The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

40 protocols using igor software

1

Measuring K⁺-ATP Channel Activity in Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
KATP channel currents and membrane potentials were measured with an EPC 10 amplifier and PULSE software (version 8.67; HEKA Elektronik, Lambrecht, Germany) at room temperature using inside-out patch clamp and perforated patch clamp techniques, respectively. The data were analyzed using IGOR software (Wavemetrics, Lake Oswego, OR, USA). Patch electrodes were pulled from borosilicate glass capillaries to a resistance between 3 and 4 MΩ when filled with pipette solution. For inside-out patch recordings, patch pipettes were filled with an internal solution containing the following (in mM): 140 KCl, 2.6 CaCl2, 1.1 MgCl2 and 10 HEPES (pH 7.2 with KOH), and a bath solution comprising (in mM): 140 KCl, 2 CaCl2, 1 MgCl2, 11 EGTA, 10 HEPES (pH 7.2 with KOH). The internal solution for perforated patch recordings contained the following (in mM): 110 K-aspartate, 30 KCl, 2.6 CaCl2, 0.5 EGTA, 5 EDTA, 10 HEPES (pH 7.2 with KOH) and 200 μM nystatin, and the bath solution (normal Tyrode's solution) contained (in mM): 143 NaCl, 5.4 KCl, 0.5 MgCl2 and 1.8 CaCl2, 5 HEPES (pH 7.4 with NaOH). Single-channel KATP currents were recorded at −60 mV by inside-out patch and analyzed for channel activity (NPo; where N is the number of functional channels, and Po is the open probability).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Standardized Mouse Electroretinography Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Standard electroretinography recording techniques were used (Viswanathan et al., 1999 (link); Clark & Kraft, 2012 (link)). Following overnight dark adaptation, mice were anesthetized under dim red illumination with 100 mg/kg ketamine and 10 mg/kg xylazine. Under anesthesia, both eyes were treated with proparacaine HCl (0.5%) followed by a mixture of phenylephrine HCl (2.5%) and tropicamide (1%) for pupil dilation. A gold reference electrode was electrically connected to one eye and a platinum wire fiber-optic combination was connected to the other. Light stimuli were delivered directly onto the eye through the fiber-optic with a 100-W tungsten bulb light-source. Calibrated neutral density filters were used to control stimulus intensity, and the stimulus wavelength was set by a 505 nm band pass filter (35nm FWHM full width at half maximum). Stimulus flashes (2ms) were controlled by a computer-driven Uniblitz shutter. Electrical responses were amplified (CP122W; Astromed; DC 300 Hz) and digitized at 2 KHz (Real-Time PXI Computer; National Instruments). Data analysis was performed using IGOR software (WaveMetrics). The data in Fig. 4 were low-pass filtered at 40 Hz post-hoc.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Whole-cell Membrane Current Recording in HEK-293 Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Whole-cell membrane currents were recorded in HEK-293 transiently transfected cells. The extracellular solution had the following composition: 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM CaCl2, 1 mM MgCl2, 10 mM glucose, 10 mM mannitol, and 10 mM Na-HEPES (pH = 7.4). The pipette (intracellular) solution contained: 130 mM CsCl, 10 mM EGTA, 1 mM MgCl2, 10 mM Cs-HEPES (pH = 7.35), and 1 mM ATP, plus CaCl2 to obtain the desired free Ca2 + concentration: 1 mM for 8 nM, 8 mM for 305 nM, 9 mM for 685 nM, and 9.5 mM for 1.44 μM (calculated with a dissociation constant for the EGTA-calcium complex of 76 nM at pH 7.35). During the experiments, the membrane capacitance and series resistance were analogically compensated using the circuitry provided by the EPC7 patch-clamp amplifier. The stimulation protocol to generate current–voltage relationships consisted in 600 ms-long voltage steps from − 100 to + 100 mV in 20 mV increments starting from a holding potential of − 60 mV. The waiting time between steps was 4 s. Membrane currents were filtered at 1 kHz and digitized at 5 kHz with an ITC-16 (Instrutech) AD/DA converter. Data were analyzed using the Igor software (Wavemetrics) supplemented by custom software kindly provided by Dr. Oscar Moran (Institute of Biophysics, CNR, Genova).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Dendritic Plateau Potential Estimation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data analysis is performed using Igor software (Wavemetrics) and Matlab (MathWorks). Statistical tests are performed with Matlab using, if not otherwise indicated, a Student's t-test in comparison of two datasets, a statistical test comparing the slope of a least-squares linear best fit line to 0, or a least-squares regression to an exponential function when such a trend is expected (subthreshold and action potential attenuation). Statistical tests are two-tailed unless a reason is explicitly stated to expect a directional relationship between two datasets.
To estimate the width of dendritic plateau potentials in the apical dendrite with long dendritic current injection, we determine the longest depolarization sustained at 20% or more above the baseline level (defined as the most hyperpolarized membrane potential during the dendritic current injection). This includes the effects of backpropagating APs as well as their interplay with the dendritic depolarization.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Monocyte Adhesion Dynamics Under Shear

