The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Optogait

Manufactured by Microgate
Sourced in Italy

OptoGait is a laboratory equipment product that utilizes optical technology to gather data. It functions as a measurement system, providing quantitative information about various parameters.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

28 protocols using optogait

1

Acoustic Reaction Time Assessment in Athletes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Acoustic reaction time was assessed using the reaction time reactivity system of Optogait (Microgate SRL, Bolzano, Italy; Software Optogait Version 1.12.21 Microgate SRL, Bolzano, Italy). The optoelectric detection device used in this study consists of two bars (one transmitting and one receiving) of 100 × 8 cm placed parallel to each other and contains 96 light diodes located 3 mm above the floor level. This device has been previously used to assess reaction time [25 (link)]. Reaction times were evaluated acoustically using two tests. The first one consisted of an upper limb simple reaction test, where participants tried to lift one hand when they received the acoustic stimulus [26 (link)].
The second test consisted of a complex reaction test, where athletes performed a specific defensive goalball movement from low position with the acoustic stimulus (Figure 3). Two training attempts and three experimental tests were carried out, with one minute of rest between tests.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Vertical Jump Performance Assessment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Players performed three types of vertical jumps, keeping their hands on their hips. Jump height in centimeters was estimated using the photoelectric cells system (Optogait, Microgate, Bolzano, Italy). First, they performed a squat jump, starting from a standing position, bending the knees to 90°, stopping for 3 s, and then jumping as high as possible. They were instructed to avoid any countermovement. Players then performed a countermovement jump from a standing position and were asked to jump as high as possible, immediately after rapid countermovement to a self-selected depth. During the drop jump, players step off from a 30-cm box and performed a maximal jump immediately after landing on the floor. They were instructed to jump as high and as fast as they could, with minimum ground contact time. The reactive strength index (RSI) was recorded and calculated as the jump height, divided by the contact time [14 (link)]. Subjects were instructed to keep their legs straight throughout the flight phase of the jumps. Two trials were carried out for each type of jump and the best result (using the jump height for the squat jump and countermovement jump, and the RSI for the drop jump) was taken.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Validation of Activity Trackers against Gold Standards

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The following ten activity trackers were examined: the Lumoback, Fitbit Flex, Nike+ Fuelband SE, Jawbone Up, Misfit Shine, Withings Pulse, Fitbit Zip, Omron HJ-203, Yamax Digiwalker SW-200 and the Moves mobile application. The OPTOGait system (OPTOGait, Microgate S.r.I, Italy, 2010) was used as the gold standard on the treadmill in the laboratory condition. This system consists of two beams attached to the sides of the treadmill. The system uses an LED lighting system to precisely measure the number of steps which is a reliable and valid method for measuring step count (cadence) [19 (link)]. The ActivPAL (PAL Technologies Ltd., Glasgow, UK) was used as the gold standard in the free-living condition. The ActivPAL was worn on the thigh underneath the clothing. Previous research has demonstrated that the ActivPAL is a reliable and valid tool for measuring the number of steps taken both on a treadmill and in free-living conditions [20 (link)–22 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

IMU-Based Stride Length Estimation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The study presented in this article used the data from the TRIPOD—Treadmill, IMU, Pedobarographic and Photoelectric Dataset [12 (link)] study, available upon request for scientific research purposes. The measurements were obtained from 15 young and healthy participants (8 males, 7 females) who walked on a treadmill for two minutes at three different speeds (Table 1). After two minutes, the treadmill slowed down until it stopped. The dataset also included data from seven IMU sensors (Physilog® 5 IMUSs from Gait Up, Lausanne, Switzerland). The sensors were located on the left and right instep, left and right heel, left and right shank, and one at the sacrum. The data were acquired at a sample rate of 128 Hz. The IMU data for the three different walking speeds are provided in a CSV file (RF.csv).
Additionally, one file (SyncInfo.csv) contains the timestamp of the initial contact. The ground truth was measured by a pressure-sensitive Zebris (zebris Medical GmbH, Isny, Germany) and photoelectric OptoGait (Microgate, Bolzano, Italy) system. In the multilayer 1D convolutional neural network design, only data from the IMU sensor attached to the right foot, instep position, were used. As ground truth, we used the stride length from the OptoGait system, which is provided in a CSV file (OptoGait.csv).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Gait Improvement with Acoustic Cues

