The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Neoscope jcm 5000

Manufactured by JEOL
Sourced in Japan, United States

The NeoScope JCM-5000 is a compact scanning electron microscope (SEM) designed for routine observation and analysis of samples. It provides high-quality images and analytical capabilities within a small footprint. The NeoScope JCM-5000 is suitable for a wide range of applications, allowing users to investigate the surface structure and composition of various materials.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

34 protocols using neoscope jcm 5000

1

Scanning Electron Microscopy for Fly Eyes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For SEM images of adult eyes, heads of 2-day old flies were cut and immediately mounted on a piece of masking tape with the frontal side up and imaged in table-top Scanning Electron Microscope (Jeol, Neoscope JCM5000) in the N-SEM mode. For frontal view of the head, images were taken at 100X. To determine the ommatidial sizes, images were taken at 1000X. The images were processed by the Fiji software and the area of eye was quantified by marking the boundary of the eye. For SEM images of the adult eyes with somatic clones, the flies were laterally mounted on masking tape and bright filed image of the eye was taken in Zeiss STEMI 2000C stereobinocular prior to capturing the image in table-top Scanning Electron Microscope (Jeol, Neoscope JCM5000) in the N-SEM mode.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Antimicrobial Effects of Green Plum Extract

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The same S. aureus and E. coli strains were grown for 7 h in tryptone soy yeast extract broth (TSYEB) at 37 °C. A total of 75 µL of concentrated green plum flesh water extract in 20% ethanol (from approximately 130 mg DW of flesh powder) was added to 1 mL bacteria and broth samples, and 75 µL of 20% ethanol was added to the controls, and incubated for 24 h at 37 °C. The samples and controls were washed three times in sterile phosphate buffered saline and fixed in 3% glutaraldehyde. They were adhered to poly-l-lysine-coated (1 mg/mL) coverslips and dehydrated in ethanol before being dried in a critical point dryer (Tousimis Research Corporation, Rockville, MD, USA). Coverslips were attached to stubs with double-sided carbon tabs and coated with gold before samples were imaged using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) on a Jeol Neoscope JCM 5000 (Jeol Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) at an accelerating voltage of 10 kV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Scanning Electron Microscopy of Testicular Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Suspensions of testicular cells or mature sperm from the sperm duct were immobilized on a poly L-lysine-coated coverslip. Samples were fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.45 M sucrose and 0.1 M sodium cacodylate (pH 7.4) at 4°C for 1 h. Fixed samples were washed three times with 0.1 M sodium cacodylate (pH 7.4), dehydrated using a graded ethanol series, substituted with t-butyl alcohol and freeze-dried (JFD-320, JEOL, Tokyo, Japan), coated with Au using an ion sputter gun, and observed under a scanning electron microscope (NeoScope JCM-5000, JEOL).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Plant Sample Preparation for SEM Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Plant samples from whole soil grown plants were detached with a dissecting knife and immediately placed on a 6 mm-wide double adhesive and conductive tape (Canemco Inc., Quebec, Canada) that was pre-attached onto the specimen stage. The specimen was examined with a bench-top scanning electronic microscope (NeoScope JCM-5000, Jeol Ltd, Tokyo, Japan) and images were acquired using the software provided by the manufacturer.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Ophiuroid Microfossil Extraction and SEM Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Bulk sediment samples taken by one of us (M.K.) were screen-washed using tap water. Ophiuroid microfossils were picked from dried sieving residues under a dissecting microscope. Selected specimens were cleaned in an ultrasonic bath, mounted on aluminum stubs and gold-coated for scanning electron microscopy (SEM) using a Jeol Neoscope JCM-5000. Skeletal plates of the recent ophiuroid Ophiopholis aculeata used for comparison with the Gotland ophiuroids were extracted from an articulated individual using household bleach, rinsed in tap water and mounted for SEM8 (link). All figured specimens are deposited in the collections of the Natural History Museum Luxembourg (MnhnL).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Scanning Electron Microscopy of Sponge Surfaces

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The surface layer of each sponge sample was sliced, dehydrated and placed on a microscope sample holder and gold sputtering was done in an argon atmosphere. Adequate care was taken to obtain a homogenous cell gold coating.The surfaces of H. pigmentifera and C. cavernosa were imaged on a Neoscope JCM 5000 scanning electron microscope (JEOL, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Morphological Analysis of SMP Foams via SEM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used to assess the morphology of SMP foams. To perform this analysis, three samples of SMP foams were gold sputter-coated using a 108 Auto Sputter Coater (Cressington Scientific Instruments Ltd, Watford, England) and placed on double-sided carbon tape for imaging in a NeoScope JCM5000 (Jeol USA, Inc., Peabody, MA, USA) scanning electron microscope. Images were taken using an acceleration voltage of 10 kV in High Vacuum mode. Four different regions from each specimen were imaged to identify representative foam morphology. Pore sizes were calculated using the Image J Software (NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA). N = 25 data points were collected for axial and transverse pore size, from samples from each region, for each SMP foam formulation.
Strut thickness of each SMP foam formulation was measured by evaluating the SEM images collected for pore size analysis. Image J software (NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA) was used to measure the width of the struts (n = 5) per formulation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

SMP Foam Imaging via LV-SEM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Dried foam samples were sputter coated with gold using a Cressington 108 sputter coater, model 6002-8 (Ted Pella, Inc., Redding, CA) for 60 seconds at a distance of 3 cm. Imaging of the SMP foam was done before and after reticulation via low vacuum scanning electron microscopy (LV-SEM) using a NeoScope JCM-5000 (Jeol USA, Inc., Peabody, MA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Hydrogel Characterization Techniques

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Polymer characterization
was carried out with NMR spectroscopy (Varian 400 MHz). The microstructures
of hydrogels were investigated with a scanning electron microscopy
(SEM) instrument (JEOL NeoScope JCM-5000, an accelerating voltage
of 10 kV). The rheological properties of gels were evaluated using
a rheometer (Anton PAAR MCR 302). Encapsulation and release of fluorescently
labeled model molecules were analyzed using a Varian Cary 50 Scan
UV/vis spectrophotometer.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Scanning Electron Microscopy Analysis of Porous Discs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Discs (8 mm diameter) were allowed to air dry (30 min), and dried in a vacuum oven (14.7 psi, 24 hr, RT). Dried discs were subjected to Au-sputter coating (Cressington Sputter Coater 108) and viewed with a field emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM; JEOL NeoScope JCM-5000) at an accelerated electron energy of 10 keV. Pore size was measured using ImageJ software, and determined by the mean of the longest and shortest cross-sectional areas of the rectangular pores. Dry pore measurement was conducted by the same method described in section 2.8.1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!