The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Proteome discoverer software v1

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United States

Proteome Discoverer software v1.4 is a data analysis platform designed for the processing and interpretation of mass spectrometry-based proteomic data. The software's core function is to facilitate the identification and quantification of proteins from complex biological samples.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

18 protocols using proteome discoverer software v1

1

Immunoprecipitation and Mass Spectrometry Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For immunoprecipitation, 50 μl of protein A or protein G (depending on capture antibody) magnetic beads (Millipore) was washed with 500 μl PBS containing 0.1% Tween 20. After removing the buffer, the beads were resuspended in 100 μl of PBS/0.1% Tween, capture antibody added to the beads and incubated at room temperature for 10 min before adding the protein samples. The protein samples and antibody were incubated at 2–8 °C overnight with continuous mixing, washed with PBS/Tween0.1% before adding sample buffer. For spectrometry, after running the samples on PAGE, the gel was fixed in methanol:acetic acid (50%:7%) for 30 min and stained with SYPRO Ruby (Molecular Probes) overnight. The gel was de‐stained in methanol:Acetic Acid (10%:7%), washed and imaged. The band was excised and subjected to in‐gel tryptic digestion using a ProGest automated digestion unit (Digilab UK). The resulting peptides were fractionated using a Dionex Ultimate 3000 nanoHPLC system in line with an LTQ‐Orbitrap Velos mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific) as described in the supplementary material. Raw data files were processed and quantified using Proteome Discoverer software v1.2 (Thermo Scientific) and searched against the SwissProt Human database using the Mascot search engine (Matrix Science) with parameters as described in the supplementary material.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Proteomic analysis of tryptic peptides

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The tryptic peptide mixture was further analyzed using an Easy-nLC 1000 liquid chromatograph (Thermo Scientific), on-line coupled to a mass calibrated LTQ-Orbitrap Velos Pro (Thermo Scientific) via a Nanospray Flex ion source (Thermo Scientific) using sleeved 30 µm ID stainless steel emitters (spray voltage +2.3 kV, capillary temperature: 200 °C) as described previously14 (link). Next, the analysis of the mass spectrometric raw data was carried out using Proteome Discoverer software v.1.2 (Thermo Scientific) with build-in Sequest v.1.3.0339 and interfaced with an in-house Mascot v.2.4 server (Matrix Science). The Scaffold protein and peptide scoring and identification data obtained for each sample were exported and subsequently, merged into a Microsoft Excel summary report (Supplementary Data S1).
The UniprotKB database (www.uniprot.org) was used to annotate the identified proteins, using the GO sets ‘biological process’ and ‘molecular function’. Moreover, the proteins that were shared between both strains for each condition were presented in a graphical form using the Search Tool for Retrieval of Interacting Genes (STRING) (https://string-db.org/). This is a database and web resource dedicated to understanding the relationship among differentially expressed proteins. The protein interactions can be displayed according their confidence, evidence and actions or interactions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Proteomics Analysis of Protein Complexes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Proteomics was performed as previously described (45 (link)), with a few modifications. A single gel slice for each pulldown was subjected to in-gel tryptic digestion using a ProGest automated digestion unit (Digilab UK). The resulting peptides were fractionated using a Dionex Ultimate 3000 nanoHPLC system in line with an LTQ-Orbitrap Velos mass spectrometer controlled by Xcalibur 2.1 software (Thermo Scientific) operated in data-dependent acquisition mode. The raw data files were processed and quantified using Proteome Discoverer software v1.2 (Thermo Scientific) and searched against the UniProt Human database (122604 sequences) using the SEQUEST (Ver. 28 Rev. 13) algorithm. The reverse database search option was enabled, and all peptide data were filtered to satisfy a false discovery rate of 5%.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Proteomic Analysis of Wolbachia and Brugia malayi

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All MSMS data generated was searched against a customised database for Wolbachia (wBm) and B. malayi (concatenated from .fasta files obtained from UniProtKB www.uniprot.org, downloaded on 14/01/2013) using the search engine MASCOT and Proteome Discoverer software v1.2 (Thermo Scientific, UK). Search parameters included a precursor mass tolerance of 10 ppm and fragment ion tolerance 0.8 Da with one tryptic missed cleavage permitted. Carbamidomethyl (C) was set as a static modification with oxidation of methionine (M), deamidation (N, Q) and phospho (ST) (Y) set as dynamic modifications. A decoy database was searched and relaxed peptide confidence filters applied to the dataset (ion scores p < 0.05/FDR 5%).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Proteomic Identification of Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tryptic digests were analyzed by LC-MS/MS as previously described (Jorissen et al., 2017 (link)), using an easy-nanoLC 1000 liquid chromatograph (Thermo Fisher Scientific) on-line coupled to a LTQ-Orbitrap Velos Pro (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Analysis of the mass spectrometric raw data was carried out using Proteome Discoverer software v.1.2 (Thermo Fisher Scientific) with built-in Sequest v.1.3 and interfaced with an in-house Mascot v.2.4 server (Matrix Science). MS/MS spectra were searched against dd_Djap_V1.contigs.orf.fasta and smedV4.contigs.orf_1.fasta databases (kindly provided by Jochen Rink, Max Planck Institute for Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, Dresde, Germany). Search engine result files were evaluated in Scaffold v.3.6.1 (Proteome Software, Portland, OR, USA) using the Peptide Prophet and Protein Prophet algorithm, with a preset minimal peptide and protein identification probability of 95% and 99%, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

