The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Ge discovery ste pet ct scanner

Manufactured by GE Healthcare
Sourced in United States

The GE Discovery STE PET/CT scanner is a diagnostic imaging device that combines positron emission tomography (PET) and computed tomography (CT) technologies. It is designed to capture detailed images of the body's anatomy and metabolic activity simultaneously.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

8 protocols using ge discovery ste pet ct scanner

1

Multimodal Imaging in Epilepsy Assessment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All images were acquired at 3.0T field strength using dedicated MRI epilepsy protocols. 3D T1-weighted IR prepped gradient echo scan sequences were used for quantitative image analysis, and their parameters are described (Table S1). In addition, fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) images (slice thickness 1–4mm), and T2-weighted images (thickness 1–3mm) were included as part of the clinical protocol, complementing qualitative image interpretation. Acknowledging the importance of thin FLAIR slices in the clinical identification of small lesions, both institutions (UCSF and UAB) routinely used 1mm volumetric coronal acquisitions after 2011. Prior to this, FLAIR sequences were 3mm thick, and anything above this was an exception.
FDG-PET scans were acquired in the interictal state under standard resting conditions (eyes closed, dimmed ambient light) using CTI ECAT HR+, GE-Discovery LS, and GE-Discovery STE PET/CT scanners. Approximately 45 minutes following the intravenous administration of 2.6–13.2 mCi 18F-labeled FDG, 3D PET images of the brain were obtained from the vertex to skull base (slice thickness 3.0–4.25mm). Images were attenuation-corrected using noncontrast CT transmission information.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

PET Scanner Calibration and Cross-Validation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
There were three PET scanners used in the study. Cohort-1 patients were all imaged on one of two General Electric (GE) Discovery STE PET/CT scanners [33 (link)], with identical reconstruction parameters, where each test-retest study was acquired on the same scanner. In addition to the recommended PET scanner calibration [32 (link)], the two scanners were cross-calibrated and quantitative performance was monitored with NIST-traceable reference sources to ensure similar quantitative accuracy [34 (link), 35 (link)].
Most cohort-2 patients (15) were imaged on the same PET/CT scanner in serial studies. However, due to the addition of the GE Discovery STE PET/CT scanners at our center, thirteen cohort-2 patients were initially imaged on a GE Advance PET scanner [36 (link)] and underwent the second scan on a Discovery scanner. We have shown that our calibration and cross-calibration procedures and identical acquisition and reconstruction protocols provide test-retest accuracy comparable to a well-calibrated single scanner [37 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

PET/CT Imaging Protocol for Cancer Patients

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In our dataset. The PET/CT scanning of all patients was performed in Klinikum Bayreuth. Siemens Biograph mCT (Erlangen, Germany) was used. All patients fasted for 6–8 h before PET/CT scan. About 1 h after injection, the images were acquired. At first, low-dose CT was performed at tube current of 30 mAs and tube voltage of 120 kV. The PET images were corrected using low-dose CT and reconstructed iteratively (2 iterations, 12 subsets) + TrueX + TOF.
For The dataset from TCIA. GE Discovery D690 PET/CT and GE Discovery STE PET/CT scanners were used. The mean uptake time before scanning was 66.58 min (range 23.08~128.90 min). Low-dose CT was performed, tube current 36~400 mAs, tube voltage 120~140 kV. The PET images were corrected using CT images based on iterative Ordered Subset Expectation Maximization (OSEM) reconstruction.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

FDG-PET Imaging of Pediatric Interictal Brain

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All FDG-PET scans were obtained in the interictal state, using either the EXACT/HR PET scanner (CTI/Siemens, Hoffman Estates, IL, USA), or the GE Discovery STE PET/CT scanner (GE Medical Systems, Milwaukee, WI), both located at the PET Center, Children’s Hospital of Michigan. The difference between the two scanners was an isotropic image resolution of 5.5 ± 0.35mm at full-width at half-maximum (FWHM) on the Siemens scanner and 6.0 ± 0.5mm at FWHM on the GE Discovery scanner. For both scanners, 47 axial image planes were obtained, with a slice thickness of 3.125mm. Four hours of fasting was required prior to the procedure. Intravenous slow bolus of 0.143mCi/kg of FDG was injected, followed by a 30-minute uptake period. Continuous scalp EEG monitoring was performed during tracer uptake. External stimuli were minimized during this time by asking the patients to lie quietly in a semi-dark room with their eyes closed. The children were positioned in the scanner 40 minutes after FDG injection, and a static 20-minute emission scan of the brain was acquired. Automated threshold fits to sinogram data were used to calculate the attenuation correction which was then applied to the brain images. After the tracer uptake period (but not during the uptake period), sedation was used when necessary.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Dynamic PET Imaging of Breast Cancer

