The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

14 protocols using model 705 sonic dismembrator

1

Purification of Recombinant DmmarA Protein

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The suspension with the harvested cells was defrosted and 90 µl of DNAse was added (∼2 µg ml−1). The cell suspension was sonicated using a Fisherbrand Model 705 Sonic Dismembrator in three 2 min cycles. The disrupted cells were centrifuged (4°C and 14 000 rev min−1 for 1 h). The protein was then filtered and loaded onto a BioLogic DuoFlow FPLC system (Bio-Rad, USA) equilibrated in buffer A (10 mM Tris, 50 mM sodium formate, 10 mM imidazole pH 8.5) and buffer B (10 mM Tris, 50 mM sodium formate, 500 mM imidazole pH 8.5). The protein was purified by metal-affinity chromatography using a nickel-charged column at a flow rate of 1 ml min−1. The protein was eluted with an increasing gradient of imidazole (0%, 10%, 60% and 100% buffer B; DmmarA was eluted in the 10% and 60% gradients). The purified protein from the 60% imidazole gradient was concentrated to ∼5 ml using Amicon Ultra-15 Centrifugal Filter Units (10 kDa cutoff).
5 ml of protein was loaded onto an ÄKTApure FPLC system (Cytiva, Sweden) equilibrated in gel-filtration buffer (10 mM Tris, 50 mM sodium formate pH 8.5). The protein was purified by size-exclusion chromatography using a Superdex 16/60 200 pg column (GE Healthcare, UK). SDS–PAGE was used to check the purity of fractions from affinity chromatography and size-exclusion chromatography (run at 200 V and 400 mA for 40 min).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Purification of Recombinant DmmarA Protein

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The suspension with the harvested cells was defrosted and 90 µl of DNAse was added (∼2 µg ml−1). The cell suspension was sonicated using a Fisherbrand Model 705 Sonic Dismembrator in three 2 min cycles. The disrupted cells were centrifuged (4°C and 14 000 rev min−1 for 1 h). The protein was then filtered and loaded onto a BioLogic DuoFlow FPLC system (Bio-Rad, USA) equilibrated in buffer A (10 mM Tris, 50 mM sodium formate, 10 mM imidazole pH 8.5) and buffer B (10 mM Tris, 50 mM sodium formate, 500 mM imidazole pH 8.5). The protein was purified by metal-affinity chromatography using a nickel-charged column at a flow rate of 1 ml min−1. The protein was eluted with an increasing gradient of imidazole (0%, 10%, 60% and 100% buffer B; DmmarA was eluted in the 10% and 60% gradients). The purified protein from the 60% imidazole gradient was concentrated to ∼5 ml using Amicon Ultra-15 Centrifugal Filter Units (10 kDa cutoff).
5 ml of protein was loaded onto an ÄKTApure FPLC system (Cytiva, Sweden) equilibrated in gel-filtration buffer (10 mM Tris, 50 mM sodium formate pH 8.5). The protein was purified by size-exclusion chromatography using a Superdex 16/60 200 pg column (GE Healthcare, UK). SDS–PAGE was used to check the purity of fractions from affinity chromatography and size-exclusion chromatography (run at 200 V and 400 mA for 40 min).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Chromatin Extraction and Fractionation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell pellets were resuspended into ice cold Extraction Buffer (25 mM HEPES pH 7.9, 300 mM sucrose, 50 mM NaCl, 1 mM EGTA, 3 mM MgCl2, 0.5% IGEPAL CA-630) supplemented with cOmplete protease inhibitor cocktail, phosSTOP phosphatase inhibitor cocktail (both from Roche), and 25 mM N-ethylmaleimide (NEM) and tumbled end-over-end for 20 min at 4°C. Samples were then centrifuged at 20 000g for 20 min at 4°C, after which the supernatant was recovered as the soluble fraction. The pellet, representing the chromatin-enriched fraction, was then resuspended into the buffer of choice and sonicated with a Model 705 Sonic Dismembrator fitted with a microtip probe (Fisher Scientific).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quisinostat-loaded PLA-PEG Nanoparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Nanoparticles were produced by a modified single emulsion-solvent evaporation approach, as previously reported [21 (link),23 (link),24 (link)]. 50 mg PLA-PEG dissolved in 2 ml DCM was added dropwise into 4 ml of 1% (w/v) sodium cholate while vortexing, then probe sonicated (Fisher Scientific Model 705 Sonic Dismembrator, Waltham, MA USA) on ice in 3, 10-s bursts at 40% amplitude. The resulting emulsion was added to an evaporation phase consisting of 20 ml of 0.3% (w/v) sodium cholate and allowed to stir for 3 h to evaporate the DCM. Drug loaded nanoparticles were produced by adding 5 mg quisinostat, dissolved in 300 μl DMSO, dropwise into the organic phase or the evaporation phase, as specified for each formulation in Table 1. For nanoparticles made under basic or acidic conditions, the pH of the 0.3% sodium cholate evaporation phase was adjusted to the specified pH by adding dilute (0.1 M) NaOH or HCl. After the 3 h, nanoparticles were washed and concentrated through Amicon Ultra-15 Centrifugal Filters (100 kDa cut-off) for 4, 20 min spins at 5000 RCF. Aliquots were frozen and lyophilized to determine nanoparticle concentration and drug loading. The rest of the nanoparticles were frozen and stored at −80 °C.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quisinostat-loaded PLA-PEG Nanoparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Nanoparticles were produced by a modified single emulsion-solvent evaporation approach, as previously reported [21 (link),23 (link),24 (link)]. 50 mg PLA-PEG dissolved in 2 ml DCM was added dropwise into 4 ml of 1% (w/v) sodium cholate while vortexing, then probe sonicated (Fisher Scientific Model 705 Sonic Dismembrator, Waltham, MA USA) on ice in 3, 10-s bursts at 40% amplitude. The resulting emulsion was added to an evaporation phase consisting of 20 ml of 0.3% (w/v) sodium cholate and allowed to stir for 3 h to evaporate the DCM. Drug loaded nanoparticles were produced by adding 5 mg quisinostat, dissolved in 300 μl DMSO, dropwise into the organic phase or the evaporation phase, as specified for each formulation in Table 1. For nanoparticles made under basic or acidic conditions, the pH of the 0.3% sodium cholate evaporation phase was adjusted to the specified pH by adding dilute (0.1 M) NaOH or HCl. After the 3 h, nanoparticles were washed and concentrated through Amicon Ultra-15 Centrifugal Filters (100 kDa cut-off) for 4, 20 min spins at 5000 RCF. Aliquots were frozen and lyophilized to determine nanoparticle concentration and drug loading. The rest of the nanoparticles were frozen and stored at −80 °C.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Optimizing Exfoliation of Expanded Graphite