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In order for us to determine walking speed, subjects walked at various speeds without an assistant or support, and the most comfortable speed for each subject was set. While patients were walking at a comfortable speed, the step times of both legs were calculated using a gait analysis system (OptoGait, Microgate S.r.l, Bozen, Italy). Based on the calculated step time, the auditory stimulation sound was produced at an increased rate of 10% for the paretic side and 5% for the non-paretic side, rather than at a comfortable speed. Previous studies have shown that gait velocity and symmetry improved when patients walked to a faster acoustic cue than at a comfortable speed. To reduce the asymmetry of both step times, fast acoustic cues of 10% and 5% were applied differently. The auditory stimulation sound was generated using digital audio editing software (GoldWave v5., GoldWave Inc., St. John’s, NL, Canada). We provided different pitch sounds to distinguish the sounds applied to both legs. Measurements were taken every 2 weeks and acoustic cues were given to subjects according to the changed step time.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Gait Analysis Using OptoGait System

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A gait analyzer (OptoGait, Microgate S.r.l, Italy, 2010) was used to test the gait pattern of patients and quantity of gait analysis. Temporal and spatial gait were measured. The gait analyzer was 3 m in length and had 2 transmitting bars and a webcam (Logitech Webcam Pro 9000). The distance between the 2 bars was 1 m, bars were 1 cm from each other, and were continuously receiving signals from a light-emitting diode in the transmitter. Participants gait was sensed and transmitted through the infrared ray sensor, temporal and spatial variables were collected, and participant walking order was stored in the webcam and later synced with the perception error for accurate gait measurement. Collected data were processed using OptoGait, Version 1.5.0. 0 software (Microgate S.r.l, Italy, 2010). To ensure data collection accuracy, the device was calibrated before the test. In order to minimize muscle fatigue, a 1-minute break was provided between measurements; measurement was repeated 3 times, and the average was used.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Spatiotemporal Gait Analysis with OptoGait

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Running spatiotemporal parameters were measured with the system previously validated for this purpose, OptoGait (OptoGait, Microgate, Bolzano, Italy) [32 (link),52 (link)]. The default settings for the filter 0_0 (Gait R. in: 0 and Gait R. out: 0 filter) were used. This configuration provides the least bias for time parameters in athletic walking [53 (link)]. Spatiotemporal parameters measured for each step during the 30 s uptake interval at 9 km·h−1, 10 km·h−1, and 11 km·h−1 were the contact time (CT, in seconds; time since the foot touches the ground until the toes separate from the ground), flight time (FT, in seconds; time from the take-off of the forefoot to the initial ground contact of the next contralateral support), vertical oscillation (VO, in centimetres; change in the height of the centre of gravity during the run), step frequency (in steps per minute; number of ground contacts per minute), step length (in metres; distance between two successive contacts with the ground, finger-to-finger) and stride angle (in degrees; the angle formed by the tangent of the parabola traced by the foot to the ground during a stride). The theoretical parabola for determining the stride angle was calculated by the system using the stride length and the maximum height of the foot during a stride [15 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Biomechanical Gait Parameters During Running

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Ground contact time, stride length, and stride frequency were measured using an optical detection system (OptoGait, Microgate Corporation, Bolzano, Italy). Ground contact time is defined as the time span from the first contact of the foot until the take-off of the foot. Stride length is defined as the distance between the heel of two subsequent footprints of the same foot. Stride frequency can be determined from stride length and the constant velocity of the treadmill during the running economy trials. Ground contact time, stride length, and stride frequency were averaged throughout the same time window of the running economy measurements.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Vertical Jump Height Measurement

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Participants were instructed to put their hands on their waist and jump as high as possible, while maintaining their legs shoulder-width apart, with no restrictions on how low they needed to squat prior to jumping. This test was repeated three times with one minute of rest between jumps. Jump height was calculated by flight time, using a jumping gate (Optogait, Microgate, Bolzano, Italy). The highest value obtained during the three trials was used. If the two best measurements differed by more than 10%, participants were asked to perform a fourth trial.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Measuring Normal Gait Speed

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Gait speed was measured once for each participant by optical-sensitive gait analysis (Optogait; Microgate Co., Bolzano, Italy). Each participant was instructed to walk at their normal speed and the mean gait speed was calculated using a software program (Optogait analysis software, version 1.6.4.0; Microgate Co.) during 5 m of walking at a comfortable speed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!