified as: previously described mutation; not previously described mutation; surely disease‐causing mutation; probably disease‐causing mutation; or DNA variation of uncertain significance. Mutations were also categorized according to the exon of place in the FBN1 gene (1–64) and depending on the type of mutation (missense, nonsense, frameshift, and splicing). Moreover, effects of mutations were predicted by Alamut software, to classify pathogenetic FBN1 mutations as “haploinsufficient” or “dominant negative.” This approach was validated in a previous study.30 Mutations were also listed as familiar or “de novo.”
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Genomic DNA Extraction from Whole Blood

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA was extracted from 2 mL whole blood obtained from patients before induction of anesthesia using a Puregene Blood Core Kit B (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). The quality and quantity of DNA were checked using a NanoDrop spectrophotometer (NanoDrop Technologies, Wilmington, DE, USA). Samples with an absorbance ratio lower than 1.6 at 260 and 280 nm were excluded from further analysis. The samples were stored at 4 °C until use.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!