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For the probe sonication exfoliation of EG, a Fisher Scientific Model 705 sonic dismembrator was used with a 127 mm replaceable tip probe. The probe was lowered into the EG suspension in the same manner as the shear mixing procedure, roughly 10 mm from the bottom, and was sonicated at 50% amplitude for various times using a 3 s on and 3 s off pulse for total sonication times of 10, 15, 20, 25, and 30 min to determine the optimum sonication time (sEG-XX where XX denotes the period of time sonicated). The pulse was used to avoid excessive heating or evaporation of solvent along with submerging the vessel in an ice–water bath. The solution was also monitored by a temperature probe to keep the solution below 65 °C. The ShEG and sEG samples were freeze dried (Buchi Lyovapor L-200, Buchi Corporation, New Castle, DE, USA). The purpose of the freeze drying was to attempt to retain the separation of the graphene sheets [34 (link),35 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Endotoxin-free PLGA Nanoparticle Synthesis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PLGA nanoparticles were prepared under endotoxin free conditions using a single-emulsion technique that was previously outlined by McCall and Sirianni (2013 (link)) but adapted to utilize PVA as the stabilizing agent. Briefly, to make blank PLGA nanoparticles (blank-PLGA), 200 mg of PLGA was dissolved in 2 mL of DCM:methanol (4:1) and added drop-wise to a 5% PVA aqueous phase on vortex, which created an emulsion. The emulsion was then ultrasonicated on ice 3 times in 10 s intervals (40% amplitude, Fisher Scientific Model 705 Sonic Dismembrator) and added to 84 mL of 0.3% PVA. Solvent was evaporated, which allowed nanoparticles to harden, over 3 h while stirring. Particles were then washed 3 times with endotoxin free water by centrifugation at 25,000 rcf for 20 min at 4°C (Beckman L8-80M Ultracentrifuge, F0630 rotor). Prior to lyophilization and storage (at −80°C), 75 mg of trehalose was added to the particles. To prepare E2-containing PLGA nanoparticles (E2-PLGA), 12 mg of E2 and 200 mg of PLGA were dissolved in 2 mL of DCM:methanol (4:1) and processed using the same approach as above.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Protein Extraction and Denaturation Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Frozen pellets (obtained from the above cell harvesting protocol) were resuspended into ice-cold High SDS Lysis Buffer (25 mM HEPES pH 7.4, 500 mM NaCl, 2% sodium dodecyl sulfate, 1% Triton X-100, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 1 mM EDTA) supplemented with 2× cOmplete protease inhibitor cocktail, EDTA-free (cOmplete, Roche) and 1× phosSTOP phosphatase inhibitor cocktail (phosSTOP, Roche). The mixture was then sonicated with a Fisher Scientific Model 705 Sonic Dismembrator with microtip probe (at amplitude 1–5, for 1 min). 4× SDS Sample Buffer (250 mM Tris pH 6.8, 8% sodium dodecyl sulfate, 40% glycerol, 0.2% bromophenol blue) was then added to attain a final concentration of 1×, while 2-mercaptoethanol (BME) was added to a final concentration of 5%. The samples were treated at 95 °C for 5 min at 900 rpm on a ThermoMixer F1.5 (Eppendorf) prior to resolution by SDS-PAGE.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Isolation and quantification of A. marginale

