The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Tmt labeling kit

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United States

The TMT labeling kit is a set of reagents used for the quantitative analysis of proteins in biological samples. The kit enables multiplexed protein identification and quantification using tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) techniques.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

31 protocols using tmt labeling kit

1

Peptide Labeling and Fractionation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A total of 100 μg of peptides were taken from each sample and labeled using the TMT Labeling Kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Thermo Scientific TMT Labeling Kit, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Each set of labeled peptides was mixed and fractionated using an Agilent 1260 infinity II HPLC system (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Buffer A contained 10 mM ammonium formate and 5% acetonitrile, with a pH of 10.0, while Buffer B contained 10 mM ammonium formate and 85% acetonitrile, with a pH of 10.0. The chromatographic column was equilibrated with Buffer A, and the sample was loaded from the autosampler to the column for separation at a flow rate of 1 mL min−1. The liquid-phase gradient was as follows: 0–25 min: Buffer B 0%; 25–30 min: linear gradient of Buffer B from 0–7%; 30–65 min: linear gradient of Buffer B from 7−40%; 65−70 min: linear gradient of Buffer B from 40−100%; and 70 min to 85 min: Buffer B was maintained at 100%. The absorbance was monitored at 214 nm during the elution process, and the eluted fractions were collected every 1 min. Approximately 40 fractions were collected, and the samples were lyophilized and reconstituted with 0.1% formic acid (FA) to N parts.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Peptide Labeling Using TMT Kit

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
According to the protocol of the TMT labeling kit (Thermo Scientific, USA), the peptides were reconstituted in 0.1% (v/v) formic acid and every 100 μg of peptide mixture of each pooled sample was reconstituted and labeled with the TMT-labeling reagents [21 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantitative Proteomic Analysis of Exercise

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Each sample was labeled with 100 μg of peptide fragments according to the manufacturer's instructions for the TMT labeling kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Peptides of the two groups were labeled with different TMTs: three biological repeats of the control group were labeled with TMT-126, TMT-127, and TMT-128, respectively, and three biological repeats of the exercise group were labeled with TMT-129, TMT-130, and TMT-131, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantitative Proteomics Analysis of Synechocystis 6803 under Cu/Fe Deduction

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
With the fastest growing cultures (the F4C4 group, see section “Physiological response to copper and iron deduction” in Result) set as the control group, the Fe-deduction group (i.e., F1C4), Cu-deduction group (i.e., F4C1), and Cu–Fe dual deduction group (i.e., F1C1) were set as the experimental groups. Three replicates were performed for each group. These cultures have the same culture conditions and growth status as the cultures used for growth curve measurement and were investigated using TMT quantitative proteomics to determine the effect of Cu/Fe deductions on Synechocystis 6803 protein levels. Cells in logarithmic growth phase were collected for proteomic determination after 120 h of metal-deduction.
Proteins were extracted from cyanobacteria using the SDT [4% w/v sodium dodecul sulfate (SDS), 100 mM Tris/HCl pH 7.6, 0.1 M dithiothreitol (DTT)] cleavage method (Wiśniewski et al., 2009 (link)), and total protein levels were quantified using the bicinchoninic acid assay (BCA) method. Each sample was trypsinized using the filter-aided proteome preparation (FASP) method and the peptides were quantified (OD280) (Wiśniewski et al., 2009 (link)). The peptides (100 μg) of each sample were labeled according to the instructions of the TMT labeling kit (Thermo, United States).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Protein Extraction and Quantification for Ovarian Tissue Proteomics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Firstly, according to the method given by Tang et al. (25 (link)), the protein was extracted by lysis with SDT lysate (including 4% w/v SDS, 150 mM Tris/HCl (pH8), and 100 mM DTT). Also, 30 mg of each ovarian tissue was added to 900 μL SDT; the lysate was sonicated (80 W, 10 cycles of 10 s with 15 s intervals) and then boiled for 15 min. After centrifugation at 14,000 × g for 40 min, the final supernatant was quantified using a BCA assay (Bio-Rad, CA, United States) and detected by SDS-PAGE (Supplementary Figure S2). Protein was treated with the filter-aided sample preparation (FASP) method for enzymatic hydrolysis (30 (link)), and the filtrate was collected. The peptide fraction was qualified at 280 nm, OD280. After trypsin digestion, the peptide samples were dried by vacuum centrifugation, then 100 μg peptides of each sample were resuspended in 0.5 M TEAB. The TMT labeling kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, United States) with the isobaric labels 126, 127, 128, and 129 was used to label the PF, PL, MF, and ML samples, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

