The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Waters acquity uplc 1 class system

Manufactured by Waters Corporation
Sourced in United States

The Waters Acquity UPLC I-Class system is a high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) instrument designed for analytical separations. It utilizes Ultra-Performance Liquid Chromatography (UPLC) technology to provide enhanced resolution, sensitivity, and speed compared to traditional HPLC systems. The system is capable of generating high-pressure mobile phases and precisely controlling flow rates, temperature, and other parameters to optimize chromatographic separations.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

15 protocols using waters acquity uplc 1 class system

1

HILIC and RPLC-MS/MS analysis of complex samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For HILIC analysis, 1 μL of sample was injected onto a Waters ACQUITY UPLC BEH Amide (1.7 μm particle size, 100 × 2.1 mm). Samples underwent a subsequent 1:5 dilution in water for RPLC analysis and 5 μL was injected onto a Waters ACQUITY UPLC HSS T3 column (1.8 μm particle size, 100 × 2.1 mm). Both columns were maintained at 45 °C and mobile phase flow was set to 0.45 mL/min using a Waters ACQUITY UPLC I-Class system (Waters, Milford, MA). The mobile phase consisted of water containing 0.1% formic acid (A) and acetonitrile containing 0.1% formic acid (B). Mobile phase conditions for each column are described in Table S1. Time-of-Flight mass spectrometry was carried out using a Waters Xevo-G2S QTof/MS as previously described28 (link),29 (link). Briefly, capillary and cone voltage were set at 2 kV and 40 V, respectively. The source temperature was 150 °C and the desolvation temperature was maintained at 600 °C. Nitrogen gas for desolvation and the cone were set at 1200 L/h and 50 L/h, respectively. An MSE method was used to acquire ions in the range of 50–1200 m/z alternating between MS1 (no collision energy) and MS2 (collision energy ramp of 15–50 V) with a scan time of 0.1 s. Leucine-enkephalin (100 ng/L) was used as a lockmass set to a flow rate of 10 μl/min. The lockmass was acquired every 10 seconds and averaged over 3 scans to ensure mass accuracy throughout the run.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

UPLC-QTOF-MS/MS Analysis of Polysaccharides

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The conditions of UPLC-QTOF-MS/MS are in accordance with the previous study [12 (link), 13 (link)]. Briefly, the analysis was performed on a Waters Acquity UPLC I-Class system (Waters Corp., Milford, United States), coupled with a Waters QTOF-MS/MS Mass System (Manchester, United Kingdom) equipped with electrospray ionization (ESI). Chromatographic separation was performed on a Waters Acquity UPLC HSS T3 column (100 mm × 2.1 mm, 1.8 μm). Mass range, 50-1500 Da; source temperature 100 °C; desolvation temperature, 450 °C; desolvation gas flow, 900 L/h; sampling cone, 40 V; ESI capillary voltage, 2.5 KV; and ESI+ capillary voltage, 0.5 KV. UPLC-QTOF-MS/MS system was controlled by the Masslynx 4.1 platform. The MSE data collected in a continuum mode were processed using the peak detection and alignment algorithms in UNIFI 1.8, which enabled quasi-molecular ion peaks, adduct ions, and fragment ions to be analyzed as a single entity. RSGB (sugar-free) was filtered through a 0.22 μm microporous membrane before aliquots (2 µL) were transferred to autosampler vials for analysis. Fifteen standards were dissolved in methanol, respectively, and mixed in equal. The final concentration of each standard was 100 ng/mL, and 1µL for analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Phenolic Acid Identification and Quantification by HPLC-PDA and LC-MS/MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Two HPLC systems were used for phenolic acid identification and quantification. The phenolic acids were analyzed in a Waters Alliance LC system composed of a Waters e2695 Separations Module and Waters 2998 PDA Detector (Waters Corp., Milford, MA, USA). A Gemini 150 × 4.6 mm 5 μm C18 110 Å LC column (Phenomenex, Torrance, CA, USA) was used for separation, and compounds were detected at 366 nm. The injection volume was 10 μL.
For compound identification of phenolic acids, the samples were analyzed using the method described in Wang et al. [51 (link)] with a Waters ACQUITY® UPLC I-Class system coupled with a Waters Vion Ion Mobility Quadrupole Time of Flight (IMS QTof) mass spectrometer (MS) (Waters Corp., Milford, MA, USA). The same column, solvent system, and elution gradient as described by Wang et al. [51 (link)] were used with the system for compound identification. In addition, a 1:3 splitter was used to direct one-fourth of the flow (0.25 mL/min) into the MS. Compounds were identified by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS) based on accurate masses, retention times, and UV absorbance at 305 to 390 nm. All solvent systems and elution gradients are summarized in Table 7.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantitative Metabolomics Analysis by UPLC-MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Chromatography was performed on a Waters Acquity UPLC I-Class system (Waters Corp., Milford, USA) with a Waters Acquity UPLC HSS T3 column (2.1 ×100 mm, i.d. 1.8 µm; Waters, USA) maintained at 40 ℃. The mobile phases consist of 0.1% (v/v) formic acid in water (A) and 0.1% (v/v) formic acid in acetonitrile (B). A gradient elution program was used as follows: 0–4 min, 2–6% B; 4–18 min, 6–20% B; 18–21 min, 20–24% B; 21–30 min, 24–35% B; 30–33 min, 35–98% B. The flow rate was set at 0.5 mL/min, and a 1-μL aliquot was set as the injection volume.
Mass spectrometry analysis was performed on a Waters SYNAPT G2HDMS system (Waters Corp., Milford, USA) equipped with an electrospray ionization (ESI) source in both positive and negative ion modes. The optimal parameters were set as follows: capillary voltage, 2 kV; cone voltage,40 V; resolvation gas (N2) flow, 900 L/h; source temperature, 100 ℃; resolvation temperature, 450 ℃; scanning time and interval, 0.2 s; scan range, m/z 50–1500; trap collision energy, 20–50 eV; lock mass, [M+H]+ 556.2775 and [M−H]554.2615. The data were collected in the MSE continuum mode using Masslynx 4.1 software (Waters Corp., Milford, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