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To isolate A. marginale free of host cells, flasks of heavily infected DAE100 cells were pelleted via centrifugation at 1800× g for 15 min. The cell pellet was resuspended in sucrose-phosphate-glutamate buffer (SPG) made of 230mM sucrose (Avantor, Allentown, PA, USA), 4.41 mM KH2PO4 (Avantor, Allentown, PA, USA), 6.98 Mm K2HPO4 (Millipore-Sigma, Burlington, VT, USA), and 4.92 mM C5H8KNO4·H2O (Millipore-Sigma, Burlington, VT, USA) dissolved in water (ThermoFisher Scientific, Fitchburg, WI, USA), vortexed, then sonicated in a cup horn sonicator (Fisherbrand Model 705 Sonic Dismembrator) at 30% amplitude until ≈90% of cells had lysed, as visualized on a wet mount slide. Cellular debris was pelleted by centrifugation at 200 rcf for 5 min. The A. marginale was aliquoted into cryovials and preserved at −80 °C.
Anaplasma marginale DNA was extracted from cryopreserved SPG stocks using a DNeasy Blood and Tissue kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA). The quantity of A. marginale per microliter of SPG stock was calculated using quantitative PCR and a standard curve with msp5-specific primers and PerfeCTa SYBR Green FastMix (Quantabio, Beverly, MA, USA) [39 (link)]. As msp5 is a single copy gene, the number of msp5 copies reflects the number of bacteria (Table 2).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Protein Extraction from Frozen Tissues

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Frozen brain or cell pellet samples were manually homogenized in 1 × PBS/protease inhibitor/phosphatase inhibitor (Sigma, Thermo Fisher Scientific). Tissue suspensions were lysed by sonication (Sonic Dismembrator model 300, setting 40 for 15 s at 4 °C or Fisher Scientific Model 705 Sonic Dismembrator, sonication of amplitude 5% for 15 s at 4 °C). Samples were ultracentrifuged at 100,000g for 1 h at 4 °C. The resultant supernatant contained soluble proteins. To separate membrane proteins from insoluble proteins, the pellet from the homogenized brain tissue was resuspended in 1 ml OG-RIPA buffer (0.5% Nonidet P-40 substitute (NP-40, Pan Reac), 0.5% sodium deoxycholate (Sigma), 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS, Sigma), and 10 mM calcium chloride dihydrate (Sigma) with 2% n-octyl-ß-d-glucoside (abcam) and centrifuged at 175,000g for 30 min at 4 °C. The supernatant containing membrane-associated proteins was collected. The remaining pellet containing insoluble proteins was resuspended in 200 µl 8 M urea (Sigma)/5% SDS (Sigma)/PBS (Sigma), sonicated for 30 s (5 s on, 5 s off setting, amplitude 20%, room temperature (RT), Fisher Scientific Model 705 Sonic Dismembrator), and boiled for 10 min at 100 °C. Protein concentrations were measured with the Pierce BCA protein assay kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!