The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

18 protocols using clarus 500 sq 8 s

1

Cellular Fatty Acid Profiling of Intestinimonas

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cellular fatty acid methyl ester (FAME) analyses of Intestinimonas massiliensis strain GD2T (=CSUR P1930) and Intestinimonas butyriciproducens (=CSUR P1453 = DSM 103501) were performed using GC/MS. Two bacterial biomass sample tubes of about 4 mg each obtained from cultures plates were prepared after 72 hr of culture of the bacteria on 5% sheep blood‐enriched Columbia agar (bioMérieux) in anaerobic conditions. Then, fatty acid methyl esters were prepared according to the description of Sasser (2006). GC/MS analyses were carried out as previously stated (Dione et al., 2016). Mass spectrometry (Clarus 500 ‐ SQ 8 S, Perkin Elmer, Courtaboeuf, France) allowed us to separate fatty acid methyl esters by utilization of an Elite 5‐MS column. Utilization of the Standard Reference Database 1A (NIST, Gaithersburg, USA) and the FAMEs mass spectral database (Wiley, Chichester, UK), permitted us to search a spectral database with MS Search 2.0.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantification of 12-MMA in Bl. producta

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The content of 12-MMA in the conditioned culture medium of Bl. producta and in the cecal materials and serum of Bl. producta-treated animals was quantified by GC/MS. Preparation of fatty acid methyl esters and GC/MS analysis were performed as previously reported.49 (link) The pure 12-MMA was used as a standard reference. Fatty acid methyl esters were separated using an Elite 5-MS column and monitored by mass spectrometry (Clarus 500-SQ8S, Perkin Elmer, Courtaboeuf, France). The cecal and serum content of acetate was quantified by GC/MS analysis as previously reported.50 (link) N-methylbenzylamine-d0/d3 was applied as the chemical derivatization reagent to enhance the sensitivity and accuracy.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Optimizing Growth Conditions for Novel Microbe

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Optimal culture conditions were determined by testing various incubation temperatures (25, 28, 37, 42, and 50 °C), atmospheres (aerobic, anaerobic and microaerophilic), NaCl concentrations (5, 5.5, 7.5, 10, 15, and 20% of NaCl) and pH levels (5, 5.5, 6, 6.5, 7, 7.5, 8, 8.5). The morphology and motility were observed using a new-generation scanning electron microscope (Hitachi High-71 Technologies Corporation, Tokyo, Japan).
Furthermore, three semi-quantitative standardized micro-methods of Analytical Profile Index (API®, bioMérieux®) tests: API® 20A, API® 50 CH, and API® ZYM were used, according to the manufacturer’s instructions16 , in order to study carbohydrate metabolism and enzymatic activities.
Fatty acid methyl ester (FAME) analysis was explored by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry, as previously reported17 (link), 18 . FAMEs were separated using an Elite 5-MS column and monitored by mass spectrometry (Clarus 500—SQ 8 S, Perkin Elmer®, Courtaboeuf, France). Obtained spectra were compared with those contained in the repertory databases using MS Search 2.0 operated with the Standard Reference Database 1A (National Institute of Standards and Technology-NIST, Gaithersburg, USA), and FAMEs mass spectral database (Wiley, Chichester, UK).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Bacterial Fatty Acid Profiling by GC/MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cellular fatty acid methyl ester (FAME) analysis was performed by GC/MS. Two samples were prepared with approximately 2 mg of bacterial biomass each, harvested from five culture plates. Fatty acid methyl esters were prepared as described by Sasser (2006). GC/MS analyses were carried out as described previously (Dione et al., 2016). In brief, fatty acid methyl esters were separated using an Elite 5‐MS column and monitored by mass spectrometry (MS) (Clarus 500‐SQ 8 S, PerkinElmer, Courtaboeuf, France). A spectral database search was performed using MS Search 2.0 operated with the Standard Reference Database 1A (NIST, Gaithersburg, MD, USA) and the FAMEs mass spectral database (Wiley, Chichester, UK).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Cellular Fatty Acid Profiling by GC/MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
GC/MS was used for cellular fatty acid methyl ester (FAME) analysis after preparing two cell samples containing around 15 mg of bacterial biomass per tube and analysis was performed as previously described (Dione et al., 2016). Moreover, Elite 5‐MS column was used for FAME separation and checked by mass spectrometry (Clarus 500‐SQ 8 S, Perkin Elmer, Courtaboeuf, France). Then, the FAME mass spectral database (Wiley, Chichester, UK) and MS Search 2.0 operated with the Standard Reference Database 1A (NIST, Gaithersburg, USA) were used for FAME identification.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Comprehensive Biochemical and Fatty Acid Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Biochemical tests were performed using API ZYM, API 20A, and API 50CH strips (bioMérieux) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The strips were incubated for 4, 24, and 48 hr respectively.
Cellular fatty acid methyl ester (FAME) analysis was performed using Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS). Strain Marseille‐P2341T was grown on Columbia agar enriched with 5% sheep's blood (bioMérieux). Two samples were then prepared with approximately 50 mg of bacterial biomass per tube harvested from several culture plates. Fatty acid methyl esters were prepared as described by Sasser (Sasser, 2006). GC/MS analyses were carried out as previously described (Dione et al., 2016). In brief, fatty acid methyl esters were separated using an Elite 5‐MS column and monitored by mass spectrometry (Clarus 500—SQ 8 S, Perkin Elmer, Courtaboeuf, France). A spectral database search was performed using MS Search 2.0 operated with the Standard Reference Database 1A (NIST, Gaithersburg, USA) and the FAMEs mass spectral database (Wiley, Chichester, UK).
Antibiotic susceptibility was tested using the disc diffusion method (Le Page et al., 2015). The results were read using Scan 1200 (Interscience, Saint‐Nom‐la‐Bretèche, France).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Bacterial Fatty Acid Profiling by GC/MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
FAME analysis was performed by GC/MS. Two samples were prepared with 2 mg of bacterial biomass from several culture plates. Two samples were prepared with approximately 2 mg of bacterial biomass per tube collected from several culture plates. FAMEs were prepared as described by Sasser (http://www.midi-inc.com/pdf/MIS_Technote_101.pdf). GC/MS analyses were carried out as described by Dione et al.[11] (link). Briefly, FAMEs were separated using an Elite 5-MS column and monitored by mass spectrometry (Clarus 500-SQ8S; PerkinElmer, Courtaboeuf, France). A spectral database search was performed using MS Search 2.0 operated using the Standard Reference Database 1A (National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, USA) and the FAME mass spectral database (Wiley, Chichester, UK).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Biochemical Characterization of Bacterial Strains

