The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Paired end libraries

Manufactured by Illumina
Sourced in United States

Paired-end libraries are a type of DNA sequencing library preparation method used in next-generation sequencing. The primary function of paired-end libraries is to generate sequencing reads from both ends of a DNA fragment, providing additional contextual information about the sequenced region.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

17 protocols using paired end libraries

1

Paired-end Sequencing of Human Genomes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All samples were adjusted to 300 ng/µL and fragmented by ultrasonication, aiming for a fragment size of 300 base pairs (bp). Barcoded libraries were prepared using Wafergen's PrepX ILM DNA Library Kit and beads size selected before being pooled and sequenced at 150 bp at the paired end on HiSeq-4000. All procedures followed the manufacturer's instructions. We performed multiple QC sets during library preparation using 300 ng of human gDNA samples as internal control and all QC passed for this project.
Two Illumina paired-end libraries were constructed (from one female and one male) and sequenced with a read length of 150 bp and an average fragment size of ~ 350 bp. Reads were first filtered using Trimmomatic [37 (link)] and PrinSeq [38 (link)] to remove adapters and low-quality reads, and then sequencing errors were corrected using Quake [39 (link)]. The libraries were assembled individually using SOAPdenovo 2.04 [40 (link), 41 (link)] with a kmer size of 29, gap filled with GapCloser [42 (link)] and finally scaffolded with SSPACE3 [43 (link)] with default parameters.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Genome Assembly for 33 Bat Species

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The genome assemblies of the 33 bat species investigated here were retrieved from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/, last accessed February 18, 2019; SI Appendix, Table S1). In addition, we generated draft assemblies for three species of New World bats (Pteronotus parnellii, Trachops cirrhosus, and S. lilium) at 50 to 100× coverage, with two Illumina paired-end libraries (SI Appendix, Table S1). These assemblies are deposited in Dryad Digital Repository (47 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Isolating and Sequencing Mitochondrial DNA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MtDNA was isolated from tissue samples using long-range PCR methods. Amplified mtDNA PCR products were constructed into Illumina paired-end libraries, and raw sequence data were pre-processed and aligned using the Mercury pipeline.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Whole Exome Sequencing Approach

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA (1 μg) was fragmented by sonication. Illumina paired-end libraries from genomic DNA samples were constructed (Lupski et al., 2013 (link)). Pre-capture libraries were pooled and hybridized in solution to the BCM-HGSC CORE exome capture design (Bainbridge et al., 2011 (link)) (52Mb; NimbleGen). Captured DNA fragments were sequenced on an Illumina HiSeq 2000 platform, producing 9–10 gigabase-pairs (Gb) of sequence for each personal genome and achieving an average of 95% of the targeted exome bases covered to an average depth of 20x or greater, with mean coverage of target bases of over 100x. Raw sequence reads were mapped and aligned to the GRCh37 (hg19) human genome reference assembly using the HGSC Mercury analysis pipeline (http://www.tinyurl.com/HGSC-Mercury/) (Reid et al., 2014 (link)) or the Baylor Genetics analysis pipeline (Liu et al., 2019 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Whole Exome Sequencing of Desmoplastic Infantile Ganglioglioma

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
WES was performed in DIC 2 and DIC 5 (Table 1) using germline DNA extracted from bone marrow fibroblasts with normal karyotype. All variations identified by WES were confirmed as somatic on matched tumor/normal samples and tested on the remaining three DIC cases by Sanger sequencing. Illumina paired-end libraries were generated according to manufacturer’s protocol (Illumina San Diego, CA). Image processing and basecall were performed using the Illumina Real Time Analysis Software. Paired whole-exome fastq data were aligned to the human reference genome (GRCh38/hg38) with the BWA-MEM algorithm (10 (link)). Duplicates were marked using Samblaster. Quality of the aligned reads, somatic variant calling and copy number analysis were performed through CEQer2 tool, as previously described (11 (link)). Variants were annotated using dbSNP142. Variants with Minor Allele Frequency < 0.01 or carrying a ‘Clinical’ dbSNP flag were further processed; the other variants were discarded from subsequent analyses. Filtered variants were exported as vcf files and used as input for Annovar (12 (link)) analysis/annotation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Illumina Paired-End Library Preparation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA (1 μg) was used to make Illumina paired-end libraries according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA), with slight modifications as described previously [15 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Exome Sequencing Library Preparation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA (1 μg) was used to make Illumina paired-end libraries according to the manufacturer's protocol (Illumina, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA), with modifications as described previously.16 (link),17 (link) Exome capture was performed using a Nimblegen SeqCap EZ Human Exome Library v.2.0 (Roche, Madison, WI, USA) according to the manufacturers' protocols. Illumina paired-end sequencing (2 × 100 bp), alignment, and variant calling were performed as described previously.18 (link)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Genomic DNA Extraction and Sequencing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We extracted genomic DNA from ∼500–1000 flies per DGRP line using the Gentra Puregene Tissue Kit (Qiagen) and purified the samples by phenol-chloroform extraction. We constructed high molecular weight double-strand genomic DNA samples into Illumina paired-end libraries according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Illumina) (Supplemental Text S2) and sequenced shotgun DNA libraries on the Illumina HiSeq 2000 or GAII platforms, according to the manufacturer’s specifications.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Sequencing and Annotating Bacterial Genomes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Nematode 12S and 28S rRNA genes were sequenced as previously described (49 (link)), and sequences were submitted to NCBI. Bacterial genomes were sequenced using Illumina paired-end libraries (mean insert length, 300 bp) and quality trimmed using DynamicTrim.pl v.1.10 in the solexQC package. Dynamic trimming was performed according to TrimAI’s, v1.2rev59 (50 (link)) default settings. After excluding reads of <20 bp and lacking barcode sequences, genomes were assembled with Velvet v.1.1.06 (51 (link), 52 (link)) using automatic determination of sequencing coverage and a series of kmer values. Draft genomes were annotated using MaGe (27 (link), 28 (link)) and submitted to EMBL. 16S rRNA sequences from draft genomes were assessed using BLASTn (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) and were submitted to GenBank.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Illumina Sequencing of IG Bird DNA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA from an IG bird was prepared for sequencing. Illumina paired-end libraries were generated from these DNA samples (mean insert sizes of approximately 220 bases). The library was sequenced on two lanes using an Illumina HiSeq instrument (Illumina, San Diego, U.S.A.) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The reads were mapped to the chicken genome (galGal6 genome assembly) using the software BWA (version: 0.7.12) [98 ] resulting in average read depths of approximately 30X over the chicken genome. Following removal of duplicates using the Picard toolkit [99 ] SNPs and small insertions/deletions were identified from the alignment files using SAMtools (version 1.6) [100 (link)] in combination with custom python scripts. The mapping data were used to determine read depths in 1 kb windows over the region of interest. The mapping distances between mate-pairs were used to detect structural variation in relation to the reference assembly.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!