The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

29 protocols using mx8000

1

Preoperative Liver Volume Assessment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Multiphase contrast-enhanced CT was carried out during preoperative assessment and after PVE or ALPPS stage 1 (MX-8000 or Brilliance; Philips Research Eindhoven, The Netherlands). The arterial phase images were acquired 35 seconds and porto-venous phase 70 seconds after injection of contrast. The portal-venous phase was used for volumetric assessment. The liver was outlined on an axial scan in a semi-automated fashion with manual adjustment to ensure that all extra-hepatic structures were excluded in order to calculate the total liver volume (TLV; cc). The tumor volume (TV; cc) and FRLV (cc) were calculated by manual delineation according to Couinaud’s functional segmentation of the liver (7 (link),20 (link)). The volume share of the FRL (FRLV share; %) was calculated using the following formula:
A FRLV share of ≥30% was considered sufficient volume for undertaking safe resection (7 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Multiphasic Abdominal CT Imaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All patients underwent multiphasic contrast-enhanced abdominal CT scan using one of the following systems: Discovery CT750 HD (GE Medical System), LightSpeed VCT (GE Medical System), iCT 128 (Philips), iCT 256 (Philips), Mx8000 (Philips), Sensation 64 CT (Siemens), Somatom Definition (Siemens), or Toshiba (Aquilion). Scanning parameters are as follows: 120–140 kVp; 150–190 mAs; field of view, 350 × 350 mm; matrix, 512 × 512. Table S1 details the parameters of slice thickness and pixel spacing. A 1.5–2.0 mL/kg body weight bolus of contrast material iodixanol (Ultravist 370, Bayer, Germany) was injected intravenously at a flow rate of 3–4.0 mL/sec. Arterial phase, portal venous phase, and equilibrium phase were performed with bolus triggering, typically ~30, 60–70, and 180 s, respectively, after injection of contrast. We retrieved the arterial phase and portal venous phase images from the picture archiving and communication system of the five centers and downloaded images in a Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine format.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Chest CT Imaging Protocol for GGN Diagnosis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CT images were acquired using various instruments, including a Somatom Plus 4 (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany), LightSpeed Ultra (GE Medical Systems, Milwaukee, WI), and an Mx8000 (Philips Medical System, Andover, MA). Scanning was performed from the thoracic inlet to the lung base, with the patient at full inspiration; intravenous contrast material was not used. Images were obtained using a level of −600 Hounsfield units (HU) and a width of 1500 HU (lung window). All high resolution CT images were reconstructed into 0.625-mm-thick sections, with a tube voltage of 120–140 kV, tube current of 200–400 mA, and a 512 × 512 matrix, using a bone algorithm axial reconstruction and filtered back projection algorithm. CT images used to diagnose GGN were re-reviewed by two thoracic radiologists (QG W, LF Z), each having more than 12 years of experience in reading chest CT images, blinded to the lesion pathology.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Interstitial Lung Abnormalities Imaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Details about the imaging procedure have previously been published and are briefly described below [20 (link), 22 (link)]. Examination of the screening group used a multi-slice CT system (16 rows Philips Mx 8000, Philips Medical Systems) performed supine at full inspiration with a low-dose technique (120 kV and 40mAs). Thin slices were reconstructed with a hard algorithm before visual assessment. Two different sets of all scans in random order were created before evaluation by two independent observers (LHT and MMWW) who were blinded to person identification and date of scan. Interstitial lung abnormalities were registered as either absent or present. If present, ILA were categorized as centrilobular, pleural, or paraseptal nodules, ground-glass attenuation, reticulation or honeycombing (Supplementary Table 3) [22 (link)]. The interobserver agreement in the detection of ILA was fair to nearly substantial (kappa 0.60) and has previously been published in more detail [22 (link)]. Statistical analyses were performed on a combined ILA variable, classifying participants as having ILA if at least one observer noted a finding of ILA.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Contrast-Enhanced Abdominal CT Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Contrast-enhanced CT examinations were performed using 16- (n = 4), 64- (n = 17), or 256- (n = 5) detector-row scanners (Mx 8000, Brilliance 64, or iCT256; Philips Medical Systems, Cleveland, OH). Each patient was asked to drink 1000 mL of tap water for gastric distension 10 min before the CT examination. Intravenous nonionic contrast material (2 mL/kg; iomeprol, Iomeron 350; Bracco, Milano, Italy) was administered via the antecubital vein, using a power injector (Stellant D, Medrad, Indianola, PA) at a rate of 3 mL/s. Bolus-tracking software (Brilliance; Philips Medical Systems) was used to trigger the scanning 60 s after the aortic enhancement reached a threshold of 150-HU. Helical scan data were acquired using 16×1.5, 64×0.625, or 128×0.625 mm collimation; a rotation speed of 0.5 s; a pitch of 1.25, 0.641, or 0.993; and a kvP of 120 kVp). Using an automatic tube current modulation technique (Dose-Right; Philips Medical Systems), effective mAs ranged from 69 to 379 mAs. Transverse and coronal section datasets were reconstructed with 4-mm thick sections at 3-mm increments.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

