The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Ultravision lp detection system

Manufactured by Lab Vision
Sourced in United States

The UltraVision LP detection system is a lab equipment product designed to detect and analyze specific targets in a sample. It utilizes advanced imaging and analysis technologies to provide accurate and reliable results. The core function of this system is to facilitate the identification and quantification of target analytes within a given sample.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

10 protocols using ultravision lp detection system

1

Immunohistochemical Analysis of PMCA4 in Melanoma

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A total of 3 µm sections from formalin fixed and paraffin embedded tissues were stained for PMCA4 (JA9 clone, AB2783, Abcam) on the Ventana BenchMark Ultra automated staining system (Roche Tissue Diagnostics, Grenzach-Wyhlen, Germany). Antibody binding was detected with the UltraVision LP Detection System (Lab Vision Corporation) which was used for antibody binding detection. Color development with the OptiView staining kit (Roche Tissue Diagnostics, Grenzach-Wyhlen, Germany) was followed by hematoxylin counterstaining. In primary melanoma, the cellular morphology was described as epitheloid or spindle cell or mixed. Anaplastic morphology was indicated in the melanoma lung metastatic specimens if regions with undifferentiated cellular morphology and pleomorphic nuclei were identified. An expert pathologist scored the staining. Endothelial PMCA4 expression served as an internal control. The melanoma cell specific scores were as follows: 0—no expression, 1, 2 and 3 for low, intermediate and high staining intensity. If considerable heterogeneity was present in the staining intensity, then 0.5, 1.5, and 2.5 scores were assigned.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Ki67 in FFPE Tumour Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All 285 histological specimens were fixed in formalin and embedded in paraffin (FFPE). One 4-μm section from a representative, tumour-rich FFPE block was stained by haematoxylin/eosin to confirm and locate malignant areas and consecutive sections were used for Ki67 immunohistochemistry. Sections were deparaffinised with xylene and rehydrated with decreasing alcohol concentrations. After heat-induced epitope retrieval in citrate buffer (10 mmol l−1, pH 6.0), slides were incubated at room temperature with the Ki67 antibody (monoclonal mouse antibody, Dako Cytomation (Dako, Glostrup, Denmark), clone MIB-1, dilution 1 : 100, incubation time: 30 min). Antibody binding was detected by means of the UltraVision LP detection system (Lab Vision Corporation, Fremont, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer's recommendations. Colour development was achieved by 3-3-diaminobenzidine. Finally, all analysed slides were counterstained with Mayer's haematoxylin.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Immunohistochemical Analysis of CAIII and Hsp70

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue sections (4 to 5 µm thickness) on slides were placed in an incubator at 60℃ for 30 minutes to secure the tissue sections. The sections were deparaffinized in xylene three times over a 5-minute period, dehydrated in 90%, 75%, and 50% ethanol, each for 2 minutes, and washed in distilled water for 5 minutes. The antigen retrieval technique was used to maximize the immunohistochemical signal. Sections were pretreated with 0.01 mol/L citrate buffer (pH 6.0) and microwaved for five 2-minute cycles. The slides were cooled in buffer before further treatment. Endogenous peroxidase activity was blocked with 0.5% hydrogen peroxidemethanol for 10 minutes, and sections were washed in distilled water for 10 minutes. Immunohistochemical staining was done using an AUTOSTAINER 480 (Labvision, Fremont, CA, USA) and detection kit that incorporated an Ultravision LP detection system, horseradish peroxidase polymer, and AEC chromogen (Labvision). Primary antibodies were mouse monoclonal anti-CAIII (clone 4A12-1A3; Abnova, Taipei City, Taiwan) and mouse monoclonal anti-Hsp70 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Fremont, CA, USA). Striated muscle tissue and breast cancer tissue were used as positive controls.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Automated Immunohistochemistry Workflow for FFPE Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Ventana BenchMark Ultra automated staining system (Roche Tissue Diagnostics, Grenzach-Vyhlen, Germany) was used for immunohistochemistry. From the formalin-fixed and paraffin embedded (FFPE) tumor specimen 3 μm sections were prepared. The following primary antibodies were used: anti-vimentin (Dako #M0725), anti-TTF1 (Dako, clone 8G7G3/1), anti-PAX8 (Cell Marque, MRQ-50), Cytokeratin 18 (Dako, Clone DC 10) and anti-thyroglobulin (Dako, A0251) and anti-PD-L1 (22C3, Dako). Antibody binding was detected with the UltraVision LP Detection System (Lab Vision Corporation). Color development with OptiView staining kit (Roche Tissue Diagnostics, Grenzach-Vyhlen, Germany) was followed by hematoxylin counterstaining. PD-L1 expression was quantified by a pathologist using the combined positive score (CPS).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Comparative Analysis of Tumor C4d and Circulating C4d in MPM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To obtain information about C4d presence within the tumor tissue and to compare these tissue levels with circulating C4d levels, 32 FFPE MPM tissue specimens were collected and analyzed by C4d immunohistochemical staining. Additionally, we performed immunohistochemical staining for C1q in 14 FFPE tissue specimens deriving from patients with high (n = 7) and low (n = 7) circulating C4d levels. After the sections were deparaffinized and rehydrated, endogenous peroxidase activity was blocked with 0.3% H2O2 in phosphate buffered saline. Heat-induced epitope retrieval was performed by using TRIS/EDTA buffer (pH = 9). Primary antibodies (anti-human C4d; Biomedica, Vienna, Austria and anti-human C1q; ab71089, Abcam, Cambridge, UK) were diluted 1:500 and 1:1000, respectively, and incubated for 60 min at RT. Antibody binding was detected with the UltraVision LP Detection System (Lab Vision Corporation, Fremont, CA, USA). Color development was achieved by DAB followed by hematoxylin counterstaining. Stainings were evaluated by a pathologist.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantitative Ki67 IHC in MPM Tumors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Ki67 immunohistochemistry was performed as described earlier [33 (link)]. Three-micrometer sections from formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor nodules were deparaffinized and rehydrated with decreasing alcohol concentrations. Following heat-induced antigen retrieval in citrate buffer (pH 6.0), slides were incubated with the Ki67 antibody (mouse mAb, Dako Cytomation, clone MIB-1, dilution 1:100) for 30 min. UltraVision LP detection system (Lab Vision Corporation, Fremont, CA) was used to detect antibody binding according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. 3-3-Diaminobenzidine (Dako) was applied for color development. Each analyzed slide was counterstained with Mayer’s hematoxylin (Sigma) and images were taken using a bright-field microscope (Axio Imager, Carl Zeiss). Labeling index was determined by using the automated image analysis application ImmunoRatio [34 (link)]. At least 2000 tumor cells were counted to obtain the mean percentage of Ki67-positive MPM tumor cells per sample.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Immunohistochemical Detection of HBD-1 in Prostate Cancer

