The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

10 protocols using waters 600 hplc

1

Quantification of Mycosporine-like Amino Acids

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MAAs were determined using HPLC (high performance liquid chromatography) according to Korbee-Peinado et al., with some modifications of Chaves-Peña et al. [96 (link),142 (link)]. Seven hundred microliters of the aqueous extracts (item 2.2) were dried under vacuum. The dry extract was re-suspended in 700 μL of methanol, filtered through a 0.2 μm membrane and analyzed using HPLC (Waters 600 HPLC, Waters Cromatografía, Barcelona, Spain). MAAs were detected using a Luna C8 column (Phenomenex, Aschaffenburg, Germany), applying an isocratic flow of 0.5 mL min−1 and a mobile phase of 1.5% methanol and 0.15% acetic acid in ultrapure water. The detection was made using a photodiode array (PDA) detector at 310 and 330 nm. Secondary standards were used for the identification of MAAs, and the quantification was performed using the molar extinction coefficients (ε) of the different MAAs [143 (link)]. Results were expressed as mg g−1 DW.
The MAAs were also identified via positive electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) (Orbitrap Q-Exactive, Thermo Scientific S.L., Bremen, Germany) in the Research Support Central Services (SCAI, University of Malaga, Spain).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantifying Ascorbate Levels via HPLC

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Ascorbate concentrations in cell lysates, tissues, and plasma were measured using reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC; Waters 600 HPLC; Waters, MA, USA) with an ESA Coulochem II detector (Thermo Fisher Scientific), as described before.19 (link),22 (link),23 (link) A fresh standard curve of 0–40 μM ascorbate was prepared for each HPLC run.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Comprehensive Analytical Techniques Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
This study used the following instruments: centrifuge (LG10‐2.4, Beijing Medical Centrifuge Co., Ltd.), freeze dryer (FDU‐2100, Tokyo Chemical Analysis (Sartourius), balance (Beijing Saiduolisi Balance Co., Ltd.), UV–Vis spectrophotometer (UV‐9100D Beijing LabTech Instrument Co., Ltd.), electric thermostatic water bath (HWS‐24, Shanghai Heng Technology Co., Ltd.), decolorization table (WD‐9405A, 61 Beijing Instrument Factory), PHS‐3C laboratory pH meter (Shanghai Ang Yu Environmental Technology Co., Ltd.), MALDI‐TOF/TOF mass spectrometer (5800, Bruker Daltonics Inc., USA), Waters 600 HPLC (Waters, USA), ZEISS Axio Observer Z1 inverted microscope (Zeiss Optical Instruments (Shanghai) International Trade Co., Ltd.), high‐speed refrigerated centrifuge (HC‐3018R, Kdcx Limited by Share Ltd. Zhongjia Branch), ice machine (AF103AS, Shanghai, Delta Industrial Co. Ltd.), ultrasonic cell grinder (JY92‐2D, Ningbo Scientz Biological Polytron Technologies Inc.), and ELISA analyzer (MULTISKAN GO Thermo), ultrafiltration membrane (Millipore 3, 10, and 30 kDa, Shanghai Juncheng Biotechnology Co., Ltd.).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantifying Gossypol in HPLC Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Standard gossypol solution was made by dissolving 20 mg of standard gossypol acetic acid in 20 mL of 85% methanol. Standard gossypol solutions of 0.2, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, and 5.0 mL were pipetted into 100-mL volumetric flasks. 85% methanol was added to give a total volume of 20 mL. The sample was injected into the high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), and the total run time was 10 min. The weights of pure gossypol used (wt of gossypol acetic acid×0.8962) and peak areas determined were then used to calculate the linear calibration equation:
The amounts of TG and FG in solutions were quantified by Waters 600 HPLC (Waters, Millford, MA, USA). Column: Waters X Terra MS C18.5, 100×3 mm, 3.5 μm. Flow rate: 1.0 mL/min. Mobile phase system: (methanol+0.2% H3PO4)/(acetonitrile: water [1:3]), 85/15 (v/v) (the two injectors were used respectively). Column temperature: 25°C. Sample volume: 20 μL. Detection system was Waters-UV-235 nm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Analytical Instrumentation and Chemicals

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Primary analytical instruments and chemicals used were as follows: Waters 600 HPLC (Waters, MA, USA) with an L-column2 ODS column (250 mm × i.d. 4.6 mm; particle size 5 μm); Agilent 218 Purification Systems (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) with a Prep-C18 column (50 mm × i.d. 30 mm; particle size 5 μm); Agilent 7890A GC (Agilent, CA, USA) with an HP-5 capillary column (30 m × i.d. 0.25 mm); MS spectrometers JEOL JMS-T100GCV, JMS-SX-102 (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) and Agilent 7000C GC-MS/MS (Santa Clara, CA, USA) with an Agilent HP-5 glass capillary column (Agilent Technologies, 30 m × i.d. 0.32 mm) under the conditions of initial temperature of 100 °C for 1.5 min and heating at a rate of 60 °C min−1 until 300 °C with a carrier gas of He; NMR spectrometers JEOL JNM-EX270 (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) and Bruker AM 500 (Bruker, Bremen, Germany); ABI Prism 310 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, CA, USA); StepOnePlus Real-Time PCR thermal cycling block (Applied Biosystems, CA, USA); trifluoromethanesulfonic acid-d (TfOD, Energy Chemical, Shanghai, China); L-phenylalanine (TCI, Tokyo, Japan); L-phenylalanine-[ring-2H5] (Sigma-Aldrich, MO, USA); phenylacetic acid (PAA, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Luis, MO, USA). Other chemicals used for preliminary screenings in the present study were purchased from TCI and Wako (Osaka, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