SILAC-based Proteomics for ASFV Interactors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The raw data files were processed and quantified using Proteome Discoverer software v1.4 (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and searched against the UniProt Human database (downloaded 29/06/17; 140,000 entries) plus the ASFV I215 protein sequence using the SEQUEST algorithm. Peptide precursor mass tolerance was set at 10 ppm, and MS/MS tolerance was set at 0.6 Da. Search criteria included carbamidomethylation of cysteine (+ 57.0214 Da) as a fixed modification and oxidation of methionine (+ 15.9949 Da) and SILAC labels [+ 6.02 Da (R) or + 10.008 Da (R) and + 4.025 Da (K) or + 8.014 Da (K)] as variable modifications. Searches were performed with full tryptic digestion and a maximum of 1 missed cleavage was allowed. The reverse database search option was enabled and all peptide data were filtered to satisfy a 1% false discovery rate (FDR). Contaminants, reverse database hits and hits corresponding to one single peptide were removed. Protein ratios were calculated and converted into their log2. Putative interaction partners were selected when their ratios were above the cut-off (mean + 1.96 SD) and had been identified in at least two of the three replicates unless otherwise indicated. The mass spectrometry proteomics data have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE partner repository with the dataset identifier PXD023086.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Mass Spectrometry-based Protein Identification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Protein spots with ≥2 fold differential regulation were analysed using nano reverse phase-LC (Thermo Scientific, USA) coupled with an Orbitrap Elite Mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific, USA) using standard parameters71 (link). The MS data acquisition was done in positive ion mode (m/z 350–4000 Da) using Xcalibur software (Version 2.2.SP1.48, Thermo Scientific, USA). Protein identification was done with Proteome Discoverer software v.1.4 (Thermo Scientific) using the following parameters: 2 missed cleavages, 10 ppm and 0.5 Da as precursor mass tolerance and fragment mass tolerance, respectively. In addition, cystine carbamidomethylation as fixed modification, methionine oxidation, N-terminal acetylation and phosphorylation (S, T, Y) as variable modification.
Protein spots with 1.5 to 1.9 fold differential regulation were analysed using MALDI-TOF/TOF analysis. Prior to analysis, internal calibration was carried out using TOF-Mix™ (LaserBio Labs, France). For MALDI-TOF/TOF analysis, 1 µL of purified peptides were mixed with 1 µL of the alpha-cyano-4-hydroxy cinnamic acid matrix (10 mg/mL) on MALDI target plate. Mass spectra were acquired in positive reflectron mode and the monoisotopic peak list (m/z range of 700–4000 Da) was used for protein identification using MS-Fit (http://prospector.ucsf.edu) online software using standard parameters69 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

GFP-VEGFR2 Interactome Analysis by Mass Spectrometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CiGEnCs stably expressing GFP-VEGFR2 or GFP were serum-starved for 1 h and then stimulated with 40 ng/ml VEGF for the indicated time points. The cells were then washed once with ice-cold PBS and harvested in lysis buffer (20 mM Tris pH7.5, 137 mM NaCl, 0.5% NP-40, 1 mM EDTA, 2 mM sodium orthovanadate, 10 mM sodium fluoride) containing protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma-Aldrich). Cell lysates were clarified by centrifugation for 12 min at 12,000 × g and 4 °C. The lysates were then incubated with GFP-Trap agarose beads (ChromoTek, Martinsried, Germany) for 1 h with end-over-end rotation at 4 °C. The beads were washed three times with lysis buffer and the bound protein eluted by heating at 95 °C with SDS-PAGE sample buffer. Samples were run approximately 1 cm into the separating gel of an SDS-PAGE gel and then subjected to in-gel tryptic digestion. The resulting peptides were fractionated using an Ultimate 3000 nanoHPLC system in line with an LTQ-Orbitrap Velos mass spectrometer (ThermoFisher Scientific). The raw data files were processed and quantified using Proteome Discoverer software v1.4 (ThermoFisher Scientific) and searched against the UniProt Human database using the SEQUEST algorithm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

TMT-labeled Human Proteome Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The raw data files were processed and quantified using Proteome Discoverer software v1.4 (Thermo Scientific) and searched against a combined database consisting of the UniProt human database (downloaded 8 November 2014 : 126 385 entries) and adenovirus protein sequences using the SEQUEST algorithm. Peptide precursor mass tolerance was set at 10 ppm and MS/MS tolerance was set at 0.6 Da. Search criteria included oxidation of methionine (+15.9949) as a variable modification and carbamidomethylation of cysteine (+57.0214) and the addition of the TMT (+229.163) to peptide N-termini and lysine as fixed modifications. Searches were performed with full tryptic digestion and a maximum of one missed cleavage was allowed. The reverse database search option was enabled and all peptide data were filtered to satisfy a false discovery rate (FDR) of 1 %.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Phosphoproteomics of EGF-treated PFKP

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
An in vitro KAT5-acetylated purified PFKP was digested in-gel in 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate buffer containing Rapigest (Waters Corp., Milford, MA) overnight at 37°C with 200 ng of sequencing-grade modified trypsin (Promega, Madison, WI). The digest was analyzed by LC-MS/MS on an Orbitrap-Elite mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA).
Immunoprecipitated PFKP protein from EGF-treated U251 cells was digested and analyzed by LC-MS/MS on an Orbitrap-Ellite mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA). Proteins were identified by searching of the fragment spectra against the SwissProt protein database (EBI) using Mascot Server v.2.3 (Matrix Science, London, UK) and SEQUEST v.1.27 (University of Washington, Seattle, WA) via Proteome Discoverer software v.1.4 (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Phosphopeptide matches were analyzed by using the PhosphoRS algorithm implemented in Proteome Discoverer and manually curated (Taus et al., 2011 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!