The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

4 protocols using imipenem ipm

1

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute recommendations (M100 document) [16 ]. The diffusion method on Mueller–Hinton agar was used to test susceptibility to different antibiotics, including amoxicillin (AMX) (30 µg), cefipime (FEP) (30 µg), cephalothin (CF) (30 µg), ceftazidime (30 µg), amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (AMC) (30 µg), cefotaxime (CTX) (30 µg), ertapenem (ETP) (10 µg), aztreonam (30µg), meropenem (MEM) (10 µg), and imipenem (IPM) (10 µg) (Oxoid, Basingstoke, UK).
The selected isolates were resistant to ertapenem (≤18 mm), imipenem (≤19 mm), and/or meropenem (≤19 mm). The resistant isolates were confirmed by the Vitek 2 system (Biomérieux, Marcy l’Etoile, France) at MIC values ≥ 2 µg/mL for ETP and ≥4 µg/mL for IPM and MEM.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing of A. pittii

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) for A. pittii TCM strain against multiple antibiotics were tested by using disk diffusion and broth microdilution. It interpreted breakpoints for Acinetobacter spp. according to the recommendations from the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI), 2021 guidelines and European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST), 2021 . Because there is no tigecycline breakpoint for Acinetobacter, MIC was interpreted according to the guidelines of EUCAST for Enterobacterales (with MIC breakpoint value ≤0.5 mg/L denoting susceptibility and >0.5 mg/L denoting resistance). The antibiotic disks used in this study included imipenem (IPM, 10 µg, Oxoid, Cheshire, UK), meropenem (MEM, 10 µg, Oxoid, Cheshire, UK), Amikacin (AMI, 30 µg, Oxoid, Cheshire, UK), and ciprofloxacin (CIP, 5 µg, Oxoid, Cheshire, UK) in a Mueller-Hinton agar (MHA) culture medium (Oxoid, Cheshire, UK). In addition to the antibiotics mentioned above, colistin (COL, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and tigecycline (TGC, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) were also investigated using broth microdilution. Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 served as the quality control strain.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Screening Carbapenemase-Producing Bacterial Isolates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The bacterial isolates were screened for carbapenemase production according to CLSI guidelines (CLSI, 2005 ). In this method, carbapenem antibiotics-meropenem (MEM) and imipenem (IPM) discs (10 μg, each) (Oxoid, UK) were used. The antibiotic discs were placed on the surface of MHA plates using sterile forceps. The discs were placed about 30 mm apart and the plates were incubated for 24 h at 37 °C after which zones of inhibitions were read. Isolates that showed a zone of inhibition ≤ 21 mm in diameter for meropenem were considered as suspected carbapenemase producers and were subjected to confirmatory test by the Modified Hodges Test (MHT).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Antibiotic Susceptibility Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Susceptibility testing of isolates to 7 antibiotics was performed using disc diffusion method. Isolates were enriched in peptone water for 24 hours after which 0.1ml was streaked onto Mueller Hinton agar (Oxoid, UK). The following antibiotics were used; cefoxitin (FOX: 30µ g, Oxoid, UK), cefotaxime (CTX: 30µ g, Oxoid, UK), ceftazidime (CAZ: 30µ g, UK, Oxoid), gentamicin (GEN: 10µ g, Oxoid, UK), ciprofloxacin (CIP: 5µ g, Oxoid, UK), amoxycillin+clavulanic acid (AMC: 30µ g, Oxoid, UK) and imipenem (IPM: 10µ g, Oxoid, UK). Results were interpreted as resistant or susceptible based on the interpretative standard according to the clinical and laboratory standards institute (CLSI) manual29.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!