The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

X pert panalytical pro x ray diffractometer

Manufactured by Malvern Panalytical
Sourced in United Kingdom

The X'Pert PANalytical PRO X-ray diffractometer is a laboratory instrument used for the characterization of materials through X-ray diffraction analysis. It is designed to provide accurate and reliable data on the structural properties of a wide range of materials, including crystalline solids, powders, and thin films.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

14 protocols using x pert panalytical pro x ray diffractometer

1

Fabrication and Characterization of CdTe Thin Films

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A range of substrates were used in this work; uncoated soda-lime glass (SLG), fluorine doped tin oxide (FTO) coated SLG “TEC 6” glass (NSG Ltd., St. Helens, UK) and 0.1 mm Mo foil substrates (Advent, 99.95% pure, Oxford, UK). All substrates were washed with isopropyl alcohol (IPA) and de-ionized (DI) water, then ultrasonically cleaned in DI water prior to deposition. 250 nm (0.5 Ω/sq) Mo films were grown onto the glass substrates via Direct Current (DC) magnetron sputtering at 400 °C using an Ar plasma. 6–8 μm CdTe (Alfa Aesar, 99.99% pure, Lancashire, UK) was deposited via CSS in an N2 ambient at a variety of pressures and at source and substrate temperatures of 650 °C and 550 °C respectively.
Atomic force microscopy (AFM) was carried out using a Veeco Innova Bruker atomic force microscope (Bruker, CA, USA) in contact mode. XRD measurements were performed using a PANalytical X’pert PRO X-ray diffractometer (PANalytical B. V., Eindhoven, The Netherlands) at room temperature, using CuKα1 line as the X-ray source. SEM images were taken using a JSM-7001F microscope from JEOL with EDX spectrometer (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan). CL spectra was measured with a Hitachi SU-70 SEM (Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan) operating at 12 keV together with a Gatan MonoCL system (Gatan, CA, USA) for CL detection. The pixel dwell time for the panchromatic was 4 s.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Characterization of Polydopamine-Coated Clay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) measurement was carried out using a Kratos Analytical AXIS HIS spectrometer (Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan) with a monochromatized Al Ka X-ray source (1486.6 eV photons) to verify the polydopamine coating on the clay. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was carried out using a TGA Q2950 (TA Instruments, New Castle, DE, USA) under an atmosphere environment where the samples were heated from 25 °C to 140 °C and kept isothermally for 40 min before being further heated at a rate of 10 °C/min to 850 °C. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) was carried out using a Perkin-Elmer 2000 spectrometer (Perkin-Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA) scanning in the range of 400 cm−1 to 4000 cm−1 with a resolution of 4 cm−1. Crystal structure was determined using X-ray diffraction (XRD) on a PANalytical X’Pert PRO X-ray diffractometer (Almelo, The Netherlands) with Cu K radiation (λ = 0.154 nm). D-clay was pounded and grinded into powder form before the XRD measurement. Samples were scanned with a scanning rate of 2°/min from 2° to 35° in ambience. The average D-spacing was then calculated using the Bragg’s law based on the measured diffraction angle.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Comprehensive Material Characterization Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The crystal structure of the investigated materials was detected using a PANalytical X’Pert Pro X-ray diffractometer (Malvern Panalytical Ltd., Malvern, UK) equipped with Ni-filtered Cu 1 radiation (1 = 1.54060 Å, U = 40 kV, I = 30 mA) in the 2θ range of 5°–70°. X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were parsed by Match! software version 3.7.0.124. Energy-dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) analysis was carried out using an FEI Nova NanoSEM 230 scanning electron microscope (SEM, Hillsboro, OR, USA) equipped with an EDS spectrometer (EDAX GenesisXM4) and operating at an acceleration voltage in the range 3.0–15.0 kV and spots at 2.5–3.0 were observed. The Fourier-transformed infrared spectra were carried out by the Thermo Scientific Nicolet iS50 FT-IR spectrometer (Waltham, MA, USA) equipped with an automated beam splitter exchange system (iS50 ABX containing DLaTGS KBr detector), built-in all-reflective diamond ATR module (iS50 ATR), Thermo Scientific Polaris™ and the HeNe laser was used as an infrared radiation source. Absorption spectra were collected by the Agilent Cary 5000 spectrophotometer (Agilent, 5301 Stevens Creek Blvd, Santa Clara, CA 95051, USA), employing a spectral bandwidth (SBW) with a spectral resolution of 0.25 nm in the visible and ultraviolet range and recorded at room temperature.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Comprehensive Material Characterization Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The morphological properties of the samples were tested with a Malvern Panalytical X’Pert Pro X-ray diffractometer (XRD, Malvern, UK) device. Testing was performed at 40 kV and 30 mA. Absolute scanning mode was selected with a starting angle of 1° and a final angle of 50° with a step of 0.03° and a time of 38 s at each step. The nanoparticle scattering was investigated using transmission electron microscopy (TEM) using a JEOL JEM 2100 device (Tokyo, Japan) with 200 kV acceleration voltage. Ultra-thin sections of material with the thickness of 90 nm were cut from sheets using a Leica EM UC7 ultramicrotome (Wetzlar, Germany). Additional to the XRD and TEM analysis, differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) was used to evaluate the crystallinity of prepared samples. The experiment was performed on a Mettler Toledo DSC 700/1 device (Columbus, OH, USA) in the temperature range from 25 °C to 210 °C, heating rate 20 K/min, and two cycles under nitrogen atmosphere. The weight of sample was in the 5–10 mg range. The evaluation was carried out from the second sample heating.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Synthesis and Characterization of ZnO Microstructures

