The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

255 protocols using vitek 2 automated system

1

Identification and Antibiotic Susceptibility of Acinetobacter baumannii Isolate

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The A. baumannii isolate was collected at Dr George Mukhari Tertiary Laboratory (DGMTL, Pretoria, South Africa) located at Dr George Mukhari Academic Hospital in April 2018 and identified using a double identification method. The VITEK2 automated system (bioMerieux, Marcy l’Etoile, France) and genotypic confirmation of A. baumannii isolate using conventional polymerase chain reaction (cPCR) detection of blaOXA-51 was carried out. Oxacillinase blaOXA-51 is intrinsic to Acinetobacter species and reportedly reliable to genotypically confirm strain identity [30 (link)]. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed using a VITEK2 automated system (bioMerieux, France). Piperacillin + tazobactam, ceftazidime, cefepime, cefotaxime/ceftriaxone, imipenem, meropenem, gentamycin, ciprofloxacin and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole were tested. Results were analyzed and interpreted following the manufacturer guidelines.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Identification and Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Bacterial Isolates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Collected isolates were identified using a phenotypic and genotypic method, VITEK2 automated system (bioMerieux, France) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification of blaOXA-51 gene.
Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed using the VITEK2 automated system (bioMerieux, France). Piperacillin + tazobactam (ptz), ceftazidime (caz), cefepime (fep), trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (sxt), gentamycin (cn10), ciprofloxacin (cip), cefotaxime (ctx), imipenem (imp), meropenem (mem), and tigecycline (tig) were tested.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Identification and Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Acinetobacter baumannii

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The isolate was identified using a double identification method; VITEK 2 automated system (bioMerieux, Marcy-l’Étoile, France) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification of blaOXA-51 gene [36 (link),37 (link),38 (link)]. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed using VITEK 2 automated system (bioMerieux, Marcy-l’Étoile, France). Piperacillin/tazobactam, ceftazidime, cefepime, cefotaxime/ceftriaxone, imipenem, meropenem, gentamycin, ciprofloxacin, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, tigecycline, and colistin were tested. Colistin resistance was confirmed using broth microdilution (ComASP® Colistin 0.25–16 µg/mL, Diagnostic Liofilchem, Inc. Zona Industriale, Roseto degli Abruzzi, Italy), and performed and interpreted as described by the manufacturer.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Epidemiology of Candidemia in Saudi Arabia

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The study was conducted at King Fahd Hospital of the University Al-Khobar, a 550-bed secondary care and academic training centre. All patient age groups were included. Charts were individually reviewed to include cases that had clinically significant isolates. For the enrolled cases, the patients’ chart data (age, sex, and location of patients when specimens were collected) and microbiological results available in the laboratory information system were evaluated. Routine testing of candidemia isolates in the laboratory included speciation by the automated VITEK 2 system (bioMe ´rieux Inc., Durham, NC, USA) between 2013 and 2016 and the VITEK MS (bioMe ´rieux Inc.) between 2016 and 2018.16 Susceptibility testing was performed on all strains using the automated VITEK 2 system throughout the study period and was interpreted based on the FDA/CLSI breakpoints.17 Intrinsic resistance patterns were excluded from the analysis e.g. resistance to amphotericin B in Candida lusitaniae and to fluconazole in Candida krusei. Only the first episode of candidemia per patient was included in the analysis. Two or more Candida species episodes per patient were counted separately. All cause crude mortality was recorded at 14, 30, 60, and 90 days.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Carbapenem-Resistant Isolate Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A total of 61 non-susceptible isolates to at least one of the carbapenems, with a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of >1mg/L for imipenem or meropenem, or >0.5mg/L for ertapenem, according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) [11 ] were included in the study. They were stored at -70°C in 1% protease/peptone broth containing 7% glycerol for further evaluation. Species identification was performed with VITEK II automated system (bioMérieux, Marcy l’Etoile, France).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Antibiotic Resistance in Urinary Tract Infections

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
ESBL are enzymes that give resistance to most beta-lactam antibiotics, including penicillins, cephalosporins, and the monobactam aztreonam. Bacteremia is defined when there are bacteria present in bloodstream. The causative microbes were confirmed by the presence of microorganisms with a colony count of 105 CFU/mL in urine cultures or the isolation of microorganisms from blood specimens of patients using automated methods. Detection of ESBL producing Escherichia coli and antibiotic susceptibility patterns of urinary tract pathogens were identified using a Vitek II automated system (bioMérieux Inc.) or Microscan (Siemens Healthcare Inc.) at each hospital. The susceptibility of a uropathogen to an antibiotic was determined by interpreting the breakpoints recommended by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines (2017).[12 ] Microbial isolates showing intermediate antimicrobial susceptibility were considered to be resistant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Automated Blood Culture and Susceptibility

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Blood culture was performed using the automated BACTEC FX system (Becton Dickinson, Sparks, MD, USA) or a BacT/Alert 3D system (bioMérieux, Marcy l'Etoile, France). Bacterial identification and antimicrobial susceptibility tests were performed using the Vitek II automated system (bioMérieux). The results of the antimicrobial susceptibility test were interpreted based on the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines, and all the results were re-evaluated based on the revised CLSI guidelines.20 Intermediate susceptibility was defined as being non-susceptible.10 (link)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Automated Blood Culture and Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All blood cultures were obtained from peripheral veins or central venous catheters (CVCs). A Bactec-9240 system (Becton Dickinson, Sparks, MD) or a BacT/Alert 3D system (bioMérieux Inc., Marcy l’Etoile, France) was used for blood cultures. A Vitek II automated system (bioMérieux Inc.) was used for antibiotic susceptibility testing.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Identifying E. aerogenes and Antimicrobial Susceptibility

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The clinical isolates were identified with a VITEK II automated system (bioMe´rieux, Marcy l’Etoile, France). Antimicrobial susceptibility determinations including the MICs were performed automatically with the VITEK II system.
The MIC was interpreted as susceptible or resistant according to the guidelines of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) MIC interpretive standards for E. aerogenes where applicable (Gouby et al. 1994 (link); National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards 2003a , b ).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Ascitic Fluid Culture and Antimicrobial Susceptibility

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Ascitic fluid was drawn by paracentesis using an aseptic technique and inoculated into blood culture bottles placed beside the bed. The ascitic fluid specimens obtained were also sent to the laboratory for biochemical profiles. Ascitic fluid and blood were incubated in the BacT/Alert 3D automated blood culture system (bioMérieux, Marcy l’Etoile, France). Microbiological identification was performed using a standard identification card. Antimicrobial susceptibility was tested using the modified broth microdilution method on the VITEK II automated system (bioMérieux). Minimum inhibitory concentration breakpoints and quality-control protocols were used according to the standards established by the Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute [12 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!