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Expression of HBD-1 in prostate cancer tissue samples was studied using the UltraVision LP Detection System (Lab Vision Corp., Fremont, CA, USA), as described previously[27 (link)]. Briefly, slides with prostate cancer tissue sections were dewaxed in xylene for more than 20 min and then sequentially rehydrated in 100%, 95%, 90%, and 80% ethanol solutions. After a 5-min rinse in water, the slides were pretreated with 0.01M sodium citrate buffer and autoclaved for 1 min at 121°C for antigen retrieval. After the slides were rinsed, endogenous peroxidase activity was blocked by treatment with 3% H2O2 for 30 min. A primary mouse polyclonal antibody against HBD-1 (1:50, Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA) was applied to the sections on the slides, following which the sections were incubated for 2 h in a moist chamber at room temperature. Sections for negative control were incubated with the same reagents and underwent the same epitope retrieval protocol without the primary antibody (S1 Fig). After the slides were rinsed with PBS, they were incubated with secondary antibody for 10 min at room temperature and then rinsed in PBS. The slides were incubated with a horseradish peroxidase conjugated antibody for 10 min, rinsed in PBS, and incubated with diaminobenzidine for 10 min. After the slides were counterstained using Mayer’s hematoxylin, they were dehydrated and coverslipped.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Immunohistochemical Analysis of NUDC Expression in Cancer Recurrence

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We generated a tissue microarray with surgical samples from 313 patients and collected clinical data from the patients’ pathological reports regarding cancer recurrence. In the case of death, the National Statistical Office of the Republic of Korea was commissioned for confirmation.
Immunohistochemistry staining of NUDC was performed using monoclonal anti-rabbit NUDC antibody (1:300; Abcam, Boston, MA, USA). For immunohistochemical staining, unstained slides were treated with 3% H2O2 after deparaffinization and rehydration. After heating the slides in a microoven to induce epitope expression, we performed immunohistochemical staining by using the UltraVision LP detection system (Lab Vision Corporation, Fremont, CA, USA). The expression of NUDC was scored by a pathologist blinded to the clinicopathological data. Cytoplasmic reactions were scored according to the percentage of NUDC-positive cells as follows: 0, negative, 1+ (1%-24%), 2+ (25%-49%), and 3+ (50%-74%) (Figure 4).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Immunohistochemistry Staining of NSE

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
IHC staining was performed using 4-μm thick tissue sections. Briefly, tissue sections were deparaffinized and rehydrated. The slides were then incubated in 3% H2O2 for 10 minutes to reduce nonspecific background staining due to endogenous peroxidase. For epitope retrieval, the specimens were heated for 20 minutes in 10 mM citrate buffer (pH 6.0) in a microwave oven (700 W). Background staining was blocked by incubating the samples in Ultra V Block solution (Lab Vision Corporation, Fremont, CA, USA) for 7 minutes at room temperature. The slides were then incubated for 1 hour at room temperature with a rabbit monoclonal antibody specific NSE (1:250; Abcam, Boston, MA, USA). Antibody binding was detected using the UltraVision LP detection system (Lab Vision Corporation) in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations. Slides were developed using 3-3′-diaminobenzidine, followed by counterstaining with hematoxylin. Expression of NSE was determined and scored by a pathologist blinded to the clinicopathological data. Cytoplasmic staining was scored as the percentage of NSE-positive cells in the following manner: 1+ (1%–24% NSE-positive cells), 2+ (25%–49% NSE-positive cells), 3+ (50%–74% NSE-positive cells), or 4+ (75%–100% NSE-positive cells) [7 (link)]. A score of 0 was considered negative for NSE protein expression, while scores of 1+ to 4+ were considered as NSE-OE.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Immunohistochemical Evaluation of ERH Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We obtained core tissue biopsy samples (2 mm diameter) from tumor paraffin blocks (donor blocks). These specimens were inserted into new paraffin blocks, and IHC staining was performed on 4-µm-thick sections. Briefly, the tissue sections were deparaffinized and rehydrated, and the slides were incubated for 60 minutes at room temperature with a specific antibody against ERH (rabbit polyclonal antibody, 1:25; Atlas Antibodies AB, Stockholm, Sweden). We used an UltraVision LP detection system (Lab Vision Corporation, Fremont, CA, USA) to detect expression. The scoring of ERH expression was performed by a pathologist (K. H. Ko) who was blinded to the clinicopathological data. The extent of the histochemical reaction in the nucleus was scored according to the percentage of ERH-positive cells as follows: 2+ (25–49%) and 3+ (50–74%) (Figure 1) (13 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!