The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

6 mv linear accelerator

Manufactured by Agilent Technologies
Sourced in United States

The 6 MV linear accelerator is a type of medical equipment used in radiation therapy. It generates a beam of high-energy electrons or photons that can be directed towards a target. The accelerator is designed to deliver precise and controlled radiation doses for the treatment of various medical conditions, such as cancer.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

7 protocols using 6 mv linear accelerator

1

Combination Nanoparticle Therapy and Radiation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For each cell line, cells were plated in two 96-well plates to attain confluency after 4 days. On each plate, two columns of cells were dosed with 1 nM of GNP-PEG-RGD and GNP-BLM. Cells were also dosed with free BLM at the equivalent concentrations of the GNP-BLM doses (~250 nM) and two columns of wells were left un-dosed as a control. After a 24 h incubation with the doses, the dosed media was removed from all plates and one plate was given a 2 Gy dose from a clinical 6 MV linear accelerator (Varian Truebeam, Palo Alto, CA, USA), while the other was left unirradiated. Cell viability was measured at five time points for all treatments: immediately after radiation; 1 day after radiation, 2 days after radiation; 4 days after radiation; and 6 days after radiation. To measure cell viability, wells were incubated for 20 min in 10% PrestoBlue™ before measuring fluorescence (excitation: 530 nm, emission: 590 nm) with a CytationOne™ Multi-Reader.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Radiotherapy for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Of these patients, 69.8% were treated with 2D-CRT and 30.2% were treated with IMRT. 87.2% of the patients received cisplatin-based chemotherapy before or during RT; 35% of the patients received adjuvant chemotherapy. All IMRT plans and 2D-CRT plans were delivered by a 6 MV linear accelerator (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA). Radiation was administered five times per week. All patients were treated according to the treatment principles for NPC patients at our institute.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

In Vitro Radiation Assay Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All in vitro radiation assays were done with a clinical 6 MV linear accelerator (Varian Truebeam, Palo Alto, CA, USA), and samples were placed between two 30 cm × 30 cm × 5 cm solid water (Gammex-RMI, Middleton WI, USA) blocks. Samples were irradiated at a source-axis distance of 100 cm. A field size of 28 cm x 28 cm and a dose rate of 600 monitor units (MUs) per minute was used for all irradiations. The appropriate number of MUs to administer was calculated using the known calibration output of the machine. Non-irradiated samples were transported along with irradiated samples to maintain consistency.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

SBRT for Unidentified Lesions via VMAT/IMRT

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Patients underwent CT simulation in a supine position with a slide of 2.5 mm. All patients were immobilized using a vacuum-assisted body mold to recreate exact positioning during daily sessions. Target lesion was not readily identified on the CT simulation, and the planning data set was registered to a diagnostic contrast CT or PET-CT, using a mutual information algorithm from our in-house treatment system, to facilitate gross tumor volume (GTV) delineation. A 3–8 mm isotropic expansion was generated from GTV to obtain planning target volume (PTV). Organs at risk (OARs) were delineated depending on the target lesion location without margins. The treatment planning system was Eclipse 4.5.5 (Varian), and VMAT/IMRT technique on a 6-MV linear accelerator Varian were used for treatment. The dose of SBRT was converted to the biologically effective dose (BED) to compare different dose-fractionation schedules. The BED was calculated using the linear-quadratic model with α/β = 10 Gy for the tumor and α/β = 3 to the organs at risk. Dose schedules were chosen with the aim of delivering ablative treatments respecting dose constraints for OARs.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Radiotherapy for Head and Neck Cancer

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
This prospective study was conducted in the Radiotherapy Sector of the
Universidade Federal de São Paulo (Unifesp), from June 2010 to August
2012. It included 30 patients with HNC (oral cavity, pharynx, larynx, or occult
primary tumor) submitted to conventional 3D radiotherapy, with irradiation
fields necessarily encompassing all major salivary glands. The total dose ranged
from 66 to 70 Gy, given in fractions of 2 Gy/day, in weekly combination with
cisplatin (40 mg/m2), accompanied or not by surgery. The radiotherapy
was performed with a 6 MV linear accelerator (Varian) or with a 60Co
teletherapy unit (Alcyon II; CGR MeV), in cervicofacial areas and
supraclavicular fossa. All patients were over 18 years of age and had a
Karnofsky index ≥ 70.
Patients with diabetes mellitus, autoimmune diseases, infectious diseases, or
collagen diseases were excluded, as were those with incipient tumors (stage T1
or T2) limited to the larynx, as well as those with trismus (reduced mouth
opening capacity) due to surgical sequelae.
This study was approved by the Unifesp Research Ethics Committee (Ruling no.
0844/10). All research subjects gave written informed consent.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Uniform Dose Delivery Validation Using Acrylic Phantom

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A custom-made acrylic phantom was fabricated to insert cuvettes for delivering a uniform dose to a total of three cuvettes at a time. The dimensions of the phantom were 10 × 10 × 14 cm3. Three cuvettes could be located at the center of the phantom, i.e., the center of each cuvette was located at a depth of 7 cm into the phantom, as shown in Fig 1(A).
The mold phantom with three inserted cuvettes was processed to acquire CT images using a Brilliance CT Big Bore (Philips, Cleveland, OH, USA) with an imaging slice thickness of 1 mm. Based on these CT images, IMRT plans using two opposed bilateral beams were calculated to deliver uniform doses of ±1.0% to all cuvettes at once. The IMRT plans were generated with 6 MV photon beams in the Eclipse system (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA USA). Irradiation of the PRESAGE dosimeters was also carried out with a 6 MV linear accelerator (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA, USA) according to the IMRT plan. Various radiation doses (0, 10, 20, 50, 80, 100, 150, 200, and 300 cGy) were delivered at a dose rate of 600 cGy/min for all fabricated dosimeters, as shown in Fig 2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Head and Neck Irradiation in Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The head and neck region (full-body shielded) of mice from each genotype were irradiated using a Varian 6 MV linear accelerator, at a dose rate of 200 cGy/min, according to previously published methods (15 (link)). Groups of mice received a single 30 Gy fraction, and other groups received 10 Gy daily fractions for four consecutive days. Mice were immobilized and irradiated while under Nembutal anesthesia as described elsewhere (14 (link), 15 (link)). Lower single- or fractionated radiation doses did not induce mucositis (14 (link), 15 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!