The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Axiovert 135 tv microscope

Manufactured by Zeiss
Sourced in Germany

The Axiovert 135 TV microscope is a high-performance inverted microscope designed for applications in the life sciences. It features a robust and ergonomic design, providing a stable platform for observation and image capture. The Axiovert 135 TV is equipped with a range of optical components, including plan-achromatic objectives, to deliver high-quality images. It is compatible with various types of contrast enhancement techniques, such as phase contrast and differential interference contrast (DIC), allowing for the visualization of a wide range of specimens.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

13 protocols using axiovert 135 tv microscope

1

Wound Healing Assay with Perlecan

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A 12-well culture plate was coated with BSA (control) or perlecan DV (500 nmol/liter) and incubated at 4°C overnight. After washing the plate with sterilized H2O, a silicone Culture-Insert 2 well (Ibidi) was attached; this allows the growth of cells in two separated wells with a 500-µm-wide gap without mechanical damage due to scratching of cells and surface. A final concentration of 2 × 105 cells/ml was applied to each well (70 µl/well) and incubated at 37°C in 5% CO2 for 24 h to allow cell attachment. The Culture-Insert 2 well was then gently removed, and cells were rinsed using serum-free medium. We used an Axiovert 135TV microscope with a 10× objective (Zeiss) to capture time-lapse images at 37°C in 5% CO2 in a humidified condition. The cell-covered area was analyzed using ImageJ.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Cell Tracking on Glass Coated Plates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A glass-bottom plate (MatTek Corp.) was coated with PBS or perlecan DV (500 nmol/liter) at 4°C overnight and blocked with 1% heat-denatured BSA for 15 min. After the plate was washed three times with PBS, a total of 4 × 104 cells/well were added. After serum starvation, nuclear staining was performed with a SiR-DNA-kit (1:1,000, Cytoskeleton), and we acquired time-lapse images for 24 h in a humidified 5% CO2 atmosphere using a Zeiss Axiovert 135TV microscope. Cell tracking analysis was performed using the Fiji TrackMate plugin (Tinevez et al., 2017 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Radiation-Induced DNA Damage Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA solutions with different DMSO concentrations were irradiated with 60Co γ-ray at a dose rate of 28 Gy/min. The quantity of γ-rays was controlled by the duration of irradiation19 (link), 44 (link). For the evaluation of freezing-induced DSB, DNA samples in a DMSO-water solution were frozen to −25 °C (freezing speed: ca. −0.4 K/min) and −80 °C (freezing speed: ca. −0.9 K/min) for 4 hours with electric freezers. They were then thawed at 4.2 °C (NIHON FREEZER, Tokyo, Japan) for about 12 hours.
Just before the measurements by fluorescence microscopy, DNA molecules were stained with YOYO-1 (final concentration: 0.05 μM). Glasses were pre-treated with poly-(L-lysine) (concentration: 0.05 (v/v)%) solution, and washed repeatedly with distilled water. A droplet (10 μL) of a sample was absorbed on a modified glass slide and covered with a glass cover slide under weak shear. Fluorescence images were observed with an Axiovert 135TV microscope (Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany) and analysed using ImageJ software (National Institute of Mental Health, MD, USA)16 , 44 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Microscopic Examination of Capsules

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Bright field images of capsules were captured with a Zeiss Axiovert 135 TV microscope. Images were taken using either a ×2.5 or a ×10 objective. In some cases, the microscopy was performed with slight under-focus, which helped to clearly define the outlines of the layers and/or the overall capsule.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Immunofluorescence Analysis of Viral Antigens

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunofluorescence analysis was performed exactly as described previously (28 (link)). Samples were collected at times indicated, washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and fixed either with paraformaldehyde (4%) followed by permeabilization with 0.5% Triton X-100 or by methanol (5 min at −20°C). Samples were blocked with PBS containing 10% NCS or a mix of 5% goat serum, 5% NCS, and 2% bovine serum albumin (BSA), for 1 h at room temperature. Primary antibodies for the antigens were anti-ICP4 antibody (Virusys) used at 1:400 and anti-ICP8 antibody used at 1:400. DNA was stained with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI; Sigma), and coverslips were mounted in Mowiol supplemented with 2.5% 1,4-diazabicyclo(2,2,2)octane (DABCO). Images were taken using an Axiovert 135 TV microscope using Zeiss 10×, 40× LD, or 63× lenses (Plan-Apochromat, 1.4 numerical aperture) and captured using a Retiga 2000R camera with Image Pro Plus software or with a Zeiss laser scanning confocal microscope (Zeiss Pascal).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantifying Cerebellar Mossy Fiber Terminals

