The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

54 protocols using meropenem

1

Efflux Pump Phenotypic Detection in Pseudomonas

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Efflux pump activity of the strains were phenotypically detected by using meropenem (10 mg, Himedia, Mumbai) with and without CCCP (carbonyl cyanide m-chlorophenylhydrazone, 100mM, Himedia, Mumbai)[8 ].
MIC (Minimum inhibitory concentration) reduction assay was performed with meropenem alone and in combination with CCCP at concentration 20 μg/ml [9 (link)]. An efflux pump-overexpressed phenotype was defined as any strain exhibiting at least a fourfold decrease in MIC when tested in the presence of CCCP. P. aeruginosa PAO1 and P. aeruginosa knockout mutant (Kindly donated by Prof. Keith Poole, Queens University, Canada) of MexAB-OprM was taken as negative control.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing by Disc Diffusion

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antibiotic susceptibility testing was performed on Mueller Hinton agar (Himedia, Mumbai, India) plates by Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method and interpreted as per CLSI recommendations [10 ]. The antibiotics tested viz., meropenem (10μg) ciprofloxacin (5μg), amikacin (30μg), gentamicin (10μg), carbenicillin (10μg), polymixin B (300 μg), ceftazidime (30 μg), Piperacillin-Tazobactam (100/10 μg), faropenem (5μg) (Himedia, Mumbai, India).
Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was determined on Muller Hinton Agar plates by agar dilution method against meropenem and ciprofloxacin (Himedia, Mumbai, India) according to CLSI guidelines and interpreted according to CLSI breakpoint [10 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Efflux Pump Activity Detection Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Efflux pump activity of the strains were phenotypically detected by using meropenem (10 mg, Himedia, Mumbai) and ciprofloxacin (5 mg, Himedia, Mumbai) with and without CCCP (carbonyl cyanide m-chlorophenylhydrazone, 100mM, Himedia, Mumbai) [11 (link)].
MIC reduction assay was performed with meropenem and ciprofloxacin alone and in combination with CCCP at a concentration of 12.5 μM [11 (link), 12 (link)]. An efflux pump-overexpressed phenotype was defined as any strain exhibiting at least a twofold decrease in MIC when tested in the presence of CCCP.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed using the Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method, adhering to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines [26 ]. The selection of antibacterial disks was based on CLSI 2022 recommendations and availability. The bacterial inoculum, equivalent to 0.5 McFarland standards, was uniformly spread onto Mueller–Hinton agar plates (Himedia India) using a sterile cotton swab applicator. Antibiotic disks for gram-positive bacteria were penicillin G (10 μg), nitrofurantoin (300 μg), ciprofloxacin (5μg), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (1.25/23.75 μg), gentamicin (10 μg), cefoxitin (30 μg), and clindamycin (30 μg) (Himedia, India).
The antimicrobial disks for Enterobacteriaceae included piperacillin-tazobactam (100/10 μg), ampicillin (10 μg), nitrofurantoin (300 μg), amoxicillin-clavulanate (20/10 μg), gentamicin (10 μg), cefotaxime (30 μg), ciprofloxacin (30 μg), meropenem (10 μg), piperacillin (100 μg), cefepime (30 μg), amikacin (30 μg), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (1.25/23.75 μg), ceftazidime (30 μg), and ceftriaxone (30 μg) (Himedia, India). Antimicrobial disks for Pseudomonas spp and Acinetobacter were gentamicin (10 μg), meropenem (10 μg), ceftazidime (30 μg), piperacillin-tazobactam (100/10 μg), ciprofloxacin (5 μg), and amikacin (30 μg) (Himedia, India).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antimicrobial susceptibility was determined by Kirby–Bauer disc diffusion method13 (link) on MHA plates. The following antibiotics were used: amikacin (30 μg), gentamicin (10 μg), ciprofloxacin (30 μg), trimethoprim/sulphamethoxazole (1.25/23.75 μg), cefepime (30 μg), imipenem (10 μg), meropenem (10 μg), ceftriaxone (30 μg) and aztreonam (30 μg) (HiMedia). Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of various antibiotics were determined on MHA plates by agar dilution method according to CLSI guidelines14 using the following antibiotics: cefotaxime, ceftazidime, ceftriaxone, cefepime, imipenem, meropenem, ertapenem and aztreonam (HiMedia).