The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Ac40 clinical audiometer

Manufactured by Interacoustics
Sourced in Denmark

The AC40 is a clinical audiometer designed for comprehensive hearing assessments. It provides essential functionality for conducting pure-tone and speech audiometry, enabling healthcare professionals to evaluate an individual's hearing abilities.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

15 protocols using ac40 clinical audiometer

1

Standardized Extended Comprehension Audiometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In Flanders, a Madsen Orbiter 922 or Madsen Midimate 622 audiometer connected to
an HDA-200 headphone, calibrated according to ISO-389 standards, was used.
Partners in Slovenia used an Interacoustics Clinical Audiometer AC40. Partners
in The Netherlands used an Interacoustics Equinox 2.0 audiometer and an
Interacoustics Callisto portable audiometer. The SEC was administered on a
7-inch Samsung Galaxy Tab A tablet, connected to DD65 transducers embedded in
Peltor caps. The test setup was calibrated to the sound-weighted noise (SWN),
i.e., noise with a spectrum similar to the average spectrum of the test
materials, at 80 dB Sound Pressure Level (SPL) with a Brüel & Kjaer Sound
level meter 2260 and a Brüel & Kjaer 4153 artificial ear using the flat
plate. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee Research UZ / KU Leuven.
The SEC test used and the protocol for children are described in the following
paragraphs.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Pure Tone Audiometry for Hearing Loss Evaluation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The pure tone audiometry was applied in quiet rooms according to the standards of the Industrial Acoustic Company (IAC) Inc. using a Clinical Audiometer AC40 device (Interacoustics, Assens, Denmark). The determination of the type and degree of hearing loss was based on pure tone average (PTA). By determining the air and bone conduction thresholds (BCT) at 500, 1000, and 2000 Hz, the PTA values for both ears were obtained separately. The Northern and Downs classification8 was used for the classification of hearing loss. According to this classification, a pure tone average less than 16 dB is accepted as normal hearing, 16-25 dB slight hearing loss, 26-30 dB mild hearing loss, 31-50 dB moderate hearing loss, 51-70 db severe hearing loss, 70 dB and above profound hearing loss.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Pure-Tone Audiogram Measurement Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Pure-tone audiograms were performed using Clinical Audiometer AC-40 (Interacoustics A/S, Assens, Denmark) in silent cabins. Air and bone conduction hearing thresholds were measured using TDH 39 standard earphones between 0.125 and 8 kHz and Radioear B-71 bone vibrator between 500 and 4000 Hz, respectively. Pure-tone averages were calculated at 500, 1000, and 2000 frequencies.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Comprehensive Audiological Assessment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The audiological assessment encompassed tympanometry (Interacoustics Impedance Audiometer AT235, Middelfart, Denmark), transitory evoked otoacoustic emissions (Eclipse, Interacoustics, Assens, Denmark), and play audiometry for younger or less cooperative children and pure tone audiometry (Clinical Audiometer AC40, Interacoustics, Middelfart, Denmark) for older or more cooperative children.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Customized Hearing Training for CI Users

