The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

29 protocols using diphenylamine

1

Dische Method for DNA Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The DNA concentration in the matrix was estimated using the Dische method (Dische, 1930 ). This method is based on the reaction of desoxyribose with diphenylamine in acetic acid. When heated, levulinic aldehyde is produced, which then condenses with diphenylamine to form a colored compound. Briefly, the diphenylamine solution was prepared by dissolving 1 g of diphenylamine (Sigma) in 100 ml of pure acetic acid (Sigma, United States). Then, 2.75 ml of 96% SA was added. A calibration series of standard DNA solutions (50–500 μg/ml) was then prepared using herring sperm DNA (Sigma), and the matrix samples were prepared for analysis. All samples (2 ml) were distributed into glass tubes. Then, a double amount of Dische reagent (4 ml) was added, and the samples were heated for 15 min at 100°C in a water bath. The OD595 values were measured after cooling. MQ water was used as a control.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

DNA Quantification Using Dische Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The DNA concentration in the matrix was estimated using the Dische method (Dische, 1955 (link)). This method is based on the reaction of desoxyribose with diphenylamine in acetic acid. When heated, levulinic aldehyde is produced and condenses with diphenylamine to produce a colored compound. Briefly, the diphenylamine solution was prepared by dissolving 1 g of diphenylamine (Sigma) in 100 mL of pure acetic acid (Emsure, Germany). Then, 2.75 mL of 96% SA was added. A calibration series of standard DNA solutions (50–500 μg/mL) was then prepared using herring sperm DNA (Sigma), and the matrix samples were prepared for analysis. All samples (2 mL) were distributed into glass tubes. Then, a double amount of Dische reagent (4 mL) was added, and the samples were heated at 100°C in a water bath. The OD595 was measured after cooling. MQ water was used as a control.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Cytotoxicity Assay Reagents and Suppliers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Various chemicals and reagents were sourced from different suppliers for this study. Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA, USA) provided the trypsin/ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) solution. Sigma Chemical Company (Perth, Australia) supplied dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT), Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM), and trypan blue dye. Additionally, the diphenylamine (DPA) reagent was prepared using 100 mL glacial acetic acid, 1.5 g diphenylamine, 1.5 mL concentrated sulfuric acid, and 0.5 mL of a 16 mg/mL acetaldehyde stock solution, also obtained from Sigma Chemical Company.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Urinary Cotinine Thresholds for Smoking Detection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The current smoking rate is based on the definition of a smoker as someone who has smoked at least 100 individual cigarettes in his or her lifetime and who, at the time of interview, reported smoking every day or some days. Measurements of UCC are taken using gas chromatography–mass spectrometry, specifically with the detector model Clarus 600 T of Finland PerkinElmer. The indicators used in the measurement are cotinine and diphenylamine (Aldrich, USA). The UCC threshold for identifying smokers is generally set at 20–100 ng/ml [7 (link),13 (link),14 (link)], but the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco has suggested that the standardized threshold of urinary cotinine be set at 50 ng/ml [15 (link)]. It should be noted that this suggestion for standardization reflects a Western model that does not necessarily apply to the characteristics of South Korea or other Asian countries. In South Korea, for instance, studies involving interviews and longitudinal observations of certain populations have suggested UCC thresholds as low as 20 ng/ml can indicate smokers [9 ]. Admittedly, however, such a low threshold is not sensitive to the detection of cotinine owing to unrelated factors such as secondhand smoking. Therefore, the present research used one of the generally accepted threshold levels of UCC ≥ 30 ng/ml [16 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Antioxidant Activity Assay Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
H, xanthine solution, xanthine sodium salt, H2O2, thiobarbituric acid (TBA),diphenylamine, pyrogallol, standard SOD, GSH, GSSG and all chemicals were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Smoking History and Cotinine Levels

