The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

13 protocols using c18 pre column

1

Lipid Profiling by LC-MS/MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The protocol to carry out the lipidomic analysis is described elsewhere [9 (link)]. Briefly, the analysis was performed using LC separation followed by HESI in negative or positive mode and detection by MS/ MS. The separation was carried out using a Kinetex C18 100 A column (100 mm × 3 mm i.d., 2.6 μm particle size) from Phenomenex (Madrid, Spain) protected with a C18 pre-column (4 mm × 3 mm), also from Phenomenex. The composition of mobile phase A was 60:40 (v/v) deionized water:acetonitrile, while phase B was 85:10:5 (v/v) isopropanol:acetonitrile:deionized water. Both phases contained 5 mM ammonium formate and 0.1% (v/v) formic acid as ionization agents [16 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

LC-MS Metabolite Separation Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The samples were maintained at 10 °C in the auto sampler, and the column was thermostated to 25 °C. The reversed-phase separation was performed on a C18 column (3.5 µm; 2.1 × 150 mm, XBridge®, Waters, Milford, MA, USA) coupled to a C18 precolumn (4 × 3 mm, Phenomenex, Torrance, CA, USA). The injection volume was 2 µl. The eluent system consisted of (A) H2O + 0.1 % FA and (B) MeOH + 0.1 % FA that was passed through the column at a flow rate of 0.25 ml/min with a chromatographic gradient according to [1 (link)]. Here, a linear gradient was utilized. The initial mobile phase composition was 10% of eluent B, which was held constant for 2 min. In the next 30 min, eluent B was increased linearly to 100% and maintained at 100% for another 4 min. Lastly, the column was recalibrated for 8 min with 10% eluent B.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantifying Quercetin in Onion Extracts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The major flavonoid found in Allium cepa L. is quercetin [30 (link),31 (link)]. The AcE was standardized in terms of quercetin concentration by high performance liquid chromatography, with ultraviolet light detection at 250 nm, using a C-18 column (150 × 4.6 mm ID, 5 μm particle size, Thermo Scientific) and a C-18 pre-column (Phenomenex, Torrance, USA). The mobile phase consisted of 0.1% aqueous formic acid (A) and methanol (B) at a flow rate of 1.0 ml/min. The following gradient elution method was used for separation: 5% to 90% of B in A in 30 min. The injection volume was 20 μL and quercetin calibration curves were in the range of 5 to 100 μg/ml.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantitative HPLC Analysis of Polyphenols

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The polyphenolic compounds were quantified using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) using a Shimadzu Prominence device (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) equipped with LC-20AT binary pumps, CTO-20A thermostats, SIL-20A automatic dispensers, and SPD-20AV UV/Vis detectors. Different wavelengths of light were used to record chromatograms: 280 nm, 320 nm, and 360 nm. Separation was conducted using a Luna C-18 RP column, 5 μm, 250 × 4.6 mm (Phenomenex, Torrance, CA, USA), which was protected by a C18 pre-column, 4 × 30 mm (Phenomenex, Torrance, CA, USA). As the mobile phase, the following solvents were used: A (acetonitrile) and B (1% formic acid) at the flow rate of 1 mL/min and using the following linear gradient: 0–10 min, from 10 to 25% A, then 10–20 min to 60% A, then 20–30 min to 70% A. After the column has been equilibrated to initial conditions, 10% A in 10 min, there is an additional 5 min stabilization period. Filters with a pore size of 0.45 μm were used to filter all samples and solvents before analysis (Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA). The LC Solution Software (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) was used to identify and quantify the peaks obtained.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Comprehensive HPLC-MS Analysis of Phytochemicals in Azadirachta indica Leaves

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The identification and quantification of phenolic compounds in A. indica leaf extract were carried out using an Agilent 1200 Series HPLC-MS equipment. The equipment consists of an automatic sample injection system, two high-pressure isocratic pumps, a degasser and a chromatographic oven. The components were separated by a C18 column (100 mm × 2.1 mm, 3.5 m, Zorbax Eclipse, Agilent, Madrid, Spain) connected to a C18 precolumn (4 mm × 2 mm, Phenomenex, Torrance, CA, USA). HPLC-MS conditions were set as follows. The mobile phase was composed of Phase A (ultrapure water acidified with 0.11% formic acid) and phase B (acetonitrile acidified with 0.11% formic acid). Elution gradient corresponded to 0–2 min, 3% B; 25–27 min, 100% B; 28–38 min, 3% B, at the flow rate of 0.2 mL/min. An injection volume of 10 µL was filtered and injected into the analytical C18 column, at 30 °C (column temperature). Different commercial standards were subsequently used to identify the compounds detected by HPLC-MS. The identification of the components was confirmed by matching their retention time (RT) and the fragment ions (m/z) to those of the corresponding authentic standard compounds, in addition to the literature available.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

