The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Quantstudio real time pcr software v1

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United States, France, United Kingdom

The QuantStudio Real-Time PCR Software v1.3 is a software program designed to operate real-time PCR instruments. The software provides the necessary functionality to control the instrument, monitor reactions, and analyze the generated data.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

70 protocols using quantstudio real time pcr software v1

1

Real-Time qPCR for Gene Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNA was extracted using the Zymo Research Direct-zol RNA mini-prep kit and cDNA was made using the TaqMan RNA-to CT 1-Step Kit (Cat # 4392938). Real Time quantitative PCR was performed using an Applied Biosystems Vii7 system utilizing QuantStudio™ Real-Time PCR Software v1.3. Commercially available TaqMan probes were utilized; a list of probes can be found in Supplemental Table 3. Fold change was calculated using the 2−ΔΔCT method as described [21 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantitative RT-PCR Analysis of ELA1 Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA from siliques at 2 and 5 DPA was extracted using the Spectrum Plant Total RNA Kit (Sigma). Total RNAs were digested with Turbo DNA-free DNase I (Ambion) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The mRNAs were reverse transcribed using the SuperScript VILO cDNA Synthesis Kit (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. PCR reactions were performed in an optical 384-well plate in the QuantStudio™ 6 Flex Real-Time PCR System (ThermoFisher Scientific), using FastStart Universal SYBR Green Master (Rox) (Roche), in a final volume of 10 µL, according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The following standard thermal profile was used for all PCR reactions: 95 °C for 10 min, 40 cycles of 95 °C for 10 s, and 60 °C for 30 s. The data were analyzed using the QuantStudio Real-Time PCR Software v1.3 (Applied Biosystems). As a reference, a geometric mean between two house-keeping genes, EIF4A1 and AP2M, was used to normalize ELA1 expression. For each couple of primers, PCR efficiency (E) was estimated from the data obtained from standard curve amplification using the equation E = 10–1/slope. Expression levels are presented as E–ΔCt, where ΔCt = CtGOI – CtREF. The sequence of the primers used for qPCR can be found in Supplementary Table 7.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Profiling microRNA Expression in CMT-U27 and CIPm Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNA from CMT-U27 and CIPm cells was isolated using the miRCURY™ RNA Isolation kit (Exiqon, Vedbaek, Denmark). RNA concentration was analyzed using the Nanodrop spectrophotometer ND-1000 (Thermo Scientific, Breda, The Netherlands). cDNA synthesis with 250 ng RNA was performed using the miScript II RT kit (Qiagen), according to the manufacturers protocol. A miScript miR PCR Array Dog miFinder (Qiagen) was performed on a total of 84 most abundantly expressed and best characterized microRNAs in miRBase (www.qiagen.com/nl/shop/pcr/primer-sets/miscript-miR-pcr-arrays/?catno=MIFD-001Z#geneglobe). The relative expression was measured using the miScript II RT kit on 384-well plates using the miScript SYBR Green PCR kit (Qiagen), and a standard amplification protocol according to the manufacturer. qPCR was performed on a 384 Viia (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) and analyzed with QuantStudio Real-Time PCR software v1.3 (Applied Biosystems). All reactions were performed in fourfold. Data analysis for the Array was performed online (http://pcrdataanalysis.sabiosciences.com/miR), following the ΔΔCt method [66 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Multimodal Data Acquisition Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
FACS data acquisition were performed in FACSDiva v6.1.3 (BD) and analyzed in FlowJo v7.6.3 (FLOWJO LLC). Quantitative PCR data acquisition were performed in QuantStudio Real-Time PCR Software v1.3 (Applied Biosystems). Force measurements were acquired using LabChart v6.1.1 (ADInstruments). Immunostaining data were acquired using ZEN v2.3 pro (Zeiss). Fiber counting and measurements were performed with ImageJ v2.0.0-rc-65/1.52a (NIH).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantitative gene expression analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Isolation of total RNA and reverse transcription into cDNA was performed as described recently [3 (link)]. Relative quantitative gene expression was measured via real-time PCR using a QuantStudio 6 Flex Real-Time PCR System with QuantStudio Real-Time PCR Software v1.3 (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) Target gene expression was normalized to glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) expression as internal standard and calculated as fold induction in comparison to untreated controls. All primer sequences used for qPCR are given in Table A1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Validating Differential Expression of RNAs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The five broilers of each line from the same generation of the NEAUHLF were selected randomly to perform the validate experiment. The total RNA of abdominal fat tissue was extracted using TRizol reagent (Invitrogen, CA, USA) following the manufacturer’s protocol. According to the recommended protocol of the PrimeScript™ RT reagent kit (Takara Bio Inc., Kusatsu, Japan), the probable genomic DNA in isolated RNA was firstly removed by gDNA Eraser followed by the reverse transcription reaction. Specific primers (Additional file 1: Table S11) for candidate RNAs (three each of the DE lncRNAs and DE circRNAs were randomly selected) were designed using Primer premier 5.0 software. The ABI QuantStudio™ 6 Flex Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) was adopted to perform the qRT-PCR of candidate genes with FastStart SYBR Green Master (Roche, Mannheim, DEU). The reaction conditions were: an initial denaturation at 95 °C for 10 min, 40 cycles of 15 s at 95 °C and 1 min at 60 °C. Ct values of all genes were analyzed using QuantStudio™ Real-Time PCR Software v1.3 (Applied Biosystems). The housekeeping gene of TBP was used for normalization of Ct values. Gene expression comparison between the two lines was done using the 2−ΔΔCt method.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantitative PCR Analysis of Gene Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was extracted using either the RNeasy Mini kit (Qiagen) or Arcturus PicoPure RNA isolation kit (Applied Biosystems), and reverse transcription was performed with the High-Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription kit (Applied Biosystems) according to the manufacturers’ instructions. qPCR was performed with the SYBR Green gene expression assay (Applied Biosystems) using the ViiA 7 Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems) and analyzed with Quant Studio Real-Time PCR software v.1.3 (Applied Biosystems). Primer pairs are listed in Supplementary Table 11.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantification of mRNA Expression by qPCR

