The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Ph meter

Manufactured by Ohaus
Sourced in United States

The Ohaus pH meter is a precision instrument designed to measure the pH of a solution. It provides accurate and reliable pH readings, essential for various applications in laboratories and industrial settings.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

14 protocols using ph meter

1

Mineral Analysis of Food Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
An acid extraction was first carried out in an ultrasonic bath (model Easy 180H, Elma, Singen, Germany) and minerals were quantified using an inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrophotometer (ICP OES 5100VDV, Agilent Technologies, Tokyo, Japan). The ICP OES operating conditions were as follows: power 1.2 kW; argon flow rates of 12, 1.0, and 0.7 L min À1 for plasma, auxiliary, and nebuliser, respectively. Selected emission lines were: Ca, 317.933; Na, 589.592; P, 213.618; Cu, 324.754; Fe, 259.940; Mn, 257.610; Zn, 206.200; K 766.491 and Mg, 279.553 nm. The linear ranges were 0.2e5 mg 100 mL À1 for Ca, Na and P; 0.5e200 mg 100 mL À1 for Cu, Fe, Mn and Zn; 0.2e10 mg 100 mL À1 for K and 0.2e2 mg 100 mL À1 for Mg. A Dubnoff type water bath (Nova T ecnica, Piracicaba, Brazil), a pH meter equipped with a selective electrode (Ohaus, Parsippany, NJ, USA) and a refrigerated centrifuge (Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany) were used for the bioaccessibility trials. Water used for solutions and samples was purified in a reverse osmosis system (Gehaka, São Paulo, Brazil).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Breast Muscle pH and Cooking Hold Rate

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We used a pH meter (Ohaus, Pinebrook, NJ) to measure the breast muscle pH at 45 min (pH 45 min) and 24 h (pH 24 h) after death. The pH probe was used to measure each muscle sample 3 times at various sites, and the results were averaged. Then, the cooking hold rate was performed. Approximately 30 g of regular columnar muscle mass was taken from the same muscle position of each sample and the initial weight was recorded. Then the muscle mass was steamed with boiling water for 30 min and hung in a cool place for 30 min, and the final weight was recorded. The cooking hold rate is equal to the ratio of final weight to initial.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Toxic Leaching Test for PG Impurities