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Smoking-related factors included smoking status, urinary cotinine level, and pack-years of smoking. Smoking status was determined using the questionnaire and categorized as non-smoker, ex-smoker, or current smoker (including smoking often). Urinary cotinine levels were analyzed in 2010 and 2011 and measured using gas chromatography and mass spectrometry with a Perkin Elmer Clarus 600T (PerkinElmer, Turku, Finland), cotinine (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA), and diphenylamine (Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) (threshold of detection, 0.25 ng/mL) [21 ]. We corrected for urine dilution by using urinary creatinine concentrations and calculated creatinine-standardized cotinine concentrations (vs. non-standardized) by dividing individual urinary cotinine concentrations by creatinine concentrations. Pack-years of smoking (Equation (1)) were calculated using information collected with the questionnaire and the following formula:
Pack-years of smoking=Number of cigarettes smoked per day20 (the number of cigarettes in a pack)×the number of year smoked
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Calibration of Nitro-based GSR Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MS calibration
curves for nitroglycerin and diphenylamine were collected every day
that had sample measurement following methods described previously.21 (link) Briefly, a length of 1/4-inch (outer diameter)
sulfinert stainless-steel tube (5 inches in length) was packed with
200 mg of deactivated glass wool (Restek; Bellefonte, PA). Several
milligrams of nitroglycerin (1 mg/mL in acetonitrile; Sigma-Aldrich;
Burlington, MA) or diphenylamine (≥99%; Sigma-Aldrich; Burlington,
MA) were deposited into the packed tubes using standard solutions,
and the solvents were dried at least overnight by passing N2 through the tube (50 mL/min). Once dried, sequential flow rates
of N2 were passed through the saturator tube into the ionization
source to create calibration curves.
For data processing, background
and sample intensities were separately averaged per sample measurement.
The background intensity was then subtracted from the sample intensity,
and the difference was calibrated to vapor concentration. Concentrations
from all monitored transitions were averaged together. For measurements
of GSRs over time, the concentration for a time point was reported
only if all transitions responded above the limit of quantitation
(LOQ; signal to noise over 10).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Analytical Caffeine Extraction Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All chemicals used for caffeine analysis were of analytical grade. Bulk solvents and routine chemicals were procured from SISCO research laboratory (Mumbai, India). Caffeine standard and diphenylamine were procured from Sigma Aldrich, USA.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Catalyst Support Characterization and Preparation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HPS (Purolite Int., Llantrisant, UK), used as catalyst support, was of two types: hyper-cross-linked nonfunctionalized polystyrene, Macronet MN270 (BET SSA 1337 m2/g), and HPS containing tertiary amino groups, MN100 (BET SSA 724 m2/g), designated here as HPS-NR2. Both supports were washed with distilled water and acetone and then dried under vacuum as described elsewhere [34 (link)]. Benzene (BZ, 99.8%), toluene (TOL, 99.8%), naphthalene (NL, 99%), aniline (AN, 99%), anthracene (ANC, 97%), phenylacethylene (PHA, 98%), phenol (PL, ≥99%), propiophenone (PP, 98%), diphenylamine (DPA, 99%), tetrahydrofuran (THF, ≥99.9%), methanol (MeOH, 99.8%), acetone (≥99.5%), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2, 35%), isopropanol (i-PrOH, ≥99.5%), butanol (BuOH, ≥99%), hexane (≥99%), and dodecane (≥99%) were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich. Chloroplatinic acid hydrate (H2PtCl6·6H2O, Pt content 38.41%), palladium acetate (Pd(CH3COO)2, Pd content 47.68%), and ruthenium hydroxychloride (Ru(OH)Cl3, Ru content 45.05%) were purchased from JSC “Aurat” (Moscow, Russia). Sodium hydroxide (NaOH) was obtained from Reakhim (Moscow, Russia). Reagent-grade hydrogen of 99.999% purity was received from AGA (Tver, Russia). All chemicals were used as received. Distilled water was purified with an Elsi-Aqua water purification system.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Anticancer Potential of Venom Across Breast Cell Lines

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For this exprimental in vitro study, two breast cancer cell lines (MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231) and normal human mammary epithelial cell line (MCF-10a) were obtained from the National Cell Bank of Iran. Trypsin, 3-(4, 5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2, 5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT), acridine orange (AO), ethidium bromide (EB), dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), tween-20, propidium iodide (PI), JC-10, dichloro- dihydro-fluorescein diacetate (DCFH-DA), non-fat dry milk, and diphenylamine were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Chemical Co (St. Louis, MO, USA). NP-40 lysis buffer, antibodies, and enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) western blotting substrate were purchased from AbCam (Cambridge, UK). Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI) 1640 medium and fetal bovine serum (FBS) were procured from Gibco (USA). Lyophilized venom was supplied by Razi Vaccine and Serum Research Institute. Cells were treated with 0, 0.62, 1.25, 2.5, 5, and 10 μg/mL of venom in cell culture media.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!