The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

23 protocols using fluorochrome conjugated monoclonal antibodies

1

Flow Cytometric Analysis of Vaccine-induced B Cell Response

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Flow cytometry was performed as previously described [23 (link)–25 (link)]. Briefly, peripheral blood mononuclear cells were collected from immunized volunteers at 0 and 7 days post-vaccination. Day 7 post-vaccination is when the peripheral blood B cell response peaks allowing analysis [23 (link),28 (link)]. Enriched lymphocytes were blocked with PPS22F and CWPS to prevent non-specific labeling with fluorescent PPS. Cells were then labeled with 10 μg/ml of either PPS14-CB or PPS23F-5-DTAF. Fluorochrome-conjugated monoclonal antibodies (BD Bioscience or eBioscience) to the following anti-human Ags were used: CD19 (APC-Cy7), CD27 (PerCP-Cy5.5), IgM (APC). Cells were analyzed as previously described with FACSAria using FACSDiva software (BD Biosciences) [23 (link),24 (link)]. FCS files were analyzed using FlowJo software (Tree Star, Ashland, OR). Populations were divided into three sub-populations: naïve (CD27), IgM+ memory (CD27+IgM+), and switched memory (CD27+IgM) B cells. Absolute numbers of B cells were calculated for each donor individually by multiplying the lymphocyte counts by the percentage of B cells determined by flow cytometry.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Flow Cytometry Analysis of Immune Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were incubated with 24G2 cell supernatant for 10 minutes at 4°C before incubation with fluorochrome-conjugated monoclonal antibodies (all from BD Bioscience, Oxford, UK) against cell surface markers CD45 (1:1000) (30-F11), CD4 (1:100) (RM4-5) and CD8 (1:100) (53-6.7) at 4°C for 20 minutes. Cells were resuspended in 7-aminoactinomycin D (7AAD) (Molecular Probes), and dead cells were excluded from analysis by gating on 7AAD negative cells. Measurement of cell suspensions were acquired using a three-laser BD LSR-II flow cytometer (BD Cytometry Systems, Oxford, UK) and analyzed was performed using FlowJo software version 7.6.5 (Tree Star, Ashland, OR). Cell numbers were calculated by reference to a known cell standard, as previously reported64 . Briefly, splenocytes at a range of known cell concentrations were acquired using a fixed and stable flow rate for 1 minute. Based on total cell number acquired during this time, a standard curve was generated and used to interpolate cell concentrations of ocular infiltrating cells acquired at the same flow rate and time.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Flow Cytometric Analysis of Vaccine-induced B Cell Response

