The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

101 protocols using ventana benchmark

1

Immunohistochemistry for Immune Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunohistochemistry (IHC) for CD3 and CD8 was performed in a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments–accredited laboratory using a polyclonal rabbit antibody for CD3 (A0452; Dako/Agilent, Santa Clara, CA) and a mouse monoclonal for CD8 (clone C8/C8144B, 760-4250; Cell Marque, Rocklin, CA) on the Ventana Benchmark immunostaining system (Ventana/Roche, Tucson, AZ). IHC for FOXP3 used a rat monoclonal antibody (FJK-16s; Invitrogen/Thermo Fisher, Carlsbad, CA) on the Ventana Discovery Ultra (Ventana/Roche). FOXP3 IHC was unevaluable in a subset of the European American tumors from the matched-race TMA set because of a faulty batch of charged slides, which were incompatible with the Ventana immunostainer. Thus, these data are not included.
p53 IHC was performed on the Ventana Benchmark autostaining system using a mouse monoclonal antibody (BP53-11) after antigen retrieval in CC1 buffer followed by detection with the iView HRP system (Roche/Ventana Medical Systems, Oro Valley, AZ). This protocol was previously validated for detection of TP53 mutations in prostate cancer [9 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

CD44 Expression Immunostaining Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The slides were stained for CD44 expression using an automated Ventana Benchmark staining machine (Ventana Medical Systems). Citrate buffer at pH 8.0 for 8 min at 94 C and EDTA buffer for 4 min at 100 C were applied for antigen retrieval.
Thereafter, the primary antibody CD44 monoclonal IgG2a, diluted 1/100 (MA5-13890, ThermoFisher Scientific) was applied, followed by incubation for 32 min. The slides were then counterstained in a Ventana Benchmark staining machine with hematoxylin and bluing reagent (lithium carbonate).
Secondary antibodies part of AEC Detection Kit (760-020) for Ventana Benchmark XT (Ventana Medical Systems, Inc, Roche), were used for detection.
Human skin was used as positive control. Staining without primary antibody was used as negative control.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

DONSON Expression in Renal Cancer

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DONSON protein expression was investigated using a clinically annotated TMA from paraffin-embedded renal and cancerous tissue as described previously (KIRC N = 124, KIRP N = 29, KICH N = 10, NAT N = 21) [17 ,18 (link)]. 5 μm thick paraffin sections were stained with the specific polyclonal DONSON antibody in a 1:50 dilution (HPA039558, Atlas Antibodies, Bromma, Sweden) using the Ventana Benchmark automated staining system (Ventana Medical System, Tuscon, AZ, USA) as formerly described [19 (link),20 ].
The DONSON protein expression was quantified as an H-score with the semi-quantitative QuPath image analysis software [21 (link)]. First, the morphology of the RCC was trained to the algorithm in order to get the automated recognition of the tumor samples with evaluation of the DONSON expression as H-score in the second step.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Tumor Proliferation and Angiogenesis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
IHC was performed with the Ventana Benchmark automated staining system (Ventana Medical Systems, Tucson, AZ) on 4-μm paraffin sections. The slides were deparaffinized in xylene and rehydrated through a graded series of ethanol concentrations. Tissue sections were stained using the following primary antibody: Ki67 (1:100, Spring Bioscience, CA); CD31 (1:100, Cell Marque, CA, USA); S100 (1:100, Cell Marque) and loaded into a Benchmark XT (Ventana Medical Systems Inc, Tucson, AZ) automated stainer. Primary antibodies were detected with the Ventana iVIEW DAB detection kit. Scoring of Ki67 and CD31 protein expression was interpreted independently by an expert gastrointestinal pathologist (SO). For quantification of the proliferation, the percentage of Ki67-positive nuclei was determined in five of the most proliferating areas within a tumor (“hot spots”) (×200 magnification, n = 10). To quantify angiogenesis, blood vessels/cells were counted in a representative high-power (×200) field. Blood vessel density was calculated as the mean ± SD of all counts (×200 magnification, n = 10) (10 (link), 23 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Melanoma Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For the mouse experiments: skin samples were fixed with 4% formaldehyde and frozen in OCT compound. For immunohistochemistry, sections were stained as previously described [20] (link). Anti-Dct (rabbit, ab74073, Abcam) was used.
Sections of 2 μm from a tissue TMA were stained with antibodies against Melan A, Hif-1α, TRP-2 and Mib-1. The immunohistochemical staining for all antigens was performed on automated staining systems Melan A, TRP-2/Mib-1 on Ventana Bench Mark, Ventana Medical Systems, Tucson, AZ, USA and Hif-1α on Bond Refine, Vision BioSystems Ltd, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK. The following antibodies were used: Hif-1α clone mgc3 (Abcam Limited), dilution 1:400; Melan A clone A103 (DAKO A/S), dilution 1:30; Mib-1 clone 30–9 (Ventana-Roche), prediluted.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

