The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Cfx maestro 2

Manufactured by Bio-Rad
Sourced in United States, Belgium

The CFX Maestro 2.0 software is a data analysis platform designed for the management and analysis of real-time PCR data. It provides users with tools to design, run, and analyze experiments using Bio-Rad's real-time PCR instruments.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

33 protocols using cfx maestro 2

1

RNA Extraction and qPCR Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Xenograft tumor tissues were lysed with Tri-Xtract™ reagent (#786–652, G-Biosciences) using a polytron homogenizer (POLYTRON® PT 10–35, Kinematica). RNA was further purified with Ribospin II mini Kit (#314–150, GeneAll), according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Two hundred nanograms of RNA were retrotranscribed with PrimeScript RT Reagent Kit (#RR037A, Takara Bio) and quantitative PCR was performed with SsoAdvanced Universal SYBR Green Supermix (#1725274, Bio-Rad), using a Biorad CFX Connect™ Real-Time PCR Detection System. Data were analyzed using the Bio-Rad CFX Maestro 2.0 software (Bio-Rad) and mRNA expression was normalized to RPS20 and bACTIN genes. Oligonucleotides are listed in Supplementary Table S1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantitative PCR Analysis of ER Stress Genes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNA was purified and reverse-transcribed [69 (link)], then quantitative PCR was performed with SsoAdvanced Universal SYBR Green Supermix (#1725274, Bio-Rad Laboratories srl, Segrate, Italy) with the following oligonucleotides listed from 5′ to 3′: TMEM97 (F:ttgcgagcttgtgtttcagc; R:ttgcaggagttcgaatccac), RPS20 (F:gcgcctcttatcaagtcagc; R:cggaaaaacacccgtggag), ACAT2 (F:cggcgcggaccatcatag; R:acccacactggcttgtctaa), FDFT1 (F:tggactcgacagactctaagg; R:ttggtcaataagtcgcccacg), FDPS (F:agcctgttgtgtccgttttg; R:aggttcctctgtccacgctt), ATF4 (F:gttctccagcgacaaggcta; R:atcctgcttgctgttgttgg), CHOP (F:cagaaccagcagaggtcaca; R:agctgtgccactttcctttc), XBP1s (F:tgctgagtccgcagcaggtg; R:gctggcaggctctggggaag), BIP (F:tgttcaaccaattatcagcaaactc; R:ttctgctgtatcctcttcaccagt). Data were analyzed using the Bio-Rad CFX Maestro 2.0 software (Bio-Rad Laboratories srl, Segrate, Italy), and mRNA expression was normalized to RPS20 gene.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

RNA Extraction and Quantitative PCR Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The extraction of RNAs from germinated grains (germ-free grains) was performed using a Plant RNA Mini-preps kit (Biobasic, Markham, Canada). After DNAse treatment, samples were purified and concentrated with Monarch RNA Clean Up kit (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA). Reverse transcription was carried out with 0.5 μg of total RNAs, oligo d(T)23, and the ProtoScript First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (New England Biolabs).
Quantitative PCR was performed on the CFX Connect Real-Time instrument (Biorad, France) using SsoAdvanced Universal SYBR Green Supermix (Biorad, Hercules, CA, USA). Three replicates were performed for each experiment. The expression of genes of interest was normalized with two endogenous controls protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A) and succinate deshydrogenase (Bd-SDH) [64 (link),65 (link)]. The relative expression values were calculated using the ∆∆Cq method (software Bio-Rad CFX Maestro 2.0 (5.0.021.0616)). The primers used for RT-qPCR are listed in Supplementary Table S1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Real-Time RT-PCR Data Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Real time RT-PCR data were processed using ABI 7500 software v2.0.6 (ABI 7500) or Bio-Rad CFX Maestro 2.0 v5.0.021 (Bio-Rad Opus 96). Ct values were interpreted as described in the manufacturer’ IFU for each molecular diagnostic assay. Data were analysed using Microsoft Excel 365 software (Microsoft, Redmond, WA). Figures were prepared using GraphPad Prism version 9.2.0 for Windows (GraphPad Software, San Diego, California USA), www.graphpad.com.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantifying Muscle Immunogenicity of HDR-NP

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The immunogenicity of HDR-NP in treated muscles was analyzed by RT-PCR. In brief, the muscle samples collected from mdx mice were stored in RNAlater solution (Thermo Fisher Scientific) at −20 °C until RNA extraction. RNA in these samples was extracted using TRIzol reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific) following manufacturer’s protocol and quantified by Nanodrop One Microvolume UV-Vis Spectrophotometer. cDNA was then synthesized using iScript Reverse Transcription Supermix for RT-PCR (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.) following the manufacturer’s protocol. Quantitative RT-PCR was finally performed using iTaq Universal SYBR Green Supermix (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.) with cDNA templates (10 ng) and customized primers (0.5 μM, Integrated DNA Technologies, Inc.) for genes of interest on a CFX96 Touch Real-Time PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.). The thermocycling conditions used for PCR were 40 cycles of 95 °C for 5 s and 60 °C for 30 s. Melt curve analysis was performed at the end of PCR experiments. Glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) was selected as the reference gene for data analysis. Data were analyzed using CFX Maestro 2.0 (Bio-Rad). Sequences of primers used in this work are summarized in Table S3.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Analyzing Gene Expression in Peri-Implant Tissues

