The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Anti foxo1 c29h4

Manufactured by Cell Signaling Technology
Sourced in United States

Anti-FOXO1 (C29H4) is a lab equipment product offered by Cell Signaling Technology. It is an antibody that targets the FOXO1 protein. The core function of this product is to facilitate the detection and analysis of FOXO1 in various research and experimental settings.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

8 protocols using anti foxo1 c29h4

1

Signaling Pathway Analysis in Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
FSH-19 was obtained from the National Hormone and Pituitary Agency of the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (Torrance, CA). The following were purchased from the indicated sources: forskolin from Sigma; human fibronectin from Corning (Bedford, MA); DMEM/F12 from Gibco, Life Technologies (Grand Island, NY); Halt Protease Inhibitor cocktail from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Rockford, IL). Antibodies were obtained from the following sources: anti-FOXO1 (FKHR H128) (rabbit, Santa Cruz; for use in western blot), anti-phospho-Ser256 FOXO1 (rabbit, Cell Signaling), anti-SHP2 (mouse, Santa Cruz), anti-Gαq (rabbit, Santa Cruz), and anti-FOXO1 (C29H4) (rabbit, Cell Signaling; for use in ChIP assay).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Multiparametric Flow Cytometry for Immune Cell Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Flow cytometry was performed as described previously (11 (link), 14 (link)). In details, single cells were isolated from mouse BM, spleen, and periphery lymph nodes (pLN). If necessary, BM cells were counted by Fuchs-Rosenthal Counting Chamber. Briefly, to analyze the surface marker, cells were blocked with anti-CD16/CD32 antibodies (eBioscience, San Diego, CA) and then stained with surface marker antibodies and washed by PBS. To analyze the intracellular proteins, after staining with surface markers, cells were fixed and permeabilized with Foxp3/Transcription Factor Staining Buffer Kit following the manufacturer's protocols (eBioscience, San Diego, CA).
Antibodies used were as followings: anti-Foxo1 (C29H4) was from Cell Signaling Technology (Boston, MA); anti-NKp46 (29A1.4), anti-CD19 (6D5), anti-CD3 (17A2), anti-Gr1 (RB6-8C5), anti-Ter119 (Ter119), anti-CD4 (GK1.5), anti-CD8 (53-6.7), anti-c-Kit (2B8), anti-Sca-1 (D7), anti-CD127 (A7R34), and anti-CD49b (DX5) were from Biolegend (San Diego, CA); anti-CD27 (LG.3A10), anti-CD11b (M1/70), anti-B220 (RA3-6B2), and anti-CD122 (TM-β1) were form BD Biosciences (San Diego, CA); anti-CD43 (S7), anti-KLRG1 (2F1), anti-CD135(A2F10), anti-Ki-67 (SolA15), and anti-T-bet (4B10) were from eBioscience (San Diego, CA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Tetracycline-Induced Breast Cancer Signaling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A total of 300,000 cells/well were seeded into 6-well plates. After 24 h, the cells were incubated with serum- and steroid-deficient medium and treated with 1 µg/mL tetracycline for 48 h. Then, the cells were treated with solvent (0.1% DMSO (v/v) and 0.1% ethanol (v/v)) as a control or 10 µM Api alone or in combination with 1 nM E2 for 24 h. After the treatment, the cells were directly lysed in 2X Laemmli buffer. The protein extracts were denatured for 10 min at 95 °C, separated on 7.5% SDS polyacrylamide gels, and transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (Millipore). The proteins were then probed with specific antibodies. The following antibodies were used: anti-Akt1 (sc-5298, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX, USA) (dilution 1:1000), anti-FOXM1 (D12D5, Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA) (dilution 1:1000), anti-FOXO3a (ab53287, Cambridge, MA, USA) (dilution 1:1000), anti-cyclin B1 (sc-245, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX, USA) (dilution 1:1000), anti-FOXO1 (C29H4, Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA) (dilution 1:1000) and anti-β-actin (A1978, Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA) (dilution 1:5000), which served as a control for the total amount of protein. An enhanced chemiluminescence system (Immune-Star, Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) was used to detect the immunocomplexes.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Splenic B Cell Protein Extraction and Western Blot

