The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

804 protocols using diva software

1

Immunophenotyping of Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tumor cells obtained from control or treated mice were thawed, centrifuged, and stained in one-step test using monoclonal antibodies conjugated with fluorophores: anti-CD45 PE-Cy7, anti-CD4 APC, anti-CD8 FITC, and anti-CD49b PE (all from BD Biosciences). In order to eliminate dead cells during the analysis, cells were additionally stained with DAPI dye (Molecular Probes). The analysis was carried out using LSR Fortesssa with Diva software (Becton Dickinson). In order to determine the percentage of T regulatory lymphocytes in tumors, the cells were stained with monoclonal antibodies: anti-CD45 PE-Cy7 (BD Biosciences), anti-CD4 FITC (eBioscience), and anti-CD25 PE (eBioscience). Then, cells were fixed using Foxp3/Transcription Factor Staining Buffer Set (eBioscience) according to manufacturer instruction and incubated with anti-FoxP3 monoclonal antibody conjugated with APC (eBioscience). The analysis was carried out using LSR Fortessa with Diva software (Becton Dickinson).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Cell Cycle and Apoptosis Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell cycle phase distribution was analysed by flow cytometry using propidium iodide (PI) staining (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, Missouri, USA). HCC cells were collected by trypsinization, washed with PBS, then fixed in a cold solution of methanol/acetone (4:1). Cells were first incubated with RNase A at 37 °C then stained with a solution containing 100 μg/ml PI, at 37 °C for 20 min. Stained nuclei were analysed for DNA-PI fluorescence using a Becton Dickinson FACSCanto II flow cytometer (Becton-Dickinson, Milan, Italy). The proportions of cells in G0/G1, S phase, and G2/M phases of the cell cycle were analysed by DiVa Software, version 6.3 (Becton-Dickinson).
Apoptosis was assessed by FITC Annexin V Apoptosis Detection Kit (Becton-Dickinson). Briefly, cells were washed in PBS and re-suspended in Annexin Binding Buffer (10 mmol/L HEPES pH 7.4, 140 mmol/L NaCl, and 2.5 mmol/L CaCl). Cells were then stained with 0.5 μl Annexin V-FITC and 5 μl PI (Becton-Dickinson) for 15 min before analysing. Acquisition and analysis were carried out on a Becton Dickinson FACSCanto II flow cytometer, using DiVa Software, version 6.3.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Isolation and Sorting of HSPCs and Monocytes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HSPCs were stained for 30 min at 4°C in 500 µl of PBS with 2 mM EDTA. Mouse anti-CD45-AF700 (304024; BioLegend), mouse anti-CD38-PerCp5.5 (303522; BioLegend), mouse anti-CD34-APC (555824; BD Bioscience), mouse anti-CD33-PE (555450; BD Bioscience), and mouse anti-CD19-FITC (555412; BD Bioscience) were used at 5 µl/106 cells. The sorting procedure was performed on a FACS Aria II with DIVA software (BD Bioscience). For monocytes, PMBCs were labeled with mouse anti-CD3-PE (clone UCTH1; 300456; BioLegend), mouse anti-CD19-PE (clone HIB19; 982402; BioLegend), mouse anti-NKp46-FITC (clone 9E2; 331921; BioLegend), mouse anti-CD16-PerCP (clone 3G8; 302029; BioLegend), or mouse anti-CD14-APC (clone M5E2; 982508; BioLegend) for 30 min on ice. The cell sorting was performed by negative selection on the BD FACS Aria III with DIVA software (BD Bioscience; see also Merah-Mourah et al. [2020] (link)). After cell sorting, cells were centrifuged and resuspended in the desired volume of IMDM for HSPCs and RPMI 1640 for monocytes to achieve the appropriate cell culture density.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Multiparametric Flow Cytometry Analysis of Liver Immune Subsets

