The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Tripletof 5600 mass spectrometer

Manufactured by AB Sciex
Sourced in United States, Canada, Japan, Germany, Australia, United Kingdom

The TripleTOF 5600 is a high-resolution mass spectrometer designed for advanced analytical applications. It features a combination of a triple quadrupole and a time-of-flight mass analyzer, providing high sensitivity and mass accuracy. The TripleTOF 5600 is capable of performing a variety of analytical techniques, including quantitative and qualitative analysis of small molecules, proteins, and other biomolecules.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

364 protocols using tripletof 5600 mass spectrometer

1

Quantitative Proteomic Analysis of DIP Treatment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Protein digestion and iTRAQ labeling were performed as previously described (16 (link)). The iTRAQ labeling scheme was as follows: the two untreated biological repeats (controls) were labeled 113 and 117, and the two biological repeats treated with 150 μM DIP were labeled 114 and 118. Labeled peptides were quantified with an AB Sciex TripleTOF 5,600 mass spectrometer (AB SCIEX; Concord, ON, Canada) equipped with a NanoAcquity UPLC system (Waters, Milford, MA, USA). All of the settings were as previously described (17 (link)), except that we used the LP-2 genome re-sequencing database produced in our laboratory (unpublished data).Proteins matching at least two unique peptides, with a false discovery rate (FDR) < 1%, were considered for further analysis. To quantify protein expression, we compared the degree of change in the iTRAQ ratio of the samples treated with DIP to that of the untreated controls. If the fold change as compared to the controls was >1.5 or <0.667 (a fold change of ±1.5), and the p < 0.05 for both biological replicates, these proteins were deemed significantly differentially expressed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Serum bile acid analysis protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Serum BAs were analyzed as previously described23 (link). Briefly, 100 μL of serum samples was diluted with 500 μL of 0.01% formic acid-spiked with dhCA (internal standard), vortexed, and loaded onto Oasis-HLB cartridges, which were then washed with 1 mL H2O and eluted with 1.5 mL methanol. The elute was evaporated, and the remaining residue was reconstituted in 100 μL methanol, 5 μL of which was analyzed by a high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) system (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) and an AB-Sciex Triple TOF 5600 mass spectrometer (AB Sciex, Foster City, CA, USA). Separation was performed on a ZOEBAX Eclipse Plus C18 column. The chromatographic and mass spectrometric parameters for the quantification of BAs were same as before.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

MALDI-TOF MS Proteomics for Clostridium difficile

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MALDI target plates were analyzed in a data-dependent manner on an ABSciexTripleTOF 5,600+ mass spectrometer (AB SCIEX, Framingham, MA). MS spectra were acquired from each sample spot using 500 laser shots per spot, laser intensity of 3,200. The highest peak of each observed m/z value was selected for subsequent MS/MS analysis.
Up to 2,500 laser shots at laser power 4,200 were accumulated for each MS/MS spectrum. Protein identification and quantitation were performed using the Paragon algorithm implemented in Protein Pilot 3.0 software by searching the acquired MS and MS/MS spectra from all 15 plates against the C. difficile strain BI-1 protein database, or the 078 representative strain QCD-23m63 database, plus common contaminants. The Protein Pilot Unused score cutoff of >0.82 (1% global false discovery rate) was calculated from the slope of the accumulated Decoy database hits by the Proteomics System Performance Evaluation Pipeline (PSPEP) program [72]. Proteins with at least one peptide >95% confidence (score based on the number of matches between the data and the theoretical fragment ions) and a Protein Pilot Unused score of >0.82 were considered as valid identifications (IDs).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Mass Spectrometry Analysis of Synechocystis sp.

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The mass spectroscopy analysis was performed using a AB SCIEX TripleTOF™ 5600 mass spectrometer (AB SCIEX, Framingham, MA, USA), coupled with online micro flow HPLC system (Shimadzu Co, Kyoto, Japan) as described previously. Genome sequence and annotation information of Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 were downloaded from NCBI (ftp://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genomes). The details for the experimental design, execution, and proteomic data analysis can be found in the original publications (Liu et al., 2012 (link); Qiao et al., 2012 (link), 2013 (link); Huang et al., 2013 (link); Tian et al., 2013 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Senp7 Interactome Profiling in Adipocytes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mouse primary preadipocytes were differentiated for 2 days. Cell lysate was incubated with anti-Senp7 beads or mouse IgG individually. Then proteins were eluted and collected followed by SDS-PAGE. Proteins were digested into peptides by trypsin. Tryptic peptides were desalinated and then subjected to MS analysis. Mass spectral analysis was performed on the AB Sciex Triple TOF 5600+ mass spectrometer (AB Sciex) with an electrospray ionization probe operated in positive ion mode. The raw data were processed using AB SCIEX ProteinPlot software (version 4.5, https://sciex.com/products/software/proteinpilot-software) in its standard mode. Data were searched against the February 2018 UniProt mouse database (61,314 entries). Peptides with confidence >95% were considered for further analysis. Three trypsin missed cleavages were considered. The minimum length of peptides was seven amino acids. Identified proteins in IgG control sample were excluded from protein result of anti-Senp7 pulldown sample. The analysis results were listed in Table S1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