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For quantification, label was analyzed with a Zeiss Axiovert 135TV microscope with HBO 100W lamp. Mossy fiber terminals were identified as a large swelling surrounded by four to twelve knob-like outgrowths in the granule cell layer connected to an axon. Labeled somata were counted within the boundaries of the cerebellar nuclei. Terminals and somata were counted in every third section (approximately 120 μm increments) encompassing the anterior-posterior length of the cerebellum. Quantification and location of labeled terminals were mapped onto atlas landmarks (Paxinos and Franklin, 2008 ). Size measurements were made on micrographs collected with 63X (1.4 NA) and 100X (1.4 NA) objectives. N’s in the text indicate numbers of mice unless noted otherwise.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Microscope Imaging Protocol for Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All the samples processed for optical microscopy were visualized and photographed with an Axiovert 135 TV microscope (ZEISS, Germany) equipped with an Olympus DP50 digital camera and a fluorescence lamp. The images were obtained with the program ViewFinderTM 7.1 (Better Light, USA) and processed with the program Adobe PhotoShop CS4 EXTENDED V11.0 (Adobe systems, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Cell Counting Protocol for mHSCs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell counting was performed as described previously [30 (link)]. mHSCs were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; Sigma-Aldrich, Taufkirchen, Germany) and incubated with Hoechst 33342 (Fluka, Buchs, Switzerland) for 5 min. Microscopy was performed with a Zeiss Axiovert 135 TV microscope with a Zeiss AxioCam MRm camera (objective lens Fluar 10×/0.50), using Zeiss AxioVision SE64 Rel. 4.9 imaging software. Nuclei count was performed with ImageJ software (Version 1.53c, Wayne Rasband, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Spermatozoid Observation and Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Gametophytes were allowed to develop for 10.5–16 h and viewed by placing several drops of culture media containing emerging and fully developed spermatozoids in a shallow dish with a coverslip for a bottom. Spermatozoids were analyzed using differential interference contrast (DIC) microscopy with a Zeiss Axiovert 135 TV microscope. Movies were taken with a PIKE F032B monochrome camera (Allied Vision Technology) using StreamPix software at 30 frames per second. Movie files were converted to .mov format. Still frames from movies were captured and converted into tiff format for analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Alkaline Comet Assay for DNA Damage

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The level of DNA damage was assessed by the alkaline Comet assay (Singh et al., 1988 (link)). Liver and kidney samples from all experimental groups were minced in ice-cold HBSS buffer (0.14 g/l CaCl2, 0.4 g/l KCl, 0.06 g/l KH2PO4, 0.1 g/l MgCl2 × 6H2O, 0.1 g/l MgSO4 × 7H2O, 8.0 g/l NaCl, 0.35 g/l NaHCO3, 0.09 g/l Na2HPO4 × 7H2O, 1.0 g/l D-glucose) containing 20 mM EDTA and 10% DMSO. Ten microliters of a liver or kidney cell suspension was mixed with low-melting agarose (0.75%) and applied to a microscope slide. Cells were lysed for 2 h at 4°C in lysis buffer (2.5 M NaCl, 100 mM EDTA, 10 mM Tris, pH 10, 1% Triton X-100). After lysis, the slides were incubated for 30 min at 4°C in electrophoresis solution (300 mM NaOH, 1 mM EDTA, pH 13.0) and subjected to electrophoresis in order to separate the damaged DNA fragments. The slides were placed in neutralization buffer (0.4 M Tris-HCl, pH 7.4) and stained with SYBR Green I (1:10,000 dilution; Sigma–Aldrich). Fluorescence microscopy was performed with a Zeiss Axiovert 135TV microscope equipped for epifluorescence. DNA damage was quantified by measuring the displacement between the genetic material contained inside the nuclear sphere or comet ‘head’ and the resulting comet ‘tail.’ Images were analyzed with TriTekCometScore Freeware v1.5.1
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!