The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

8 protocols using sucralfate

1

Reagents for Biochemical Assays

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sucralfate, lipopolysaccharide (LPS), ferric chloride, trichloracetic acid (TCA), sodium nitrite, potassium ferricyanide, dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), N-(1-naphthyl) ethylenediamine dihydrochloride, phosphoric acid, and sulfanilamide were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, Inc. (St. Louis, MO, USA). Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM), the antibiotic mixture (penicillin-streptomycin), and fetal bovine serum (FBS) were purchased from Hyclone (South Logan, UT, USA). All chemicals not listed were grade of reagent.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Corneal Angiogenesis Assay in Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The corneal micropocket assay was performed as described37 (link),38 (link). Seven-week-old Akt1WT and Akt1∆SMC mice were anesthetized with chloral hydrate (450 mg/kg, i.p.). After 10 min, alcaine was dropped into the eye. A corneal micropocket was created with a modified von Graef knife and MVR knife in both eyes. A micropellet of sucralfate (Sigma-Aldrich) coated with hydron polymer (Sigma–Aldrich) containing 200 ng of VEGF was implanted into each corneal pocket. The pellet was positioned approximately 1 mm from the corneal lymbus. Seven days later, the mice were anesthetized with 1–2% inhaled isoflurane, and the eyes were captured using a digital camera. For staining, eyes were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 12 h at 4 °C. The primary antibody was incubated in blocking buffer (3% BSA in PBS-Tween-20) overnight at 4 °C. The secondary antibody was diluted in blocking buffer and incubated for 2 h at room temperature. Corneas were flat-mounted using an anti-fading reagent, and images were obtained using a confocal microscope (K1-Fluo, Nanoscope Systems, Daejeon, Korea). Sprouting was quantified by measuring the VEGF-induced vessel sprouting length using ImageJ (National Institutes of Health).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Corneal Neovascularization Induction and Treatment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Pellets were prepared using poly(hydroxyethyl methacrylate) (poly-HEMA; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), sucralfate (20 ng/pellet; Sigma-Aldrich), and mouse bFGF (80 ng/pellet; MedChemExpress, Monmouth, NJ, USA). A 12% (w/v) poly-HEMA was prepared with absolute ethanol, and a 10% (w/v) sucralfate solution was prepared with PBS. For 50 bFGF pellets, 5 µL 12% (w/v) poly-HEMA, 1 µL 10% (w/v) sucralfate solution, and 4 µL 1 µg/µL bFGF solution were mixed and vortexed thoroughly. For each pellet, 0.2 µL of the mixture was dropped onto the parafilm and dried at room temperature for 1 to 2 hours to form a pellet.40
The mice were randomly assigned to either the control group or the experimental group. Six hours before CNV induction, the experimental group received 1 mg/mL NE via subconjunctival injection, and the control group was injected with an equal volume of sterile water. Corneal micropockets were created with a Von Graefe cataract knife on the cornea of the right eye, and the bFGF pellet was implanted into the corneal micropocket. Then, 1 mg/mL NE or infection water was applied as eye drops six times a day beginning on the second day after pocket formation. Eye phenotypes were recorded with a slit lamp on day 1, 3, 5, and 7 after the operation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Uniform Preparation of Angiogenic and Lymphangiogenic Micropellets

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Micropellets were prepared in a uniform manner so that they all contain the same amount of the angiogenic or lymphangiogenic stimulus. VEGFA, VEGFC, and control (phosphate-buffered saline, PBS) pellets used for implantation were made with modifications. Pellets contained 10% (w/v) sucralfate (Sigma-Aldrich), 12% (w/v) poly-HEMA (Sigma-Aldrich) dissolved in absolute ethanol, and recombinant human VEGF (VEGF/VEGFA, R&D Systems, Minneapolis MN), VEGFC, or PBS[12 (link)]. Pellets were formed by pipetting 5 μl poly-HEMA solution onto UV-exposed parafilm, yielding 20 pellets containing 150 ng VEGFA or VEGFC. Pellets were air dried at room temperature before storage at −80°C. To avoid additional freeze-thaw cycles for the lymphangiogenic factors, which must be stored frozen, the pellets should be carefully stored in small batches. In addition, it is strongly recommended that during preparation, the lymphangiogenic factors are suspended in a low-salt solvent to avoid corneal irritation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Inflammatory Cytokine Profiling of Macrophages

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Human monocytes (THP-1 cell line) were seeded onto a 6-well plate with 3 × 105 cells in 2 mL medium and then stabilized for 24 h. The stabilized cells were differentiated into macrophages by treatment with 10 ng/mL phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (Sigma-Aldrich, MO, USA) for 24 h. The macrophages were then exposed to 10 μmol/L of Rh1, butyric acid, curcumin, and sucralfate (Sigma-Aldrich, MO, USA) and incubated for 48 h. The cell supernatant was collected and centrifuged to remove the debris. Inflammatory cytokines, including CXCL10, CCL2, CCL8, IFN-γ-, IL-4, IL-12, and IL-21, were examined using a Bio-plex multiplex system and Bio-plex 200 (Bio-Rad, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Angiogenesis Tube Formation Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The μ-slides for angiogenesis were obtained from Ibidi (Ibidi USA Inc., WI, USA). Ten microliters of Matrigel (Corning, NY, USA) were added to the inner wells of slides and incubated at 37°C for 30 min to 1 h. HUVECs were irradiated with a 10 Gy dose of radiation and were then harvested, and 1 × 104 cells were resuspended in 50 μL media containing 10 μmol/L of Rh1, butyric acid, curcumin, and sucralfate (Sigma-Aldrich, MO, USA). The cells were then seeded on Matrigel-coated slides, and their presence on the gel surface was confirmed. The cells were incubated at 37°C in 5% CO2 for 3 h. Thereafter, randomly selected fields in each group were observed under an inverted microscope, and the lengths of the tubes were measured.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Transwell Migration Assay with Ginsenosides

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The 6.5-mm Transwell inserts with 8.0-μm pores were obtained from Corning (Corning, NY, USA) for the migration assay. The cells were exposed to a single dose of 10 Gy and stabilized for 24 h. The cells were detached and resuspended in 200 μL of opti-MEM (Gibco, NY, USA) supplemented with 10 μmol/L of ginsenosides (Rh1, Rh2, Rb1, or Ro), butyric acid, curcumin, and sucralfate (Sigma-Aldrich, MO, USA) and then seeded in the upper chamber of transwell inserts. The lower chamber of the 24-well plate was filled with a medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum (Millipore, MA, USA) as a chemoattractant. After 24 h of incubation, the cells that migrated to the bottom of the transwell membrane were stained with crystal violet solution, and the stained cells in randomly chosen fields were counted, per group, using an inverted microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Corneal Micropocket Angiogenesis Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The procedure was performed as previously reported22 (link). Corneal micropocket was created 1.0 mm apart from limbal vascular arcade using a modified von Graefe Knife and slow-release pellet was implanted into the pocket. The pellet was made of sucralfate (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) and hydron polymer (Sigma Aldrich) containing 400 ng VEGF-C (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN) and left in place for 9 days.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!