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The toxic leaching test was conducted to evaluate the quantities of impurities in the PG used in this study according to Chinese standard HJ 557-2010 [38 ]. The three batches of PG (dry mass) and deionized water were mixed in a ratio of 1:10. The mixture was put on a horizontal shaker to shake at 110 rpm/min for 8 h and then was moved to a table for 16 h. The supernatant was collected and filtered through a 0.45 mm filter for further analysis. The concentrations of PO43− (as mg/L P) and SO42− in bleeding water were measured with a spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, Japan). The concentration of F was measured using a fluorine ion-selective electrode (Leici, Shanghai, China). The pH and total dissolved solids (TDS) were tested using a pH meter (Ohaus, Parsippany, NJ, USA) and a TDS meter (Ohaus, Parsippany, NJ, USA), respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Rumen Fluid Collection and Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Following blood collection, rumen fluid was collected after 3 h of feeding using the oral stomach tube method, as described by Shen et al [22 (link)]. Rumen fluid pH was measured immediately using a pH meter (Ohaus Corp., Parsippany, NJ, USA). The 1 mL VFA rumen fluid samples were mixed with 0.2 mL of 25% meta-phosphoric acid and storage at −20°C until analysis. An additional 30 mL of rumen fluid was stored at −20°C for ruminal ammonia nitrogen (NH3-N) analysis. NH3-N concentrations were determined using a modified colorimetric method [23 (link)]. The VFA concentrations were determined using an Agilent Tech 7890A gas chromatograph (Hewlett Packard, Waldbronn, Germany) with a Supelco fused silica capillary column (30 m×0.25 mm×0.25 μm).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Characterization of Adsorbent Materials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The adsorbents were characterized in terms of point of zero charge pHPZC . To this aim, 20 mL of distilled water at neutral pH was added to 12 Erlenmeyer flasks of 50 mL. Then, the pH of the 12 solutions was adjusted with either HCl (0.1 M) or NaOH (0.1 M). After that, 20 mg of the adsorbent powder was added to all the solutions. Each suspension was stirred for 24 h, and the final pH values were measured using a pH meter (OHAUS). The final pH minus the initial pH value, as a function of the initial pH values, was plotted to obtain pHPZC. The pHPZC is calculated as the terminal pH value corresponding to the intersection of the obtained curve with the abscissa axis.
The infrared spectra of the adsorbents before and after modification and the PEG-SG were recorded by an FTIR spectrophotometer (Shimadzu) in the range of 4500–500 cm−1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Reducing sugar quantification by DNS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Reducing sugar was determined by the dinitrosalicylic acid (DNS) method using glucose (0–1000 µg/mL) as a standard as described by Miller [30 (link)] with slight modifications.
Total soluble solid (°Brix) was measured by a portable refractometer (Trans Instruments, Singapore). The pH was measured by a pH meter (OHAUS®, Parsippany, NJ, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Alpine Lake Sediment Sampling Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The sampling sites are located at alpine lakes in the Hengduan Mountains (27°31′40″–28°14′31.2″N and 98°12′49.2″–100°4′1.2″E), which are under the conditions of low temperature and hypoxia throughout the year. A total of 15 alpine lake sediment samples were collected using a stainless steel grab sampler at different locations in the Hengduan Mountains in 2015 (Figure 1). GS2‐1, GS2‐2, GS3‐1, GS3‐2, GS3‐3, GS4‐2, and GS4‐3 were collected in October or November; while DK, DV, GGC, NB, NB‐1, SL, WD‐2, and ZN were acquired in May or June. Samples (upper 3 cm) from each station were pooled, homogenized, collected in sterile 50 ml tubes, and immediately stored at −20°C until DNA extraction was undertaken in our laboratory. We classified the sample number based on the sampling order. At each station, depth and sediment temperature (T) were profiled by a SeaBird CTD (SBE37 MicroCAT, SeaBird), and altitude was determined by GPS. The pH was detected using a pH meter (Ohaus, NJ), and dissolved oxygen (DO) was measured by a DO meter (HQ30D, HACH). Sediment water content (SWC) (10 g of each sample) was determined as gravimetric weight loss after drying the sediment at 105°C until constant weight (Guo et al., 2015).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Fermentation Sample pH Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The fermentation samples collected at 0, 3, 6, 12, 24 h were centrifuged at 1000 rpm for 5 min (HC-3018R, Anhui USTC Zonkia Scientific Instruments Co., ltd, China). The supernatant was transferred to a 10 mL centrifuge tube and then use the pH meter (OHAUS, Parsippany, NJ, USA) to determine the pH.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Leaching Test for Impurity Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In order to investigate the concentration of impurities in PG and backfill samples, the toxicity leaching test was conducted according to HJ 557-2010. After curing for 28d, the backfill samples were grounded and sieved through a 3.0 mm screen. The powders were mixed with deionized water in a container at a mass proportion of 1:10 and shaken at 110 rpm/min on a rotary shaker for 8 h. Then the mixtures were placed on the table for 16 h. Finally, the mixtures were filtered through a 0.45 mm filter, and the leachates were collected for further analysis.
The pH value of PG, bleeding water and the leachate of toxicity leaching test was measured by pH meter (Ohaus, US). The concentrations of SO42− and PO43− were determined by ammonium molybdate tetrahydrate spectrophotometry (Shimadzu, Japan). The total dissolved solids (TDS) and the concentration of F were measured by TDS meter (Ohaus, US) and fluorine ion-selective electrode (Leici, China), respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Grape Freshness and Quality Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Average FW was determined using a Mettler Toledo analytical balance after berries had been sorted, washed, and dried. An aliquot of 1 g of fresh grape homogenate was centrifuged for 5 min at 1200× g, and TSS (°Brix) and pH of the supernatant were measured using a bench-top refractometer (Hanna Instruments, Woonsocket, RI, USA) and pH meter (OHAUS, Parsippany, NJ, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!