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Biochemical characteristics of the strains were investigated using API ZYM, 20A and 50CH strips (BioMérieux) according to the manufacturer's instructions. A 20‐min‐thermic shock of fresh colonies at 80°C was done in order to test sporulation. Catalase (BioMerieux) activity was determined in 3% hydrogen peroxide solution and oxidase activity was assessed using an oxidase reagent (Becton‐Dickinson).
Cellular fatty acid methyl ester (FAME) analysis was performed by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS). Two samples were prepared with approximately 17 mg of bacterial biomass per tube for strain Marseille‐P2849T and 5 mg per tube for strain Marseille‐P3277T. Briefly, fatty acid methyl esters were separated using an Elite 5‐MS column and monitored by mass spectrometry (Clarus 500—SQ 8 S, Perkin Elmer, Courtaboeuf, France) as previously described (Dione et al., 2016). Spectral database search was performed using MS Search 2.0 operated with the Standard Reference Database 1A (NIST, Gaithersburg, USA) and the FAMEs mass spectral database (Wiley, Chichester, UK).
Antibiotic susceptibility was tested using the E test gradient strip method (BioMerieux) to determine the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of each tested antibiotic on blood Colombia agar media (BioMerieux, France).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Cellular Fatty Acid Methyl Ester Analysis by GC/MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cellular fatty acid methyl ester (FAME) analysis was performed by GC/MS for both Marseille-P9602 and LMG 13028T strain. Fatty acid methyl esters were prepared as described by Sasser52 and GC/MS analysis was realized as previously described53 (link). Briefly, Marseille-P9602 and LMG 13028T strains were inoculated in 5% sheep blood-enriched Columbia agar and incubated at 28 °C. Fatty acid methyl esters were separated using an Elite 5-MS column and monitored by mass spectrometry (Clarus 500—SQ 8 S, Perkin Elmer, Courtaboeuf, France). Spectral database search was performed using MS Search 2.0 operated with the Standard Reference Database 1A (NIST, Gaithersburg, USA) and the FAMEs mass spectral database (Wiley, Chichester, UK).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Cellular Fatty Acid Profiling by GC/MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cellular fatty acid methyl ester (FAME) analysis was performed by GC/MS, as previously described [59 (link),60 (link)]. Fatty acid methyl esters were prepared as described by M. Sasser [61 ]. Briefly, fatty acid methyl esters were analyzed by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS). Compounds were separated using an Elite 5-MS column and monitored by mass spectrometry (Clarus 500—SQ 8 S, Perkin Elmer, Courtaboeuf, France). Spectral database search was performed using MS Search 2.0 operated with the Standard Reference Database 1A (NIST, Gaithersburg, MD, USA) and the FAMEs mass spectral database (Wiley, Chichester, UK).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!