CT Imaging Protocol for Clinical Studies

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Imaging of patients in the training data set was performed on one of three Philips scanners: MX8000, Brilliance iCT 256, or Brilliance 40 (Philips Medical Systems, Best, Netherlands). Patients were imaged in the supine position at full inspiration. Scanning parameters were as follows: detector collimation: 0.625–0.75; rotation time: 0.5–0.75 s; tube voltage: 120 kVp; tube current: 34–229 mAs. 100–150 ml iopromide 300 (300 mg I/mL Ultravist, Bayer Pharma, Berlin, Germany) was administered intravenously at a rate of 2–4 ml s−1 after a 30–70 s delay.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Measuring Coronary Artery Calcium Scores

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cardiac CT examinations were obtained using General Electric Health Systems LightSpeed Plus and LightSpeed Ultra, Siemens Volume Zoom, or Philips MX 8000 machines. These examinations were performed using the same protocol as employed in the NHLBI’s Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis [13 (link)]. The details of cardiac CT examination have been reported in previous publications [9 (link)]. Cardiac CT images from all sites were sent electronically to the central CT reading center located at Wake Forest University Health Sciences, Winston Salem, NC, where trained CT analysts identified CAC in the epicardial coronary arteries using Agatston score. Agatston score refers to the amount of calcium detected by the scan based on the area and the density of the calcified plaques [14 (link)]. In this study, the sum of the vessel plaque is reported as the total CAC score. Total CAC scores from the first and second measured values were then averaged.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Low-Dose Chest CT Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All CT scans were performed using volumetric acquisition (16 rows Philips Mx 8000, Philips Medical Systems, Eindhoven, The Netherlands) and a low-dose protocol (120 kV, 40 mAs) with a section collimation of 16 x 0.75 mm, pitch 1.5 and rotation time 0.5 s. The scans were obtained after full inspiration and without the use of contrast. Images were reconstructed with thin (1 mm) sections and a sharp filter algorithm (kernel D) [19 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Multidetector CT Scanning for Splenic Lesions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Various types of multidetector computed tomography scanners with 8–320 channels were used to screen patients in the two hospital databases. Commonly used multidetector CT scanners include: an 8-channel scanner (LightSpeed Ultra, GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI, USA, [n = 7]), a 16-channel scanner (Sensation 16, Siemens, Forchheim, Germany, [n = 18]; LightSpeed Pro 16, GE Healthcare, [n = 13]; Mx8000, Philips Medical Systems, Best, the Netherlands, [n = 7]), 64-channel and 320-channel scanners (Brilliance 64, Philips Medical Systems, [n = 22]; LightSpeed VCT, GE Healthcare, [n = 14]; Aquilion, Toshiba Medical Systems, Otawara, Japan, [n = 7]). Table 1 summarizes the CT parameters of popular CT scanners. All of the CT images included portal venous phase, which was used to evaluate splenic lesions. The portal venous scans were acquired at fixed delays (70–80 seconds) after the administration of 1.5–2.0 mL per kilogram of body weight of nonionic contrast material at a rate of 2.0–3.5 mL/sec with a pump (Multilevel CT; Medrad, Indianola, PA, USA) via an 18-gauge catheter placed in a peripheral vein.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Abdominal CT Scans for Distension Assessment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Abdominal CT scans were obtained with a helical multislice CT scanner, exposure 120 kV and 50 mAs, using the available dose reduction options (tube current modulation). Section thickness and image reconstruction depended on the scanner model (2.5-mm thickness, 1.6-mm interval reconstruction with Mx8000, Philips Medical Systems, Best, The Netherlands; 2-mm thickness, 1.5-mm interval reconstruction with Somatom Sensation 16 or Somatom Definition AS, Siemens Medical Solutions, Forchheim, Germany). Images were obtained in the supine position during a single breath-hold. No oral or intravenous contrast medium was administered. At the time of each CT scan, the participant's subjective sensation of abdominal distension was measured on a graphic rating scale graded from 0 (no distension) to 6 (extremely severe distension).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!