LCMS Detection of Purpurin-Glutathione Adduct

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
An Agilent 1200 series high performance liquid chromatography system coupled with a Bruker microTOF (time-of-flight mass analyzer) (Bruker Daltonics, HB, Germany) was used to qualitatively detect the adduct of purpurin with GSH. A phenomenex C18 column (50 × 2.1 mm, 1.7 µm) fitted with C18 precolumn (Phenomenex, Torrance, CA, USA)was used. Water with 0.1% formic acid (A) and 100% acetonitrile with 0.1% formic acid (B) were used as the mobile phase at a flow rate of 0.3 mL/min. The elution gradient was same as used in UPLC analysis: 0–9 min, 10–100% B; 9–10 min, 100% B; 10–10.5 min, 100–10% B; 10.5–15 min, 10% B. The injection volume was 10 µL. Mass spectrometric analysis was performed in negative electrospray ionization mode, with an m/z range from 100–1500.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

HPLC Analysis of Amino Acids

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mucosa extracts gained as aforementioned were diluted with ultra pure water (1:20), and free amino acids were analyzed by HPLC equipped with a fluorescence detector (Series 1260 Infinity II/ 1200, Agilent Technologies, Germany). The HPLC method was adapted from Krömer et al.55 (link). Briefly, amino acids were separated after automated pre-column derivatization with ortho-phthalaldehyde/3-mercaptopropionic acid and 9-fluorenylmethoxycarbonyl chloride after reaction with 3-mercaptopropionic acid as reducing agent and iodoacetic acid to block sulfhydryl groups. Analyses were carried out at a flow rate of 0.8 ml/min within 45 min on a 250 × 4 mm Hyperclone ODS (C18) 120 Å column protected by a 4 × 3 mm C18 pre-column (Phenomenex, Aschaffenburg, Germany) using a gradient with 40 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.8) and acetonitrile/methanol/water (v:v:v: 45:45:10) ranging from 6 to 100%. Amino acid concentrations were normalized to the protein concentration of each sample.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Targeted Cobalamin LC-MS/MS Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The LC-MS/MS measurements were conducted on a Nexera X2 UHPLC (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) coupled to a triple quadrupole mass spectrometer (LC-MS 8050, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) under positive electrospray ionization (ESI) mode. A Hydrosphere C18 column (150 × 3.0 mm, 3 μm, YMC, Dinslaken, Germany) with a C18 pre-column (4 × 2.0 mm, Phenomenex, Aschaffenburg, Germany) served as stationary phase for chromatographic separation. Mobile phases A and B were 0.1% acetic acid in water and 100% methanol, respectively. The acquisition was performed in scheduled multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mode. The gradient and instrumental conditions were the same as previously reported for the native SIDA method [7 (link)]. The detailed MRM parameters are listed in Table S2, Electronic Supplementary Material. The MRM transitions of OHCbl, AdoCbl, and MeCbl were monitored for the detection of unconverted cobalamins. LabSolutions software (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) was used for system control, data acquisition, and data analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

HPLC Analysis of Retinoic Acid Valproate

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The HPLC system consisted of a Waters Alliance 2695 system with a Waters 2495 diode array detector. Samples were separated using a Phenomenex® C18 column (4.6×150 mm, 5 µm) with a Phenomenex C18 precolumn (4.6×5 mm, 5 µm). The mobile phase consisted of acetonitrile/water (70:30, v/v) pumped isocratically at 0.8 mL/min, following a method adapted from two methods previously reported.27 (link),28 (link) RAV was detected by monitoring the absorbance of the column eluent at 284 nm at 25°C. The injection volume was 25 µL, and the run time was 7 min, with a retention time of RAV of 4.3 min. The standard calibration curve was linear over a concentration range of 0.5 µg/mL–100.0 µg/mL, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9996 under our experimental conditions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Sample Preparation and Instrumental Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sample preparation was carried out using a vortex mixer from Scientific Industries (NY, USA), a Vibra cell VCx130 ultrasound probe from Sonics & Materials Inc. (CT, USA) with a 2 mm diameter titanium microtip and a 130 W high-frequency generator at 20 kHz, X50S metal carbide technical nitrogen stream (Barcelona, Spain), and the Eppendorf 5415R microcentrifuge (Hamburg, Germany). Plastic and glass P100 culture plates, 96-well plates, and a CO2 incubator (MIDI 40) were purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Spain).
Instrumental determination was performed by Agilent Gas Chromatographic Mod. 7890A Series (Agilent Technologies, Madrid, Spain) equipped with a HP 7683B autoinjector, a microelectron capture detector (μECD), a HP 5975C VL MSD mass spectrometry detector, and a polydimethylsiloxane (95%) ZB-5 capillary column (30 m × 0.25 mm I.D., 0.25-μm film thickness); and HPLC Spectra System P 4000 (Thermo Electron Corporation, San Jose, USA) equipped with a programmable fluorescence detector FL 3000 and Hypersil Green PAH columns (150 mm × 3 mm; particle size 3 μm) attached to a Phenomenex C18 pre-column.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!