The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Focus 220

Manufactured by Siemens
Sourced in United States

The Focus 220 is a laboratory equipment designed for analytical applications. It is a versatile instrument that can be used for various analytical techniques. The core function of the Focus 220 is to provide precise and reliable data for scientific research and analysis.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

33 protocols using focus 220

1

PET Imaging of Macaque Brain Uptake

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Male macaques (∼10 kg) were used for PET imaging data acquisition with a microPET Focus 220 scanner (Siemens Inc., Knoxville, TN). Animals were anesthetized using ketamine and glycopyrrolate and maintained with inhalation of isoflurane. Core temperature was kept at 37 °C with a heated water blanket. The head was secured in a customized head holder. Subsequently, a 2 h dynamic PET scan was performed after administration of radiotracers (8.13 MBq (2.17 mCi) or ~25.2 MBq (6.79 mCi)) via the venous catheter. PET scans data were collected from 0∼120 min with the following time frames: 3 × 1 min, 4 × 2 min, 3 × 3 min, and 20 × 5 min. Emission data were corrected for dead time, scatter, and attenuation and then reconstructed. For quantitative analyses, dynamic PET images were co-registered to a standardized monkey MRI template using PMOD software 4.02 (PMOD Technologies, Zürich, Switzerland).28 (link) Predefined brain regions of interest from the template were applied to the co-registered PET image to obtain regional time-activity curves. The measurement of the brain uptake of radiotracer was standardized to body weight and the dose of radioactivity injected to yield a standardized uptake value (SUV).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Multimodal Imaging of Brain Tumor Metabolism

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Animals were preanesthetized in an induction chamber using isoflurane (2.5%-3.5% in oxygen) and placed on a heated animal bed (38°C), and the lateral tail vein was cannulated. Anesthesia and warming were maintained for the whole imaging period. Anatomic MR imaging was performed on a 1-T benchtop MR imaging system (ICON; Bruker BioSpin GmbH) using a modified 3-dimensional T1-weighted gradient echo sequence (T1-fast low angle shot). After MR imaging, the animal bed was transferred into the gantry of a microPET scanner (Focus 220; Siemens Medical Solutions) and a 10-min transmission scan using a 57 Co point source was recorded. Subsequently, 11 C-erlotinib (27 6 8 MBq, 2 6 1 nmol, 0.10 mL, n 5 29) was administered as an intravenous bolus over 1 min, and a 90-min dynamic PET scan (energy window, 250-750 keV; timing window, 6 ns) was initiated at the start of radiotracer injection.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

PET Imaging of Tumor Uptake in Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Two mice were placed (one on top of the other) in a Focus 220 rodent scanner (CTI Siemens), with the tumor in the field of view. Mice were kept warm on heating mats. Acquisition times differed between 10 min (24-h time point) and 75 min (96-h time point). A transmission scan of 515 s was obtained using a 57 Co point source to correct for tissue attenuation.
). PET data were reconstructed using a 2-dimensional ordered-subset expectation maximization reconstruction algorithm with Fourier rebinning, 4 iterations and 16 subsets. Images were quantified using Amide's medical image data examiner software (version 1.0.4; Stanford University). Regions of interest were drawn for tumors at 50% of maximum intensity, and images were quantified using Amide's medical image data examiner software. The data are presented as the SUV mean or SUV max . n 5 3-5/group). After scanning, mice were sacrificed for ex vivo biodistribution analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Small Animal PET Imaging of FAPI-46

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Small animal PET imaging was performed when the tumor was visible on 3 consecutive MRI scans on a FOCUS 220 micro-PET scanner (CTI-Siemens, Germany). The rats were anesthetized with isoflurane in O2/air 3:7 (induction 5%, maintenance 2%), and a catheter for tracer injection was inserted into the lateral tail vein. After fixation in the animal holder, the emission scan started with intravenous injection of 10 to 64 MBq 68Ga-FAPI-46 in 500 µL 0.9% NaCl. The acquisition time was 60 min to 120 min. Emission scans were followed by an 8 min transmission scan with a rotating 57Co-point source.
Breathing rate and body temperature were monitored and held at approx. 60 breaths/min and 37 °C, respectively. The emission scans were histogrammed into time frames (2 × 1 min, 2 × 2 min, 6 × 4 min, 18 × 5 min for time–activity curves, and 4 × 30 min/4 × 15 min for display) and fully 3D rebinned (span 3, ring difference 47), followed by OSEM3D/MAP reconstruction. The resulting voxel sizes were 0.38 × 0.38 × 0.80 mm3. For all further processing of the images, including statistics, the software VINCI 5.21 for MacOS X (Max Planck Institute for Metabolism Research, Cologne, Germany) was used. Images were intensity-normalized to injected dose and corrected for body weight (SUVbw). To this end, every frame was divided by injected dose and multiplied by body weight times 100.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Microfluidic PET Imaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PET imaging was performed on the microPET FOCUS220 (Siemens) under standard anesthesia and monitoring procedures [29 (link)]. Data acquisition started with the IV bolus injection of [18F]UCB-H (32.9 ± 1.0 MBq/kg, 0.35 ± 0.07 µg/kg). Dynamic PET images were reconstructed using standard OSEM-2D algorithms while correcting for radioactive decay, scatter, attenuation and detectors inhomogeneity, which were measured prior to PET scanning using respectively 57Co and 68Ge external sources.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Longitudinal FAZA-PET/CT Imaging of Tumor Hypoxia