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The results from the samples from the nine patients were gathered and analyzed according to Control Bone sample (CB), Bone Loss sample (BL), and Peri-Implant Crevicular Fluid sample (PICF). Log-values of the DDCq were analyzed using the built-in t-test in the analysis software of the BioRad CFX Maestro 2.0. Upregulation or downregulation ≥2-fold was considered clinically relevant and statistical significance was set at P<0.05. 199 (link)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantifying mRNA Expression in Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA from cells and tissues was extracted using TRIzol. RT-qPcR was performed according to the manufacturer's protocol. Briefly, total RNA was reverse transcribed into cdNA using PrimeScript™ RT Master Mix (Perfect Real Time; cat. no. RR036A; Takara Bio, Inc.). Subsequently, qPcR was performed using SYBR Premix Ex Taq II (cat. no. RR820A; Takara Bio, Inc.) and a cFX connect instrument (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.). The following primers were used for qPcR: Mouse FoxO6 forward, 5'-cAG cAA ccc TcT TcG TTc AcA-3' and reverse, 5'-cAG GAc TGG TTA AGA TGG GAG AcT-3' (101 bp); and mouse β-actin forward, 5'-AGA TTA cTG cTc TGG cTc cTA Gc-3' and reverse, 5'-AcT cAT cGT AcT ccT GcT TGc T-3' (147 bp). The following thermocycling conditions were used for qPcR: 95˚C for 30 sec; 40 cycles of 5 sec at 95˚C and 30 sec at 56˚C; and melting curve analysis. mRNA expression levels were quantified using the 2 -ΔΔcq method (30) and normalized to the internal reference gene β-actin using cFX connect instrument software (cFX Maestro 2.0; Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.). RT-qPcR was performed in duplicate.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantitative PCR and Digital PCR Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The data was analyzed using specific instrument software. Real-time PCR was analyzed using CFX Maestro 2.0 software (Bio-Rad), and the resultant amplification curve and Cq values were used for further analysis. Data from ddPCR were evaluated using QuantaSoft Version 1.7.4 (Bio-Rad). Positive droplets in the experiment indicated that target DNA existed in the amplification process, whereas negative droplets signified no target DNA in the amplification process. The clusters of positive and negative droplets were separated through a threshold line immediately above the negative droplets. The acceptance threshold for total droplets per well was above 10 000 and suitable for the data analysis. The DNA copy number for each reaction was obtained directly from the ddPCR software using the Poisson error algorithm and the total error from a random distribution. The ddPCR linear regression was determined by plotting the value of the measured copy number and the assigned copy number using Microsoft Excel (Microsoft, Redmond, WA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Sensitive SARS-CoV-2 Delta Variant Detection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The method requires two parallel RT-PCR reactions carried out in separate wells. Reaction ‘A’ is designed to detect any SARS-CoV-2 sequence other than the Delta variant, i.e., non-Delta. Reaction ‘B’ is designed to detect only the Delta variant. The primers used for Reaction ‘A’ and Reaction ‘B’ are detailed in Table 1. The amplicons generated in both reactions are detected by a common fluorescently labelled hydrolysis probe (Table 1). Primers and probes were synthesized by Integrated DNA Technologies IDT, Belgium. Five μL RNA template was used in a 20 μL reaction containing 5 μL of 4x TaqMan Fast virus 1-step mastermix (Applied Biosystems), primers at 400 nM and probe at 250 nM. Thermal cycling was performed in a Bio-Rad CFX real-time PCR system with reverse transcription at 54 °C for 10 min, followed by 94 °C for 3 min, then 40 cycles of 94 °C for 15 s and 58 °C for 30 s. Data were processed using Bio-Rad CFX maestro 2.0 software with baseline subtracted curve fit, fluorescence drift correction, automatically calculated baseline cycles and manual threshold settings. Each run included IC19 RNA and Delta #395 RNA, both diluted a million-fold, as positive controls. Several no-template nuclease-free water negative controls were also included in each run.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Drosophila S2 Cell Transfection and Morpholino Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Drosophila S2 cells were cultured at 28 °C in Schneider’s Insect Medium (Sigma, S9895-1L) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated bovine growth serum (HyClone, SH30541.03HI). When confluent, the S2 cells were passaged with 1:5 dilution every 5 days. For transfections, 2.5 × 106 S2 cells/well were seeded in six-well plates for 24 h, and then transfected using lipofectamine 3000 (Invitrogen, L3000015) according to the manufacturer’s protocols. For morpholino oligo treatment, 6 × 106 S2 cells/well were seeded in six-well plates and incubated with 1 µM, 2.5 µM or 5 µM vivo-morpholino oligos against AGO1 TDMD trigger in the medium for 48 h, then the total RNA was extracted for northern blot and RT-qPCR. Morpholino oligo sequences and RT-qPCR primers are listed in Supplementary Data 2, RT-qPCR data were obtained by Bio-Rad CFX96 real-time PCR machine with the Bio-Rad CFX Maestro 2.0 software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!