The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Sciclone ngs liquid handler

Manufactured by PerkinElmer
Sourced in United States

The Sciclone NGS Liquid Handler is a automated liquid handling system designed for next-generation sequencing (NGS) workflows. It provides precise and accurate liquid handling capabilities to streamline laboratory processes.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

5 protocols using sciclone ngs liquid handler

1

RNA-seq Library Preparation and Alignment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) and quality control (QC) was performed by the Genome Analysis Facility (GAF) of the UMCG. Illumina TrueSeq RNA sample preparation kits were used to generate sequence libraries while using the Perkin Elmer Sciclone NGS Liquid Handler (Waltham, MA, USA). Obtained cDNA fragment libraries were sequenced on an Illumina HiSeq2500 (San Diego, CA, USA) (single reads 1 × 50 bp) in pools of multiple samples. Mus musculus.GRCm38 ensembleRelease 82 reference genome was used to align the trimmed fastQ files with hisat (https://github.com/infphilo/hisat, accessed on 20 March 2017). Sorting of aligned reads was performed using SAMtools (http://www.htslib.org/, accessed on 20 March 2017). The gene level quantification was performed by HTSeq and Ensembl version 82 (https://github.com/htseq/htseq, accessed on 20 March 2017) was used as the gene annotation database. FastQC (https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/, accessed on 20 March 2017) was used for quality control measurements of raw sequencing data. Picard-tools (https://broadinstitute.github.io/picard/index.html, accessed on 20 March 2017) calculated quality control metrics for aligned reads. Sequencing data was provided via a count table, which could be loaded into RNA-seq analysis software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

RNA Extraction and Sequencing Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNA isolation, sample preparation, and sequencing was conducted at the University Medical Center Groningen in Groningen, the Netherlands. Each sample was homogenized with zirconia/silica beads in the BeadBeater machine (BioSpec products, Inc.). After homogenization, total RNA was extracted and purified using an RNeasy microkit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. An initial quality check of the samples by capillary electrophoresis and RNA quantification for each sample was performed using the LabChip GX (PerkinElmer, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA). Samples with a minimum amount of 7 ng non-degraded RNA were selected for subsequent sequencing analysis. Sequence libraries were generated using the TruSeq RNA sample preparation kit from Illumina (San Diego, USA) using the Sciclone NGS Liquid Handler (Perkin Elmer). To remove contamination of adapter-duplexes, an extra purification of the libraries was performed with the automated agarose gel separation system Labchip XT (Perkin Elmer). The obtained cDNA fragment libraries were sequenced on an Illumina HiSeq2000 using default parameters (single read 1x100bp) in pools of 10 or 11 samples. Processing of the raw data, including a demultiplexing step, was performed using Casava software (Illumina) with standard settings.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

RNA Quantification and Sequencing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
First quality check of and RNA quantification of the samples were performed by capillary electrophoresis using the LabChip GX (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA). Nondegraded RNA samples were selected for subsequent sequencing analysis. Sequence libraries were generated using the NEXTflex Rapid Illumina Directional RNA‐Seq Library Prep Kit (Bioo Scientific, Austin, TX, USA) using the Sciclone NGS Liquid Handler (PerkinElmer). The obtained cDNA fragment libraries were sequenced on an Illumina Nextseq500 (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) using default parameters (single read 1 × 75 bp) in pools of multiple samples, producing on average 4 million reads per sample.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

High-throughput RNA-seq library preparation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The sequence libraries were generated using the TruSeq mRNA sample preparation kit from Illumina (San Diego) by use of the Sciclone NGS Liquid Handler (Perkin Elmer) according to the manufacturer's instructions. After extra purification of the libraries, we sequenced 9 pmol of each obtained cDNA fragment library on an Illumina HiSeq2500 High Output Standard using default parameters.
Good quality of the data was ensured by showing on average Phred‐scores exceeding the predefined minimum of 30 in over 90% of the reads of each position, equivalent to a base call accuracy of 99.9%. Quality control of the reads, alignment to the build 37 human reference genome, and subsequent gene annotation are described in detail in the Supporting Information. The average alignment of the reads to the human reference genome (uniquely mapped reads) was 86% (range, 73−90%).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

RNA-seq and Quality Control Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNA sequencing (RNAseq) and quality control (QC) were performed by the Genome Analysis Facility (GAF) at the UMCG. Illumina TrueSeq RNA sample preparation kits were used to generate sequence libraries using the Perkin Elmer Sciclone NGS Liquid Handler. cDNA fragment libraries were sequenced on an Illumina HiSeq2500 (single reads 1 × 50 bp) in pools of multiple samples. A total of 3 independent replicates (from 3 mice) were analyzed. The Mus musculus GRCm38 Ensembl Release 82 reference genome was used to align trimmed fastQ files with hisat. Sorting of aligned reads was performed using SAMtools. Gene level quantification was performed by HTSeq and Ensembl version 82 was used as gene annotation database. FastQC was used for QC measurements of raw sequencing data. Picard-tools calculated QC metrics for aligned reads. Sequence counts were standardized against total number of high quality reads for each sample. Because only one fragment was sequenced per transcript, length normalization was not necessary. For each gene, the mean values were generated from three replicate standardized values. Transcripts were considered present only if 2 of the 3 reads were greater than 0 RPM.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!