CD8 Immunohistochemistry Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CD8 immunohistochemistry (clone CD8/144B, Dako M7103) was performed on tissue sections from the formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded blocks, after pre-treatment of the tissue, on the Ventana Benchmark automated slide stainer (Ventana Medical System). The antibody was diluted to a concentration of 1:40, and DAB (3,3′-diaminobenzidine) was used as the colour reagent for visualisation. All slides were counterstained with haematoxylin for visualisation of the nuclei. Appropriate positive and negative controls were utilised for all cases. The haematoxylin- and eosin-stained slides, along with the CD8-stained slides, were then digitised using an Aperio AT2 scanner (Leica).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Targeted Genetic Profiling of Lung Cancer

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA of EGFR and KRAS was isolated from paraffin-embedded tissues using the QIAamp DNA mini-Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. EGFR tyrosine kinase exons 18, 19, 20, 21, and KRAS exon 2 were detected by amplification refractory mutation system (ARMS) based polymerase chain reaction (PCR), using the ACCB Gene mutation Detection Kit (ACCB Biotech Ltd, Beijing, China).
ROS1 was detected by IHC staining (clone D4D6, Cell Signaling Technology Inc, Shanghai, China) and ROS1 gene rearrangement was verified by PCR using ROS1 fusion gene detection kit (Ed biopharmaceutical company, China). ALK was detected only by IHC with intense cytoplasmic granular staining, for a high consistency between IHC positive expression and gene rearrangement of ALK. Automated IHC for ALK rearrangement was performed using an anti-ALK monoclonal antibody (D5F3, Roche) using the OptiView DAB IHC Detection kit and OptiView Amplification kit (Spring Bioscience, Ventana, Tucson, AZ, USA). IHC staining of ALK and ROS1 was performed automatically using Ventana BenchMark ultra automated staining platform (Ventana Medical Systems Inc., Tucson, AZ, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Tissue Biopsies

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The formalin-fixed biopsies were paraffin-embedded and sectioned for Haematoxylin & Eosin (HTEX) and immunohistochemical staining. Primary antibodies used were; rabbit anti-cytokeratin 18 (CK18) at 1/50 dilution (ab52948, Abcam, Cambridge, United Kingdom) and rabbit anti-alpha smooth muscle actin (aSMA) at 1/200 dilution (ab5694, Abcam, Cambridge, United Kingdom). Antibody staining’s were performed using an automated Ventana Benchmark staining machine (Ventana Medical Systems, Tucson, AZ, USA). Antigens were retrieved with citrate buffer at pH 6.0 for 8 min at 94 °C. For validation of islet AF on cryosections, guinea pig anti-Insulin (A0564, DAKO) at 1/500 and Alexa Fluor 488 goat anti-guinea pig, dilution 1/500 (A11073, Invitrogen Thermo Fisher Scientific) were used.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

HER2 SISH Evaluation Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We performed HER2 SISH on the Ventana Benchmark automated instrument (Ventana Medical Systems, Tucson, AZ, USA), according to the manufacturer’s protocols for INFORM HER2 DNA and chromosome 17 probes. We performed testing for the HER2 gene and chromosome 17 on sequential sections. Two sections were baked at 60 °C for 20 min. The HER2 DNA probe was denatured at 95 °C for 12 min, and hybridization was performed at 52 °C for 2 h. The chromosome 17 probe was denatured at 95 °C for 12 min, and hybridization was performed at 44 °C for 2 h. After hybridization, appropriate stringency washes were performed three times at 72 °C for the HER2 probe and three times at 59 °C for the chromosome 17 probe. Both DNP-labeled probes were visualized using a rabbit anti-DNP primary antibody and the ultraView SISH Detection Kit (Ventana). The slides were counterstained with hematoxylin for examination by light microscopy. Evaluation of HER2 gene amplification status was performed in a blinded manner using the ASCO/CAP guidelines [20 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Tumor Markers in TETs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In our clinical institute of pathology, tumor sections are processed from the capsule, every 1–2 cm of tumor tissue and from tumor regions, which appear different on gross inspection. However, our immunohistochemical analyses were done on selected slides from one block per patient that represented the main tumor component with a very homogenous histology.
Formaldehyde-fixed and paraffin embedded human specimens of all patients (n = 95) with TETs were available for immunohistochemical stainings. Staining was performed by using the automated Ventana Benchmark® platform (Ventana Medical Systems, Tucson, AZ, USA) according to standard protocol of the Clinical Institute of Pathology46 (link). We used monoclonal rabbit anti-human Anti-Activin A Receptor Type IB antibody (ab204655, Abcam, Cambridge, UK) and monoclonal mouse anti-human Follistatin antibody IgG2a (MAB669, R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA) as primary antibodies to assess Activin A and Follistatin expression in TETs. In addition, we used monoclonal mouse anti-human CD34 antibody (LEICA, NovoCastra, Clone QBEnd/10, Nussloch, Germany) to assess microvascular density.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!