The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

12 protocols using rabbit anti cd3

1

Immunohistochemical Profiling of Immune Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunohistochemistry was performed on 5 μm-thick FFPE tissue sections as previously indicated1 (link),39 (link). Tissues were stained with combinations of primary antibodies including polyclonal rabbit anti-IFNγ (Abcam, Cambridge, MA), rabbit anti-TNF (Bioss Antibodies, Boston, MA), rabbit anti-IL-4 (Abcam), rabbit anti-IL-10 (Abcam), rabbit anti-CD3 (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA), mouse anti-calprotectin (clone: MAC378, ThermoFisher), mouse anti-CD163 (clone: 1D6, ThermoFisher), and mouse anti-human alveolar macrophage antibody (HAM56, Enzo Life Sciences, Farmingdale, NY). Tissues were subsequently stained with appropriate anti-rabbit and anti-mouse secondary antibodies (Jackson ImmunoResearch, West Grove, PA) for 1 hr at room temp, and coverslips were mounted with DAPI-containing Prolong Gold mounting medium (ThermoFisher). Cells were imaged on an Olympus confocal microscope (Olympus, Waltham, MA) running FlowView 1000 software maintained by the University of Pittsburgh’s Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, or a Nikon e1000 epifluorescence microscope running Nikon Elements (Nikon Instruments, Melville, NY). Images were annotated with Photoshop CS5.1 (Adobe Systems, San Jose, CA) and projections of z-stacks were made with the FIJI build of ImageJ42 (link). Quantitative image analysis was performed with CellProfiler43 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Immunohistochemical Profiling of Immune Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunohistochemistry was performed on 5 μm-thick FFPE tissue sections as previously indicated1 (link),39 (link). Tissues were stained with combinations of primary antibodies including polyclonal rabbit anti-IFNγ (Abcam, Cambridge, MA), rabbit anti-TNF (Bioss Antibodies, Boston, MA), rabbit anti-IL-4 (Abcam), rabbit anti-IL-10 (Abcam), rabbit anti-CD3 (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA), mouse anti-calprotectin (clone: MAC378, ThermoFisher), mouse anti-CD163 (clone: 1D6, ThermoFisher), and mouse anti-human alveolar macrophage antibody (HAM56, Enzo Life Sciences, Farmingdale, NY). Tissues were subsequently stained with appropriate anti-rabbit and anti-mouse secondary antibodies (Jackson ImmunoResearch, West Grove, PA) for 1 hr at room temp, and coverslips were mounted with DAPI-containing Prolong Gold mounting medium (ThermoFisher). Cells were imaged on an Olympus confocal microscope (Olympus, Waltham, MA) running FlowView 1000 software maintained by the University of Pittsburgh’s Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, or a Nikon e1000 epifluorescence microscope running Nikon Elements (Nikon Instruments, Melville, NY). Images were annotated with Photoshop CS5.1 (Adobe Systems, San Jose, CA) and projections of z-stacks were made with the FIJI build of ImageJ42 (link). Quantitative image analysis was performed with CellProfiler43 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Immunohistochemical Evaluation of Canine Lymphoma

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The 3 μm thick serial sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (HE) for histological evaluation. CD3 was used as a T-cell marker (rabbit anti-CD3 DAKO, High Wycombe, UK) and CD79a for B-cell labelling (mouse anti-CD79a DAKO, High Wycombe, UK), as described by Kiupel et al. [42 (link)]. Tumors were graded based on the REAL classification scheme [43 (link)] applied for canine lymphoma [8 (link),44 (link)], while staging was performed according to Valli et al. [8 (link)]. Proliferation status of the tumor was assessed by immunostaining against Ki67 (Monoclonal mouse MIB-1 anti-Ki-67: DAKO Ltd., High Wycombe, UK). To assess the percentage of the Ki67 positive cells, approximately 100 cells were counted in five different fields on each slide [45 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Histological Analysis of Cardiac Allografts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Heart allografts were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde and their paraffin-embedded sections were stained using H & E (hematoxylin and eosin) stain. Tissue injury by rejection was semiquantitatively assessed according to a previous study [24 (link)]. Immunohistochemical staining was also performed using rabbit anti-CD3 (DAKO, Glostrup, Denmark) or anti-mouse F4/80 (clone BM8, Thermo Fisher Scientific), followed by a Dako Real Envision HRP kit (DAKO). The stained slides were assessed using an Olympus BX40 light microscope (Olympus, Japan), and images were analyzed with Image-Pro 5.1 software (Media Cybernetics, Rockville, MD, USA). All histological analyses were performed by two independent researchers blinded to the treatment group.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Immunofluorescence Staining of Vα7.2 and CD3

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunofluorescence staining was performed based on a previously described method.42 Frozen sections were cut at a thickness of 6 μm on a Miles Tissue‐Tek II cryostat and subsequently fixed for 10 min in ice‐cold 2% formaldehyde in PBS. The sections were incubated overnight at 4°C with mouse anti‐Vα7.2 (3C10; Biolegend) and rabbit anti‐CD3 (polyclonal; Dako, Santa Clara, CA, USA), washed then stained with Alexa Fluor 488 goat anti‐mouse and Alexa Fluor 568 goat anti‐rabbit for 30 min at room temperature. The sections were then counterstained with DAPI (4’,6‐diamidino‐2‐phenylindole) and mounted in Prolong Diamond (both Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Fluorescence images were acquired using a Nikon C2+ confocal microscope and Nikon A1 camera equipped with a CFI plan apochromat 20X/0.75 objective (Nikon, Melville, NY, USA). Nikon NIS Elements software was used for image acquisition and images were processed with ImageJ/Fiji software (Version 2.0.0; (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Immunohistochemical Analysis of CD3+ T Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tumors were fixated by perfusion using ZN2+ fixative. After fixation and paraffin embedding, sections were deparaffinized using xylene and graded alcohol before hydration and washing with PBS. Antigen retrieval was performed in a sodium citrate buffer (pH 6) in a microwave oven, and endogenous peroxidase was subsequently blocked by 0.3% H2O2. Sections were incubated overnight at 4°C with a primary antibody (rabbit anti-CD3; Dako). An anti-rabbit-horseradish peroxidase SuperPicTure Polymer detection kit (Invitrogen, San Francisco, CA, USA) was used as a secondary antibody. A matched isotype control was used as a control for non-specific background staining, and a routine standard staining was performed with hematoxylin and eosin.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Multicolor Immunofluorescence Staining of Spleen Tissue