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The adhesion experiments were performed as described previously14 (link). Briefly, the monocytes were subjected to laminar flow through a channel (2 mm width and 0.1 mm height) inserted into a well of a 24-well chamber. The shear rate was ~10 s−1; thus, the cells attached to the surface were subjected to a viscous force on the order of 7 pN23 (link). Images were acquired with a video camera (HyperHAD; Sony France, Clichy, France) attached to an Olympus IX 50 inverted microscope with a 10× objective set within a closed box maintained at 37 °C. The pixel size was 1 × 1 μm2. Sequences, typically 2 min in duration, were digitized and DivX compressed with a Win-TV digitizer (Hauppauge, France) for subsequent analysis. The films were decomposed into frames using ImageJ software (1.48v; NIH, USA). Subsequently, the TrajFSerie program (written in Java) used these tables to create a file containing the trajectory of each cell. This file was processed with Igor software (Wavemetrics, EUA) to detect and measure the duration of the stops of each cell. The numbers of detectable arrests (remaining for 200 ms or longer) and the numbers of permanent arrests (i.e., arrests lasting 2 min) were thus determined.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Synchrotron SRCD Spectroscopy of mt-AspRS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SRCD spectra were recorded on the DISCO beamline36 (link) at synchrotron SOLEIL (Saint-Aubin, France). The experimental setup was calibrated for magnitude and polarization with a 6.1 mg/ml D-10-camphorsulfonic acid solution. Two μl of WT mt-AspRS or mutants solution at 10 mg/ml in 100 mM potassium phosphate pH 7.5, 50 mM KCl, 10% (v/v) glycerol and 1 mM TCEP were transferred in a CaF2 cuvette with an optical path of 8 μm. Three spectra from 170 to 280 nm were recorded at temperatures ranging from 24 to 80 °C with 4 °C steps. They were averaged, solvent baseline subtracted, scaled and normalized to molar ellipticities using CDtool37 (link). Protein stability was determined by plotting the variation of the CD minimum at 209 nm as a function of temperature. IGOR software (WaveMetrics) was used to model this variation by a sigmoid and the temperature corresponding to the maximum of its derivative defined a structural transition or melting temperature (Tm). Secondary structure content was estimated from SRCD spectra collected at 24 °C using CONTINLL in Dichroweb and SELCON3 in CDPro using the SP175 reference data set38 (link)39 (link)40 (link). A data cutoff at 180 nm was applied based on photomultiplier high-tension viability. Values were compared to those in the X-ray structure of the WT human mt-AspRS (PDBid: 4AH6).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Light Stimulation Characterization of Retinal Responses