UPLC-Q-TOF-MS Analysis of ZWT Extract

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The extract of ZWT was used for UPLC-Q-TOF-MS analysis according to our previous study (Liang et al., 2019 (link)). The chromatographic separation was achieved by Shimadzu UPLC-30AD (Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan) equipped with a Phenomenex Genmini 3u-C18-110 column (150 × 2 mm, 3 μm). The mobile phases included 0.025% formic acid in water (A) and acetonitrile (B) at an ambient temperature of 35°C. The linear gradient elution is as follows: 0–10 min, 5% B; 10–12 min, 8% B; 12–15 min, 20% B; 15–30 min, 35% B; 30–35 min, 45% B; 35–45 min, 95% B. The flow rate was set at 0.3 ml/min. The sample injection volume was 5 μl. Mass spectrometry was measured by the ABsciex Triple TOF 5600 mass spectrometer (ABsciex, Framingham, MA, USA), and the data were analyzed using Peakview software (Version 2.0, ABsciex). The mass parameters were as follows: ion source in electrospray mode: negative; electrospray ionization: 55 psi; IonSpray Voltage Floating: 5,500 V; declustering potential: 100 V; collision energy: 45 eV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Untargeted Metabolomics Profiling by LC-HRMS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Untargeted LC–HRMS/MS analysis was carried out using data dependent acquisitions utilizing an AB SCIEX TripleTOF® 5600 mass spectrometer (AB SCIEX, Concord, Canada) coupled to Shimadzu Nexera UHPLC system as previously described with some modifications [19 (link)–21 ]. Chromatographic separation was performed on an Inertsil Phenyl-3 column (4.6 × 150 mm, 100 Å, 5 μm; GL Sciences, Rolling Hills Estates, CA, USA) held at 50°C. A gradient with two mobile phases was used: Mobile phase A was water (LC-MS grade) with 0.1% v/v formic acid and B, methanol (LC-MS grade) with 0.1% v/v formic acid. After 1 min at 5% B, the linear elution gradient was as follows: 1 min, 5% B; 11 min, 30% B; 20 min, 100% B; 25 min, 100% B; 30 min, 5% B; and 35 min, 5% B. The injection volume was 5 μL with a flow rate of 0.4 mL/min. Samples were randomized before injections. A QC sample was analyzed every five LC runs. The IonSpray voltage was set at 4500 V, and the source temperature was 500°C. Period cycle time was 950 ms; accumulation time 100 ms; m/z scan range 100–1400; and collision energy 35 V with collision energy spread of 15 V. Mass calibration of the TOF analyzer was performed automatically after every fifth LC run.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

HPLC-MS/MS Analytical Methodology

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All samples were analyzed using the HPLC-MS/MS system following the manufacturer's instructions. First, all chromatographic separations were performed using an HPLC system. The sample was collected on a Waters BEH (100  2.1 mm, 1.7 um column). The column oven was maintained at 40°C, and the flow rate was 0.4 ml/min. In the positive ion mode, the mobile phase consisted of solvent A (water + 0.1% formic acid) and solvent B (organic phase acetonitrile). In the negative ion mode, the mobile phase consisted of solvent A (0.1% formic acid +5 mM ammonium acetate) and solvent B (organic phase acetonitrile). The specific chromatographic conditions are listed in Table 2.
An AB SCIEX Triple TOF 5600 + mass spectrometer was used to collect data in the positive and negative ion modes separately. The scanning method was a classic data-dependent scanning (IDA), and one primary mass spectrometry scan (100 ms) triggers 10 secondary mass spectrometry scans (500 ms). Dynamic background deduction (DBS) was turned on, first-level scanning range: 50 m/z–1000 m/z; secondary scanning range: 50 m/z–1000 m/z; air curtain gas: 35 psi; atomizing gas: 55 psi; auxiliary atomizing gas: 55 psi; ion source temperature: 550°C; decluster voltage: 80 V; and collision voltage: 35 ± 15 V.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Spectroscopic Analysis of Molecular Structure

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The optical rotations were detected at 20°C using MCP 5100 digital polarimeter (Anton Paar, Graz, Austria). The UV data were recorded on a Shimadzu UV-2500 spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). The Chirascan CD spectrometer (Applied Photophysics Ltd., Surrey, UK) was used to acquire ECD spectra. 1D and 2D NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker AVANCE III 500 M NMR spectrometer (Bruker BioSpin Corporation, Billerica, USA). UPLC-Q-TOF/MS analysis was carried out on a Waters ACQUITY UPLC system (Waters Corporation, Milford, USA) equipped with an AB SCIEX Triple TOF 5600 mass spectrometer with electrospray ionization source (ESI; Framingham, MA, USA). Silica gel (200–300 mesh, Qingdao Marine Chemical Inc., Qingdao, China), RP-C18 silica gel (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany), and Sephadex LH-20 gel (GE Healthcare Bio-Sciences AB, Uppsala, Sweden) were employed for column chromatography (CC). High-performance liquid chromatographies (HPLCs) were performed on Agilent 1260 series (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, USA) with C18 reversed-phase columns (YMC, Kyoto, Japan; 250 × 4.6 mm i.d., 5 μm, for analysis; 250 × 10 mm i.d., 5 μm, for separation).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Quantification and Bioaccumulation of Ibuprofen in Plants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The extraction, separation, concentration, and validation of IBU from experiment samples were analyzed according to Picó et al. [26 (link)] and Andreotti et al. [64 (link)] using ultra-high performance liquid chromatography (Agilent 1260 Infinity, Waldbronn, Germany) and an AB SCIEX TripleTOF™ 5600 mass spectrometer (AB SCIEX, Foster City, CA, USA). Data acquisition processing and instrument control were performed using Analyst, Peak View 1.0, and MultiQuant 2.0. software [26 (link)].
The bioconcentration factor (BCF), bioaccumulation factor (BAF), and translocation factor (TF) of IBU in V. unguiculata plants were calculated according to Wang [65 ]: BCF (L/Kg)=IBU concentration in media (mg/L)IBU concentration in plant tissue (mg/Kg),
BCF (L/Kg)=IBU concentration in media (mg/L)IBU concentration in whole plant tissue (mg/Kg),
TF=IBU concentration in shoot (mg/Kg)IBU concentration in root (mg/Kg).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!