The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Signal version 5

Manufactured by Cambridge Electronic Design
Sourced in United Kingdom

Signal, version 5 is a digital signal processing device designed for laboratory applications. It provides fundamental functionalities for analyzing and manipulating electronic signals. The core function of this product is to capture, process, and display digital waveforms.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

5 protocols using signal version 5

1

Patch-clamp Analysis of GABA Receptor Kinetics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Patch-clamp recordings were analyzed using Signal, version 5 (Cambridge Electronic Design) and Axograph (version 1.3.4). Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism 9 software (San Diego, CA, USA). The statistical analyses were two-tailed statistical tests with alpha risk set at 0.05. All data were tested for normality using the Shapiro–Wilk test. For two-group comparisons we used two-tailed paired or unpaired t test depending on if the data resulted from the same cells or not, respectively. Further, one-way and two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test were used when comparing more than two datasets. In each experiment, results are presented as amplitude difference, percent change, p value(s), t value(s), statistical test used and cell number. Further animal number is indicated in each respective results section. Correlations between reduction of GABAAfast and GABAAslow were done using a Pearson r correlation. Statistical significance is defined as *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, and ****p < 0.0001, if not noted otherwise.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Whole-Cell Patch-Clamp Recordings of Optogenetically-Stimulated Neurons

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Slices were initially visualized under epifluorescence illumination with a high-sensitivity digital frame transfer camera (Cooke SensiCam) mounted on an Olympus BX50-WI epifluorescence microscope with a × 40 long working distance water-immersion lens. Once a GFP+ interneuron was identified, visualization was switched to infrared–differential interference contrast microscopy for the actual patching of the neuron. Micropipettes for whole-cell recording were constructed from 1.2 mm outer diameter borosilicate pipettes on a Narishige PP-83 vertical puller. The standard internal solution for whole-cell current-clamp recording was as follows (in mM): 130 K-gluconate, 10 KCl, 2 MgCl2, 10 HEPES, 4 Na2ATP, 0.4 Na2GTP, pH 7.3. These pipettes had a DC impedance of 3–5 MΩ. Membrane currents and potentials were recorded using an Axoclamp 700B amplifier (Molecular Devices). Recordings were digitized at 20–40 kHz with a CED Micro 1401 Mk II and a PC running Signal, version 5 (Cambridge Electronic Design). Optogenetic stimulation in vitro consisted of 2–5 ms duration blue light pulses delivered using a high-power (750 mW) LED. Sweeps were run at 20 s intervals.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Patch-clamp Analysis of GABA Receptor Kinetics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Patch-clamp recordings were analyzed using Signal, version 5 (Cambridge Electronic Design) and Axograph (version 1.3.4). Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism 9 software (San Diego, CA, USA). The statistical analyses were two-tailed statistical tests with alpha risk set at 0.05. All data were tested for normality using the Shapiro–Wilk test. For two-group comparisons we used two-tailed paired or unpaired t test depending on if the data resulted from the same cells or not, respectively. Further, one-way and two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test were used when comparing more than two datasets. In each experiment, results are presented as amplitude difference, percent change, p value(s), t value(s), statistical test used and cell number. Further animal number is indicated in each respective results section. Correlations between reduction of GABAAfast and GABAAslow were done using a Pearson r correlation. Statistical significance is defined as *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, and ****p < 0.0001, if not noted otherwise.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Measuring Muscle Activity with EMG

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Throughout the experiment, subjects were seated comfortably in a non-reclining chair, with their right hand rested on a cushion. Electromyographic (EMG) activity was recorded from the right first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscle using Ag/AgCl cup electrodes arranged in a belly-tendon montage. The raw signals were amplified and a bandpass filter was also applied. (20 Hz to 2 kHz (Digitimer, Welwyn Garden City, UK)) Signals were digitised at 5 kHz (CED Power 1401; Cambridge Electronic Design, Cambridge, United Kingdom) and data were stored on a computer for offline analysis (Signal Version 5.10, Cambridge Electronic Design, UK was used).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Electromyographic Recording of FDI Muscle

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Throughout the experiment, participants were seated comfortably in a non-reclining chair, with their right index finger rested over the 'M' key on a keyboard. Their forearms were supported using a cushion. Electromyographic (EMG) activity was recorded from the right first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscle using 19 x 38 mm surface electrodes (Ambu WhiteSensor 40713) arranged in a belly-tendon montage. The raw signals were amplified, and a bandpass filter was also applied (20 Hz to 2 kHz, Digitimer, Welwyn Garden City, United Kingdom). Signals were digitised at 5 kHz (CED Power 1401; Cambridge Electronic Design, Cambridge, United Kingdom) and data were stored on a computer for offline analysis (Signal version 5.10, Cambridge Electronic Design, United Kingdom).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!