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Light stimulation was generated by custom-written code in Igor software (Wavemetrics) and 4D Workshop 4 IDE (4D Systems) to control an LCD mask in front of a collimated LED (405 nm, Thorlabs) with a bandpass filter (BP 405, Thorlabs). The stimuli were projected onto the retina through the objective lens (XLUMPlanFL 20× 0.95 NA water-immersion, Olympus). Stimulus contrast varied between 100 – 300%, with the 300% stimulus intensity at ~25 × 103 photons s−1 μm−2 on a background intensity of ~6 × 103 photons s−1 μm−2. For the bar stimulus, the bar (400 × 400 μm) moved in one of eight evenly – spaced directions at a range of velocities between 0.03 – 1 mm s−1. The bullseye stimulus was configured as previously described6 (link). Each stimulus was repeated 3 – 5 times and responses were averaged.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Electrophysiological Recordings in Brain Slices

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
As previously described, electrophysiological recordings from acute hippocampal slices (Dai et al., 2019; Dai et al., 2021) or prefrontal cortex (Xu et al., 2012) or cerebellum (Zhang et al., 2015) were essentially performed. In brief, slices were prepared from Cbln2 +/+ and Cbln2 -/-mice at P35-42, or from all other mice at 2-3 weeks after stereotactic infection of region as shown in our previous studies (Dai et al., 2019; Dai et al., 2021) . The firing type of subiculum neurons (burst-spiking vs. regular-spiking) was identified by injecting a depolarizing current immediately after breaking in and monitoring action potential patterns in current-clamp mode as previously described (Aoto et al., 2013; Dai et al., 2019) . To induce evoked synaptic responses in mPFC, the electrode was placed at the border of L1 and L2/3 layer as illustrated in Figure 6B and the L5/6 layer pyramidal neurons were recorded (Fenelon et al., 2011) . To induce evoked synaptic responses in cerebellum, the electrode was placed at the parallel fibers in the distal molecular layer as illustrated in Figure 7B and the purkinje neurons were recorded (Zhang et al., 2015) . AMPAR-EPSCs the Igor software (WaveMetrics). Miniature events were handpicked with a threshold of 5 pA by using the Igor software (Dai et al., 2015) .
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

CFTR Channel Electrophysiology Protocols

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Whole-cell and inside-out membrane currents were recorded in FRT cells stably expressing human wild-type CFTR. For whole-cell experiments, the extracellular (bath) solution contained (in mM): 150 NaCl, 1 CaCl2, 1 MgCl2, 10 glucose, 10 mannitol, 10 Na-HEPES (pH 7.4). The pipette (intracellular) solution contained (in mM): 120 CsCl, 10 TEA-Cl, 0.5 EGTA, 1 MgCl2, 10 Cs-HEPES, 40 mannitol, 1 ATP (7.4). For inside-out patch-clamp experiments, the pipette solution contained (in mM): 150 N-methyl-D-glucamine chloride (NMDG-Cl), 3 CaCl2, 2 MgCl2, 10 Na-Hepes (pH 7.3). The bath solution contained (in mM): 150 NMDG-Cl, 2 MgCl2, 10 EGTA, 10 Na-Hepes, 1 ATP (pH 7.3), and 125 nM catalytic subunit of protein kinase A (Promega, Sunnyvale, Calif). Pipette electrical resistance for both whole-cell and inside-out experiments was 3–5 MΩ. The protocol for stimulation consisted of 600-ms voltage steps from −100 to +100 mV in 20 mV increments starting from a holding potential of −60 mV. The interval between steps was 4 s. Membrane currents were filtered at 1 kHz and digitized at 5 kHz. Data were analyzed using Igor software (Wavemetrics, Portland, Ore) with custom software kindly provided by Dr Oscar Moran.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Dose-Response Analysis of Ion Currents

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analysis was performed using Fitmaster (version 2.69; HEKA, Germany) and Igor software (version 6.34; WaveMetrics, USA). The p-values were calculated using Microsoft Excel version 14.1.2 using the two-tailed paired Student’s T-test. Data were normalized to cell size and expressed as current density (pA/pF), or normalized to the time point right before application (I/I[time]s). Data were displayed as mean ± standard error of mean (s.e.m.). Dose-response fits were assessed using the fit function f(x) = ([Maximum current] *(1/(1 + ([Estimated IC50]/x)^[Hill coefficient])). The IC50 or EC50 values calculated with the dose-response curve function were reported with ± standard deviation (S.D.).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!