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A total of seven FAZA-PET/CT imaging sessions were performed on day 0, 2, 4, 7, 10, 16, and 21 following initiation of treatment using a triple mouse imaging bed (Fig. 1). [18F]FAZA was produced by CanProbe (Ontario, Canada) with a radiochemical purity of 95.7 ± 3.7 % (calculated over seven productions). PET imaging (Focus 220, Siemens) was performed at 2-h post-FAZA administration (0.79 ± 0.06 MBq/g of body weight, Additional file 1: Figure S1). Imaging at 2-h post-FAZA injection was reported to be a desirable imaging time point based on tracer kinetics at the tumor site (i.e., reaching steady state) and on the fact that at this time, post-injection, the tumor tracer uptake levels correlated well with tissue hypoxia [5 (link), 30 (link)]. Each PET acquisition consisted of a 20-min emission scan followed by an 8-min 57Co transmission scan for attenuation and scatter correction. Then, a CT scan (GE Locus Ultra, 80 kVp, 50 mA) was performed with animals in the same position in order to provide anatomical data for image registration. Treatment response was quantified based on CT tumor volumes.

Illustration of a the triple mouse PET imaging set-up and b the experimental workflow. Day 0 corresponds to the day of treatment initiation. Note that the fur of the mice was colored for identification purposes

+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

PET Imaging of Receptor Occupancy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PET imaging was conducted as previously reported (Nagai et al., 2020 (link)). Briefly, PET scans were performed using a microPET Focus 220 scanner (Siemens Medical Solutions). Monkeys were immobilized by ketamine (5-10 mg/kg) and xylazine (0.2-0.5 mg/kg) and then maintained under anesthetized condition with isoflurane (1%-3%) during all PET procedures. Transmission scans were performed for ∼20 min with a Ge-68 source. Emission scans were acquired in 3D list mode with an energy window of 350-750 keV after intravenous bolus injection of [11C]DCZ (324.9-382.3 MBq). Emission data acquisition lasted for 90 min. To estimate the specific binding of [11C]DCZ, regional binding potential relative to nondisplaceable radioligand (BPND) was calculated by PMOD with an original multilinear reference tissue model (MRTMo) (Yan et al., 2021 (link)). PET scans were conducted at 45 d after injection of vectors for the two monkeys (#229 and #245) and for one monkey expressing hM4Di in the amygdala (#237) between 496 and 984 d, during which enough hM4Di expression for the occupancy study was observed after its introduction.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

PET Imaging with Motion Tracking

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PET measurements were performed using the microPET Focus 220 small animal PET scanner (Preclinical Solutions, Siemens Healthineers, Knoxville, TN, USA). To track the motion, the MicronTracker Sx60 (ClaroNav Inc., Toronto, Canada) was used, as in [11 (link)]. The MicronTracker (MT) is a stereo-optical system which tracks preregistered planar markers, deriving the 6 degrees-of-freedom (i.e. the marker pose) from two simultaneously acquired but spatially offset images. It was used to track a small marker (2.2×1.7 cm) attached to the rat’s head, at a frequency of 25–30 Hz. The experimental setup is shown in Fig. 1.

a The MicronTracker in front of the microPET scanner. The large marker attached to the front of the scanner is the reference marker used to aid in transforming from the MT coordinates to the microPET coordinates. b The head marker used in rat studies. c An unrestrained rat with an attached head marker inside a tube within the microPET. The catheter port can be seen between its shoulders. Figure reproduced with permission of IOP Publishing from [14 (link)]. Ⓒ Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine. All rights reserved

+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

FDG-PET and Hoechst Perfusion of Tumors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
10 MBq of [18F]FDG was injected intravenously (iv) into mice for 1 h. Live mice were then scanned using a microPET scanner (Siemens Focus 220) to detect fluorescent uptake. Mice were also scanned with a microCT scanner (GE Locus Ultra) to collect anatomical information to assist with tumor volume quantification. One minute prior to being euthanized, mice were injected iv with 40mgkg−1 of Hoechst 33,258. Tumors were harvested, frozen in liquid nitrogen and sectioned at 8 μm. Tumor perfusion was measured using ImageJ after visualizing the sections with UV illumination. Specifically, the Hoeschst dye was UV activated at 350 nm, then absorbance measured at 460 nm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Multimodal PET Imaging of Glyburide

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PET scan was performed according to our previous reported methods with modifications 17 (link), 18 (link). Briefly, rats were sedated with isoflurane (3%) in a sedation chamber and kept anesthetized with isoflurane (1.5-2.5%). PET images were acquired using the Siemens FOCUS 220 PET scanner (Siemens Preclinical Solutions, Knoxville, TN) with a reconstructed image resolution of ~2 mm. Following a transmission scan, 11C-glyburide was injected intravenously. List-mode data were acquired and dynamic scan data were reconstructed with a filtered back projection algorithm with corrections for attenuation, normalization, scatter and randoms. The left and right brain regions of interest (ROIs) were manually drawn based on the PET image. Regional time-activity curves (TACs) were generated for the left and right brain hemispheres.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!