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For the analysis of Th1, Th2, Th17 subsets, approximately 106 leukocytes isolated from liver were stimulated with 20 ng/ml PMA, 1 μg/ml ionomycin and 2 mmol/ml monensin (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) for 4 h at 37°C in 5% CO2. For surface staining, the cells were collected and then incubated with anti-CD4-FITC for 30min. For intracellular staining, the cells were washed and fixed, permeabilized with Perm/Fix solution (eBioscience, San Diego, CA, USA) for 30 min and stained with anti- IFN-γ- Alexa Flour 488, anti-IL-4- APC and anti- IL-17A-PE (BD Biosciences) for 30 min for detecting Th1, Th2, Th17 cells, respectively. All samples were evaluated on flow cytometer (FACSCanto II; BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) using Diva software (BD Biosciences).
For detection of Treg cells, the liver leukocytes were first surface incubated with anti-CD4-PerCP-Cyanine5.5 and anti-CD25-FITC for 30 min. Subsequently, Foxp3 staining buffer set (eBioscience, San Diego, CA, USA) were used to treat the cells and anti-Foxp3-APC were added for 1 hour. All samples were evaluated on flow cytometer (FACSCanto II; BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) using Diva software (BD Biosciences). Samples were acquired and analyzed on a FACSCanto II flow cytometer.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Surface Marker and Apoptosis Detection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For detection of surface Fas or CD74, cells were washed with 2% FBS/PBS and blocked with 0.025 mg/mL of mouse IgG blocking reagent (Invitrogen) at 4°C for 15 min in the dark and washed once with 2% FBS/PBS. Cells were then incubated with 3 μL of PE-conjugated anti-Fas antibody UB2 or with FITC-conjugated anti-CD74 antibody M-B741 (both from BD Biosciences) in 50 μL of 2% FBS/PBS at 4°C for 20 min in the dark. After washing cells 2× with 2% FBS/PBS, flow cytometry was performed on an BD LSRFortessa flow cytometer with Diva software (BD Bioscience).
For evaluation of apoptosis and cell death, cells were collected and resuspended in 1 mL of cold 1% FBS/PBS and stained with Vybrant® Apoptosis Assay Kit #5 according to protocol provided by the manufacturer (Molecular Probes). Flow cytometry was performed on BD FACSCanto II flow cytometer with Diva software (BD Bioscience). Data were analyzed using FlowJo software (Tree Star Inc.).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Isolation and Analysis of Brain Leukocytes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mice were deeply anesthetized with isoflurane 72 h after reperfusion. Ischemic ipsilateral brains were dissected after transcardial perfusion with 100 ml of PBS. Brain leukocytes were collected as described previously [22 (link)]. In brief, ipsilateral hemispheres were homogenized and filtered through a 70-μm cell strainer. After centrifugation, the cells were resuspended in 7 ml FACS buffer, completely mixed with 3 ml of 90 % Percoll (GE Healthcare), and then 1 ml of 70 % Percoll was loaded under cell suspension. The cell suspension was then centrifuged at 500 g for 30 min at 4 °C. Leukocytes at the interphase were collected for immunostaining and FACS analysis. These cells were stained with differentially fluorochrome-labeled mAbs against TCR, CD4, and CD8 (AbD Serotec) on ice for 30 min to identify T cells, CD4+ T cells, and CD8+ T cells. Data on stained samples were acquired on a BD LSR II flow cytometer using Diva software (v6.1.2; Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA, USA) and analyzed using FlowJo software (v7.6.2; Tree Star, Ashland, OR, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Intracellular Sodium Measurement by Flow Cytometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Intracellular Na+ was measured with the sodium-sensitive fluorescent probe, sodium green (Molecular Probes), using flow cytometry as described previously (Sugishita et al., 2001 (link)). Briefly, cells were loaded with 5 µmol/L sodium green AM in HEPES solution for 60 min at 37°C. Loaded cells were then washed and incubated in dye-free HEPES solution for 10 min. The cells were separated into aliquots and exposed to either normal (150 mM NaCl) or high salt (190 mM NaCl) for 15 min. The cells were then immediately analyzed by flow cytometry on a FACSCanto flow cytometer with DIVA software (Becton Dickinson). Dead cells were eliminated from the analysis using 7-AAD (BD Pharmingen). Cells that were not loaded with the sodium green fluorescent probe were used as controls to establish the gates. Data analysis was done using FlowJo software (Tree Star).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

ErbB Receptor Expression Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were detached using StemPro Accutase (Gibco), counted and treated with Human TruStain FcX™ (Biolegend, San Diego, CA) to prevent non-specific binding. Cell surface-expressed ErbB receptors were assayed using phycoerythrin (PE)-conjugated anti-human ErbB2/Her2 (Fab1129P) and IgG2B isotype-matched control (IC0041P), anti-hErbB3/Her3 (Fab3481P) and IgG1 control (IC002P), or anti-hErbB4/Her4 (Fab11311P) and IgG2A (IC003P) isotype control as follows: 1 × 106 cells were incubated with 5 µL of each antibody in 100 µL of FACS buffer (0.5% BSA and 2 mM EDTA in PBS) for 30 min at 4 °C. The cells were then washed 3 times with FACs buffer and immediately analyzed on a FACSCanto flow cytometer with DIVA software (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ). Dead cells were eliminated from the analysis using 7-AAD (BD Phermingen). For each experiment, we gated on single live cells and used isotype controls for each fluorophore to establish the gates. Data analysis was done using FlowJo software (Tree Star, Inc.).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Flow Cytometric Characterization of MSCs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Flow cytometric analysis for the expression of cell surface markers (CD90-FITC/CD73-APC, CD44-FITC/CD105-APC and CD29-APC), and cell size was determined on FACS Canto II using Diva Software (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, New Jersey).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Cell Surface Antigen Expression and Cell Cycle Distribution

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell surface antigen expression was investigated in the control cell population, represented by AD-MSC-GFP and HOXB7-overexpressing AD-MSC. The following panels of monoclonal antibodies were assessed: APC-anti-CD45, PE anti-CD14, PE anti-CD73, and PE anti-HLA-DR (BD Pharmigen, San Diego, CA, USA); APC-anti-CD146 (MACS, Miltenyi Biotec Bergisch Gladbach, Germany); APC-anti-CD90 and APC-anti-CD105 (eBioscience, San Diego, CA, USA); and isotype controls (BD Biosciences and BioLegend, San Diego, CA, USA). Samples were analyzed using the FACSAria III flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). The data were analyzed using DIVA software (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). Cell cycle distribution was evaluated by propidium iodide (PI) staining. Single suspensions of 1 × 106 AD-MSC-GFP or AD-MSC-HOXB7 at passage 12 were fixed with ice-cold 70% ethanol and stored at − 20 °C overnight. Cells were washed in PBS and resuspended in 200 μl of Cell Cycle Solution containing PI, RNase A, and Triton X-100 (Invitrogen, Molecular Probe, USA). The samples were then incubated for 30 min at room temperature in the dark and analyzed by FACSAria III and DIVA software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!