Log In Sign up
The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Display monitor

Manufactured by Cambridge Research Systems
Visit Supplier
Sourced in United Kingdom

The Display++ monitor is a high-performance display device designed for research and scientific applications. It features a precise and accurate color representation, high-resolution, and low latency. The core function of the Display++ is to provide a reliable and consistent visual interface for various research and laboratory activities.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Lab products found in correlation

Matlab, by MathWorks (1 mentions) Minolta ls 110, by Konica Minolta (1 mentions) Visage mkii stimulus generator, by Cambridge Research Systems (1 mentions)

4 protocols using display monitor

1

Display Specifications for Visual Experiments

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Stimuli were displayed on a 10-bit depth 32-inch Display++ monitor (Cambridge Research Systems, Ltd., Rochester, UK) with a refresh rate of 120 Hz and 1920 × 1080 pixels spatial resolution. The display area subtended 44.4° horizontally and 24.8° vertically at a viewing distance of 90 cm, resulting in 43 pixels per degree. We controlled the stimulus presentation with Matlab (MathWorks, Natick, USA) via the Psychophysics toolbox (Brainard, 1997 (link); Pelli, 1997 (link)).
Souto D., Gegenfurtner K.R, & Schütz A.C. (2016). Saccade Adaptation and Visual Uncertainty. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 10, 227.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

ETDRS Chart Visual Acuity Measurement

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
High contrast visual acuity was measured in a darkened room and calculated with per-letter scoring, terminating after five missed letters, as the mean of three unique ETDRS logMAR charts displayed with –100% Weber contrast (Display++ monitor; Cambridge Research Systems, Kent UK) and background luminance of 116 cd/m2 (Minolta LS-110, Konica Minolta, Ramsey, NJ).
Hastings G.D., Applegate R.A., Nguyen L.C., Kauffman M.J., Hemmati R.T, & Marsack J.D. (2019). Comparison of Wavefront-Guided and Best Conventional Scleral Lenses after Habituation in Eyes with Corneal Ectasia. Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry, 96(4), 238-247.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Psychopy Experiment with Gaze Monitoring

Cited 1 time
Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The experimental software was coded in Psychopy V1.85.232 (link) and the stimuli were presented on a 32-inch gamma-corrected Display++ monitor (Cambridge Research Systems Ltd., Rochester, UK) with a refresh rate of 120 Hz, resolution of 1920 × 1080 pixels and a mean luminance of 50 cd/m2. The fixations made to locate the targets were simultaneously monitored using a Gazepoint GP3 eye tracker (GP3, Software version V4.0.13; Gazepoint, Vancouver, Canada) with a sample rate of 60 Hz. Participants were seated at 80 cm from the monitor using a chin rest to maintain steady chin and head position. Individual refractive correction for 80 cm in a trial frame was provided while performing the test.
Srinivasan R., Turpin A, & McKendrick A.M. (2022). Developing a Screening Tool for Areas of Abnormal Central Vision Using Visual Stimuli With Natural Scene Statistics. Translational Vision Science & Technology, 11(2), 34.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Binocular Perception in Controlled Lighting

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The experiments were conducted in a dark room; that is, all the light in the room was from the monitor's screen, and the walls were black to avoid interreflections. Stimuli were presented on a calibrated 32'' LCD Display++ monitor (Cambridge Research Systems, Ltd.) at 100 Hz, with 1440×1080 pixels resolution, and subtending 22.6×16.95 visual degrees. The stimuli was viewed binocularly (subject's head was not constrained) from a distance of approximately 134 cm. We used the Cambridge Research Systems ViSaGe MKII Stimulus Generator, capable of displaying 14-bit color depth. The monitor was calibrated via the customary software (Cambridge Research Systems, Ltd.) and the Display++ monitor embedded colorimeter. The subject's responses were collected using a Logitec gamepad.
Otazu X, & Cerda-Company X. (2022). The contribution of luminance and chromatic channels to color assimilation. Journal of Vision, 22(6), 10.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!