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To assess mRNA expression, total RNA was isolated from cells and tissues then subjected to cDNA synthesis29 (link). Quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) reactions were set up with Power SYBR Green PCR Master Mix and were run with default cycle parameters on the Applied Biosystems 7500 Fast Real-Time PCR System (for 96-well plate format) or the Applied Biosystems ViiA7 Real-Time PCR System (for 384-well plate format). Applied Biosystems 7500 software v2.3 and Applied Biosystems QuantStudio Real-Time PCR software v1.3 were used for qPCR data analysis. Gene expression was quantified using the 2−ΔΔCT method and relative mRNA expression was normalised to 18S rRNA levels which have been shown to display consistent expression across the cells and conditions studied. All qPCR primers were designed using primer3 (http://primer3.ut.ee/) and can be found in Supplementary Table 2. For microarrays on eosinophils sorted from subcut SVF by FACS, RNA was isolated using the RNeasy Micro Kit (Qiagen) then subjected to quality control using an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer, following preparation with an Agilent RNA 6000 Pico Kit. An Affymetrix 3’ IVT Pico Kit was used prior to microarrays which were performed on an Affymetrix GeneChip HT MG-430PM Array Plate. Partek Genomics Suite v7 software was used for data analysis, and microarray datasets are available from GEO (Accession No. GSE117445).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantifying MECP2 Expression in Blood

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Whole blood was collected in PAXgene Blood RNA (PreAnalytiX) or Tempus Blood RNA (Applied Biosystems) Tubes (N = 16 and 47, respectively) [40 ]. Total RNA including miRNA was extracted using the PAXgene Blood miRNA Kit (Qiagen), or the Tempus™ Spin RNA Isolation Kit (Applied Biosystems), respectively, following the manufacturer´s protocols. The concentration of the RNA samples and the sample purity was assessed with NanoDrop 1000 Spectralphotometer (Thermo Scientific). The cDNA was synthesized by a reversed transcription reaction using the High Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Applied Biosystems). Quantitative PCR was performed on the QuantStudio 7 Flex Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems by Life Technologies) by using TaqMan Fast Advanced Mastermix (Applied Biosystems), and the MECP2 TaqMan Gene Expression Assay Hs00172845_m1 (Applied Biosystems). The Actin Beta (ACTB) TaqMan Gene Expression Assay Hs01060665_g1 (Applied Biosystems) was used as an internal standard. Results were calculated with the QuantStudio Real-Time PCR Software v1.3 (Applied Biosystems by Thermo Fisher Scientific) by the comparative 2−ΔΔCt method and normalized to ACTB. Analyses were carried out in triplicates. An unpaired t-test revealed that blood tubes did not significantly influence MECP2 levels (t61 = −0.534, p = 0.595).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

SARS-CoV-2 RNA Detection by RT-PCR

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Nasopharyngeal swabs were tested for SARS-CoV-2 RNA using the CDC 2019-nCoV RNA RT-PCR diagnostic panel (Integrated DNA Technologies, Iowa, USA). A cycle threshold (Ct) value of <40 was considered positive for SARS-CoV-2 using QuantStudio Real-Time PCR software v1.3 (Applied Biosystems, UK). Ribonuclease protein was used as an internal control to identify presence of human RNA. A negative extraction control and a PCR no-template control were also performed with every test. The results of patients with positive PCR tests were shared with the Blantyre District Health Office for further follow up and patient management.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!