The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

36 protocols using uv 3600 plus spectrophotometer

1

Characterization of Nanomaterial Properties

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Photoluminescence spectra were measured via using OmniFluo fluorescence spectrometer (Zolix, Beijing, China). Ultraviolet-visible (UV-vis) absorption spectra were taken on a UV-3600 Plus spectrophotometer (SHIMADZU CO., Ltd., Hong Kong, China). X-ray diffraction (XRD) measurements were measured on a Bruker/D8 FOCUS X-ray diffractometer (Billerica, MA, USA) with a Cu Kα radiation source (wavelength at 1.5405 Å). Transmission electron microscope (TEM) and high-resolution TEM (HRTEM) images were recorded with a Technai F20 transmission electron microscope (FEI, Hillsboro, OR, USA). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images were taken on a S-4800 SEM microscope (Hitachi, Ltd., Tokyo, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Adsorption of Cu(II) and Methyl Orange on Magnetic Composites

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To prepare the DCS/Fe3O4-Cu, a certain amount of the DCS/Fe3O4 was added into 30 mL of CuSO4·5H2O solution. The solution pH (2–6, adjusted using 0.1 M H2SO4 or 0.1 M NaOH), adsorbent dosage (1–8 g L−1), initial Cu ions concentration (50–300 mg L−1), and contact time (0–700 min) were investigated. Using a thermostatic shaker (SHZ-C, Suzhou, China) at 25 °C/150 rpm during the whole adsorption process, the concentration of Cu ions was determined by the inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometer (ICP-OES, Avio 500, PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA).
Similarly, for the batch adsorption experiments of MO, 0.015 g of CS/Fe3O4, DCS/Fe3O4 or DCS/Fe3O4-Cu adsorbent was added into 30 mL of MO aqueous solution (MO initial concentration of 10–100 mg L−1) at 25 °C. The MO concentration in solution was determined by an UV-3600 PLUS spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) at a wavelength of 460 nm. The removal efficiency (R, %) and adsorption capacity (Qe, mg g−1) can be calculated by the following Equation 8 and Equation 9, respectively.
R=C0CeC0×100%
Qe=(C0Ce)·Vm
where C0 (mg L−1) is the initial concentration of Cu2+ or MO, Ce (mg L−1) is the equilibrium concentration, V (L) is the volume of solution, and m (g) is the mass of adsorbent.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Characterization of Lead Sulfide Colloidal Quantum Dots

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The morphology of PbS CQDs film was measured by scanning electron microscope (SEM, FEI NovaNanoSEM450) and atomic force microscope (AFM, SPM-9700 Shimadzu Co.,Japan). Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images were obtained using FEI Tecnai G2 20 microscope with a LaB6 filament operated at 200 KV. The absorption spectra were measured by Shimadzu UV-3600 plus spectrophotometer. The crystal structure of PbS CQDs film was identified by X-ray diffraction (XRD, Philips, X pert pro MRD, Cu Kα radiation) with a step of 0.013°. The Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectra of PbS CQDs film were investigated using VERTEX 70 ATR-FTIR spectroscope (Bruker Co., Germany). The X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) measurements were performed on AXIS-ULTRA DLD-600W Ultra spectrometer (Kratos Co. Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Characterization of Nanomaterials via Spectroscopic Techniques

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A Hitachi S‐4700 field emission SEM was operated at an accelerating voltage of 10 kV. TEM images were recorded by using a FEI Tecnai G2 20 X‐Twin type instrument, operating at an acceleration voltage of 200 kV. Raman spectra were recorded on a DXR Raman Microscope using a green laser (λ = 532 nm), operating at 6.25 mW laser power. UV–vis spectra were recorded on a Shimadzu UV‐3600 Plus spectrophotometer in between 300 and 800 nm both in absorbance and reflectance mode. Diffuse reflectance spectra were recorded to construct the Tauc plots. XPS was performed with a SPECS instrument equipped with a PHOIBOS 150 MCD 9 hemispherical analyzer. The analyzer was in FAT mode with 40 eV pass energy (survey scans) and 20 eV pass energy (high resolution scans). The Al K a radiation (hv = 1486.6 eV) of a dual anode X‐ray gun was used as an excitation source and operated at 150 W power. Ten scans were averaged to get a single high‐resolution spectrum, while 20–30 scans were averaged to get a single survey scan. The adventitious carbon peak was at 284.8 eV in all cases. For spectrum evaluation, CasaXPS commercial software package was used.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Characterization of Spaser Nanoprobes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
TEM images of the synthesized spaser nanoprobes were characterized on a JEM-1011 transmission electron microscope (JEOL Ltd.). The ultraviolet-visible spectrum of the Au nanoparticles was characterized on a UV-3600 Plus spectrophotometer (Shimadzu Co.). Excitation-emission and luminescence lifetime spectra of the dye molecule were carried on an FLS980 fluorescence spectrometer (Edinburgh Instruments Ltd.).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Characterization of Photovoltaic Devices