HPLC Detection of Sugars

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The chromatographic conditions for the detection of sugars were as follows. Waters-600 HPLC was used with a Sugarpak I column at a column temperature of 85 °C, using the evaporative light scattering detection method. The mobile phase was ultrapure water, and the flow rate was 0.4 mL/min.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Extracting Proteins from Cell Culture Plastic

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In order to determine the identity of molecules from CM bound to tissue culture plastic, two different extraction methods were used to remove the molecules from the plastic. First, after overnight incubation of wells of a 24‐well tissue culture plate were with 30× concentrated lung epithelial CM, bound protein was extracted using 1% sodium lauryl sulfate (SDS) and 0.2% deoxycholate buffer. Scattering assays of duplicate wells that were not extracted confirmed that the migration‐inducing substances were bound to the plastic. MCF‐7 cells added to the wells after extraction no longer exhibited scattering, confirming the removal of motility‐inducing substances. SDS‐deoxycholate‐extracted samples were supplemented with SDS to 4% and then subjected to filter‐assisted sample preparation (FASP) 28. Peptides trypsinized from the FASP membrane (1:50 trypsin:substrate) were isolated using C18 STAGE‐tips 29. Eluted, vacuum‐dried peptides were redissolved in 10 μL of 0.1% formic acid in water for nanoLC‐MS/MS, using an LTQ mass spectrometer (Thermo‐Fisher) with Waters 600 HPLC running with split flow. The five most intense precursor peptides per spectrum were subjected to fragmentation and, using Mascot 2.3, the resulting peaklist against a SwissProt database with human taxonomy was searched. In addition, a decoy search was performed using a database of common contaminants.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Determination of Biomass, Metal, and Sugar Content

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The biomass was determined by measuring the dry weight of shoots and roots. After the treatments, the fresh tissues were dried at 80°C until the weight was constant, and then cooled in the dryer.
The dry plant tissues were mixed with HNO3 and HClO4 (v/v, 83/17) for 24 h. The mixtures were then digested at 90°C for 3 h, 150°C for 5 h, and 180°C until nearly dry. The digested products were cooled and dissolved in ddH2O to reach a total volume of 25 mL. The Cd concentrations were measured using an atomic absorption spectrophotometer.
To estimate the sugar, the shoot and root samples were dried at 105°C for 30 min, and at 70°C for 24 h. They were then homogenized in 80% ethanol, boiled at 70°C for 30 min, and centrifuged at 8000 g at 4°C for 10 min. The total soluble sugars in the supernatants were measured using the method of McCready et al. [41 ]. The fructose, glucose, and sucrose contents were measured using high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC, Waters 600 HPLC), as described by Sánchez-Linares Luis et al. [42 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Tovarol Extraction from N. benthamiana

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For isolation of tovarol, a large-scale hexane extraction was made from N. benthamiana leaves expressing truncated AtHMGR, TlTPS820 and TlCYP76AE4. The leaves from approximately 100 five-week-old plants were extracted with hexane. The crude hexane extract was subjected to an initial preparative separation on a Isolera autoflasher using a 10 g diol functionalized silica column (Biotage, Uppsala, Sweden) eluted stepwise in hexane-ethyl acetate, from hexane to hexane:ethyl acetate (80:20) with 2 % increments. Final isolation of tovarol was achieved by semi-preparative HPLC utilizing a 250 × 10 mm, 7 μm Nucleosil PEI column (Macherey-Nagel) eluted in a linear hexane-isopropanol gradient from 0-5 % isopropanol in 20 min, on a Waters 600 HPLC equipped with a Waters 996 PDA detector. The purity was confirmed by LC-MS as described in 5.6.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

RP-HPLC Purification of Bioactive Peptides

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The method reported by Hernández-Ledesma, Dávalos, Bartolomé & Amigo (2005) with slight modifications was used. FPH, at a concentration of 5.0 mg/mL, was separated using a Waters Nova-Pak HR C18 (300 mm × 7.8 mm internal diameter) column, in a Waters 600 HPLC (Waters Corp., Milford, MA, USA) equipped with two pumps (module delta 600), a pump controller (module 600), an autosampler (module 717), and a diode array detector (module 996) in combination with an automatic fractions collector (module II). The digests were eluted by using 0.37% (v/v) trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) in water as solvent A and 0.27% (v/v) TFA in acetonitrile as solvent B, at a flow rate of 3.5 mL/min. The injection volume was 350 µL. Peptides were eluted with a linear gradient of solvent B in A going from 0 to 40% over 45 min. Detection was carried out at 214 nm. Data were processed by using Empower 2 Software (Waters Corp.). Six fractions were collected from separate RP-HPLC runs, pooled, lyophilized, and stored at -20°C until further analyses.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!