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing of Yeast Isolates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Isolated yeast strains were tested against 30 antibiotics with different modes of actions such as amikacin (MD001), amoxycillin (MD002), azithromycin (MD004), benzyl penicillin (MD062), cefalexin (cephalexin) (MD014), cefepime (MD070), cefotaxime (cephotaxime) (MD064), chloramphenicol (MD016), ciprofloxacin (MD017), erythromycin (MD022), gemifloxacin (MD076), gentamicin (MD061), kanamycin (MD026), levofloxacin (MD027), methicillin (MD031), moxifloxacin (MD033), neomycin (MD036), norfloxacin (MD038), ofloxacin (MD039), pefloxacin (MD040), polymyxin-B (MD043), rifampicin (MD045), roxithromycin (MD046), streptomycin (MD048), sulphadiazine (MD050), sulphamethizole (MD052), teicoplanin (MD055), vancomycin (MD060), tetracycline (MD056), meropenem (SD727) (Himedia, Mumbai, India) with standard antibiotic concentration previously determined by testing against pathogens [17 (link)]. The diameter of the inhibition zone was measured after 48 h of incubation at 30 °C.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing of Isolates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antibiotic susceptibility tests of all isolates were performed using Kirby Bauer disc diffusion method on Mueller-Hinton Agar with recommended antibiotics by CLSI 2020 guidelines [14 ].The antibiotics used were gentamicin (GEN,30 µg), amikacin (AK, 10 µg), ciprofloxacin (CIP, 5 µg), ceftazidime (CAZ, 30 µg), cefepime (CPM, 30 µg), aztreonam (AT, 30 µg), imipenem (IPM, 10 µg), piperacillin (PI,30 µg), piperacillin-tazobactam (PIT), meropenem (MRP, 10 µg), ofloxacin (OF, 30 µg), Levofloxacin (LEV, 30 µg) and colistin (CL,10 µg) from Hi-Media, Laboratories Pvt. Ltd. India.
Isolates that were non-susceptible to at least one agent in ≥ 3 antimicrobial categories have been categorized under MDR [15 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Antimicrobial Resistance Profiling of Virulent Isolates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The isolates positive for at least one virulence marker gene by PCR were subjected to antimicrobial susceptibility test against the selected antimicrobials (ampicillin-10 μg, amikacin-10 μg, chloramphenicol-30 μg, ceftriaxone-10 μg, cephalexin-30 μg, ciprofloxacin-10 μg, co-trimoxazole-25 μg, cefoperazone-tazobactam-75 + 10 μg, meropenem-10 μg, norfloxacin-10 μg, gentamicin-10 μg, cefixime-5 μg, doxycycline hydrochloride-10 μg and ofloxacin-5 μg) (HiMedia, India) by disc diffusion method in Mueller–Hinton agar [18 (link)]. The performance of this test was checked by employing E. coli ATCC 25922 as a standard quality control strain. The results were expressed as sensitive, intermediate and resistant as per standard CLSI guidelines [19 ]. MDR was defined as “acquired non-susceptibility to at least one agent in three or more antimicrobial categories” [20 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antibiotic susceptibility testing was performed by modified Kirby Bauer's disc diffusion method on Mueller Hinton Agar medium according to the Clinical Laboratory Standard Institute guidelines (CLSI, 2013) . The antibiotics used were ciprofloxacin ((5 µg), cotrimoxazole (25 µg), cefotaxime (30 µg), ceftriaxone (30 µg), cefixime (10 µg), amikacin (30 µg), gentamycin (10 µg), ceftazidime (30 µg), cefoperazone/sulbactum (75/10 µg), meropenem (10 µg), piperacillin/tazobactam (100/10 µg), chloramphenicol (30 µg) (HiMedia, India). Suspension of bacteria maintained to 0.5 McFarland standards was inoculated on Mueller Hinton Agar (HiMedia, India) plates using sterile swabs, and then antibiotic discs were placed on it. The plates were incubated at 37 °C for 24 hours. The diameter of the zone of inhibition was measured and compared with standard strain. The results were interpreted as sensitive, intermediate, resistant according to CLSI (2013) guidelines. Pseudomonas (ATCC 27853) was used as standard control strains.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Amikacin (AMK; 30 μg/disk), ampicillin/sulbactam (SAM, 10/10 µg/disc), cefixime (CFM; 5 µg/disc), cefotaxime (CTX; 30 µg/disc), ceftazidime (CAZ; 30 µg/disc), ceftriaxone (CRO; 30 µg/disc), ciprofloxacin (CIP, 5 µg/disc), gentamicin (GEN, 10 µg/disc), imipenem (IPM, 10 µg/disc), meropenem (MEM; 10 µg/disc), nitrofurantoin (NIT; 300 µg/disc), sulbactam (SUL; 10 µg/disc), trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (SXT; 25 µg/ disc) (HiMedia Laboratories, Mumbai,. India), imipenem and sulbactam powder (Sigma-Aldrich Co. St. Louis, MO, USA). The antifungal powders were dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and stock solutions diluted based on Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute (CLSI) guidelines (CLSI M07-A10).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!