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Ground truth was defined using patient datasets consisting of 60 min fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) dynamic acquisitions of 22 patients with non-high-grade (grades 1 and 2), estrogen receptor positive (ER+) primary breast cancer pre- and post-therapy, as previously described (Wangerin et al 2015 (link)). Patient characteristics are summarized in table 3. The patient scans were performed on a GE Discovery STE PET/CT Scanner (GE Healthcare, Waukesha, WI). The dynamic data were acquired with frames of 16 × 5 s, 7 × 10 s, 5 × 30 s, 5 × 60 s, 5 × 180 s, 7 × 300 s. The data were reconstructed using 3D OSEM with 28 subsets, six iterations, and a 7 mm transaxial Gaussian post-filter. The image voxel size was 4.3 × 4.3 mm transaxially and 3.3 mm axially. The tumor and normal breast tissue regions-of-interest (ROIs) were 3 × 3 × 3 voxels (1.6 cc). The normal breast tissue ROI was placed in the most homogeneous portion in successive tissue in the contralateral breast. We note here that while partial volume effects, as described in Soret et al (2007) (link), were present in the estimate of SUV, the tumors were not expected to significantly change in size between the pre- and post-therapy scans (average time = 20 d) when treated with hormonal therapy. Thus, partial volume correction methods were not evaluated.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

PET Imaging of AMT Uptake in Brain

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All PET studies were performed using a GE Discovery STE PET/CT scanner (GE Medical Systems, Milwaukee, Wisconsin) at the PET Center, Children’s Hospital of Michigan, Detroit Medical Center. The PET image in-plane resolution was 7.5 ± 0.4 mm at full-width half-maximum (FWHM) and 7.0 ± 0.5 mm FWHM in the axial direction and a slice thickness of 3.125 mm. The procedure for AMT-PET scanning has been described previously.13 (link),28 (link),30 (link)-32 (link, link) In brief, after 6 hours of fasting, a slow bolus of AMT (37 MBq/kg) was injected via a venous line. At 25 minutes after AMT injection, a dynamic emission scan of the brain (7× 5 minutes) was acquired. Measured attenuation correction, scatter, and decay correction were applied to all PET images. For measurement of AMT uptake, averaged activity images 30 to 55 minutes postinjection were created and converted to an AMT standardized uptake value (SUV) image.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Interictal FDG-PET Imaging in Neurological Disorders

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All participants underwent interictal FDG-PET scanning using a GE Discovery STE PET/CT scanner (GE Medical Systems, Milwaukee, WI). The scanner has a 15 cm field-of-view and generates 47 image planes with a slice thickness of 3.1 mm. The reconstructed image resolution was 5.5±0.35 mm at full width at half-maximum (FWHM) in-plane and 6.0±0.49 mm at FWHM in the axial direction. Intravenous injection of 5.29 MBq/kg of FDG was followed by a 30-minute uptake period. EEG was monitored throughout the tracer uptake period to ensure interictal images. Forty minutes post injection, a static 20-minute emission scan was acquired parallel to the canthomeatal plane.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

PET/CT Tumor Delineation Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

Patients were imaged with a GE Discovery STE PET/CT Scanner (GE Medical Systems) at our institution. A tumor threshold was created using a background uptake method (
Fig. 1). A 3 cm spherical volume-of-interest (VOI) was dropped onto a homogenous uptake region in the liver. The mean and standard deviation of the standardized uptake value (SUV) was extracted to calculate a threshold for the tumor volume as shown in Equation 1.
MTV threshold = [liver
μ + 2 liver
σ]
 (1)
where μ is mean and σ is standard deviation. In cases where contours extended into the stomach or the heart, a Boolean tool was used to create a conformal MTV. These difficult contours were then physician-verified and/or edited. The fiducial was delineated on CT via an absolute threshold for Hounsfield Unit (HU) greater than 350. The centroid was determined as the center of mass of the fiducial contour.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!