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The LabView (National Instruments, Austin, TX, USA) environment was used for software development.
For the ripple spectrum test, the digitally synthetized signals were digital-to-analog (D/A) converted by a USB 6212 data acquisition board (National Instruments) and played in a free sound field via an SP 90 loudspeaker (Interacoustics, Middelfart, Denmark) located at a distance of 1 m in front of the CI user.
For the speech discrimination test, signals were played with an AC-40 clinical audiometer (Interacoustics, Denmark) and SP 90 loudspeaker (Interacoustics, Denmark) located at a distance of 1 m in front of CI user. The average sound level of the signals was 65 dB SPL in the clinical test.
The training proceeded at CI users’ home using their PC, and digitally synthetized signals were D/A converted by the sound card of PC. During the training, the CI users could use a comfortable sound level by their choice.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Audiologic Evaluation in Chemoradiation Therapy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To assess the effect of the trial intervention, a complete audiologic evaluation was conducted before chemoradiation therapy and repeated 1 month after the end of chemoradiation. Pure tone air conduction audiograms were performed at frequencies ranging from 0.5 to 14 kHz using an AC-40 clinical audiometer (Interacoustics, calibrated yearly, ANSI S3.6–2004 standards) with inserted earphones (ER-3A, for 0.5 to 8 kHz) and with circumaural earphones (Koss R/80, for 9 to 14 kHz). Bone conduction audiograms were also performed for 5 frequencies ranging from 0.5 to 4 kHz. Sound intensity was measured in decibel hearing level (dB HL). In addition, distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) recordings were performed at 6 frequencies ranging from 1 to 6 kHz using an Echoport ILO-292-USB-II (Otodynamics). The day before proceeding to the second or third trans-tympanic injection, a complete unblinded air conduction audiogram was done for safety monitoring and was not kept blind to the ear assignment. The final audiologic evaluation was conducted by an audiologist blinded to the ear assignment and to the trial records. When the second or third trans-tympanic injection was not performed as scheduled, the complete final audiologic evaluation (including bone conduction and DPOAEs) was conducted before the upcoming chemotherapy.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Comprehensive Audiometric Evaluation Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After a clinical otoscopy examination, the patients underwent pure-tone audiometry using an Interacoustics° AC 40 clinical audiometer in a soundproof booth. Air and bone conduction hearing thresholds, in decibel hearing levels (dB HL), were obtained at octave intervals from 250 to 8000 Hz. For each ear, a four-frequency (500 Hz, 1, 2, and 4 kHz) average pure-tone threshold (PTA) was obtained. Tympanometric measurements were taken using an air pressure from −600 to +300 daPa (Interacoustics° AA222).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Hearing and Tinnitus Evaluation in ENT Patients

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The hearing tests were conducted in an ear nose and throat (ENT) department during the patients’ stay in the hospital. All tests were performed by one and the same researcher.
All the patients underwent subjective and objective otolaryngological and otoneurological examination, with particular emphasis on the condition of the outer, middle, and inner ear as well as nearby anatomical areas that may affect the state of hearing or the generation of tinnitus (the nose, paranasal sinuses, and nasopharynx).
Hearing tests were performed through PTA (0.125–8 kHz) and HFA (8–16 kHz), using an Interacoustics AC40 clinical audiometer in an audiometric booth. In PTA and HFA, threshold curves were determined in the 0.125–16 kHz frequency range. The next step was to characterize tinnitus in each patient (excluding the group A) in terms of its frequency and intensity. The data collected during the study were analyzed as follows:

hearing impairment was diagnosed based on the results of PTA and HFA;

a sound threshold of 20 dB was considered the limit between normal hearing and hearing impairment.

+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Soundproof Booth TEOAE Measurement

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All measurements were performed in a soundproof booth. TEOAEs were recorded using the ILO92 system (Otodynamics Ltd., London, UK). The Otodynamics 5.6 clinical OAE software was used, and responses were recorded by a standard transducer (Otodynamics Model UGS TEOAE Probe). The probe, comprising a transmitter and a microphone, was fitted to the external auditory meatus with a foam rubber tip. CAS was delivered with a headphone (TDH49) using an AC40 clinical audiometer (Interacoustics, Middlefart, Denmark).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Pure-Tone Audiometry for Hearing Assessment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Pure-tone audiograms were obtained at frequencies of 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 8 kHz on both ears. Only air conduction audiometry was performed using the usual procedure of 10-dB descending and 5-dB ascending steps. Audiometric testing was performed one volunteer at a time, in a double-walled sound attenuating booth using an Interacoustics AC40 clinical audiometer. Pure-tone stimuli were delivered through TDH-49 supra-aural earphones. Earphone placement was checked by the examiner and all audiograms were collected manually by qualified audiologists. The audiometer was calibrated according to the standards of the International Organization for Standardization, ISO 389 and checked every year. Listening checks were performed each day of testing. Participants showing audiometric thresholds above 20 dB at any of the assessed frequencies were classified as having hearing loss and were excluded from the study so as to only include participants without any preexisting hearing loss.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!