TMT-based Proteomics Workflow

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Reagents were as follows: TMT Labeling Kit (Thermo Inc.), ProteoMiner Low Abundance Protein Enrichment Kit (Bio-Rad Inc.), BCA Kit (Biyuntian Biotechnology Co., Ltd.), trypsin (Promega Inc.), Trifluoroacetic Acid (Sigma-Aldrich Inc.), formic acid (Fluka Inc.), iodoacetamide (Sigma Inc.), dithiothreitol (Sigma Inc.), urea (Sigma Inc.), triethylammonium hydrogen carbonate (Sigma Inc.), ultrapure water (Fisher Chemical Inc.), and 0.26 mm–0.28 mm monofilament nylon fishing line (2838–20A4 Beijing Xion Technology Co., Ltd.). Standard: Ligustrazine Hydrochloride (110817–201608), ferulic acid (110773–201614), and astragaloside IV (110781–201717) were purchased from China Food and Drug Control Research Institute. Rat angiotensinogen ELISA kit (ER0371) and catalase kit (ER0264) were purchased from Wuhan Fine Biotechnology Co., Ltd. Anti-catalase antibody (catalog number ab209211), anti-angiotensinogen antibody (catalog number ab213705), and Anti-beta Actin (catalog number ab8226) were purchased from Abcam company.
Instruments used were as follows: Ultrasonic Cell Breaker (Xinzhi Biotechnology Co., Ltd.), high-speed refrigerated centrifuge, Dynamica microplate reader (Bio-Rad Inc.), and Scientific Q Exactive, Scientific Q Exactive Plus, Scientific Orbitrap Fusion (Thermo Inc.). Column was Welch Vltimate XB-C18 (HS), 4.6 × 250 nm, 5 μm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

TMT Labeling and Peptide Fractionation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
One hundred milligrams of peptide were taken from each sample and labeled according to the Thermo Fisher TMT Labeling Kit instructions. The experimental induction group and the control group were labeled as TMT-126 and TMT-127, and three replicates were set. The labeled peptides were mixed in equal amounts, and the dried peptides were fractionated using High-pH (Pierce™ High pH Reversed-Phase Peptide Fractionation Kit, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, USA). The sample collection was eventually combined into ten components. The peptides of each component were dried and reconstituted with 0.1% FA for LC-MS analysis. TMT markers and LC-MS data acquisition were determined by Shanghai Baipu Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

CSF Proteome Profiling by TMT-MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total protein was extracted from CSF. After quantification and separation, 30 μL of protein from each sample was subjected to proteolysis. Tandem mass tag (TMT) labeling was carried out according to the instructions provided by the manufacturer of the TMT labeling kit (Thermo, Waltham, MA, USA). A high-pH RP spin column was used for grading. The samples were separated by chromatography (Easy nLC; Thermo) and analyzed by mass spectrometry (Thermo). The raw data were identified and quantitatively analyzed using Mascot2.2 (Matrix Science, Boston, MA, USA) and Proteome Discoverer1.4 (Thermo). Proteins with a fold change more than 1.2 or less than 0.83, as well as a statistical P-value < 0.05 between two groups, were selected as DEPs.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

TMT Labeling and Peptide Desalting

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After trypsin digestion, the peptides were desalted using a Strata X C18 SPE column (Phenomenex) and dried by vacuum centrifugation. The desalted peptides (100 µg) from each sample were dissolved in 0.5 moL/L TEAB solution and labeled using the TMT Labeling Kit (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Briefly, a unit of TMT reagent was thawed and reconstituted in acetonitrile. After the polypeptide mixture was incubated at RT for 2 h, it was pooled, desalted, and dried by vacuum centrifugation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Peptide Labeling and Purification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Furthermore, 100 μg peptides of each sample were labeled according to the instructions of the TMT labeling kit (Thermo Fisher, USA). The labeled peptides from each group were pooled and purified using an AKTA Purifier 100 (GE Healthcare, USA). The sample was loaded to the column equilibrated with buffer A (10 mM KH2PO4, 25% ACN, pH 3.0) and B (10 mM KH2PO4, 500 mM KCl, 25% ACN, pH 3.0). The chromatographic column (5 μm, 200 Å, PolyLCInc, Maryland, U.S.A.) was equilibrated with liquid A, and the sample was loaded from the injector to the chromatographic column for separation at a flow rate of 1 ml/min. The liquid-phase gradient was as follows: 0–25 min, the linear gradient of liquid B was from 0 to 10%; 25–32 min, the linear gradient of liquid B was from 10 to 20%; 32–42 min, the linear gradient of liquid B was from 20 to 45%; 42–47 min, the linear gradient of B solution was from 45 to 100%; 47–52 min, 52–60 min B solution was maintained at 100%; after 60 min, B solution was reset to 0%. During the elution process, the absorbance value at 214 nm was monitored, and the elution fractions were collected every 1 min, respectively, lyophilized and desalted using a C18 Cartridge.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!