UPLC-MS Analysis of Chlorogenic Acid

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The suspensions in the culture medium (2.4) were centrifuged at 4571× g (2000 rpm in an F21-48 × 1.5/2.0, Model RPM centrifuge, Thermo Scientific Co., Shanghai, China) at 4 °C for 15 min to remove the planktonic cells. Cell-free supernatant was obtained through a 0.22 μm filtration membrane.
To assay the content of CGA, UPLC separation was performed on a Waters Acquity UPLC-I-Class system (Waters Corporation, Milford, MA) using a Waters ACQUITY UPLC HSS T3 1.8 µm (2.1 mm×100 mm) analytical column; mobile phase A was water with 0.1% formic acid (v/v), and mobile phase B was acetonitrile with 0.1% formic acid (v/v) with an optimized gradient-elution program: 0–2 min, 0–95% B; 2–9 min, 95–50% B; 9–15 min, 50–10% B; 15–17 min, 90–90% B; 17–19 min, 90–5% B; 19–22 min, 5–5% B [28 (link)]. The flow rate for separation systems was set at 0.4 mL/min, and the column temperature was maintained at 40 °C. All the samples were placed at 4 °C with a 1 μL injection. The parameters of MS acquisition are summarized as follows: desolvation temperature, 25 °C; cone gas flow, 50 L/h; desolvation gas flow, 600 L/h; capillary voltage, 2500 V in negative mode; source temperature, 100 °C; MassLynx software was used for fragment analysis to determine the structure of the compound.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantitative LC-MS Analysis of Metabolites

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
LC-MS analysis was performed on a Waters Acquity UPLC I-Class system (Waters Co., Milford, MA, USA) coupled with a Waters Xevo G2 QTOF MS system (Waters Co.) at the Chuncheon Center of Korea Basic Science Institute (KBSI). Chromatographic separation was performed with a Waters Acquity UPLC BEH C18 (150 mm × 2.1 mm, 1.7 μm) maintained at 40 °C, and the injection volume was set at 2 μL. The mobile phase was composed of two mobile phases (A:0.1 % (v/v) formic acid in distilled water; B: 0.1 % (v/v) formic acid in acetonitrile) with gradient elution (10–90 % B, 0–14 min) at a flow rate of 400 μL/min. QTOF-MS analysis was performed in electrospray ionization (ESI) negative ion mode in a continuum format. MS/MS ion patterns were scanned within the mass range of m/z 100 to 1200, and the collision energy ramp was set from 15 to 45 eV in MSE mode. The ESI source had the following settings: the capillary and cone voltages were 2.5 kV and 45 V, respectively; temperatures of the source and desolvation gas were 120 and 350 °C, respectively; the cone and desolvation gas flows were 50 L/h and 800 L/h, respectively. To ensure reproducibility and accuracy, leucine encephalin was used as the reference compound (m/z 554.2615) at a flow rate of 5 and 200 pg/μL. The instrument was controlled MassLynx V4.1 software (Waters Corporation, Milford, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Plasma Metabolite Profiling in Rats