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Flow cytometry was performed as previously described [23 (link)–25 (link)]. Briefly, peripheral blood mononuclear cells were collected from immunized volunteers at 0 and 7 days post-vaccination. Day 7 post-vaccination is when the peripheral blood B cell response peaks allowing analysis [23 (link),28 (link)]. Enriched lymphocytes were blocked with PPS22F and CWPS to prevent non-specific labeling with fluorescent PPS. Cells were then labeled with 10 μg/ml of either PPS14-CB or PPS23F-5-DTAF. Fluorochrome-conjugated monoclonal antibodies (BD Bioscience or eBioscience) to the following anti-human Ags were used: CD19 (APC-Cy7), CD27 (PerCP-Cy5.5), IgM (APC). Cells were analyzed as previously described with FACSAria using FACSDiva software (BD Biosciences) [23 (link),24 (link)]. FCS files were analyzed using FlowJo software (Tree Star, Ashland, OR). Populations were divided into three sub-populations: naïve (CD27), IgM+ memory (CD27+IgM+), and switched memory (CD27+IgM) B cells. Absolute numbers of B cells were calculated for each donor individually by multiplying the lymphocyte counts by the percentage of B cells determined by flow cytometry.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Immunophenotyping of B cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fluorochrome-conjugated monoclonal antibodies specific for: CD3, CD4, CD19, CD20, CD25, CD27, (BD Biosciences); CD8 (Beckman Coulter, Fullerton, CA) were used to stain fresh, whole blood. After staining, red blood cellswere lysed with BD Pharm Lyse or an automated TQ Prep workstation (Beckman Coulter). Flow cytometry was performed on a FACSCanto II (BD Bioscience) and analyzed using BD FACSDiva software, or on a Beckman Coulter FC500, with Beckman Coulter CXP analysis software. We found no difference betweenB cell numbers using CD19 or CD20 cell surface staining. B-cell percentage was based on enumeration of cells expressing CD20.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Cell Surface Immunophenotyping by Flow Cytometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell surface staining was performed in ice-cold PBS containing 2% FBS and 2 mM EDTA (cytometry buffer) using appropriate fluorochrome-conjugated monoclonal antibodies and corresponding isotypes, all purchased from BD Biosciences (Table 3). A total of 1.5 to 2×105 cells per experimental condition were resuspended in cytometry buffer containing 2 µg/mL of FcBlock (anti CD16/CD32) for 20 min at 4°C, then stained with 1 µg/mL of antibody or control isotypes for 30 min on ice in the dark. Next, cells were washed with cytometry buffer, and fixed in BD cell fix buffer (BD Biosciences) or in 4% paraformaldehyde solution before acquisition through a BD FACSCanto™ II Cell Analyzer (IPNC) or a CytoFLEX flow cytometer (Beckman Coulter). For cell viability analysis, cells were incubated with eBioscience™ Fixable Viability Dye eFluor 780 for 5 min on ice, washed in cytometry buffer before fixation. Positive eFluor dead cells were excluded from the analysis. At least 30,000 events were acquired for the phenotyping. Compensations were performed using UltraComp eBeads (Thermofisher Scientific) stained positively with each of the antibodies used in the experiment. Baseline photomultiplier tube voltages of the instrument were set using unstained cells, showing the background fluorescence of the experimental samples. Data were analyzed using FlowJo v10 analysis software package.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Phenotypic Analysis of Regulatory T Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Freshly isolated PBMCs of healthy volunteers and recipients at a pretransplant time point were used for phenotypic analysis of Tregs. As routine Treg analysis had only recently commenced, we analyzed Treg frequency in the patients from our cohort. Tregs were surface stained with the following fluorochrome‐conjugated monoclonal antibodies from BD Pharmingen: peridinin‐chlorophyll protein‐Cyanine5.5 anti‐human CD3 (SK715, 16, 17, 18), allophycocyanin‐conjugated Cyanine7 anti‐human CD4 (RPA‐T4), fluorescein isothiocyanate‐conjugated anti‐human CD25 (M‐A251), PE‐Cyanine7 anti‐human CD45RA (HI100). Intracellular Foxp3 was stained using PE‐conjugated anti‐human Foxp3 (PCH101; eBioscience). Treg phenotypes were analyzed on a BD FACS Canto II (BD Biosciences), and data were analyzed with FlowJo 7.6.5 (Tree Star Inc., Ashland, OR).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Flow Cytometry Analysis of Ocular Immune Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were incubated with 24G2 cell supernatant for 20 minutes at 4°C before incubation with fluorochrome-conjugated monoclonal antibodies (BD Pharmingen, Oxford, UK) against cell surface markers including, CD4 (553051, 1/100), CD8 (553029, 1/100), CD11b (557657, 1/400), Ly6G (551461, 1/100), Ly6C (553104, 1/100) and CD45 (552848, 1/1000) at 4°C for 20 minutes. A streptavidin secondary antibody was added to all samples, (48-4317-82, eBioscience, San Diego, USA, 1/1000) then cell suspensions were acquired using a 3-laser BD LSR-II flow cytometer (BD Cytometry Systems, Oxford, UK). Analysis was performed using FlowJo software (Treestar, San Carlos, California, USA). Cell numbers were calculated by reference to a known cell–standard, as previously reported [14 (link)]. In brief, splenocytes at a series of known cell concentrations were acquired using a fixed and stable flow rate for 45 seconds. Based on total cell number acquired during this time, a standard curve was generated and used to interpolate cell concentrations of ocular infiltrating cells acquired at the same flow rate and time.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Multicolor Flow Cytometry Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For flow cytometry, cells were centrifuged, washed, and resuspended in PBS with 1% FBS and conjugated antibody cocktail mix. Antibodies were added at 2 µl per 100 µl of sample, which also contained a 1:100 dilution of violet dye (Zombie; BioLegend). After 30 min of staining on ice, the samples were washed with PBS with 1% FBS and run on an ADP analyzer (CyAn; Beckman Coulter) or a flow cytometer (FACSCalibur; BD). Data analysis used the FlowJo 8.8.7 software package, which was used for compensation and gating of live cells (based on FSC/SSC and Zombie exclusion). Fluorochrome-conjugated monoclonal antibodies to human markers (CD235a, CD36, CD13, and CD34) and mouse markers (Ter119 and CD71) were purchased from BD PharMingen.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Generating Monocyte-Derived Dendritic Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Buffy coats from the healthy donors were purchased from Centre Necker-Cabanel, Etablissement Français du Sang (EFS), Paris, France. Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale-EFS ethical committee permission (N°12/EFS/079) was obtained for the use of buffy coats of healthy donors. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were purified from the buffy coats by density gradient centrifugation using Ficoll-paque PREMIUM (GE healthcare, France). CD14+ monocytes were isolated from PBMCs by using CD14 microbeads (Miltenyi Biotec). Purified monocytes were then cultured for 6 days in RPMI-1640 medium plus 10% fetal calf serum (FCS) containing cytokines GM-CSF (1000 IU/106 (link) cells) and IL-4 (500 IU/106 (link) cells) (both from Miltenyi Biotec) to obtain DCs56 (link). The purity of DCs was >98%. DC-SIGN expression on Mo-DCs was examined by flow cytometry using fluorochrome-conjugated monoclonal antibodies (BD Biosciences) and data were analyzed by FACSDiva™ and FlowJo softwares (Tree Star, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Flow Cytometry Analysis of Cancer Stem Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HMEC spheres were grown in various media as previously described for cell proliferation assay [78 (link)]. Harvested spheres were trypsinized and cells were diluted to 106 cells/ml. Combinations of fluorochrome-conjugated monoclonal antibodies obtained from BD Biosciences (San Diego, CA, USA) against human CD44 (FITC) and CD24 (Alexa 647) or their respective isotype controls were added to the cell suspension at concentrations recommended by the manufacturer and incubated at 4 °C in the dark for 30 to 40 min. The labeled cells were washed in the wash buffer and DAPI was added to gate the live cells during the flow cytometry analysis using LSRII (BD Biosciences). Results were analyzed using ModFit Lt V3 software (Verity Software House).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!