The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

10 protocols using millex syringe driven filter unit

1

Harvesting and Characterizing Haematococcus pluvialis EVs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
H. pluvialis 192.80 was obtained from the Sammlung von Algenkulturen Culture Collection of Algae at Gottingen University and cultured in Bold Basal Medium (BBM) in 1000-mL culture flasks with working volumes of 900 mL in an illumination incubator. The cells were cultured in suspension, wherein the flasks were continuously bubbled with air filtered through a 0.22-µm Millex Syringe-driven Filter Unit (Millipore, Ireland). The culture temperature in the illumination incubator was approximately 22 ℃, light intensity was 20 µmol·m–2 s–1, and the light-to-dark ratio was 24 h to 0 h. The culture was grown to the logarithmic phase (approximately 5 × 105 cells mL–1). Subsequently, the cultures were pooled and evenly divided into 9 aliquots of 1000 mL each in 2000-mL Erlenmeyer flasks, which were incubated under high light (350 µmol m–2 s–1) and high sodium acetate (45 mM) conditions. The cultures were grown for 0 h, 9 h, and 48 h to achieve the different stages of H. pluvialis life cycle, that is, green vegetative motile stage, green nonmotile stage, and red nonmotile cyst stage. Three microalgal cultures were randomly selected for extraction of H. pluvialis EVs (HpEVs). Each treatment was performed in triplicates.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Rare-Earth-Encapsulated Liposome Uptake

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Plants were grown for 3 weeks and transferred to hydroponic tap-water media where they were left to adjust and proceed growth up to 5–8 weeks (8–12 leaves). Then, we applied apical leaflet-submerging (one leaf below new growth), within rare-earth-metal-encapsulated liposomes for 72 hour period (EuCl3, from Sigma Aldrich). Encapsulated material within NPs was ~25 ppm, obtained by proper dilution of bulk liposomes solution. Following exact distance-from-application-point measurement for each future sample, plants were dismembered to their separate leaflet and root samples, followed by 2 hours @ 105 °C oven dehydration (BIFA Electro-therm MS8 multi stage laboratory furnace, max temp. 550 °C, Middlesex, UK) and dry weight measurements. Plant samples were later placed within ceramic bowls and fully digested by 5 hours @ 550 °C cremation. Ash residues were dissolved in 1% Nitric-acid and collected to tubes, where final volume for each sample predetermined to 10 ml. Samples were filtered through 0.45 µm syringe filter (Millipore Millex Syringe-driven filter unit) and analyzed for Europium content via ICP-OES apparatus.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

HPLC Analysis of α-Solanine in Plant Extracts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The methanolic fraction was evaporated to dryness under vacuum using rota-evaporator (Buchi Lab Equipments, USA) and stored at 4 °C for HPLC analysis. For preparation of standard, 10 mg of α-solanine (Sigma, USA) was weighed and added to a 10 mL volumetric flask, and made up to 10 mL with methanol (HPLC grade, Merck). 100 mg of the extract was weighed and made up to 100 mL, followed by filtration through a Millex syringe-driven filter unit (Millipore Corporation, Bedford, USA) before injection. The sample injection volume was 2.0 μl and the chromatogram was recorded at 210 nm. HPLC was performed in model LC-10AT vp (Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan) using C18 column (3 μm size, 5 cm × 2.1 mm in length; Supelco, USA) with water-acetonitrile (HPLC grade; Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) as the mobile phase. Separation was carried out at a flow rate of 0.2 mL/min.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantification of Caecum Short-chain Fatty Acids

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
One hundred mg of caecum contents from each were homogenized in MQ water (100 mg/mL) by vortex for 30 s, and then centrifuged at 8000 rpm for 10 min at room temperature to get supernatant. A mixture of 100 μL of the caecum supernatant and 200 μL of 0.25 mM 2-ethylbutyric acid as internal standard were labelled with 2-nitrophenyl hydrazide (2-NPH) using a short- and long-chain fatty acid analysis kit (YMC Co., Ltd., Kyoto, Japan) according to the manufacturer’s manual. 2-NPH labelled caecum supernatant was filtered through a 0.45 μm syringe filter (Millex Syringe Driven Filter Unit, MERCK, Darmstadt, Germany), and then injected into a high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) system (JASCO Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) with a YMC-Pack FA column (250 × 4.5 mm; YMC Co., Ltd. Tokyo, Japan). Mobile phase was acetonitrile-methanol-water (30:16:54, v/v/v), which adjusted to pH 4.5 by 0.01 M of hydrochloric acid. The injection volume was 20 μL and flow rate was kept at 1 mL/min and column oven temperature was set as 50 °C.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Glutathione Extraction from Rat Tissues

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All procedures relevant to animals used in this study were carried out in accordance with the UK Animals (Scientific Procedure) Act 1986 and were approved by the University of Hull Ethical Review Process (No. PPL 70/7966). Cardiac, skeletal, liver and kidney tissues from male Sprague-Dawley rats were washed for excess blood, freeze clamped with Wollenberger tong cooled in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C. Tissues were subsequently weighed and powdered in liquid nitrogen according to Seymour et al. [40 (link)]. At time of tissue harvesting, blood samples were taken, and a portion centrifuged at 4 °C. The serum was obtained and whole blood was snap frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C for future glutathione analysis.
Powdered tissues, whole blood and serum were subjected to 6% PCA extraction [51 (link)] and neutralised with 6 M potassium hydroxide (KOH). The resultant supernatant was filtered through 0.45 µm Millex syringe-driven Filter unit (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) for glutathione analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Extraction and Standardization of Horseradish Root Powder