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The current density–voltage (J–V) characteristics were measured in the glovebox with a Keithley 2400 measure unit under 1 sun, AM 1.5 G spectra (100 mW cm−2) from a solar simulator (S5-F5-3A Enli Tech. Co., Ltd., Taiwan). The light intensity was calibrated with a 20 mm × 20 mm monocrystalline silicon reference cell with KG5 filter (Enli Tech. Co., Ltd., Taiwan). The J–V curves are measured along the forward scan direction from − 0.2 to 1 V, with a scan step of 20 mV with delay time of 1 ms. The EQE was measured by solar cell spectral response measurement system QE-R3018 (Enli Tech. Co., Ltd., Taiwan). The light intensity at each wavelength was calibrated with a standard single-crystal Si photovoltaic cell.The film thickness was measured by a surface profilometer (Dektak XT, Bruker). The UV–Vis absorption spectrum was measured by a Shimadzu UV-3600 Plus Spectrophotometer.The steady PL spectra were measured by the FLS 920 (Edinburgh Instruments, Ltd) with excitation at 532 nm. AFM images were captured by using a Bruker Multimode-8 microscope system in the tapping mode under ambient conditions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Comprehensive Characterization of IF

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The morphological and structural characteristics of IF were observed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM, Zeiss, Germany). The electrical conductivity of IF was characterized by a physical property measurement system (PPMS‐9, America). The drug loading ability of IF was determined by UV–vis absorption spectra by a UV‐3600 plus spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, Japan). The mass of Mn2+ loaded with IF was quantified by an inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometer (ICP‐OES, Thermo Fisher, Germany). The temperature monitoring of IF was determined by a thermal camera (Teledyne FLIR, America).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Optical Characterization of PbS QD PV

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The optical absorption spectra of QDs were measured by a Shimadzu UV-3600 Plus spectrophotometer. The absorption spectra of PbS QDs film and the devices were collected using a spectrophotometer (PerkinElmer instrument, Lambda 950). The scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images were obtained using FEI Nova Nano SEM 450. The ZnO film crystallization was tested by X-ray diffractometer (XRD) with Cu Kα radiation (Philips, X pert pro-MRD, Netherlands). EQE of PbS QD PV cells was measured using a Quantum Efficiency Measurement Instrument QE-R (Enlitech Co., Ltd). The current density–voltage characteristics were recorded with a Keithley 2400 digital source meter under simulated solar light illumination (AM 1.5, 100 mW/cm2) or under 1550 nm laser illumination in the air at room temperature.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Comprehensive Analytical Techniques for Materials Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Optical microscope images were collected using the SK-2008H (Saike Digital) and Axio Imager A2 (Zeiss). Raman spectroscopy (HR Evolution and 800, Horiba) was used for sample analysis with 473 nm, 514 nm and 633 nm laser excitation. Low-temperature PL spectra was obtained by home-made PL set-up using a 532 nm wavelength laser. XPS (Axis Ultra DLD, Kratos) was used for elemental analysis of the samples (h-BN on Cu) using monochromatic Al Kα X-rays with the pass energy of 40 eV. The energy resolution of the XPS is ~1 eV and the take-off angle is 90°. The estimated probing depth for our XPS in current setup is 3 ~ 10 nm. Film thicknesses and topographical variations in the samples were measured using AFM (Asylum Cypher S and MTP-3D-Orign, Oxford). The TEM (JEM 2010, TEOL) was employed to study the morphology, crystal structure of the samples. UV-visible absorption spectroscopy was carried out with Shimadzu UV-3600 Plus spectrophotometer. The electrochemical work station (CHI 660E) was used for oxygen evolution reaction characterization.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Organochlorine Pesticide Analysis Protocols

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All organochlorine
pesticides and control analytes (compounds 1–5, Figure 1) were purchased
from Sigma-Aldrich chemical company and used
as received, unless otherwise noted. Fluorophore 6 was
synthesized following literature-reported procedures.49 (link)1H NMR spectra were recorded using a Bruker
300 MHz spectrometer. UV–visible spectra were recorded using
a Shimadzu UV-3600 Plus spectrophotometer. Fluorescence spectra were
recorded using a Shimadzu RF-5301PC spectrophotofluorimeter. The following
commercially available cyclodextrin derivatives were used as received:
α-cyclodextrin, β-cyclodextrin, randomly methylated β-cyclodextrin,50 (link) 2-hydroxypropyl β-cyclodextrin, and γ-cyclodextrin.
For the temperature-dependent studies, a Fisher Scientific Isotemp
6200 R20 instrument was used to control the temperature, and the spectrophotometer
was equipped with a single constant-temperature cell holder. All gas
chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) measurements
were obtained using a Shimadzu GC–MS-QP2020 gas chromatograph–mass
spectrometer. Conductivity measurements were obtained using a Thermo
Scientific Orion 3-Star Benchtop Conductivity Kit. All pH experiments
were performed using a MicroLab FS-522 instrument.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!