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Spleen tissue sections were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS and embedded in paraffin or by 1:1 acetone/methanol fixation for frozen sections. Paraffin sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin. Histological examination of tissue sections was done in a blind manner. Frozen sections were stained with TRITC-conjugated peanut agglutinin (PNA; Sigma), Alexa Fluor 647-labeled anti-IgD (Biolegend), and FITC-labeled anti-CD4 mAb (BD Biosciences). Paraffin sections were stained using rat anti-mouse B220 (BD Biosciences), which was detected using anti-rat FITC-labeled IgG (Sigma), and rabbit anti-CD3 (DAKO), which was detected using anti-rabbit Alexa Fluor 647-labeled IgG (Invitrogen), together with TRITC-conjugated PNA (Sigma). Stained sections were washed in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and mounted using Vectashield (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Equine IL-17A Antibody Validation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The endogenous biotin-blocking kit and the streptavidin conjugated with Texas Red were purchased from Molecular Probes. Biotinylated goat anti-mouse IgG and VECTASHIELD Mounting Medium with Dapi were obtained from Vector Laboratories. Rabbit anti-CD3 was purchased from Dako. Alexa Fluor 488 goat anti-rabbit IgG was obtained from Life Technologies. Dr. Bettina Wagner (Cornell University) supplied the murine anti-equine monoclonal antibodies (supernatants from clones IL-17A76, 79–3 and 80–1). The monoclonal antibodies were made as part of the US-wide initiative, “The U.S. Veterinary Immune Reagent Network.” The specificity of the equine IL-17A antibodies had been previously tested using various equine recombinant equine cytokines by ELISA. Recombinant cytokines were IgG or IL-4 fusion proteins and included IL-4/IL17, IL-4/IFN-γ, IL-4/IL-5, IL-4/IgG1, IL-2/IgG1 and IL-10/IgG4. The anti-IL-17A antibodies detected the IL-4/IL-17 protein but none of the other IL-4 or IgG fusion proteins. In addition, the IL-17A antibodies were validated in non-stimulated and stimulated equine PBMC by intracellular staining and flow cytometric analysis as previously described [11 (link)]. Hybridoma medium to grow the antibodies was purchased from Life Technologies.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Duodenal Biopsies

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Endoscopic duodenal tissue biopsies were acquired from one consenting patient. Biopsies were not protocol-specified but were performed as medically needed per investigator decision. Tissue was fixed in formalin and embedded in paraffin following standard procedures. Freshly cut sections (4 to 7 µm) were pretreated in a PT Link Pretreatment Module and then processed in an Autostainer Link 48 Module (Dako, Glostrup, Denmark) using mouse anti-T‒cell intracellular antigen 1 (TIA-1; clone 4i389; Zytomed Systems, Germany ), anti-EpCAM (clone VU-1D9; Leica Biosystems, Wetzlar, Germany), mouse anti-CD8 (clone C8/144B; Dako), rabbit anti-CD3 (Dako), and mouse anti-CD4 (clone 4B12; Dako) primary antibodies. Bound antibody was visualized using the EnVision Kit (Dako) following the manufacturer's directions. Sections were also stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) following standard procedures. Images were acquired using a Zeiss Axioscop (Zeiss, Jena, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Characterization of Inflammatory Cells in Diabetic Prostate

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The number and type of inflammatory cells were characterized in the prostate of Akita and WT mice. Three random areas from each prostatic lobe from each animal were acquired (WT: n = 4; diabetic: n = 4). Neutrophils were identified and quantitated in H&E stained sections. Immunohistochemistry was used to quantitate monocytes/macrophages, T lymphocytes, B lymphocytes, and fibrocytes. Briefly, sections were blocked for 4 hours in PBS containing 10% donkey serum and 1% BSA (both from Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, Missouri) was followed by primary antibodies-rat anti-F4/80 (1 : 50, eBioscience, San Diego, CA), rabbit anti-CD3 (1 : 100, Dako, Carpinteria, CA) and goat anti-CD20 (1 : 100, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA), and rat anti-CD45 (1 : 100, Abcam, Cambridge, MA) and rabbit anti-vimentin (1 : 100, Abcam, Cambridge, MA) overnight at 4 degrees. Secondary antibodies-donkey anti-rat Alexa 594, donkey anti-rabbit Alexa 594, donkey anti-rat Alexa 488, and donkey anti-goat Alexa 488 (1 : 100, Invitrogen, Grand Island, NY) were incubated for one hour at room temperature. Four μg/mL of Hoechst 33258 (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, Missouri) was incubated for 10 minutes. For quantification of each cell type, three random areas from each prostatic lobe from each animal were acquired using Nikon eclipse Ti-U microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!