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The compounds absorbed in rat plasma were detected using a Waters Acquity UPLC I-class system (Waters Corp., Milford, MA, United States) and Q-tof Synapt G2-Si mass spectrometry system (Waters, Manchester, United Kingdom). A Waters Acquity UPLC BEH reverse-phase C18 analytical column (1.7 µm, 3.0 × 100 mm, Waters) was used to separate the compounds. The column temperature was set at 35°C and the injection volume was 5 µL. The mobile phase was made up of 0.1% formic acid in water (v/v) (A) and acetonitrile (B). At a flow rate of 0.4 ml/min, the elution gradient was processed in 37 min. The base peak chromatograms of both positive and negative ion modes were acquired under multiple detection modes of MSE and Fast DDA. The parameters were set following the previous report (Mi et al., 2020 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Pesticide Residue Analysis by UPLC-MS/MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Chromatographic separation of pesticide residues was conducted by a Waters
Acquity UPLC I-Class system (Waters, Milford, MA, USA), with BEH C18
reversed-phase analytical column (100×2.1 mm, 1.7 μm) (Waters),
integrated with a Fusion-RP guard column (4×2.0 mm, 4 μm) from
Phenomenex (Torrance, CA, USA), at 50°C, and analyte determination was
achieved with a Xevo TQD tandem quadrupole tandem mass spectrometer equipped
with electrospray ionisation (ESI) interface source (Waters). The mobile phase
was: (A) 95/5 (v/v) water/methanol, (B) 5/95 (v/v) water/methanol, both
solutions containing 2 mM ammonium formate and 0.1% formic acid. The
elution was started at 25% solvent B and held for 0.5 min, then increased
B to 98% in 10 min, and kept at 98% for 1.5 min. Finally, the
column was equilibrated at the initial condition for 2 min at a flow rate of
0.45 mL/min. The injection volume was 1 μL. Positive ESI+ mode was
used for the analysis of 365 LC-amenable pesticide residues. Instrument control,
data acquisition and data processing were performed by Waters
MassLynxTM (version 4.1) software. Two specific multiple reaction
monitoring (MRM) transitions of the studied residues are shown in Table S1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantification of Hepatic Acyl-CoA Levels

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After 180 min of infusion, animals continuing to be infused were anaesthetized with 5% isoflurane and the median lobe of the liver was freeze-clamped, collected, immediately placed in liquid nitrogen and stored at -80°C for acyl-CoA analysis. Liver samples were pulverized under liquid nitrogen and acyl-CoAs extracted as performed previously [32] . Briefly, 10 mg of liver was homogenized for 150s in 500 L of 150 mM aqueous ammonium bicarbonate, then mixed with 500 L of 3:1:1 acetonitrile:isopropanol:methanol and sonicated for 3 min at 4°C. The homogenate was centrifuged at 16 000 g for 10 min and the supernatant collected. The remaining pellet was extracted again and the supernatants were combined into one vial and dried under nitrogen. The solid residue was then resuspended in 500 L of 15 mM sodium hydroxide in 1:1 water:methanol, centrifuged at 14 000 g for 5 min and the supernatant collected for LC-MS/MS analysis.
Fatty acyl-CoA liver extracts were detected using a Waters ACQUITY UPLCI-Class system (Waters Inc.) and a5500 QTRAP mass spectrometer (Applied Biosystems, Fosters City, CA) equipped with a Waters ACQUITY UPLC BEH C8 column (2.1 x 100 mm, 1.7μm). The initial HPLC conditions of elution were set at 300 μl/min gradient system consisting of 95% A (15 mM ammonium hydroxide)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Enzymatic Activity Assay for Acyltransferases

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The enzymatic activity assay was carried out in a 500 µl reaction system comprising 100 µg purified proteins, 1 mM caffeoyl-CoA or p-coumaroyl-CoA as the acyl donors, 1 mM pHPL or DHPL as the acyl receptors. The reactions were incubated at 25 °C for 60 min and terminated by adding 10 µl of 10 M acetic acid. Controls were carried out using total proteins from E. coli transformed with the empty pGEX-4T-1 vector. Reaction products were collected and analyzed using ACQUITY UPLC system (Waters, Milford, MA, USA). MS/MS data were recorded on a Xevo G2-XS Q-ToF Mass Spectrometer (Waters, Milford, MA, USA) coupled to a Waters Acquity I-Class UPLC system (Waters, Milford, MA, USA). MS/MS analyses were conducted in negative-ion mode. The samples were separated on an ACQUITY UPLC BEH C18 column (1.7 μm, 100×2.1 mm) at 25°C. The mobile phase A was 0.1% (v/v) formic acid-acetonitrile. The mobile phase B was 0.1% (v/v) formic acid in water. The flow rate was 0.3 mL min−1. The mobile phases changed with the following gradient: 0–6 min, 5% A and 95% B; 6–8 min, 20% A and 80% B; 8–14 min, 21% A and 79% B; 14–18 min, 95% A and 5% B. MS was analyzed using electrospray ionization (ESI) at negative ion mode. MS-MS data were analyzed using the MssLynx V4.1 software (Waters) as described previously (Pan et al., 2023 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!