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Standardized lyophilized plant powder of the root of horseradish (Armoracia rusticana Radix, batch number PN19869) that is used in pharmacological remedy was provided by Repha GmbH (Langenhagen, Germany). Plant powder extraction was done as described before [10 (link)]. Briefly, one gram of plant powder was mixed with 10 mL double-distilled water or DMSO and directly incubated at 37°C for 30 min at 100 rpm. For the water extract, only glassware like vials, fennels, and flasks was used. The extract was strained through gauze and sterile filtered using a Millex syringe driven filter unit, 0.2 μm (Merck Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany), and 6 serial dilutions were prepared in a 1 : 3 ratio. The initial concentration of the extracts was 33.33 mg/mL. 1 mL PBMC (1 × 106 cells) suspension, prepared in a 24-well plate, was treated with 10 μL of water extract. For the samples exposed to DMSO extract, 1 μL was used in 1 mL cell suspension. The final concentration of DMSO in the cell suspension did not exceed 0.1%.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Fermentation of LAB-enriched Broths

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To produce LAB-fermented both, a pre-grown culture of each LAB isolate was inoculated into fresh MRS broth to reach an initial density of 105 cells ml−1. The liquid portion of each culture took 10% of the volume inside the container and each culture was incubated at 200 r.p.m. at 28 °C for 24 h. The final density of each fermented broth was approximately 109 cells ml−1. As a control treatment, the MRS broth was not inoculated with LAB.
To collect the cell-free fermented broth of each isolate, each whole fermented broth was centrifuged, and the supernatant was filter-sterilized through a 0.22-µm Millex® syringe-driven filter unit (Merck Millipore Ltd., Co. Cork, Ireland) and then stored at − 20 °C before use.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Cheese Powder Extraction Protocols

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To enable accurate chemical compound extractions, powders of the cheese samples were prepared. Therefore, cheese core and rind samples were frozen using liquid nitrogen (Air Liquide, Paris, France) and subsequently milled into a fine powder with a coffee grinder (De’Longhi KG49, Treviso, Italy). These cheese powders were subjected to two types of extractions. To assess organic acids, free amino acids, and biogenic amines, an aqueous extraction was performed, as described previously (Le Boucher et al., 2016 (link); Zhang et al., 2019 (link)). Briefly, 1.0 g of cheese powder was mixed with 9.0 mL of ultrapure water (Milli-Q; Merck) on a rotating wheel at 30 rpm for 30 min at room temperature, followed by centrifugation at 1,000 × g for 5 min. Extracts were stored at −25°C until further analysis. To assess volatile organic compounds, ethyl acetate extracts were prepared by mixing 0.5 g of cheese powder with 9.5 mL of ethyl acetate (SupraSolv® grade; Merck) and supplemented with 100 μg/L of toluene-D8 (Sigma-Aldrich) as internal standard (IS). Ethyl acetate extracts were filtered with a Millex Syringe Driven Filter Unit (Millex; Merck) and immediately used for further analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

SEC fractionation and mass analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Size‐exclusion chromatography (SEC) measurements and fractionations were performed using a HLC8220 GPC system (Tosoh, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with a refractive index detector (RID). Separation was carried out using two TSKgel multipore HXL‐M columns (7.8 mm × 300 mm) connected in series following a multipore Hxl guard column. CHCl3 was used as the mobile phase at a flow rate of 1 mL min–1. EVA samples were dissolved in CHCl3 at 2 mg mL–1, filtered using Millex syringe‐driven filter units (Merck Millipore, Carrigtwohill, Ireland) and 200 μL of the so‐formed solution were injected for the SEC elutions. Fractionation of the polymeric samples was done by collecting aliquots of 0.5 mL (30 s) into vials directly after the RID, further allowed to air dry for a couple of hours and submitted to mass analysis. Following this re‐concentration procedure, the sensitivity of the mass spectrometer allowed satisfactory mass spectra to be recorded from one single analytical SEC run only. The fractions of interest in the present study were collected after 18'30''–19'00'' (fraction #1), 19'00''–19'30'' (fraction #2) and 19'30''–20'00'' (fraction #3) of elution. Fractions of higher molecular weights were also collected (16'30''–18'30'') and mass‐analyzed (see Supporting Information).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Size Exclusion Chromatography of Surfactants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Size exclusion chromatography (SEC) fractionations were performed using a HLC8220 GPC system (Tosoh, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with a refractive index detector (RID) . Separation was carried out using two TSKgel multipore H XL -M columns (7.8 mm×300 mm) connected in series following a multipore Hxl guard column. CHCl 3 was used as the mobile phase at a 1 mL min -1 flow rate. Surfactants were dissolved in CHCl 3 at 2 mg mL -1 , filtered using Millex syringe-driven filter units (Merck Millipore, Carrigtwohill, Ireland) and 200 μL of the so-formed solution were injected for the SEC elutions. The fractionation was done by collecting aliquots of 0.5 mL (30 seconds) into vials directly after the RID further allowed to air dry for a couple of hours. Following this re-concentration procedure, the sensitivity of the mass spectrometer allowed satisfactory mass spectra to be recorded from one single analytical SEC run only.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!