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Zinc oxide microcrystals (average size of 100 μm) are the analytical standard from Sigma-Aldrich, CAS Number 1314-13-2. We synthesize ZnO microspheres and G12 polypeptide as reported previously20 (link),25 (link): for details see Supplementary Note 1. Using PANalytical X’Pert PRO X-ray diffractometer (Malvern Panalytical, Malvern, UK) with Cu Kα radiation at 1.54056 Å we extract the crystallite domain sizes of 52 ± 9 and 18 ± 5 nm for microcrystals and microspheres, respectively44 .
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Multimodal Characterization of Materials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
X-ray powder diffraction studies were carried out using a PANalytical X’Pert Pro X-ray diffractometer (Malvern Panalytical Ltd., Malvern, UK) equipped with Ni-filtered Cu 1 radiation (1 = 1.54060 Å, U = 40 kV, I = 30 mA) in the 2θ range of 10°–70°. XRD patterns were analyzed by Match! software version 3.7.0.124.
The surface morphology and the element mapping were assessed by a FEI Nova NanoSEM 230 scanning electron microscope (SEM, Hillsboro, OR, USA) equipped with EDS spectrometer (EDAX GenesisXM4) and operating at an acceleration voltage in the range 3.0–15.0 kV and spots at 2.5–3.0 were observed. EDX analysis was carried out to confirm the chemical formula.
The Thermo Scientific Nicolet iS50 FT-IR spectrometer (Waltham, MA, USA) equipped with an Automated Beamsplitter exchange system (iS50 ABX containing DLaTGS KBr detector), built-in all-reflective diamond ATR module (iS50 ATR), Thermo Scientific Polaris™, was used to record the Fourier-transformed infrared spectra. As an infrared radiation source, we used the HeNe laser. FT-IR spectra of the powders were recorded in KBr pellets at 295 K temperature in the middle infrared range, from 4000 to 500 cm−1, with a spectral resolution of 2 cm−1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Multimodal Characterization of Novel Materials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PANalytical X’Pert Pro X-ray diffractometer (Malvern Panalytical Ltd., Malvern, UK) with a Cu–Kα radiation at range from 10° to 60° (exposure time of 2 h) was applied to determine structure and crystallinity. The obtained diffraction patterns were juxtaposed with standards from the Inorganic Crystal Structure Database (ICSD). Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR, Biorad 575C spectrophotometer, Hercules, CA, USA) in a frequency range of 4000–400 cm−1 was used to determine the functional groups of the obtained materials. This was performed using independent replicates. The UV–Vis spectra were recorded on an Agilent Cary 5000 UV–Vis-NIR spectrophotometer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) with a spectral bandwidth of 1 nm in the range of 200 to 800 nm (50,000–12,500 cm−1). The morphology, element concentration, and mapping were performed using a scanning electron microscope (SEM, FEI Nova NanoSEM 230, Hillsboro, OR, USA) with an energy-dispersive X-ray spectrometer (EDS, Genesis XM4, Austin, TX, USA). The EDS spectra were recorded three times for each sample and the calculated value was an average result.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

X-Ray Diffraction Characterization of Solid Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The solid state of the samples was characterized using an X’Pert PANalytical PRO x-ray diffractometer (PANalytical, Almelo, The Netherlands), using Cu Ka radiation (1.54187 Å) and an acceleration voltage and current of 45 kV and 40 mA, respectively. The samples were placed on a plate and scanned from 5 to 35° 2θ in reflection mode, with a scan rate and scan step of 0.0625° 2θ/s and 0.026° 2θ, respectively. Bragg–Brentano parafocusing geometry was used. The data were collected and analyzed using the software X’Pert Data Collector (PANalytical, Almelo, The Netherlands).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

X-Ray Powder Diffraction Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
XRPD was performed using an X’Pert PANalytical PRO X-ray diffractometer (PANalytical, Almelo, The Netherlands) using Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.54 Å), and an acceleration voltage and current of 45 kV and 40 mA, respectively. The powder samples were scanned in reflectance mode from 5° to 35° 2ϴ with a scan speed of 0.067° 2ϴ and a step size of 0.026° 2ϴ. Data were collected and analyzed using the software X’Pert Data Collector (PANalytical, Almelo, The Netherlands).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

X-Ray Powder Diffraction Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
XRPD was performed using a X’Pert PANalytical PRO X-ray diffractometer (PANalytical, Almelo, The Netherlands) using Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.54187 Å) and acceleration voltage and current of 45 kV and 40 mA, respectively. The samples were scanned in reflectance mode between 5° 2θ and 35° 2θ with a scan speed of 0.067° 2θ/s and a step size of 0.026° 2θ. Data were collected and analysed using the software X’Pert Data Collector (PANalytical, Almelo, The Netherlands).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!