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
2x106 magnetically-isolated splenic B cells were lysed in whole cell extraction buffer: 25 mM HEPES (Sigma-Aldrich), 0.3 M NaCl (Carl Roth), 1.5 mM MgCl2 (Carl Roth), 0.2 mM EDTA pH 8.0 (Sigma-Aldrich), 0.5% Triton X-100 (Sigma-Aldrich), 10 mM NaF (Sigma-Aldrich), 10 mM Na-pyrophosphate (Sigma-Aldrich), 100 μM Na-o-vanadate (Sigma-Aldrich), 2 mM DTT (Sigma-Aldrich), supplemented with protease inhibitors (cOmplete Protease Inhibitor Cocktail, Roche). 30-50 μg of proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE (31 (link)) and transferred onto PVDF membranes (Merck). Membranes were subsequently probed with anti-FOXO1 (C29H4, Cell Signaling Technology) and anti-HSP90 (F-8, Santa Cruz Biotechnology) primary antibodies, goat anti-mouse as well as anti-rabbit IgG secondary antibodies conjugated to HRP (Bio-Rad), and signals visualized using ECL prime reagent (GE Healthcare). Data were recorded on Chemidoc Imaging System (Bio-Rad) and analyzed using the Image Lab software (Bio-Rad).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Foxo1 and β-actin Immunoblotting

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sample preparation and Western blot were performed as described previously (Inoue et al., 2015 (link)). Immunoblotting was performed using anti-Foxo1 (C29H4; Cell Signaling Technology) and anti–β-actin (C-11; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Insulin Signaling Pathway Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Reagents were from the following manufacturers: ketamine (KetaSet®), Xylazine (AnaSed®), Medium 199, HBSS, EGTA, HEPES, PenStrep and Gentamycin (Life Technology), Collagen 4 (Worthington), Humulin® R U-100 (Lilly), 8-(4-chlorophenylthio) (CPT)-cAMP, dexamethasone, cycloheximide, bovine serum albumin, d-glucose and sodium pyruvate (Sigma–Aldrich), Lipofectamine2000 (Thermo Fisher), miRCURY LNA (Qiagen) (biotinylated mmu-205-5p and cel-39-3p), anti-FOXO1 (C29H4, # 2880S), anti-Phospho-FoxO1 (Thr24)/FoxO3a (Thr32) (#2599S), anti-Akt, anti-Phospho-Akt (Ser473) (D9E, #4060), anti-SHIP2 (#3397S) and anti-PTEN (#9188S) (Cell Signaling), anti-actin (ab8227) (Abcam).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Immunoprecipitation of Foxo1 and Sp1 from Murine NK Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Splenocytes were pooled from 6 mice, and 5 × 106 primary NK cells were purified from the splenocytes by using a mouse NK negative selection kit (Miltenyi Biotec), followed by FACS-sorting. Cell lysates were prepared using a NP40 cell lysis buffer, supplemented with 10 mM phenylmethanesulfonyl fluoride and 1× proteinase inhibitor cocktail (Sigma). An equal amount of protein was used in each immunoprecipitation, and was pre-cleared with 1 μg rabbit (for Foxo1 IP) or mouse (for Sp1 IP) IgG control antibodies plus 50 μl Dynabeads Protein A or Dynabeads Protein G, respectively, for 2 hours at 4 °C. The precleaned lysates were then incubated with anti-Foxo1 (C29H4) (1:100, Cell Signal Technology) or anti-Sp1 (E3) (5 μg, Santa Cruz Technology) antibodies at 4 °C overnight. An equal volume of cell lysate, incubated with the same species normal IgG, was taken as a control (Cell Signaling Technology or Abcam). The immunoprecipitates were subsequently incubated with 50 μl Dynabeads Protein A or Dynabeads Protein G for additional 4 hours at 4 °C, washed with lysis buffer, and subjected to immunoblotting against Foxo1 (C29H4) (Cell Signaling Technology) or Sp1 (Millipore). A Clean-Blot IP Detection Kit (HRP) (Pierce) was used as a secondary antibody.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Western Blot Protein Detection Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were lysed in protein lysis M buffer (Roche, Basel, Switzerland), and cell lysates were subjected to 10% SDS-PAGE (30% acrylamide-Bis solution, 10% SDS solution, 1.5 M Tris-HCl [pH 8.8], 1 M Tris HCl [pH 6.8], and 10% ammonium persulfate; Sigma-Aldrich; St. Louis, MO, USA) and transferred to a 0.45-mM polyvinylidene fluoride transfer membrane (Millipore; Billerica, MA, USA). The membranes were incubated with each antibody, followed by anti-rabbit or anti-mouse immunoglobulin G (IgG) conjugated to horseradish peroxidase. Protein bands were detected using stable peroxide solution and luminal/enhancer solution (Thermo Fisher Scientific; Waltham, MA, USA). Antibodies, including polyclonal anti-AANAT (Abcam; Cambridge, UK), anti-b-actin (C4; Santa Cruz Biotechnology; Dallas, TX, USA), peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (Thermo Fisher Scientific), and anti-Foxo1 (C29H4; Cell Signaling Technology; Danvers, MA, USA) were used for detecting proteins.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!